log☇︎
1007800+ entries in 0.748s
mircea_popescu: you're back to paying dividends
mircea_popescu: it's a stinky situation to be in especially because you may THINK you're ok, everyone claimed, everyone was taken care of, all is good
BTC-Mining: Which I was pointing out understand that by using "would"
BTC-Mining: I'm not talking about the why, but because you said "[04:57] <mircea_popescu> BTC-Mining mind you, this is just my opinion."
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining the why was at tubeguy
BTC-Mining: mircea, notice the usage of the word "would", pointing to the fact it's hypothetical
femtotube: because you are just another sociopath in this ugly BTC community
BTC-Mining: I would have other people's funds but no way to return them.
femtotube: mircea_popescu: i understand how this makes you feel good and you can gloat now like never before
drekk: from now on, i'll work hard to never be respected by the community
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining mind you, this is just my opinion.
mircea_popescu: femtotube the same members. nefario is an interscamgro alumni.
BTC-Mining: Sweet, I'm fooked then...
femtotube: it another scam that was run by "respected" LOL! members of this "community"
femtotube: no, i will not because bitcoinica has nothing to do with fixing something
drekk: dont know what to make of theymos atm
mircea_popescu: the EXACT same blueprint. zhou and tihan = nefario and theymos
drekk: well if its nefario, everything dies at that point
femtotube: so, what the plan to fix this mess and move on?
mircea_popescu: drekk well that's ALSO unclear. nefario or theymos or "the community"
mircea_popescu: he's thrown it in, fuckall knows how to get it back out.
drekk: your discussion is interesting, but who'd be actually in charge to do anything like that?
mircea_popescu: well. so, there's a saying, "one fool thows a rock in the sea and ten wise men struggle to fish it out"
BTC-Mining: Since other investors are missing then, they have no recourse, and since not all holders are publicly known, there's no way to know that.
BTC-Mining: Yes. Especially if afterward he close the method to submit BTC addys
mircea_popescu: and who's to know ?
mircea_popescu: he then will be making more by closing down glbse than he ever made running it.
mircea_popescu: what if nefario just fills in with his addy for all those who don't respond ?
BTC-Mining: Or that would be claimed by issuer after people complain they haven't received anything.
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining that is an entirely diff class of valid objection
BTC-Mining: With GLBSe possibly giving the wrong list.
mircea_popescu: when more than two people are responsible nobody can be made responsible.
BTC-Mining: The underlying issue remains the same it seems...
mircea_popescu: so. did glbse not give correct list, did issuer not pay all people or did guy lie about being entitled to dividend ?
mircea_popescu: it'd be one or the other.
BTC-Mining: The same could be said about GLBSE if someone claimed to have an incorrect balance on his account.
mircea_popescu: ____Atlas_____ i suggest nefario is shot, and any further cocky nitwits purporting to create this sort of messes are stripped and beaten, first.
mircea_popescu: except, after the 1st dividend run all customer addys are now public.
drekk: don't aim too high. this is the internet & bitcoin & anonymous users after all. you won't find a smooth way to handle this like IRL. imho
mircea_popescu: if they need to pay dividends they can *claim* they paid.
BTC-Mining: Only the BTC address with number of shares tied to it will be sent to issuers.
mircea_popescu: ok. so now, the issuers have list of email addy and btc addy.
BTC-Mining: No, funds that are not spent are to be returned to the account owner.
mircea_popescu: if i have 100 btc and 3 tickers in my portofolio you plan to what, give each ticker 33 btc ?
mircea_popescu: i thoguht that was already sent out, we're only doing the paper.
mircea_popescu: why are issuers getting the btc of customers ?
BTC-Mining: Issuers can pay to said BTC address, at least.
mircea_popescu: now, glbse distributes these lists to the asset issuers. right ?
mircea_popescu: so this completed somehow, in like a week or whatever, and everyone ticked boxes.
mircea_popescu: but we leave this aside.
mircea_popescu: or in a coma. loot the coma victim ?
mircea_popescu: now, this is complete. after say what ? 1 month ?
mircea_popescu: of which issuers they want their email and btc addy communicated. fair enough ?
BTC-Mining: We're talking about issuer receiving a BTC address of the shareholders.
mircea_popescu: so, i glbse put the website back up. all customers login, and have a set of tickboxes
mircea_popescu: ok, let's audit the entire story.
BTC-Mining: So? We're no longer talking about claim codes.
mircea_popescu: you're basically sending this stuff plaintext over the wires.
mircea_popescu: email traffic is neither encrypted nor is it so reliable.
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining i imagine the issuer to the shareholder, in your system. right ?
mircea_popescu: what if i didn't steal it but the users claims so ?
mircea_popescu: and they email me. what now ?
mircea_popescu: and i stole the email
____Atlas_____: Email is good enough for them
BTC-Mining: Then GLBSE would email the email and BTC address to the asset issuers.
____Atlas_____: mircea_popescu: These people are not on your level of conciousness.
mircea_popescu: and then ?
BTC-Mining: No, the holder would log in on GLBSE.com. The holder would give an email/btc address.
BTC-Mining: I think that's the plane, to bring an online tool for GLBSE to log on for asset holders to give their email/btc address.
mircea_popescu: and have 3 accts with the same pw
mircea_popescu: if user X has 3 assets, you can't give his name/pw to 3 issuers
k3t3r: or some other system without the ability to trade
mircea_popescu: that;d have to bring glbse.com back i guess
BTC-Mining: login, give BTC address/email, send that to asset issuers.
mircea_popescu: i still dunno how they can go from (users in db) state to (independent yet verified ownership) state
BTC-Mining: It seems a method will be implemented, albeit after the worse has happened.
mircea_popescu: online the gpg system might be sufficient (hasn't really been tested yet)
mircea_popescu: irl there's the entire clearance-holding system
BTC-Mining: What is the usual method to establish ownership?
mircea_popescu: atm the entire codes mess is due to the fact glbse purported to be an exchange, sold itself as an exchange, but it was merely a dumbass website, not an exchange.
mircea_popescu: point being, to qualify as an exchange in that sense, there'd have to be a way for ownership to be established and verified.
BTC-Mining: Eh, it was more of a broker to me.
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining glbse was not an exchange in this sense.
BTC-Mining: What's such a big fuss anyway, stock exchanges delist assets on occasions, it doesn't mean everything is lost, just that the asset is no longer traded on an exchange.
femtotube: what went wrong with my /ignore ? I still see this idiots posts.
BTC-Mining: Yes, although is location changed a few times.
femtotube: and what is this ass-hat nefarios real name?
____Atlas_____: With this sufficiently answered, will change economics as we know it.
____Atlas_____: Here lies the answer to the Resourced-Based Economy
____Atlas_____: I offered that until you got pissy
femtotube: anyone has nefario's tel number and the address?
____Atlas_____: Until some trucker comes to clean me off with his 10 gallon piss
____Atlas_____: And I rot there
____Atlas_____: He tries to have Jose do it. Jose is like no fuck you.
____Atlas_____: Then when the janitor comes to clean me up: He goes fuck no.
____Atlas_____: ...with a hint of ethanol like taint from Taco Bell.
____Atlas_____: I rather be the kind of free floater on a public urinal that got there mysteriously...
BTC-Mining: But you know, asset issuer can probably act as escrows for shares transfer.
BTC-Mining: Hope you didn't have too much and too many different kind of assets femtotube then.
BTC-Mining: or... someone is just angry that his money is... gone