log☇︎
1026700+ entries in 0.807s
coingenuity: i'm enjoying the gox market for my bots.... as a whole though, people are holding their breath and it's a little eerie to watch
Luceo: Im going to MLG in November so I'll probably get you to deliver to one of my colleagues and get them to bring it to my hotel :P
Luceo: coingenuity: I'm enjoying the Gox market atm
coingenuity: low gox volume + giant spreads == interesting to watch
coingenuity: makes me happy, i think a lot of people are sort of paused to see what pirate's effect is
Luceo: I hope to be buying from you soon ;)
coingenuity: not my cuppa tea
coingenuity: i am not really a forum user tbh
Luceo: I dont yet know everyone's forum name to IRC name
Luceo: I sometimes forget when people buy on the forum :P
Luceo: ;;rate w|zzy 1 Bought a number of raffle tickets from me.
Chaaang-Noi: oh lol someone wants to send me back the one shae and get the 1 btc and not take the wal at .9999999
nefario: and we seem to be fine with that.
nefario: Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot all had in common that they killed their own people
nefario: funny thing though
mircea_popescu: the scammer tag ?
Chaaang-Noi: yeah i dont get that either
mircea_popescu: <bitfoo> it's the new word everyone learnt on the forums << when this ?!
Chaaang-Noi: i see i sold my asicminer too soon and for too little
boonies4u: i'm sure there's a commodity ticker for it
boonies4u: it is technically a type of corn
Chaaang-Noi: i think everyone is just too busy watching pirate and buying more popedcorn
Chaaang-Noi: stockholm syndrome? how does this relate to the bonds?
bitfoo: it's the new word everyone learnt on the forums
Chaaang-Noi: i was to pay bonds like 15 hours ago and forgot
Chaaang-Noi: i know, im going to have like 50 of them
usagi: [15:20:49] <Chaaang-Noi> i forgot to pay out my mining bond <--- scammer tag pls
mircea_popescu: usagi ticker works.
assbot: Requesting data from GLBSE (might take a while).
mircea_popescu: and now those things are priced in 3 btc increments and im wtf'd.
mircea_popescu: ya. people don't understand this buyt suppose i have 100 btc to invest
mircea_popescu: anything in the 10^-2 to 10^-5 or so range
Chaaang-Noi: i just need to pay a bond
bitfoo: digging around this mysql db is a pain
Chaaang-Noi: no thanks
mircea_popescu: i have the entire list if you want it.
Chaaang-Noi: yes thanks
Chaaang-Noi: for a ppt 1 is a better number than say Pi....
mircea_popescu: i have the old one sec
mircea_popescu: bitfoo i never understood wy they price things at 1btc on glbse either.
Chaaang-Noi: if its not too much trouble that would be awesome
Chaaang-Noi: stupid travel and pirates :)
Chaaang-Noi: i forgot to pay out my mining bond
bitfoo: that's the current one
Chaaang-Noi: ah fuck,anyone know what the last difficulty was?
Chaaang-Noi: just in a bad m00d due to pirate stuff
Chaaang-Noi: im not really breakig the contract
BTC-Mining: I'm mistaken, looks like it does go to 8 decimals
Chaaang-Noi: yeah but as i pointed out im offering to buy back at 1 btc, they just have to send it to my account and email me a btc address...
BTC-Mining: Boonies4u, I think the minimum valuation is at 7 decimals or 10 satoshi
Chaaang-Noi: almost got a scammers tag for that!
bitfoo: 3000 satoshis then
boonies4u: Can you even value bonds at the satoshi level on GLBSE?
boonies4u: you can do a lot more with a satoshi than you can with the smallest division of USD
BTC-Mining: In the future, each of those satoshi will be worth a fortune! : o
bitfoo: oh, for the insured pirate thing
Gladamas: bitfoo: I called him out on not following the contract (buying at 0.9999999 vs. 1.0 BTC) so ya
bitfoo: what happened, goat was trying to skimp on 10 satoshis? ;)
Chaaang-Noi: i was not too worried and its not a big deal, but i had to respond.
Chaaang-Noi: yeah but you said i was not following the contract. thus i had to respond
Chaaang-Noi: i have to respond to all attacks on my business threads. i responded sarcasticly and was not really going to take downthat wall.
Gladamas: Chaang-Noi I was half-kidding about the 0.9999999 technicality violation
Chaaang-Noi: sorry about the mistake, i need to read more next time.
Chaaang-Noi: and i have a bid wall to absorb them all
mircea_popescu: my guess is they sold about 32 btc out of 100 "sold".
mircea_popescu: so, they insured in the end what, 32 cents to the dollar ?
mircea_popescu: i suspect the insurance proportion = the part not self bought.
Chaaang-Noi: i hold the largest assets by volume on glbse
mircea_popescu: we're talking of the insured thing.
Chaaang-Noi: well cuz i did not buy most of my bonds and im the largest
Chaaang-Noi: i kinda doubt that
mircea_popescu: boonies4u i suspect most of glbse pirate debt was bought by the issuers.
boonies4u: I wouldn't be surprised if Pirate bought some debt from passthroughs under the table
mircea_popescu: i think most people have by now, for their own books.
mircea_popescu: i wouldsay that is the meaning of life.
mircea_popescu: Total posts 42 • Total topics 11 • Total members 9
mircea_popescu: that's what the internet is for, muddy away
smickles: that's a lot of explaining you've done there
BTCHero: mircea_popescu: I was going to comment on that thread with questions and didn't want to muddy the thread
smickles: mircea_popescu: but it only effs up the display, you could hit the quote button and get the actual text
mircea_popescu: i guess it would then huh.
smickles: mircea_popescu: it does if there is bb code inside of the signed part
jcpham0: I don't consider it to a contract i agreed upon
jcpham0: Idk tbh all of that is external to me
smickles: what's the date that the nano-involved bet settles?
jcpham0: Gigavps has a joke 10 but i really trudt giga
smickles: ;;rate pirateat40 -1 there's a whole kerfuffle to be settled before i'd trade with him
BTC-Mining: Why haven't people put negative rating while this gets solved?
BTC-Mining: to encourage people not dealing with the person until disagreements are solved
BTC-Mining: The otc rating is made to put temporary ratings during disagreement
gribble: Trust relationship from user boonies4u to user pirateat40: Level 1: 0, Level 2: 4 via 3 connections. Graph: http://serajewelks.bitcoin-otc.com/trustgraph.php?source=boonies4u&dest=pirateat40
gribble: Trust relationship from user jcpham to user pirateat40: Level 1: 8, Level 2: 33 via 13 connections. Graph: http://serajewelks.bitcoin-otc.com/trustgraph.php?source=jcpham&dest=pirateat40
gribble: Currently authenticated from hostmask pirateat40!~pirateat4@unaffiliated/pirateat40 . User pirateat40, rated since Mon Aug 1 14:18:45 2011. Cumulative rating 244, from 80 total ratings. Received ratings: 78 positive, 2 negative. Sent ratings: 65 positive, 1 negative. Details: http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=pirateat40
mircea_popescu: i was about to log in to pop his cherry
BTC-Mining: ;;rate pirateat40 -1 owes me money, not very talkative about anything, past his repayment delays.
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining im sure nobody can remove ratings outside of nanotube who is pretty regimented to not do it.
BTC-Mining: I don't think*
BTC-Mining: I think only nanotube has access to that tho
kakobrekla: no, but give -1, you prolly get on the imaginary end of line
BTC-Mining: aye, I meant the rating system. Don't a few running this can remove ratings when someone abuse the otc ratings?