log☇︎
123400+ entries in 0.039s
asciilifeform: or of fits + unspeccable ?
asciilifeform: can offer item that doesn't fit + is sanely speccable ?
asciilifeform: let's revisit thread - what part of 'fits in head, and speccable, or doesn't-fit-in-head, unspeccable, t. non d.' does mircea_popescu disagree with ?
asciilifeform: aha, was making 'naked' assertion. this is better ?
asciilifeform: or is it somewhere written that mircea_popescu gets to bring in these cartoons and nobody else does.
asciilifeform: and the 'mathgeniusboy' with his udders is not a same caricature ?
asciilifeform: which presumption ?
asciilifeform straps on heavy gas mask.
asciilifeform: 'i won't answer because there is not an answer that doesn't rupture my argument' lolk.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: from which sheet would you read to herr knuth ?
asciilifeform: if this is not clear, i do not know how to help, perhaps somebody else ought to try.
asciilifeform: the other fundamental aspect, other than 'nothing-to-allcomers' is that synchronous comms over lossy media (e.g. radio) do not work well. the thing that works well is 'i'll pour a bucket of luby in your direction, and you - in mine.'
asciilifeform: i.e. if A has to ~ask~ B something and wait for a reply every time they communicate, it violates nothing-to-allcomers.
asciilifeform: at any rate, i stand by my assertion that a synchronous (if you don't know what this means, look it up) carrier is unsuitable for gossipd.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: it ~would~ be a considerably easier job if you answered the q, which is, do you want a description of the thing on all possible physical carriers (radio, pigeon, ip, telex, ...) or just particulars. and if so, which.
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: answr'd.
asciilifeform: phf`: it is quite possible for a bot to sit on >1 server. just needs >1 nick.
asciilifeform: eh, заметили, заметили.
asciilifeform: and it does not have to insult, but to prod - it must.
asciilifeform: and not mine, but the language's.
asciilifeform: if it doesn't , it is a dire problem
asciilifeform: (and to an extent, those who have indirect contact, generals, also)
asciilifeform: it is the domain of things everyone who has direct contact with the battlefield is expected to understand.
asciilifeform: 'матчасть' (contraction of, approx, 'material part') is a military term of art, refers to, e.g., how far a ru 120mm howitzer shoots when pointed at 45deg, vs 'how do we make a pincer' ☟︎
asciilifeform: it is pointedly NOT same.
asciilifeform: e.g., what would you say to a dude who demands an airgun that fires supersonic bullets.
asciilifeform: mno. not quite.
asciilifeform: !~translate RU to EN матчасть
asciilifeform: how do we say http://lurkmore.to/%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B8_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C in ro ? or for that matter eng.? or any of the languages mircea_popescu knows.
asciilifeform: lolk
asciilifeform: Framedragger: we all have man pages.
asciilifeform: https://archive.is/NihIk << claims the railway story was a gag. whatever.
asciilifeform: http://www.thescreamonline.com/essays/essays2-1/tsarsthumb.html << see also.
asciilifeform: who wants - go, do.
asciilifeform: not for love, nor money
asciilifeform: Framedragger: i won't touch a tcp 'gossipd'
asciilifeform: and that (b) means either being retarded (services built on tcp, such as www and irc) or some variation on udp.
asciilifeform: Framedragger: i'm not yet entirely certain if mircea_popescu understands that the choices on the table are strictly a) use radio b) use ip c) lay own oceanic fiber.
asciilifeform: Framedragger: all it means is that you need a patched kernel to send and receive.
asciilifeform: phf's bot looks to be knocked out ?
asciilifeform: Framedragger: answr'd x2.
asciilifeform: lol
asciilifeform: Framedragger: answr'd.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: 3913MB of what ?
asciilifeform: the only computer program that qualifies to be thought of as an ideal object is one which fitsinhead.
asciilifeform: it is merely a real object that can be copied and teleported.
asciilifeform: it is not one.
asciilifeform: the fundamental mistake of 'spec by gcc' is to consider a large computer program as an ideal object.
asciilifeform: just as folks allergic to cat often do not know that they are in fact allergic to a certain parasitic mite that lives in the animal's fur.
asciilifeform: granted, these have gone together inseparably for the entire history of programming.
asciilifeform: this is why i suspect that folks such as mircea_popescu are not allergic to the idea of a program specifying a concept, but of a concept that CAN ONLY BE specified by THIS HERE PROGRAM
asciilifeform: (not, at any rate, a ~live~ whale)
asciilifeform: or in 10,000 bowls.
asciilifeform: just like you cannot keep a whale in a bowl in your kitchen.
asciilifeform: however an ideal object that is two+ heads wide is not a thing.
asciilifeform: a specification can exist as a real object (which is very painful, consider the standard kilogram block, or trb) or an ideal object.
asciilifeform: you get one, or you get the other, tertium non datur.
asciilifeform: the reason why we ~have~ spec-by-program is because it is the only actual alternative to fits-in-head.
asciilifeform: (who is probably already born.)
asciilifeform: it will die with the last programmer.
asciilifeform: specification-by-program is probably one of those evils that is here to stay, like cancer and airplane crashes.
asciilifeform: (it 'optimizes' away essential security checks, as discussed in at least 2 past threads )
asciilifeform: even gcc5 no longer does. ☟︎
asciilifeform: correct.
asciilifeform: well, they gotta hash and shit with ~something~, eh
asciilifeform: if i had to guess - i'd guess 'openssl'.
asciilifeform: right.
asciilifeform: i operate 0 block exploders.
asciilifeform: not me.
asciilifeform: ask them, then.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: well where is it then ?
asciilifeform: that is something only a jwz could love.
asciilifeform: but to specify TWO byte orders in 1 protocol !
asciilifeform: to be fair i have nfi how to possibly escape from specifying byte order.
asciilifeform: pure simonsays.
asciilifeform: for some reason bigendian is considered 'canonical network order'
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: artifact of 'standards org' idiocy
asciilifeform: and not fits-in-head.
asciilifeform: if it turns out that it is impractical for one man to wrap his head around a cpp compiler, it is cpp that will have to vanish
asciilifeform: these are to go away. not be propped up.
asciilifeform: 'because no reasonable fella would ever try to write an ... !'
asciilifeform: one of those ill-fated 'de-facto standards', like gcc.
asciilifeform: i cannot speak, for instance, for diametric, i'm pretty sure he used it.
asciilifeform: at least i don't.
asciilifeform: so we do not need fartupilot or whatever, for anything.
asciilifeform: ( you do not, in point of fact, even need a digital computer; there were ODE solvers before the computer, and before the transistor. )
asciilifeform: and it isn't as if we did not go to highschool and did not learn how an ODE is solved.
asciilifeform: if not - not.
asciilifeform: if we make one, it will be from 0, and not from them.
asciilifeform: at this point i have ~0 interest in heathen flying machine controllers.
asciilifeform: i did not even bother to look, ben_vulpes
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: i know 0 about it, it was simply mentioned in thread.
asciilifeform: i'd say yes. but ask mircea_popescu when he wakes up, iirc he doesn't even like the idea of a scoopbot
asciilifeform: which imho would be quite annoying.
asciilifeform: otherwise it risks shitting out 'scoops' when scriba, a111, et al shit links.
asciilifeform: PeterL: in order to work correctly, this bot would have to know about every other bot, neh ? ☟︎
asciilifeform: !!up scoopbot
asciilifeform: http://adapilot.likeabird.eu << linked from ben_vulpes's link. ☟︎
asciilifeform: http://trilema.com/2016/gossipd-design-document/#comment-119078 << seems like we're back to start, eh.
asciilifeform: rather than from same impracticality as 'the 10-34 thread is this here screw in washington'