1012400+ entries in 0.789s
smickles: < mircea_popescu> smickles why do you keep spelling principal "principle" ? << becuase i am flawd ;) um,
tell me
this is just in irc, and not in some signed document I produce
rg: i
think
this chicken omelette is going
to be god
Diablo-D3: how
the hell does
this channel
talk
this much
mircea_popescu: jurov you p[rolly read more
than 5
this week. it's a paid site.
jurov: no problem, you'll have
to fake
the ID and electricity bill
Luceo: I'm a bit paranoid
that Gox will ask me
to prove
that my name really is Doctor Robotnik
though :(
Luceo: I sent it
to no-one
Chaang-Noi: i was not
that stupid... i sent it
to gox, and wish i had not... but id never send
to glbse
jurov: mircea,
that link says Acest articol nu este disponibil gratis.
mircea_popescu: i feel kind of sorry for
the poor suckers who sent him passport pics or w/e
Chaang-Noi: seems important if you ar
trying
to sell an anon stock exchange...
Chaang-Noi: i really wonder if
that was by design or if nefario just is
that ignorant.
assbot: BMF [1@0.49BTC] (since: 2012-09-25) paid: 0.01112149 BTC. Last price: 0.49 BTC. Capital gain: 0 BTC.
Total: 0.01112149 BTC. (2.3%)
assbot: Requesting data from GLBSE (might
take a while, also might return fishy results as it does not account for splits etc).
Chaang-Noi: i wonder if nefario is aware of
this...
nenolod: Diablo-D3: you see, i have had a contingency plan for
that for years
nenolod: Diablo-D3: wherein i
took advantage of certain realities,
to acquire hosting elsewhere at very cost-efficient prices.
nenolod: Diablo-D3: i kicked in
the 'nenolod hosting continuity endgame scenario'
rg: why
the hell isnt
this
transaction confirming
nenolod: rg: i don't really want
to get into hosting
mircea_popescu: so why
the hell is usagi attacking bakewell now. he seems reasonable enough ? am i missing something ?
rg: i will inconvenience 30 customers
to move
rg: i dont
tolerate shit from our DCs
rg: i
thought it was enzu
nenolod: i want
to sell beer for a living
rg: that's not
the relationship we have
nenolod: i don't want
to do hosting
nenolod: rg: you should
talk
to openitc
nenolod: Diablo-D3: i just kicked in
the 'nenolod hosting continuity endgame scenario'
OneEyed: Apparently, you should
trust me more
than I should
trust you :)
gribble: Trust relationship from user rg
to user Nick 'diablo-d3', with hostmask 'Diablo-D3!~diablo@pool-64-222-225-145.port.east.myfairpoint.net', is not identified.: Level 1: 0, Level 2: 0 via 0 connections. Graph:
http://serajewelks.bitcoin-otc.com/trustgraph.php?source=rg&dest=Nick 'diablo-d3', with hostmask 'Diablo-D3!~diablo@pool-64-222-225-145.port.east.myfairpoint.net', is not identified.
OneEyed: And I also
totally agree
that if
there was a default,
then you should pay
the shareholders directly, not Ian Bakewell, as per
the contract.
OneEyed: I did. And I read
that Ian Bakewell required
that
the contract be cancelled and
the premiums reimbursed. And I seem
to understand you agreed
to
that if his shareholders did agree as well.
OneEyed: usagi: I don't
troll, I just
try
to understand what I read. If you call
that
trolling,
then call it
trolling, but I'm hardly
trying
to escalate
the debate into some heated argument or make anyone lose
time
rg: i could also make some noodles with
the chicken
rg: but im not sure if
they should be mixed
rg: i like all
those
things
rg: has anyone heard of
thatb efore?
OneEyed: as it is not insurance because of a default, but cancellation of
the contract
OneEyed: usagi: he passed a motion at your request from what I see, you required
that
to pay *him* back
OneEyed: mircea_popescu: don't underestimate
the problem:
they are fighting over a whole 4 BTC!
Diablo-D3: nenolod: hey, he was my friend
too damnit
Diablo-D3: [07:26:57] <nenolod> Diablo-D3: rob levin was a friend of mine and really discussing
the
tragic incident of him being hit by an automobile has really become daft
to discuss
Diablo-D3: adsl2+ with all
the annexes maxes out at 24/3.5
nenolod: i'd soooooo make a ponzi on
this shit
nenolod: rg: so did Diablo-D3
take his free replacement vps?
OneEyed: Which is also a good
thing in itself
OneEyed: This is probably
to encourage you
to create well-balanced bets
OneEyed: So he only lost .85 by creating
the bet :)
OneEyed: Who gets 5% of
the losing bets anyway
nenolod: Diablo-D3: is
this ADSL2+?
mircea_popescu: To promote early bettors on a statement, we distribute 45% of
the lost bets such
that early bettors get a larger share.
OneEyed: Weighting bets makes sense, as
the closer
to
the deadline you are,
the less undecided
the issue is, in most cases at least
rg: its completely irrelevant
today
mircea_popescu: well,
thanks for your early faith, it obviously was well placed.
OneEyed: mircea_popescu: yes,
the sooner you bet,
the more your bet weights
OneEyed: For a
total of 1729.980 weighted winning bets
OneEyed: My weighted bet is 60.909 according
to
the site
OneEyed: mircea_popescu:
the
total amount paid by betters is redistributed
to winners, minus 5% fee for
the site and 5% for
the creator of
the bet if I remember well
OneEyed: mircea_popescu: fortunately, as in every bets,
the amount paid by
the winners is redistributed as well :)
nenolod: rg:
that will keep bitcoin people away
rg: but
then id be vulnerable
to sabotage
rg: though i could
totally run it myself
rg: mircea_popescu: its kinda expensive
to get
the cable co
to run a 20mi coax
through a body of water
mircea_popescu: OneEyed you can't get more
than
the
total agree can you
OneEyed: My 0.1 should get me back around 0.381 due
to
the way bets are weighted
rg: id love an island in hte middle of no where but i wont be able
to deal with satelite internet
rg: i was looking at
the private island website
the other day
OneEyed: (I had
totally forgotten about
that bet)