1029000+ entries in 0.737s
mircea_popescu: you don't sign your share
tho, you jsut get a signed cert
that you own so and so shares
smickles: mircea_popescu: if an exchange offered it, what happens if i sign my share
to
two different people at
the same
time?
smickles: rdponticelli: i've come
to
the conclusion
that if you want
that, each individual issuer is going
to have
to do
that, keep a record of who has
the proper claim on a share, and not be listed on an exchange of
the current nature
rdponticelli: nefario: Are you working on offering some signed proof of ownership of shares, or some
thing alike?
Obsi: Sounds good, I'll hang around
to pay divs,
thanks
Obsi: oh man my buy order spam
took forever
nefario: had
to cancell all buy orders as well
gabbynot: i gambled a bit on some cheap PPT bonds…it'd be cool if
they actually pay off
maximian: mircea: I do like
the core functionality, and
the fact
that mpex is fast and available.
rdponticelli: I'm not
talking about any particular site, but in general
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining not exactly. recently, glbse got a shot
to show itself
that it's not a little
toy, but something
that might be maybe
taken seriously
BTC-Mining: I can't check
the security internally...
BTC-Mining: Recently
the API was moved apart from
the core and it was reworked
to work on multiple servers
mircea_popescu: rdponticelli actually, seems all
the pervasive marketing has got everyone convinced
that
that;'s how "it works". you buy a domain and wham, are entrepreneurial nao and shit.
BTC-Mining: I
think GLBSE was set up properly at
the core. It's now rolling out new features
smickles: it seems a seat on
the NYSE, allows you
to
trade, and doesn't get you an account history
rdponticelli: They're a lot of people building
thing from
the facade
rdponticelli: Well, it's about building
the houses starting from
the foundations, or from
the facade
mircea_popescu: one in
three ?! come on. one in
three musta been a hack.
BTC-Mining: But I'm pretty sure it was no hack...
the way it's been handled...
mircea_popescu: but if you're going
to replicate it, you start with
the security.
then you add
the availability/resilience.
then
the rest.
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining first and foremost
the security, actually.
that was
there before
the rest.
BTC-Mining: I mean, you would get more people.
The only reason you get large volumes and big investors
taking
the
time
to do it is because of
the quality of companies you allow on
the platform. Plus
the options.
BTC-Mining: They'd expect
the platform
to generate it for
them.
mircea_popescu: ya i guess it depends what
they're used
to, but prolly most wouldn't.
maximian: mircea: right, but
that's not immediately obvious, and not what most people would expect
mircea_popescu: when you do your accounting, you pull out your receipts and add
them up.
mircea_popescu: maximian but anyway, you're not supposed
to
throwaway your stats.
BTC-Mining: I'm saying if you'd improve
the UI, you'd bring more people
to MPEX and at
the same
time need more processing power for each user.
mircea_popescu: maximian you get
the history since last STAT, right.
the ideea kinda is
that accounting is done by client.
maximian: mircea: not
the complete history - I have
to keep
track of it myself
BTC-Mining: But
there's not so many people using Mpex.
maximian: Get a JSON dump of my
transaction history
BTC-Mining: Considering
the current simple interface, probably a lot.
smickles: he is
the 4chan of romainia, or some such
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining you have any ideea how much
traffic i handle ?
BTC-Mining: See how you can handle
the amount of
traffic
then.
mircea_popescu: dude you say features like it's some sort of
the grail. what features ?
mircea_popescu: and it's not even
that i have a problem with
the guy
trying.
BTC-Mining: It's NOT ok
to have bugs in production software, I'll have
to approve
that.
BTC-Mining: I'm saying you could at least
try
to add new features and show you can do it without any bugs before criticizing.
BTC-Mining: This update happens
to be implemented on Mpex. But
there's not
that many features as far as I know on Mpex.
smickles: ciuciu: i
think he still has you on ignore
BTC-Mining: mircea, you're rolling no new features for mpex, at least
try and show you can do it before criticizing.
mircea_popescu: get of
the fucken internet and come back when you can provide something
that works.
BTC-Mining: ... are
two exchange owners really fighting now?
mircea_popescu: tell me rthat. what school did you go wjere
they said "production software has bugs in it"
nefario: mircea_popescu: you can roll your lips on
the glory of my cokc
mircea_popescu: and who
told you it;'s ok
to have bugs in production software ?
smickles: BTC-Mining: i'll add
the ui
to mpex
BTC-Mining: Hopefully in
the future, both of you can have UI + performance.
nefario: Not hard
to be fast when hardly anyone is using it
BTC-Mining: GLBSE/Mpex both have one side of
the
thing each, UI or performance. Both seems secure.
smickles: it's
the exchange, not
the brokerage
BTC-Mining: sing
the praises of mpex? Fuck, it might be good functional wise, but any professional platform should have great user interface AND great security/performance
smickles: waht happend
to
that forum spirit?
smickles: i'm not even an exchange and i'm 'passing
thru' more
than 100 btc ??!
mircea_popescu: and im going
to shoot
the next forum fuckwit
that even dares
to not sing
the praises of mpex.
mircea_popescu: and
that was during
the half hour
the site was up
today.
mircea_popescu: it collected ~100 btc in fake bids which wiped when
the guy put
the asset out
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining deadterra was going
to
try and offer a pass-through for s.dice on
that pathetic excuse of a dysfunctional
thing which
they insist on
the forum is "the standard"
smickles: did
the deadterra
thing happen?
BTC-Mining: I prefer more shares for less
than forcing a full bitcoin per share.
BTC-Mining: It doesn't change
the percent returned, but should allow
to reinvest in full (or almost) each week if wanted.
BTCHero: I saw a bunch at .1
then went
to buy and
they weren't
there