112900+ entries in 0.874s

mircea_popescu: firing off some wartnings before actually shooting is considered the polite and civilised way where
i come from.
BingoBoingo:
I just find the potential to change the rural aesthetic lulzy if Blaze pink does work better.
assbot: Remember the Forbes article "Something Rotten In the State of Bitcoin"?
I put in a complaint and the writer was forced to change the article. : btc ... (
http://bit.ly/20ftmZh )
mircea_popescu: maybe even something smooth and classic, like,
I Can't Believe It's Not Bitcoin.
mircea_popescu:
i really hope they go with "ultimate" next. it has this flavour of old Vivendi spunk and unemployed, failed "strategists" and "designers" of unplayable reboots of stale franchises.
ascii_butugychag: from what
i know of mountain folk (the very endearing chechens esp.) they certainly see the payback they get from the plainsfolk they chronically rape as 'unfair'
mircea_popescu:
i have no idea what'd be "africa". there's a bunch of major ones. and they are mixed with stuff like the persians, which... invented civilisation.
ben_vulpes: only 'colour warz'
i'm aware of are the preference of crackers for north africans over african americans
jurov: mircea_popescu:
i see sample sizes like 200 in a million
ascii_butugychag:
i'm not convinced re: the eu genetic report being a genuine thing either
jurov:
i am not aware somethin liek evil-org even exists
ascii_butugychag:
i have not paid the shaman, did not drink the goat blood, will not link
mircea_popescu: PeterL
i doubt it'd be practical to try and get the miner to subsidize the wot.
i expect it to work the other way around.
PeterL:
I was thinking if they are in WoT it is not spam, anything else should be considered spammy and need higher fee?
pete_dushenski: ascii_butugychag: what ports can
i use for trb while syncing ? and is there a good reason why trb should jump on 8333 without me telling it to, and without being completely synced ? because this seems to be a recurring issue on my end.
pete_dushenski: mircea_popescu: "But anyway, to answer a question from the public in more detail : poorly.
I've never been this humiliated in my life." << nuts. my mind, it asploded.
ascii_butugychag:
i don't want a car engine that relies on cockroaches turning little wheels.
mircea_popescu: unavoidable, yes, but
i'd have liked it to come later.
mircea_popescu: yes yes, it's correct. and next thing you know the transactions are no longer publicly relayed (because why the fuck would
i give the fee to random miners) and lo and behold we've split in the worst way.
mircea_popescu: "Pe Argeş în gios, pe un mal frumos, Negru-vodă trece cu tovarăşi zece: nouă meşteri mari, calfe şi zidari si Manoli - zece, care-
i şi întrece."
mircea_popescu: this delusion of "
i will build" so common in us "activists" and three year olds really needs the natural check of "go ahead".
ascii_butugychag: incidentally, every ~sane~ female
i've ever encountered, had cubes
mircea_popescu:
i suppose this is how the pedestrian notion of "good" and "evil" is constructed even. let us arbitrarily divide a set of real objects into "only has height" and "only has width". thus therefore the first set are ~obviously~ good, for they allow you to build up! (how will you manage to allign things with no width on top of each other is a consideration best left to any masochistical engineers still stuck in your swampla
mircea_popescu: (that's a particularly poor illustration of what
i said, if it tries to be. for one thing
i dun think
i ever said anything alike.)
mircea_popescu: and while
i am not certain "masochists" can be separated from the general population,
i am well certain that they are not a category to be, and that you're plenty one yourself.
ascii_butugychag: in application to ~masochists~
i'm not certain they are separable from the outside of the head..
mircea_popescu: laymen famously can not separate the entreatment from the threat in what
i say to my slaves.
mircea_popescu: trinque no but he's asking me what he's doing when he's the one doing it. and in all honesty he expects me to answer.
i suppose in the same honesty he expects a snippet of code somwhere exists which says "how to subdue women". god knows the PUA subculture's been working tediously at it.
mircea_popescu: so to get back to it : <ascii_butugychag> so if
i offer a kid a candy,
i am threatening him with hunger ? << are you ?
BingoBoingo: ascii_butugychag: Mystery Chinese noise
I can not adequately parse on thread preceeded with "MEGA LOL"
ascii_butugychag: and what, 'what's 2+2?' 'how should
i know? go add them and
i'll tell you'
ascii_butugychag: so if
i offer a kid a candy,
i am threatening him with hunger ?
ascii_butugychag: the whole no-overlapping-turfs thing is supposed to be guaranteed by turf war, etc.
i get it
ascii_butugychag:
i can only guess, but 'go and pay or shoot that one yourself, he's not mine'
mircea_popescu: to which
i say that if
i were a bird also
i wouldn't flap my wings, but merely float. because why not, tis a dream.
ascii_butugychag: am
i think or what,
i don't see the equivalence. bribery and threat are approx. as equivalent as arses and elbows
mircea_popescu: the fellow says "if
i were to be a pimp [ie, the dream mode, because hey, that's what he understood of a discussion of technology, that "being an engineer" is a blessed state, to be obtained through divine grace and / or ordination]
i wouldn't beat the women, for they'd be more productive thus. but also, if they piss me off, "dead" directly. you know, like puff daddy.
mircea_popescu: and
i don't even think you mean thinking by "thinking".
i think you mean "for daydreaming". like this fellow :
mod6: Now
i have heat. fuckers.
mod6: no heat in the suburban, made appt. to have it fixed. showed up this am like "ok do your thing..". They said, "oh, can you pick it up tomorrow? we're busy...". Like wtf. It's literally like a 15 minute job. How do
I know? Because
I just did it myself instead and if
I exclude the drive time to pick up and buy the part itself, ~15 minutes.
☟︎ mircea_popescu:
i wonder how many people burned themselves trying to be me. perhaps
i find out one day.
ben_vulpes:
i rarely use arrow keys to navigate, preferring instead to search through the buffer
mircea_popescu: it's a semi-permeable membrane.
i don't indiscriminately counsel everyone there to come out.
mircea_popescu: <jurov>
i use ctrl to jump to next nonwhitespace if needed. <<
i do.
BingoBoingo: <ascii_butugychag> seriously if
i wanted to repeatedly perform manual drudgery
i would go and pick cotton somewhere. << Speaking of are you dealing with that Apocalyptic blizzard fiat news is derping about.
jurov:
i use ctrl to jump to next nonwhitespace if needed.
ascii_butugychag: seriously if
i wanted to repeatedly perform manual drudgery
i would go and pick cotton somewhere.
jurov: dunno about itches,
i was fine with vim.. but common lisp, orgmode...
ben_vulpes: and did
i read that mircea_popescu wants 'semantic extraction' built into emacs?
ben_vulpes:
i use helm for buffer selection, and winner mode to get the windows back where they were.
ascii_butugychag: (now that
i think about it,
i don't recall whether he said anything about tmsr-only. but this seems like an obvious thing)
ascii_butugychag: the 'final solution' to the tx crud flood is,
i suspect, mircea_popescu's concept of a tmsr-ONLY block-a-day mining pool
punkman: mod6:
I meant producing stric-der signatures, and yeah that pull-req only involves the relaying
mod6: just the part that
I indicated above.
mod6:
i'll note, for instance, that when using -lows lastnight,
i created tx '320665468f018d9635da7e240f01f48b07e1e5114a2535895f7091fe3aa751a0' (and a hand full of others) that never made it.
mod6:
i just sent a low-s one, and that seemed ok.
mod6: last night, it wasn't just high-s txn, it was both. which
i found to be really weird.
mod6: so
i'm ignoring that.
mod6: you passed me a link to BIP66, which, as far as
I can tell isn't anything more than a bunch of sanity checks.
mod6: im thinking maybe, worst case,
i can make a patch with just the -lows code in there, and then wait to get the rest figured out later for -highs
mod6: had some strange issue when testing my high/low patch lastnight; worked well when it was just if(fLowS) { // low-s Code } else { //orig der code }, but when
i had 'if(fLowS) { // low-s } else if(fHighS) { // high-s } else { // orig code }', tx's that
I created wern't getting picked up at all.
jurov: how do
i bind it to C-w + focus the destination widows with arrows?
ascii_butugychag: BUT every alternative
i ever tried made me want to eat a nagant.
ascii_butugychag: this being said,
i fucking hate emacs and have been cursing it every day for my entire working life.
jurov: how would
i do better?
trinque: jurov:
I use winner mode so
I can at least go back in window arrangement history when
I fuck things up
jurov: and windows management in emacs seems to be strictly designed to be illogical anti-muscle-memory,
i keep clobbering the buffer
i want to stay open
Xplosionist: and given that split makes the filenames the print0/xargs -0 isn't even needed. But yah,
I well know your "is bulletproof" feelings.