123400+ entries in 3.099s
Namworld: I didn'
t... but that might have happened.
Namworld: Sheesh, with all the BitVPS shares, S.DICE and other stuff I have, I don'
t have much capital laying around
Namworld: ask Joel Katz on the forum, or something like that. Or look for it on the forum. I don'
t know much about how Ripple works exactly.
Namworld: Ripple doesn'
t hold any currency, the user does.
Namworld: Do you trust the guy? No? Then don'
t accept the trade...
Namworld: ripple isn'
t supposed to be a currency you trade for money
Namworld: I don'
t think it works like that Thick...
Namworld: Ok, I don'
t know how it works at all...
Namworld: yeah, I don'
t understand that either
Bowjob: I don'
t know if I did something smart or stupid
mircea_popescu: only fair, bets on the 21st that bfl won'
t deliver by 1st
mircea_popescu: "As I've written in previous posts, we are dealing with such an accelerated time scale that all of these facilities simply aren'
t used to dealing with."
mircea_popescu: The simple fact of the matter is there hasn'
t been any solid updates to offer.
OneMiner: Bowjob If my miner was the only one in the world, it wouldn'
t go through.
dub: you don'
t decide what tx get through
iz: the problem is that there isn'
t an alternative
jurov: iz, you're going to cripple the whole system just because of political reason, don'
t you see that?
mircea_popescu: look! it's really simple! bitcoin was designed to do 1mb blocks. if it can'
t do 1mb blocks it sucks, dies, we move to solidcoin.
dub: I don'
t think its going away
OneMiner: It's how that casino is doing it's business. You don'
t go up and change money after every bet when you are in a casino, do you?
iz: casinos usually use chips, and don'
t have their clients bet using credit card payments
dub: instead of using yours that isn'
t designed for that
jurov: how you want to get critical mass when it can'
t handle even one casino???
OneMiner: Ya, the blockchain isn'
t going to be lost for long if it is lost. I don'
t think they'd need anything fancy for it.
dub: businesses don'
t do that
jurov: blockchain doesn'
t need to be stored properly. you just buy commoditized server with it preinstalled and backup only the wallet. it breaks? buy another one
OneMiner: More transactions is better than less. In the future we won'
t have 2012 hardware, we'll have future hardware.
dub: jurov: I don;
t hink anyone is arguing against that, if adoption is successful
jurov: so they shouldn'
t use bitcoin, you say?
jurov: why wouldn'
t they pay much less for a full node that can deal with 1TB/month to enable them access to bitcoin system?
iz: yeah, everyone is a node, even if they aren'
t mining
dub: how long before we can'
t run one on 2012 hardware?
maximian: SD just amplifies that weakness. and if it wasn'
t SD it'd be someone else. The problem has to be solved, and it can'
t be solved by banning. It's a fundamental architectural problem.
iz: just because the problem can be solved by stupidly throwing money at it, doesn'
t mean it's not a problem that could have a more elegant solution
iz: maybe in 2 years there is something else that doesn'
t have the same flaws being actively exploited to the detriment of everyone else..
jurov: don'
t tell me only 7 nodes can afford buying one harddrive per year
iz: transaction fees won'
t make a difference until we start hitting the max blocksize
iz: everyone relays transactions, even if they don'
t pickup the transaction and regardless of the fees
ThickAsThieves: if there's mass bitcoin adoption, people won'
t want to wait
iz: the fees won'
t fix anything
Namworld: Just doesn'
t fit Bitcoin's to start saying what is or what is not allowed.
jurov: but let them stay KISS... can'
t optimize for everything anyway
jurov: sigh...now if my bots weren'
t caught like deer in headlights on last spike
Bugpowder_: thestringpuller: you don'
t know what you are talking about
jurov: i wouldn'
t go below 10% monthly
aethero: FastCash4Bitcoins is a service of Tangible Cryptography LLC. We are not an exchange; we are a direct buyer of bitcoins. In keeping with the bitcoin philosophy of limited third party trust we don'
t hold client's balances (bitcoins or dollars), instead we only accept a sale when we can promptly pay it
dub: I don'
t know what that is
sgornick: Namworld: I see. That isn'
t clear from the profile. A rational person might think otherwise from viewing the site.
Namworld: sgornick, even if you bought ziggap you wouldn'
t parts of ziggap LLC
sgornick: BitPride isn'
t even an LLC or whatever, I have no idea what I'ld own if I held a share.
sgornick: There is a ZigGap LLC, on their site but the Asset listing doesn'
t use that,so not sure what I'ld own.
sgornick: That's two IPOs in two days where in the U.S., crowdfunding equity was raised from the public. The SEC still hasn'
t published its rules or this would be more common. (Still wouldn'
t be done the same way from them, ..., i.e., couldn'
t buy shares anonymously but there would be a path for an entrepreneur to put a company out there.)
jcpham: i didn'
t realize there was a team
aethero: pigeons its OK if you're gay. We don'
t judge here. The internet is for all.
dub: free shipping on orders over $100, because im goign to buy 140 bitcoin
t-shirts
Bugpowder: I don'
t know how to control the bots. Sometimes I think they react to large bid or ask walls, but I could be just inferring signal from noise.
jurov: so that wouldn'
t be so big surprise if another mpoe wall arises
ThickAsThieves: while i see great long term value in mpoe, i honestly don;
t understand the level of value it's at
ThickAsThieves: can'
t it just be someone who wanted to control the market of the most frequently traded asset?
jurov: no i think that didn'
t happen... s.mpoe value seems pretty independent of dividends
jurov: if that wasn'
t from mpoe, then we'd clearly see options volume way above reported by mpoe
jurov: i don'
t understand,too. if that money was from mpoe, it would show as mpoe loss
mjr_: and i am fine with that...if you don'
t really believe in your position, get out when the price moves "for no reason"
mjr_: and if you don'
t think that these markets, including mt. gox aren'
t manipulated constantly, then you haven'
t been watching
mjr_: i don'
t buy them to lose money...
jurov: if you weren'
t ignoring all my offers, you'd knew i have data, too
mjr_: what i don'
t understand is why people would raise the price the day after dividends
jurov: thestringpuller don'
t say it's me again
mircea_popescu: whoever did this (if it's 1 person) doesn'
t strike me as a pt player.
mircea_popescu: some people don'
t want to earn on their bitcoin, but i would guess most do.
benkay: wouldn'
t know; baby markets.
dub: and I have bitcoins I just don;
t have a working wallet I can access remote
mircea_popescu: dub i thought you didn'
t have bitcoins cause you suck ?
mircea_popescu: so... if you have money it's because you stole the dough rightfully belonging to those that don'
t have it
mircea_popescu: i don'
t need to continue, it's dumbassery "internet marketing"
mircea_popescu: Namworld why can'
t some people like one and some people the other ?
Namworld: Plus some people left after, RG was not answering us and hadn'
t given us all login infos/datacenter info to pay server rents/contact them if there was issues.
jurov: can'
t you just hide them from the list?