1010400+ entries in 0.798s
asa1024: okay - where do we riot about
this?
rg: i used it less
than 5 hrs ago
smickles: kilothousandair sounds better
to me
smickles: maybe
they were fractional reserve, and suffered a bank run
rg: isnt
there a forum post
Bugpowder: I moved 1300 BTC off... still have 60
there in GIGAMINING
smickles: I did
that
the day b/f 'coinica died
too
smickles: is
there a way
to open
the port
to
the bitcoin somehow?
rg: they advertise
their IP/port
to
the network
smickles: channel 15: open failed: connect failed: Connection
timed out
smickles: it never gets more
than 8 connections.. oh, well,
the second
thing is
that a lot of
the connections seem
to
time out
rg: mind you, you wont be able
to accept connections on it
rg: i was just going
to suggest using
that
smickles: rg: why doesn't running bitcoin-qt
thru a socks proxy
to my vps work very well?
rg: We were not meant
to experience life
through a machine
jcpham: everytime i see
that acronym i
think of anal
copumpkin: I don't
think it's really possible
to make any legal calls here :) your guesses would be more educated if you were a lawyer
smickles: that's more of a spike
trap, copumpkin
smickles: copumpkin: is
there any legal pitfalls in calling yourself an arbitor or mediator
copumpkin: and he could make
the argument on
the forum if he'd kept his paws out of it
copumpkin: I'm not saying it does apply, just
that it's analogous
copumpkin: which is precisely
the kind of
things safe harbor laws protect against
copumpkin: and now people are holding
the occurrences where he didn't step in against him
copumpkin: he chose
to selectively regulate it
copumpkin: smickles: he has no requirement
to regulate it
imsaguy2: safe harbor doesn't apply if
the creation itself is illegal
copumpkin: but he could make
that argument informally at least
copumpkin: but if he
touches some of
the issues and not others, he's sort of
tacitly condoning
the ones he lets
through
copumpkin: he'd have some sort of "safe harbor"-like argument
to make if he just insisted on being completely hands-off
smickles: ;;rate rg -1 uses dirty sales
tactics
copumpkin: that's why I wanted nefario
to stop
trying
to regulate
that shit
mircea_popescu: i'd very much want
to hear what maged has
to say now
to
turn it into a "misunderstanding"
rg: i liked it when i didn't have
to do anything
rg: but i dont understand
that shit
mircea_popescu: rg srsly, if you had 20 btc in mpcd.A it'd have paid you .4 on
the 1st
rg: mircea_popescu: only for
the past 5 months
rg: and started keeping
the %
rg: mircea says
that he cant figure out how
to do interest anymroe
rg: i liked it
the way it was before
mircea_popescu: actually mpcd would be ideal for mpex companies seeing how it pays on
the 1st
rg: i dont want
that shit
rg: then
tell him i sent him 25 btc
rg: im
trying
to scam smickles right now
rg: imsaguy is always down
to hold onto fnuds
gribble: Best bid: 12.92012, Best ask: 12.998, Bid-ask spread: 0.07788, Last
trade: 12.998, 24 hour volume: 30051, 24 hour low: 12.7025, 24 hour high: 13.01
rg: its a weird sex
thing, you dont want
to know
rg: want
to do me a favor/
jcpham: if you can't
trust a guy named nefario, who can you
trust?
rg: until its
time for next divs?
rg: can you
take 23 BTC out of my account
rg: and keep it away from
their real business
rg: all
they'd have
to do is create an anonymous entity
mircea_popescu: you say
this is owed, we paid
this much, paying rest next month cause dongs.
rg: no i dont wnna do
that
mircea_popescu: "At
the moment, we don't see
the virtual currency market as a good
rg: i wnat
to finish
the new bitvps site
rg: almost ready
to be copy/pasted
rg: i can just do a dividend with
the missing amount?
rg: that's
terribly explained
rg: but with
the extra div
rg: i can just do
the same dividend
rg: so in eed
to pay extra
rg: but i forgot
to pay some money
BTC-Mining: I started with 400 BTC (2k USD) for
the fun of it. When I found
trading profit was good, I placed more and started
taking loans at a small rate, putting my portfolio in front of it
to protect against loss of lent funds.
smickles: if
there were more funds
to work with, i would've been able
to do it more efficiently
smickles: mostly, i had buys in
to catch
the dips which went much further
than
they should've
smickles: I did it because
there was a market opportunity. and I structured it in a way
that
the workload was minimal
BitcoinBear: right, you could do some invsting on your own for fun, but
taking other peoples money
to play with is a bad idea
BTC-Mining: That's what I was referring
to as a major problem.
BTC-Mining: I mean, you don't manage a fund just for
the fun of it...
mircea_popescu: not even sure its a problem.
this isn;'t
the
thing should be done "for fun"
BTC-Mining: What's
the incentive
to be
there,
trading daily?
BTC-Mining: Especially if you manage a 500 BTC fund which earn 1-2 % (5-10 BTC weekly),
then get 5% of
that (0.25
to 0.5 BTC weekly)
BTC-Mining: Especially since
they make around 5% of profits from funds/passthrough
they manage.