asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: pgup/pgdown work on the box i have here☟︎
asciilifeform: imho anything involving php is still outhouse. (albeit some outhouses are a step ahead of others, what with stone plinths and toilet paper roll holder, instead of earthen pit)
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: you got considerably farther than i did, in re mp-wp
asciilifeform does not know, from memory, how to make this
asciilifeform: what the fuck to transact with , then ?
asciilifeform: i asked very specific question. say davout makes a wallet-less trb. and for some reason we all embrace it and roll it into each his own personal vtree.
asciilifeform: what do you intend to use ? you want to put #ifdefs in for the wallet ?
asciilifeform: also i admit to a deep curiosity, the folx itching to dump the wallet without offering a new one, what the hell are you lot transacting WITH ?
asciilifeform: what i would like to do in this thread, is to ask folx to stop and think for half a minute about what differentiates trb from prb.
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: i am all for moving the miner to own binary. BUT you would then have to test it and somehow demonstrate that it in fact behaves IDENTICALLY to the original
asciilifeform: ben_vulpes: crypto code belongs on separate box.
asciilifeform: (afaik no such thing ever existed for common lisp, because it was a sanely-defined -- i.e. paper -- standard.)
asciilifeform: trinque: sbcl is not a reference-implementation of anything.
asciilifeform: davout: this one, i agree with; mandate fee input on command line.
asciilifeform: in fact, until we nailed down the dependencies all the way down to the kernel and gcc, it was possible to argue that trb does not define bitcoin.
asciilifeform: davout: you do not get to say that a walletless bitcoin distribution succeeds in 'defining money'.
asciilifeform: anyway who wants to do the 10 minutes of work to prepare a wallet snip, go ahead, just be aware that you will have to repeat most of said work by the time replacement wallet is a thing.
asciilifeform: the even faint implication that i ought to so much as consider heathen nontrb wallets.
asciilifeform: and it is 99% of my rage, re 'lose the wallet'.
asciilifeform: srsly davout , trinque , you would compare 'verifymessage' to winblowz #ifdef crapolade ?
asciilifeform: but to lose functionality, however uncommonly needed, that does exactly 0 harm, and the loss of which reduces by no amount the labour of a trb code reader, is at best a snore.
asciilifeform: i get it, folx watched asciilifeform swing the axe, and it looked like great fun, nao everybody wants.
asciilifeform: that enemy shoved in as attempt to exploit the node.
asciilifeform: suppose i gotta verify the signature on a malformed tx.
asciilifeform: davout: a walletron is pointedly ~not~ 'a knob turn away'
asciilifeform: it means that -- yes -- if i need to , i can open an ancient wallet.
asciilifeform: davout: yes, they could 'rebuild historical trb' but imho if this is a kind of thing that ever becomes necessary, trb will have failed in its continuity-preserving mission.