log☇︎
118300+ entries in 0.071s
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> but in principle, gear can't produce more heat than the electricity it gets. so i expect at some point they'll start whining about "Gotta get another rack, we can't go over 4kw/per" or w/e they do. no ? << We have 2.5 kw now, and if we need more we can get a set of incoming power lines for another 2.5 kw. After that it is time for a second rack.
BingoBoingo: <TomServo> BingoBoingo: In my experience the plastic slats are intended to better maintain hot/cold isle airflow. << This is sorta what I figured.
deedbot: http://trilema.com/2018/totally-legit-traffix-sir/ << Trilema - Totally legit traffix sir!
mircea_popescu: aaand with that, ima be off to the beach! laters.
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 04:29 TomServo: some! contain no beer at all! strickly Windsor Canadian Whiskey
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782359 << hey, my car has a flask of rum in the net behind the front seat. and i drink it, too. ☝︎
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 04:13 TomServo: Agreed, I'll admit the overclocking really threw me.
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782342 << kinda the idea, if i bother to send a librarian over to orcistan to start an isp, ima just as well challenge established belief. it's just sane business management. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: not to say we won't rack old school disks someone ships ; but i think that's about as far as that goes.
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 04:11 ben_vulpes: this ftr is what galls me about ssds; the accelerated deterioration rate.
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782339 << sadly, i dun see how bbisp could provide platter. for one thing, it takes way the fuck more power. for the other, it simply dun work for one of the more important republican apps, teh trb. it's just... not there. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782333 << hey, we get systemd in, right ? the reboots' gonna be so fast you won't even notice them ☝︎
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 04:07 ben_vulpes: TomServo: i personally run machines for longevity, but i can see why mircea_popescu and BingoBoingo would want to run their lowendboxen hot and cram as much into 'em as possible.
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782329 << boxes with a pile of ram are not lowend by any definition of the term. ram is pretty much the only thing. ☝︎
mircea_popescu: or, for that matter, in a civilised house. because how the fuck would this work, modernity is built on airflow like the roman empire was built on running water.
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 04:01 TomServo: but the air between machines isn't moving, right? if not by convection?
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782314 << well, i'd expect airflow at all times driven by the dc HVAC. i dunno you'd want to buy space in a dc with no internal airflow. i've also never been in one that had no internal airflow. then again i've never been in a clean room that had no internal airflow either. ☝︎☟︎
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 03:59 TomServo: but i've also never racked overclocked servers and would expect no joy to come from it
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782311 << but the firm expectation based on no experience is how alf gets in trouble like...daily. why copy what dun work from him ? ☝︎☟︎
a111: Logged on 2018-02-02 16:35 BingoBoingo: <asciilifeform> holyfuq, konsoomer towers in racks in dc << Cargo cult
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 03:58 TomServo: ben_vulpes: not sure about any air gap, all the racks i've seen are pretty pretty tight
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782304 << uruguay, dood. not fucking washington. http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-02#1779553 & so fucking happy to have any business AT ALL after the impenetrable cloud of sheer imbecility they've surrounded themselves with... ☝︎☝︎
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 03:57 TomServo: That was my point, I don't see it being worth the effore given cpu cheapness.. even with the VAT.
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782302 << the cpu is worth 10% of the actual rig (disk, memory). it's the part getting fried for getting more out of the rig, if anything is. ☝︎
a111: Logged on 2018-02-07 03:56 trinque: anybody here overclocked before?
mircea_popescu: http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782296 << yes. http://btcbase.org/log/2018-02-07#1782297 << the thing changed lots in 20 years. for isntance, there's actual bios support for the procedure by now. it's a lot like say roller skating, they got special safety gear and competitions and purpose-made plywood for the backyard, it's not the 80s anymoar sorta thing. ☝︎☝︎
mircea_popescu: but, in any case, more of a curio/bikeshed than anything i think. overclocking isn't likely to have more than a 1% if tyhat impact either way in bbisp affairs.
mircea_popescu: for one thing, they don't. and for the other thing... really ?!
mircea_popescu: this is a little like saying "hospital's no place for imunosupressed patients, they should be in their car, which people keep clean"
mircea_popescu: the idea that desktop towers are well cooled is ridoinculous on the face. i dun think half of them are, tbh. ☟︎
mircea_popescu: not much experience in that experience tho.
mircea_popescu: trinque yeah, i have no clear model in my head of what's going on. but, i expect most load other than trb will be apache or something like it. and in my experience higher clock beats more cores once you have more than 4 or so, there.
ben_vulpes: right right, that
trinque: I think this practice persisted legally until quite recently in TX
TomServo: right! well in northern wisconsin there are CLASSES of beers in cars
ben_vulpes: a beer in the car!
TomServo: I doubt there is one. Perhaps I misunderstood 'road sodas' when converting to local parlance.
ben_vulpes: of the esl set that is
ben_vulpes: heh i dunno that i've ever heard a couth name for the practice tbh; or any person who'd call themselves couth engaging in it
TomServo: ben_vulpes: We call those 'travelers' in my parts. A 'roadie' if you're uncouth.
ben_vulpes: zero likelihood of interdiction with a polite babe at the wheel.
trinque: "baby, you know they'll just move out of the way for it, yeah?"
trinque: lol aha. I've never seen such a polite huge truck driver as mine.
ben_vulpes: girl is just not going to rev my shit past 4500, you know?
ben_vulpes: much like the honda babywagon i've allocated vs the three f1 engines a team's allowed in a season
TomServo: Agreed, I'll admit the overclocking really threw me. ☟︎
TomServo: Well, running hard and diddling overlclock settings + babysitting detail are different things, I think.
ben_vulpes: this ftr is what galls me about ssds; the accelerated deterioration rate. ☟︎
ben_vulpes: make 'em someone else's problem, and pay for the convenience.
ben_vulpes: heh yeah i think trinque and i have pretty similar attitudes towards how to treat machines you're going to run hard
trinque: my main point is to be ready with a stack of spares if that's the strategy
trinque: mod6: customer might. say a set of game servers that can handle losing a node for a bit. just depends.
ben_vulpes: not trying to cut you down TomServo
TomServo: ben_vulpes: I see also, just thought it was worth mentioning.
TomServo: I think trinque 's point about hardware import difficulties is important to consider when stressing the gear, is all.
ben_vulpes: TomServo: i personally run machines for longevity, but i can see why mircea_popescu and BingoBoingo would want to run their lowendboxen hot and cram as much into 'em as possible. ☟︎
trinque: makes sense, I won't dispute that part.
ben_vulpes: what, they heat up, crack their pcbs, shut down. run your fans, this won't be a problem.
ben_vulpes: i ain't justifying shit, i'm saying that i'm not concerned about the health of the rack from a few hot boxes.
TomServo: This seems like strained reasoning to justify overclocking for what I see is a minimally appreciable gain.
ben_vulpes: but in theory, if you want to wank over the thermofluids
ben_vulpes: well, no, we're talking like sub-1% contribution to overall cooling
trinque: making them better than if there were no servers on either side?
ben_vulpes: if we don't neglect it, i'd expect entrained flow in the same direction as the convective cooling flux, eg from front of rack to back
trinque: this is a fun exercise, but the air gap is not sealed between the units
ben_vulpes: air currents within the DC might actually ruin this, but for the sake of the gedankenexperiment, let's neglect those for now
ben_vulpes: that argon between them doesn't move; the viscosity of the gas keeps it locked in place and it acts as a superior insulator to the glass.
TomServo: but the air between machines isn't moving, right? if not by convection? ☟︎
ben_vulpes: heaven help us if the machine bodies actually drive a) because someone isn't cooling adequately, and if the gap is sufficiently small (as anyone with dc experience can attest) we'll probably have "stagnation" conditions, where the air is not actually circulating between the machines
ben_vulpes: the concern is convective heat transfer between servers. for that to happen there must be a) great enough gradient of heat between the machines and b) enough space between machines for air currents to get moving
TomServo: but i've also never racked overclocked servers and would expect no joy to come from it ☟︎
ben_vulpes: since we're doing thermofluids tonight...
ben_vulpes: i've never racked machines that squealed on insert, you?
TomServo: ben_vulpes: not sure about any air gap, all the racks i've seen are pretty pretty tight ☟︎
mod6: lol of course they do
TomServo: That was my point, I don't see it being worth the effore given cpu cheapness.. even with the VAT. ☟︎
ben_vulpes: intel calls that an "unplanned restart" these days lol
mod6: sure, got maybe a bit more throughput, but the tradeoff was certainly not worth it if not, for instance, gaming.
trinque: heat's one issue, general system stability another. who's going to fiddle with BIOS voltage settings?
ben_vulpes: and heaven help the person who lets their box get hot enough to transfer heat radiantly
ben_vulpes: moreover it'd be what, mostly radiant with a bit of conductive through the air gap between servers, which can probably be approximated as stagnant and a good insulator
ben_vulpes: i know but if the convective flux is adequate there really shouldn't be that much heat conducted from machine to machine
trinque: ben_vulpes: wasn't thinking of it, just heat through the metal case
ben_vulpes: cooked, yes, but you hoover from the aisle in the front and dump into the aisle in the back. so long as everyone's dumping out the back, nobody should be sucking exhaust gases.
trinque: mircea_popescu: in re: cores, depends what you're running. most of my existing servers are many separate services doing tasks that don't block each other, whereas if running trb it's doubtful the thing benefits from even one extra core, except insofar as the rest of the OS's doings get shuffled off to it.
trinque: also given the difficulty of getting parts on site, might want to optimize for longevity, then CPU cycles
trinque: yeh, gotta keep in mind that rack slots are narrow, and you're being cooked by your neighbor on two sides
TomServo: If not full throttle, is it really worth the effort compared to throwing in another system?
TomServo: If overclocking, why not go full throttle?
TomServo: I've not kept up-to-date, but in my understanding of successful overclocking is often dependant on specialized cooling systems expected to be in a mini or full tower.
mircea_popescu: TomServo the more the merrier.
TomServo: I can likely order gear as well, but I don't expect that will be a problem.
mircea_popescu: eh, there's cpus that are made for overclocking. such as this one. it'll run fine for years, if kept cool.
TomServo: mircea_popescu: that's true, but you should have plenty of warning before needing to consider torching your gear
lobbes could possibly swing the ~600. will keep eyes tuned to logs
mircea_popescu: not clear yet, intuitively there's a ~600, a ~1.5k, a ~4k and a ~9k chunk. but we see.
lobbes: mircea_popescu, I may be able to order something, depending on price (any gear needed under $500, say?). I've been meaning to convert some more fiat into coin anyway
mircea_popescu: well, if you're stuck with an overloaded rack for the few days till you get the other one up for instance, it's nice to know you've got a 20% afterburner you can run on.
TomServo: Seems to be begging for heat and reliability issues when the goal should be reliability.
TomServo: I think you're on the right track not paying the price premium on the latest and greatest and eating the power.