log☇︎
105100+ entries in 0.038s
asciilifeform: unidirectional fiber light plox.
asciilifeform: with which to tcp
asciilifeform: not to mention asking it to have a nic
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: requiring faraday cage microcontroller tx gen box to speak whole bitcoin protocol, is imho nuttery
asciilifeform: in point of fact if trb knew how to eat raw tx, you have the knob, neh?
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: it's pretty well demarcated. grep -i -r wallet *
asciilifeform can picture.
asciilifeform: incl. pygmistani.
asciilifeform: imho it was nifty and ought to appear in other langs.
asciilifeform: aaah the egg
asciilifeform: waiwat is
asciilifeform: even for winblows there are patches.
asciilifeform: there's gotta be a patch, somewhere.
asciilifeform: home/end -- do not
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: pgup/pgdown work on the box i have here ☟︎
asciilifeform: imho anything involving php is still outhouse. (albeit some outhouses are a step ahead of others, what with stone plinths and toilet paper roll holder, instead of earthen pit)
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: you got considerably farther than i did, in re mp-wp
asciilifeform does not know, from memory, how to make this
asciilifeform: in fixed width letters.
asciilifeform: if i were writing logtron, i'd go for green text , and names inverted (black on green) letters.
asciilifeform is fond of old-fashioned green crt terminals
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: i meant, whole thing
asciilifeform: eh it's your box, use what colours you like.
asciilifeform: 0x00FF00 green.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: try green in place of red, if you feel like playing with it
asciilifeform: my only nitpick is the colours, and i don't even know if it is my display calibrarion, or eyes, that balk.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes's logtron is neato btw
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: yeah, unless you're trying to bridge a specific and small gap, mine probably won't be of any use
asciilifeform: all i've got is (about 98% uptime) plain text l0gz.
asciilifeform: aah
asciilifeform: not a scrape
asciilifeform: no, iirc he has proper db
asciilifeform: Framedragger, can haz l0gz tarball ?
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: Framedragger oughta have same l0gz, let's ask him. ☟︎
asciilifeform: before, i think.
asciilifeform: iirc he vanished for 2wks once (turned out it was to bury some kin)
asciilifeform: or killed by martians.
asciilifeform: far from a console.
asciilifeform: prolly out in meatspace.
asciilifeform: !~seen phf
asciilifeform: remove-old-liver-then-go-stroll-around-liverless -- not.
asciilifeform: remove-old-liver-then-immediately-install-new -- a-ok.
asciilifeform: that'd be a tremendously useful thing.
asciilifeform: hand calculator ? abacus ?
asciilifeform: what the fuck to transact with , then ?
asciilifeform: i asked very specific question. say davout makes a wallet-less trb. and for some reason we all embrace it and roll it into each his own personal vtree.
asciilifeform: what do you intend to use ? you want to put #ifdefs in for the wallet ?
asciilifeform: prb ?
asciilifeform: also i admit to a deep curiosity, the folx itching to dump the wallet without offering a new one, what the hell are you lot transacting WITH ?
asciilifeform: what i would like to do in this thread, is to ask folx to stop and think for half a minute about what differentiates trb from prb.
asciilifeform: grandfather's pistol.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: i am all for moving the miner to own binary. BUT you would then have to test it and somehow demonstrate that it in fact behaves IDENTICALLY to the original
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: crypto code belongs on separate box.
asciilifeform: (afaik no such thing ever existed for common lisp, because it was a sanely-defined -- i.e. paper -- standard.)
asciilifeform: trinque: sbcl is not a reference-implementation of anything.
asciilifeform: and own battery.
asciilifeform: davout, ben_vulpes : signatron belongs in a copper box with tiny hole drilled for one fiber.
asciilifeform: but UNTIL new wallet EXISTS, i for one will sign no snips.
asciilifeform: davout: provide sane endpoints. i promise to read patch, and test, and help.
asciilifeform: and quite similar to the 'what is my ip' thing, which i shot.
asciilifeform: excellent example of 'what to cut'
asciilifeform: no one will miss it.
asciilifeform: the estimator is of 0 use.
asciilifeform: davout: this one, i agree with; mandate fee input on command line.
asciilifeform: in fact, until we nailed down the dependencies all the way down to the kernel and gcc, it was possible to argue that trb does not define bitcoin.
asciilifeform: it most assuredly does not.
asciilifeform: davout: you do not get to say that a walletless bitcoin distribution succeeds in 'defining money'.
asciilifeform: anyway who wants to do the 10 minutes of work to prepare a wallet snip, go ahead, just be aware that you will have to repeat most of said work by the time replacement wallet is a thing.
asciilifeform: the even faint implication that i ought to so much as consider heathen nontrb wallets.
asciilifeform: and it is 99% of my rage, re 'lose the wallet'.
asciilifeform: and i still have not forgiven.
asciilifeform: and the last time, someone DID IN FACT SAY 'use python wallet'
asciilifeform: this is not the first thread of this kind, either.
asciilifeform: or to the orphanages ?
asciilifeform: srsly davout , trinque , you would compare 'verifymessage' to winblowz #ifdef crapolade ?
asciilifeform: but to lose functionality, however uncommonly needed, that does exactly 0 harm, and the loss of which reduces by no amount the labour of a trb code reader, is at best a snore.
asciilifeform: i get it, folx watched asciilifeform swing the axe, and it looked like great fun, nao everybody wants.
asciilifeform: that enemy shoved in as attempt to exploit the node.
asciilifeform: suppose i gotta verify the signature on a malformed tx.
asciilifeform: davout: a walletron is pointedly ~not~ 'a knob turn away'
asciilifeform: it means that -- yes -- if i need to , i can open an ancient wallet.
asciilifeform: cutting-apart is a great thing.
asciilifeform: davout: didja ever read mircea_popescu's 'cut apart' piece ?
asciilifeform: or somehow this was implied in my patches ? (where, note, i cut out entire useless subsystems, and shrank memory drain eightfold ?)
asciilifeform: i said this ?
asciilifeform: when ?
asciilifeform: did i say 'everything' ?
asciilifeform: davout: can you draw a scenario where you might say 'now if only we had not thrown out idiot accounts...'
asciilifeform: davout: how's that follow?
asciilifeform: trinque: link plz?
asciilifeform: davout: yes, they could 'rebuild historical trb' but imho if this is a kind of thing that ever becomes necessary, trb will have failed in its continuity-preserving mission.
asciilifeform: trinque: 1 per user, in fact.
asciilifeform: trinque: trb already exists in multiple branches, such is the nature of vtronics.
asciilifeform: archaeology is not always about 'important' people.
asciilifeform: using the routine that the author of said signature intended.
asciilifeform: there are historical signatures floating about, and one might wish to verify them ☟︎
asciilifeform: while it is imho stupid to generate such signatures and rely on them for any practical use,
asciilifeform: i disagree that this would do any good.
asciilifeform: davout: it is good, and healthy, to 'target practice' with the toolchain. but please try to clearly note this.
asciilifeform: then i have nothing else to disagree with