log☇︎
⏐︎ 38161
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004968 = 0.2484 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.002982 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 27 @ 0.0267 = 0.7209 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7735 @ 0.00087742 = 6.7868 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9387 @ 0.000877 = 8.2324 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1650 @ 0.00087474 = 1.4433 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.7 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BFMINES] 1 @ 0.0024 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 601 @ 0.002693 = 1.6185 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BFMINES] 1 @ 0.002 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BFMINES] 1 @ 0.001133 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BFMINES] 1 @ 0.001102 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 5 @ 0.1963 = 0.9815 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 1 @ 0.103 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0273 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.002982 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.002982 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 649 @ 0.00299 = 1.9405 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4371 @ 0.00087288 = 3.8154 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5532 @ 0.00087081 = 4.8173 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 40 @ 0.00299 = 0.1196 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 10 @ 0.0035 = 0.035 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 62 @ 0.0273 = 1.6926 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 7 @ 0.0248 = 0.1736 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.02475 = 0.0495 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 25 @ 0.0247 = 0.6175 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 27 @ 0.0246 = 0.6642 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 18 @ 0.0272 = 0.4896 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BFMINES] 1 @ 0.001235 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.666 = 5.332 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 4 @ 2.666 = 10.664 BTC [-]
jborkl: mircea_popescu ping
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 8 @ 0.0273 = 0.2184 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6427 @ 0.00087281 = 5.6095 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 247 @ 0.003589 = 0.8865 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 300 @ 0.00359 = 1.077 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 291 @ 0.003595 = 1.0461 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 249 @ 0.003596 = 0.8954 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 291 @ 0.003596 = 1.0464 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 235 @ 0.003598 = 0.8455 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.718 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 85 @ 0.0273 = 2.3205 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.004915 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.002976 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1100 @ 0.002741 = 3.0151 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 127 @ 0.01598 = 2.0295 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1578 @ 0.0008738 = 1.3789 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6072 @ 0.0008751 = 5.3136 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.715 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0273 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.716 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.716 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 225 @ 0.0124 = 2.79 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 22 @ 0.002961 = 0.0651 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 80 @ 0.00345 = 0.276 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.002948 = 0.5896 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2678 @ 0.0008751 = 2.3435 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8197 @ 0.0008792 = 7.2068 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3 @ 0.00294 = 0.0088 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.002945 = 0.0059 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 2 @ 0.6 = 1.2 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.02599 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 1 @ 0.0149 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 2 @ 0.202 = 0.404 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 2 @ 0.2023 = 0.4046 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 13 @ 0.0035 = 0.0455 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [HOSTED-MINING] 1 @ 0.002798 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.68 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02674 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 4 @ 0.02673 = 0.1069 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 30 @ 0.0267 = 0.801 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02661 = 0.0532 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.0266 = 0.266 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0266 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02729 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [HOSTED-MINING] 20 @ 0.00264 = 0.0528 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02728 = 0.0546 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 13 @ 0.02729 = 0.3548 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.002895 = 0.579 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.719 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02729 = 0.0546 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 206 @ 0.002891 = 0.5955 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.002891 = 0.0578 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 576 @ 0.00289 = 1.6646 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1000 @ 0.0047 = 4.7 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.002889 = 0.0578 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.002892 = 0.0578 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.002893 = 0.0579 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 60 @ 0.004769 = 0.2861 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 410 @ 0.004769 = 1.9553 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.02598 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 4 @ 0.02599 = 0.104 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 8 @ 0.103 = 0.824 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 1 @ 0.103 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 20 @ 0.102 = 2.04 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 15 @ 0.102 = 1.53 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 12 @ 0.1011 = 1.2132 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 30 @ 0.101 = 3.03 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 9 @ 0.1002 = 0.9018 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 20 @ 0.1002 = 2.004 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 102 @ 0.00292 = 0.2978 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 102 @ 0.002921 = 0.2979 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003049 = 0.061 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 126 @ 0.003049 = 0.3842 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 102 @ 0.002919 = 0.2977 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.7 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 470 @ 0.004752 = 2.2334 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.004651 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.7 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 558 @ 0.004741 = 2.6455 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 558 @ 0.004742 = 2.646 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 25 @ 0.00475 = 0.1188 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004751 = 0.2376 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [CRYPTO-TRADE] 1 @ 0.1981 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.7 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.002981 = 0.0298 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 180 @ 0.01258 = 2.2644 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.027 = 0.054 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 34 @ 0.0035 = 0.119 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 7 @ 0.01598 = 0.1119 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.027 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.002849 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 20 @ 0.002085 = 0.0417 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 7 @ 0.0035 = 0.0245 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 19 @ 0.00289 = 0.0549 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 22 @ 0.01598 = 0.3516 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.719 = 5.438 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.719 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.002944 = 0.5888 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 72 @ 0.01598 = 1.1506 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 22 @ 0.0035 = 0.077 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4400 @ 0.0008792 = 3.8685 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.027 = 0.081 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [KENILWORTH] 2 @ 0.001799 = 0.0036 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [KENILWORTH] 775 @ 0.0018 = 1.395 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 5 @ 0.01598 = 0.0799 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.0259 = 0.0518 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 5 @ 0.0035 = 0.0175 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 61 @ 0.027 = 1.647 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3 @ 0.002994 = 0.009 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.02602 = 0.0781 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.027 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 29 @ 0.002899 = 0.0841 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4073 @ 0.00087281 = 3.555 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9427 @ 0.00087159 = 8.2165 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.72 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 11 @ 0.02602 = 0.2862 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 6 @ 0.02601 = 0.1561 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5 @ 0.002858 = 0.0143 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.002857 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.002856 = 0.0571 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3 @ 0.002855 = 0.0086 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 57 @ 0.002855 = 0.1627 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 142 @ 0.002854 = 0.4053 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.002852 = 0.2852 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 90 @ 0.002841 = 0.2557 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.00284 = 0.71 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.002838 = 0.7095 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 152 @ 0.002838 = 0.4314 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-BOND] 303 @ 0.009995 = 3.0285 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.002841 = 0.7103 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.002841 = 0.0568 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.00284 = 0.142 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-BOND] 86 @ 0.009995 = 0.8596 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.02625 = 0.525 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 48 @ 0.02625 = 1.26 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.02602 = 0.2602 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 15 @ 0.026 = 0.39 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 34 @ 0.026 = 0.884 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0258 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 7 @ 0.02573 = 0.1801 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.02572 = 0.0772 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 4 @ 0.0257 = 0.1028 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0257 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 9 @ 0.0257 = 0.2313 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.0257 = 0.514 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02561 = 0.0512 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0256 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.0256 = 0.256 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02556 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02556 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.02555 = 0.1278 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02555 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 32 @ 0.02552 = 0.8166 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.025945 = 0.0519 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.002895 = 0.579 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 100 @ 0.0007982 = 0.0798 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 2 @ 0.0007972 = 0.0016 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.00079 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.00076 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.000755 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 25 @ 0.000755 = 0.0189 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 17 @ 0.0007521 = 0.0128 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02554 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 14 @ 0.02552 = 0.3573 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.02551 = 0.2551 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 6 @ 0.02551 = 0.1531 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 145 @ 0.002976 = 0.4315 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 38 @ 0.002972 = 0.1129 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.002969 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 15 @ 0.002964 = 0.0445 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.027 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 18 @ 0.02727 = 0.4909 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.0271 = 0.1355 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 6 @ 0.1914 = 1.1484 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.1915 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004934 = 0.2467 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004935 = 0.2468 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.02709 = 0.1355 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 360 @ 0.002953 = 1.0631 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 360 @ 0.002954 = 1.0634 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PAJKA.BOND] 1 @ 0.019 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 278 @ 0.002952 = 0.8207 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 230 @ 0.002954 = 0.6794 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 360 @ 0.002955 = 1.0638 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 233 @ 0.004954 = 1.1543 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 467 @ 0.004955 = 2.314 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.0271 = 0.1355 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 2 @ 0.00365 = 0.0073 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 57 @ 0.02727 = 1.5544 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: http://bitbet.us/bet/521/labcoins-own-130nm-design-sample-chips-will-be/
ozbot: BitBet - Labcoins own 130nm design sample chips will be received by testers by 12TH SEPT 2013
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 35 @ 0.004953 = 0.1734 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: scamlab about 16:1 against atm, so if any of those fake trades want to take part in some real action...
mircea_popescu: one btc could yield 500% once they deliver.
Diablo-D3: you mean 1 btc could yield 5
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 15 @ 0.004953 = 0.0743 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.004999 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3 @ 0.005 = 0.015 BTC [+]
Duffer1: that is 500% :P
Diablo-D3: 500% is a common way of writing scams
Diablo-D3: it makes people think its a big number
mircea_popescu: hm?
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 5 @ 0.193 = 0.965 BTC [+]
Diablo-D3: oh, the fag still has me on ignore
Diablo-D3: nm
Diablo-D3: what a scammer
mircea_popescu: !ticker btctc labcoin
assbot: [BTCT:LABCOIN] 1D: 0.001879 / 0.00289 / 0.003798 (1190279 shares, 3445.1 BTC), 7D: 0.001879 / 0.00298 / 0.003867 (3669036 shares, 10919.1 BTC), 30D: 0.001 / 0.00183 / 0.0044 (19700799 shares, 36032.3 BTC)
mircea_popescu: preeety lulzy.
Duffer1: oh mircea_popescu you have Diablo-D3 on ignore :P
mircea_popescu: well... it's a privilege not a right >D
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.002953 = 0.0295 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.002954 = 0.0591 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.002956 = 0.1478 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.002957 = 0.2957 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 132 @ 0.003024 = 0.3992 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003028 = 3.028 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 807 @ 0.003029 = 2.4444 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 631 @ 0.00303 = 1.9119 BTC [+]
Duffer1: i think labcoin will have their chips by the stated date, but the bitbet resolve would be hard "at least 5 actual credible forum members (PR outlets and known shills specifically excluded) that credibly show their sample ASIC chip working to specification."
mircea_popescu: why's that hard ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 176 @ 0.00302 = 0.5315 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 132 @ 0.003028 = 0.3997 BTC [+]
zoinky: do you know if they are gonna join a pool to mine or attempt solo?
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 92 @ 0.003028 = 0.2786 BTC [+]
Duffer1: samples would have to be sent to credible forum persons within 14 days, i haven't read anything saying they plan to do that
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.6 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: right.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.025945 = 0.0519 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: it is indeed very hard to send imaginary miners to actual people.
mircea_popescu: butr anyway, i'm off. take care all.
Duffer1: hehe
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDSTM] 1 @ 0.00449 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 2 @ 0.00119887 = 0.0024 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5 @ 0.002852 = 0.0143 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.002851 = 0.057 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 30 @ 0.002844 = 0.0853 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 45 @ 0.002843 = 0.1279 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 90 @ 0.027 = 2.43 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 17 @ 0.027 = 0.459 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 15 @ 0.003031 = 0.0455 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003032 = 0.0606 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.003034 = 0.0303 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.003096 = 0.774 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.003097 = 0.7743 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003112 = 0.9336 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 60 @ 0.003112 = 0.1867 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003113 = 0.6226 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003115 = 0.3115 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003116 = 0.3116 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003117 = 0.3117 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 484 @ 0.003139 = 1.5193 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 483 @ 0.00314 = 1.5166 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.00314 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 435 @ 0.003187 = 1.3863 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.003188 = 0.4782 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 275 @ 0.00319 = 0.8773 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.00319 = 0.0319 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5654 @ 0.003192 = 18.0476 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3500 @ 0.003193 = 11.1755 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2154 @ 0.003195 = 6.882 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2002 @ 0.003199 = 6.4044 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.0032 = 3.2 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0032 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 577 @ 0.00324 = 1.8695 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003241 = 3.241 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 800 @ 0.003249 = 2.5992 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 689 @ 0.00325 = 2.2393 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003288 = 0.6576 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0033 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.721 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.721 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 8 @ 0.00365 = 0.0292 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 74 @ 0.00365 = 0.2701 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 3 @ 0.00365 = 0.011 BTC [+]
VanCleef: wonder if he gives a fuck about looking after other peoples money
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 1 @ 0.01245 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 76 @ 0.00365 = 0.2774 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDSTM] 1 @ 0.00449 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 6 @ 0.003209 = 0.0193 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0276 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 16 @ 0.02776 = 0.4442 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.796 = 5.592 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.796 = 5.592 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 46 @ 0.003034 = 0.1396 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 300 @ 0.00365 = 1.095 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.02594 = 0.2594 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 50 @ 0.02593 = 1.2965 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 6 @ 0.02592 = 0.1555 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 28 @ 0.02591 = 0.7255 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 6 @ 0.0259 = 0.1554 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0258 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.02576 = 0.5152 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 100 @ 0.02575 = 2.575 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02571 = 0.0514 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.0257 = 0.257 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02554 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8800 @ 0.0008741 = 7.6921 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.706 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 82 @ 0.002551 = 0.2092 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 175 @ 0.01598 = 2.7965 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.00476 = 0.238 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.004759 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2359 @ 0.004758 = 11.2241 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 20 @ 0.004711 = 0.0942 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 80 @ 0.00471 = 0.3768 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 375 @ 0.004701 = 1.7629 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1500 @ 0.0047 = 7.05 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 5 @ 0.025945 = 0.1297 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.788 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02699 = 0.054 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02699 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 1 @ 0.0036 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02758 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 15 @ 0.003197 = 0.048 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.0032 = 0.48 BTC [+]
VanCleef: i dont think coinflow is updating in real time atm
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4 @ 0.00321 = 0.0128 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 45 @ 0.00325 = 0.1463 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 59 @ 0.003286 = 0.1939 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 255 @ 0.003287 = 0.8382 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 547 @ 0.003288 = 1.7985 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 725 @ 0.003289 = 2.3845 BTC [+]
VanCleef: re live trades
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.783 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.025945 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 25 @ 0.026 = 0.65 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 27 @ 0.0261 = 0.7047 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 22 @ 0.0264 = 0.5808 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 15 @ 0.0267 = 0.4005 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 20 @ 0.026799 = 0.536 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 25 @ 0.0268499 = 0.6712 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 21 @ 0.02685 = 0.5639 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 861 @ 0.00087793 = 0.7559 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 636 @ 0.002269 = 1.4431 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 20 @ 0.00227 = 0.0454 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 400 @ 0.00228 = 0.912 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.00468 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 7 @ 0.004679 = 0.0328 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 25 @ 0.004658 = 0.1165 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 57 @ 0.004657 = 0.2654 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.794 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.794 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.795 = 5.59 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.797 = 5.594 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 49 @ 0.02735 = 1.3402 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.798 BTC [+]
jorash: Hi, I am selling shares in a company ( http://noospheer.org ) developing efficient quantum emulation software that will theoretically outperform traditional mining software. 1BTC purchases 0.01% class A shares, selling up to 20% of total equity. Projected ROI ~20x to ~500x depending on quantum search algorithm implemented (Grover's in the former case , Gross-Pitaevskii [ http://arxiv.
jorash: org/abs/1303.0371 ] in the latter). ;)
jorash: Op to go down Q1 2014. Software to be released freeBSD open source subsequently
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 12 @ 2.79 = 33.48 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.000878 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.79 = 5.58 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 100 @ 0.000879 = 0.0879 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.79 BTC [-]
jorash: if interested, pm me please as I may be afk for your response
Duffer1: lol fuck off
dub: dammit
dub: I wanted to be the first to tell him to fuck off
jorash: Duffer1, dub: what... it's 'impossible'?
dub: you cut my lunch by a few seconds
jorash: P vs BQP is an entirely open question -- whether Turing machines can efficiently simulate universal quantum systems
dub: why do you need money up front?
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 950 @ 0.004996 = 4.7462 BTC [+]
jorash: well certainly not after...
jorash: commit theory to code, catalyze development, have a carrot for the team other than just pot of gold at the end of rainbow
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 200 @ 0.004996 = 0.9992 BTC [+]
Duffer1: fucking with other peoples money is bad business, someday you're gonna burn the wrong person and they'll be in the right situation to do something about it, just it's not even worth it man
Duffer1: so fuck off
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7400 @ 0.00087361 = 6.4647 BTC [-]
jorash: it's called venture capital
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 36 @ 0.02736 = 0.985 BTC [+]
jorash: you do your due diligence, and commit money know the risks, it's been done for centuries
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 50 @ 0.02737 = 1.3685 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 97 @ 0.02738 = 2.6559 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [KENILWORTH] 600 @ 0.0018 = 1.08 BTC [+]
Duffer1: scamming does not = venture capitalism
jorash: and you have assessed this as a scam without asking more than one question, how
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 250 @ 0.002896 = 0.724 BTC [+]
Duffer1: I'm not going to give you pointers on how to scam people better.
jorash: You understand the basis of your evaluation of this project as a scam is probably based solely on the fact that this conversation is happening over irc?
jorash: quick to judge
Duffer1: quick to judge? lol your post set off every bullshit detector in a five mile radius
Namworld: Everything in BTC is a scam until proven otherwise and even then it can turn into a scam at any moment, pretty much
jorash: That's fine but recognize a tree for the forest
Duffer1: "quantum emulator", "class A shares", "20-500x" return
Duffer1: i get chinese spam that reads exactly like your post
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.707 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.706 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.705 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.704 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.702 = 5.404 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.00499 = 0.2495 BTC [-]
Duffer1: or malaysia maybe?
jorash: Quantum emulation is required to run quantum search algorithms such as Grover's (square root speedup) and GP (constant time).. versus classical linear time as SHA-2 is currently cracked. Class A shares indicate same rights as directors in the corp (including dividend from all revenue streams, not just miner which is a sideproject). 20-500x is the return based on the efficiency of the
jorash: miner.
Duffer1: ya i'll pass
jorash: kewl
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 301 @ 0.0047 = 1.4147 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.79 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 324 @ 0.003288 = 1.0653 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 176 @ 0.003288 = 0.5787 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.003288 = 0.4932 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 48 @ 0.003289 = 0.1579 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 950 @ 0.003289 = 3.1246 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3753 @ 0.00329 = 12.3474 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 673 @ 0.003297 = 2.2189 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2055 @ 0.003298 = 6.7774 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 599 @ 0.003298 = 1.9755 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 99 @ 0.003298 = 0.3265 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5000 @ 0.003299 = 16.495 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003299 = 3.299 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.785 BTC [-]
dub: inb4 jorash is reptilia
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.716 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.715 = 5.43 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.713 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.198 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 1 @ 0.003619 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 2 @ 0.0008839 = 0.0018 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 30 @ 0.026 = 0.78 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02749 = 0.055 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 10 @ 0.65 = 6.5 BTC
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 7 @ 0.02505 = 0.1754 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 10 @ 0.025001 = 0.25 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.025 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 3 @ 0.0246 = 0.0738 BTC [-]
Duffer1: whoa peta-mine got ok'd
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 50 @ 0.02749 = 1.3745 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 78 @ 0.02451 = 1.9118 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 5 @ 0.65 = 3.25 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 750 @ 0.004801 = 3.6008 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3000 @ 0.0048 = 14.4 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 23 @ 0.0275 = 0.6325 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 2 @ 0.09999 = 0.2 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004951 = 0.2476 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 12 @ 0.004711 = 0.0565 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.00471 = 0.2355 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 14 @ 0.004661 = 0.0653 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 13 @ 0.00466 = 0.0606 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 43 @ 0.004657 = 0.2003 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 175 @ 0.004626 = 0.8096 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 700 @ 0.004625 = 3.2375 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 283 @ 0.004623 = 1.3083 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 100 @ 0.65 = 65 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.0274 = 0.548 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 12 @ 0.0274 = 0.3288 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 2 @ 0.65 = 1.3 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003299 = 3.299 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 34 @ 0.0275 = 0.935 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003299 = 1.6495 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 70 @ 0.003299 = 0.2309 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 6 @ 0.003299 = 0.0198 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7021 @ 0.00087081 = 6.114 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 13179 @ 0.00087025 = 11.469 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003299 = 0.9897 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 18 @ 0.0274 = 0.4932 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 1 @ 0.002897 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 19 @ 0.002899 = 0.0551 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 10 @ 0.65 = 6.5 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 159 @ 0.0047 = 0.7473 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.02451 = 0.049 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.0245 = 0.049 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 8 @ 0.0245 = 0.196 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 62 @ 0.004622 = 0.2866 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.0244 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 10 @ 0.0241 = 0.241 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 50 @ 0.024 = 1.2 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 10 @ 0.0237 = 0.237 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 9 @ 0.0236 = 0.2124 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 20 @ 0.0232 = 0.464 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 6 @ 0.023 = 0.138 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 40 @ 0.023 = 0.92 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 20 @ 0.0228 = 0.456 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 50 @ 0.02230002 = 1.115 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 572 @ 0.004622 = 2.6438 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 916 @ 0.004621 = 4.2328 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.0217 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003202 = 0.064 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4 @ 0.0032 = 0.0128 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 12 @ 0.65 = 7.8 BTC
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.025 = 0.05 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 8 @ 0.0217 = 0.1736 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDSTM] 10 @ 0.00402 = 0.0402 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SDSTM] 2 @ 0.00401 = 0.008 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.004894 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 13 @ 0.004893 = 0.0636 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3300 @ 0.00087261 = 2.8796 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [KENILWORTH] 2 @ 0.0018 = 0.0036 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 921 @ 0.00087025 = 0.8015 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1679 @ 0.00086993 = 1.4606 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 1925 @ 0.01598 = 30.7615 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 100 @ 0.65 = 65 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 45 @ 0.65 = 29.25 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 2 @ 0.65 = 1.3 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 2 @ 0.65 = 1.3 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.198 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.0275 = 0.055 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 13 @ 0.004626 = 0.0601 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 37 @ 0.004625 = 0.1711 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 2 @ 0.00119887 = 0.0024 BTC [-]
jurov: http://www.noospheer.org/manifesto/ at a loss of words
jurov: "delusional" doesn't quite cut it
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 419 @ 0.01598 = 6.6956 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14048 @ 0.00086993 = 12.2208 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 6 @ 0.01479 = 0.0887 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SMG] 1 @ 0.0002448 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 1 @ 0.00357 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 7 @ 0.0275 = 0.1925 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5 @ 0.003156 = 0.0158 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 4 @ 0.00357 = 0.0143 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003279 = 0.0066 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 53 @ 0.003551 = 0.1882 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 10 @ 0.003551 = 0.0355 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 356 @ 0.00351 = 1.2496 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.0275 = 0.275 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 90 @ 0.01598 = 1.4382 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.00110802 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 8 @ 0.00110801 = 0.0089 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 2 @ 0.00110801 = 0.0022 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 4 @ 0.0275 = 0.11 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 10 @ 0.00119887 = 0.012 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 10 @ 0.65 = 6.5 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 50 @ 0.65 = 32.5 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.0275 = 0.0825 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 16 @ 0.0275 = 0.44 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.0275 = 0.55 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 90 @ 0.00351 = 0.3159 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1017 @ 0.004625 = 4.7036 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.18 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 28 @ 0.01257 = 0.352 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004845 = 0.2423 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 70 @ 0.003205 = 0.2244 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 7 @ 0.65 = 4.55 BTC
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.00119887 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3 @ 0.003277 = 0.0098 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003277 = 0.0066 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 10 @ 0.65 = 6.5 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 1 @ 0.326 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 1 @ 0.325 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.0265 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 18 @ 0.65 = 11.7 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 1 @ 0.65 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 33 @ 0.01489 = 0.4914 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 11 @ 0.0149 = 0.1639 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 18 @ 0.01499 = 0.2698 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.73 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.774 = 5.548 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 3 @ 2.775 = 8.325 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 304 @ 0.003118 = 0.9479 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003117 = 0.9351 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 917 @ 0.003115 = 2.8565 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 87 @ 0.003112 = 0.2707 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 348 @ 0.003111 = 1.0826 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 75 @ 0.003108 = 0.2331 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003107 = 0.9321 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 325 @ 0.003106 = 1.0095 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 600 @ 0.003105 = 1.863 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 700 @ 0.003104 = 2.1728 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 999 @ 0.003101 = 3.0979 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1700 @ 0.003101 = 5.2717 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4000 @ 0.0031 = 12.4 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2800 @ 0.0031 = 8.68 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1643 @ 0.003033 = 4.9832 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4937 @ 0.003032 = 14.969 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1635 @ 0.003031 = 4.9557 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003005 = 0.1503 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003004 = 0.6008 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3174 @ 0.003003 = 9.5315 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.003002 = 0.4503 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003002 = 3.002 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003001 = 3.001 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10152 @ 0.003 = 30.456 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.775 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.0265 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 1 @ 0.65 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.774 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.731 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 100 @ 0.0036 = 0.36 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 6 @ 0.003614 = 0.0217 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 100 @ 0.003615 = 0.3615 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.733 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4384 @ 0.00087261 = 3.8255 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4639 @ 0.00087415 = 4.0552 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 36 @ 0.003629 = 0.1306 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 270 @ 0.003239 = 0.8745 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 50 @ 0.002896 = 0.1448 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 1 @ 0.65 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 5 @ 0.65 = 3.25 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 50 @ 0.1 = 5 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.77 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2900 @ 0.00087482 = 2.537 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 8 @ 0.004814 = 0.0385 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 15 @ 0.003629 = 0.0544 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.198 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.198 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0275 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 10 @ 0.1999 = 1.999 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 75 @ 0.00301 = 0.2258 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 303 @ 0.003007 = 0.9111 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 25 @ 0.003005 = 0.0751 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003004 = 0.3004 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 348 @ 0.003001 = 1.0443 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 394 @ 0.003 = 1.182 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003 = 3 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 10 @ 0.1999 = 1.999 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 10 @ 0.65 = 6.5 BTC
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6777 @ 0.00087482 = 5.9287 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4973 @ 0.00086993 = 4.3262 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 5 @ 0.01499 = 0.075 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LTC-ATF.B2] 1 @ 0.01042 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LTC-ATF.B2] 7 @ 0.01043 = 0.073 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 2 @ 0.2037 = 0.4074 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 1 @ 0.003628 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [KENILWORTH] 100 @ 0.0018 = 0.18 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.003188 = 0.0319 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-TRADING-PT] 2 @ 1.082 = 2.164 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 35 @ 0.003185 = 0.1115 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.025 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.731 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.731 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3 @ 0.004797 = 0.0144 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 3 @ 0.18 = 0.54 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 20 @ 0.01257 = 0.2514 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.02745 = 0.1373 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.77 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 5 @ 2.77 = 13.85 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5 @ 0.003011 = 0.0151 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.00301 = 0.0602 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 281 @ 0.003006 = 0.8447 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 141 @ 0.003004 = 0.4236 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5 @ 0.003003 = 0.015 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 561 @ 0.003003 = 1.6847 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 105 @ 0.003001 = 0.3151 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.773 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.773 = 5.546 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.18 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003147 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.774 = 5.548 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 7 @ 0.003628 = 0.0254 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 73 @ 0.0275 = 2.0075 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 4 @ 0.2037 = 0.8148 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 20 @ 0.01245 = 0.249 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.21 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 11 @ 0.2142 = 2.3562 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0275 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 9 @ 0.2143 = 1.9287 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 20 @ 0.004772 = 0.0954 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003143 = 0.0063 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 9 @ 0.0275 = 0.2475 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 1 @ 0.65 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003125 = 3.125 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 114 @ 0.003123 = 0.356 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 386 @ 0.003124 = 1.2059 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003124 = 9.372 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 114 @ 0.003122 = 0.3559 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 675 @ 0.003124 = 2.1087 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2211 @ 0.003125 = 6.9094 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1444 @ 0.003122 = 4.5082 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003123 = 0.6246 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003126 = 0.0625 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.003148 = 1.2592 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003149 = 0.6298 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3561 @ 0.003199 = 11.3916 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.0032 = 3.2 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.0032 = 3.2 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003231 = 0.6462 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003245 = 3.245 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 322 @ 0.003275 = 1.0546 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003276 = 0.9828 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003279 = 1.6395 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4 @ 0.00328 = 0.0131 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.003297 = 0.8243 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.003298 = 0.4947 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2060 @ 0.0033 = 6.798 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0033 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7285 @ 0.0033 = 24.0405 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 600 @ 0.0033 = 1.98 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 90 @ 0.003149 = 0.2834 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.0033 = 1.65 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5 @ 0.003298 = 0.0165 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 46 @ 0.004625 = 0.2128 BTC [-]
jurov: ;;later tell mircea_popescu idea for next year conference :D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_d%C3%A9jeuner_sur_l%27herbe
gribble: The operation succeeded.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1550 @ 0.00086969 = 1.348 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 428 @ 0.004624 = 1.9791 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.731 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 246 @ 0.004621 = 1.1368 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 5 @ 0.01499 = 0.075 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 19 @ 0.003296 = 0.0626 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 90 @ 0.003297 = 0.2967 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 64 @ 0.003298 = 0.2111 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 430 @ 0.003299 = 1.4186 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 197 @ 0.0033 = 0.6501 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.0033 = 0.33 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 800 @ 0.0033 = 2.64 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 11339 @ 0.0033 = 37.4187 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.003301 = 0.033 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.00338 = 0.0338 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.00475 = 0.475 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 141 @ 0.00338 = 0.4766 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 600 @ 0.003399 = 2.0394 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5000 @ 0.0012 = 6 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3 @ 0.0034 = 0.0102 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 95 @ 0.0034 = 0.323 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.00341 = 0.0341 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 53 @ 0.003426 = 0.1816 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 414 @ 0.003442 = 1.425 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 335 @ 0.003444 = 1.1537 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 855 @ 0.003444 = 2.9446 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1238 @ 0.003481 = 4.3095 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003481 = 3.481 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2762 @ 0.003481 = 9.6145 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003486 = 3.486 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1700 @ 0.003488 = 5.9296 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003488 = 1.0464 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5 @ 0.003489 = 0.0174 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 452 @ 0.003489 = 1.577 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.00349 = 0.1745 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.00349 = 0.349 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 98 @ 0.003496 = 0.3426 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003496 = 0.6992 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.728 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.727 = 5.454 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.793 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.794 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.0275 = 0.0825 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2865 @ 0.003496 = 10.016 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003497 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003499 = 0.3499 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.0035 = 7 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1615 @ 0.0035 = 5.6525 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 550 @ 0.0035 = 1.925 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 835 @ 0.0035 = 2.9225 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1665 @ 0.0035 = 5.8275 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 335 @ 0.0035 = 1.1725 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0035 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1164 @ 0.0035 = 4.074 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.0035 = 0.875 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.0035 = 0.7 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 386 @ 0.0035 = 1.351 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0035 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7 @ 0.003501 = 0.0245 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 23 @ 0.003501 = 0.0805 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003531 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003548 = 0.0071 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.00358 = 0.358 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.00358 = 3.58 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003585 = 1.7925 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1200 @ 0.003586 = 4.3032 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003587 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 6873 @ 0.003587 = 24.6535 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 60 @ 0.003579 = 0.2147 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2714 @ 0.003587 = 9.7351 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 6581 @ 0.003587 = 23.606 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2800 @ 0.003588 = 10.0464 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4000 @ 0.003597 = 14.388 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003598 = 10.794 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003599 = 10.797 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.0036 = 0.36 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0036 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.0036 = 1.8 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.0036 = 0.072 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 34 @ 0.0036 = 0.1224 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7 @ 0.0036 = 0.0252 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 15 @ 0.003603 = 0.054 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003603 = 10.809 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 90 @ 0.003603 = 0.3243 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.728 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 4 @ 2.727 = 10.908 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.725 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.723 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.721 = 5.442 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 12 @ 2.72 = 32.64 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.711 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 10 @ 2.71 = 27.1 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.701 = 5.402 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003603 = 1.0809 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003603 = 0.7206 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 35 @ 0.003603 = 0.1261 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003603 = 0.3603 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0275 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 115 @ 0.003603 = 0.4143 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 25 @ 0.003603 = 0.0901 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.0036 = 3.6 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1120 @ 0.003603 = 4.0354 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7733 @ 0.0036 = 27.8388 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.003649 = 0.9123 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003649 = 0.7298 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.00365 = 1.825 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5000 @ 0.00365 = 18.25 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3099 @ 0.00365 = 11.3114 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.00365 = 0.365 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.00366 = 3.66 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003663 = 7.326 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.003664 = 0.5496 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 14 @ 0.003664 = 0.0513 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003666 = 7.332 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.0036 = 3.6 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1500 @ 0.003666 = 5.499 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.00367 = 0.0367 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.00367 = 0.367 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 844 @ 0.003678 = 3.1042 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.701 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 1 @ 0.176 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] 8 @ 0.0033 = 0.0264 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] 45 @ 0.0033 = 0.1485 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 89 @ 0.003679 = 0.3274 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 411 @ 0.003679 = 1.5121 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 741 @ 0.003678 = 2.7254 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 9589 @ 0.003679 = 35.2779 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1800 @ 0.003688 = 6.6384 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1500 @ 0.00369 = 5.535 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4602 @ 0.003695 = 17.0044 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003696 = 3.696 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 16509 @ 0.003697 = 61.0338 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3491 @ 0.003697 = 12.9062 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004622 = 0.2311 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2838 @ 0.004621 = 13.1144 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 514 @ 0.00462 = 2.3747 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 68 @ 0.004602 = 0.3129 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 20 @ 0.004601 = 0.092 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 200 @ 0.004601 = 0.9202 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 53 @ 0.0046 = 0.2438 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 5 @ 0.004561 = 0.0228 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1800 @ 0.00456 = 8.208 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 70 @ 0.004555 = 0.3189 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1218 @ 0.004553 = 5.5456 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003698 = 7.396 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1200 @ 0.003698 = 4.4376 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4814 @ 0.003698 = 17.8022 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3025 @ 0.003698 = 11.1865 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BFMINES] 1 @ 0.001235 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LTC-ATF.B2] 1 @ 0.01031 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 25 @ 0.003699 = 0.0925 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 245 @ 0.003699 = 0.9063 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 255 @ 0.003699 = 0.9432 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003698 = 0.3698 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 8 @ 0.003699 = 0.0296 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 140 @ 0.003698 = 0.5177 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 70 @ 0.003698 = 0.2589 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 790 @ 0.003698 = 2.9214 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003698 = 7.396 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003698 = 0.3698 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.704 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 44 @ 0.003698 = 0.1627 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 256 @ 0.003698 = 0.9467 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 481 @ 0.003699 = 1.7792 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 256 @ 0.003699 = 0.9469 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3 @ 0.003699 = 0.0111 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.701 = 5.402 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 965 @ 0.003696 = 3.5666 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2997 @ 0.003698 = 11.0829 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 35 @ 0.003698 = 0.1294 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003697 = 0.3697 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 965 @ 0.003698 = 3.5686 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 4 @ 2.701 = 10.804 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.7 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 11 @ 2.7 = 29.7 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 12 @ 2.7 = 32.4 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.69 = 5.38 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.69 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1135 @ 0.003698 = 4.1972 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003697 = 0.3697 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 304 @ 0.003602 = 1.095 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3461 @ 0.0036 = 12.4596 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 4 @ 0.2001 = 0.8004 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 10 @ 0.2 = 2 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 8 @ 0.1999 = 1.5992 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 58 @ 0.003698 = 0.2145 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004751 = 0.2376 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.703 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.003699 = 1.4796 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4 @ 0.003699 = 0.0148 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 12 @ 0.0274 = 0.3288 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 85 @ 0.003603 = 0.3063 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 115 @ 0.003603 = 0.4143 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 616 @ 0.00365 = 2.2484 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.00365 = 0.0073 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 11 @ 0.0036 = 0.0396 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.687 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.672 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.671 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 5 @ 2.67 = 13.35 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.665 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.663 = 5.326 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.662 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.661 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.66 = 5.32 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 25 @ 0.004751 = 0.1188 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003599 = 0.18 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003598 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2900 @ 0.00087177 = 2.5281 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003454 = 0.6908 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.00355 = 0.71 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2300 @ 0.00355 = 8.165 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 82 @ 0.003454 = 0.2832 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2618 @ 0.003451 = 9.0347 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003598 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 2 @ 0.325 = 0.65 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1000 @ 0.00119 = 1.19 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 685 @ 0.00119887 = 0.8212 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 261 @ 0.00346 = 0.9031 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 750 @ 0.003456 = 2.592 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003455 = 10.365 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 845 @ 0.003452 = 2.9169 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 24 @ 0.003451 = 0.0828 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 35 @ 0.00119888 = 0.042 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 12 @ 0.02747 = 0.3296 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1000 @ 0.0012 = 1.2 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 250 @ 0.004554 = 1.1385 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 385 @ 0.0035 = 1.3475 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 320 @ 0.003596 = 1.1507 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] 2 @ 0.00261 = 0.0052 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 80 @ 0.004553 = 0.3642 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1500 @ 0.004553 = 6.8295 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.665 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 14 @ 0.004553 = 0.0637 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 90 @ 0.003594 = 0.3235 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 17 @ 0.003594 = 0.0611 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02673 = 0.0535 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [KENILWORTH] 1 @ 0.0018 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 8 @ 0.02674 = 0.2139 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 8 @ 0.02673 = 0.2138 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 50 @ 0.02673 = 1.3365 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02672 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.0267 = 0.534 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 17 @ 0.0267 = 0.4539 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 600 @ 0.003565 = 2.139 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 90 @ 0.003564 = 0.3208 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 500 @ 0.00351 = 1.755 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.0267 = 0.0801 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003564 = 0.3564 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 6 @ 0.02661 = 0.1597 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 33 @ 0.0266 = 0.8778 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 29 @ 0.02604 = 0.7552 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.02604 = 0.5208 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 70 @ 0.02603 = 1.8221 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 15 @ 0.02603 = 0.3905 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 40 @ 0.003628 = 0.1451 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 70 @ 0.003472 = 0.243 BTC [-]
kleeck: LOL @ Yifu's chi being damaged by his lack of product delivery. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=269950.msg3030901#msg3030901
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 17 @ 0.004554 = 0.0774 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 33 @ 0.004553 = 0.1502 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003459 = 0.0692 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 80 @ 0.003458 = 0.2766 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003498 = 0.3498 BTC [+]
kakobrekla: nah
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003458 = 0.0692 BTC [-]
kakobrekla: ngzang is the most ethical asic dealer dontyaknow
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003458 = 0.3458 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003459 BTC [+]
kleeck: DONT DAMAGE MY CHI, BRO!
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 80 @ 0.003497 = 0.2798 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 898 @ 0.003564 = 3.2005 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1378 @ 0.003565 = 4.9126 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.00358 = 0.716 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1697 @ 0.003592 = 6.0956 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] [PAID] 1.00978800 BTC to 2`019`576 shares, 50 satoshi per share
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 4 @ 0.1969 = 0.7876 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 30 @ 0.004739 = 0.1422 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.1967 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 1 @ 0.096 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.02647 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3 @ 0.00359 = 0.0108 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 1 @ 0.3762 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 437 @ 0.01598 = 6.9833 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 54 @ 0.00351 = 0.1895 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 3 @ 0.00351 = 0.0105 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 42 @ 0.0035 = 0.147 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 10 @ 0.0035 = 0.035 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 3591 @ 0.0035 = 12.5685 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 409 @ 0.0035 = 1.4315 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 3783 @ 0.0008708 = 3.2942 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 210 @ 0.00345 = 0.7245 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 22 @ 0.00345 = 0.0759 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003585 = 0.0717 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 55 @ 0.003586 = 0.1972 BTC [+]
Ogedei: http://www.labcoin.com/images/QFP44PIN.JPG
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 1 @ 0.1 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 3 @ 0.1001 = 0.3003 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 8 @ 0.004555 = 0.0364 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 34 @ 0.004554 = 0.1548 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 48 @ 0.004554 = 0.2186 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 8 @ 0.001242 = 0.0099 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 307 @ 0.002436 = 0.7479 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 250 @ 0.002435 = 0.6088 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 10 @ 0.002431 = 0.0243 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 10 @ 0.002428 = 0.0243 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 10 @ 0.0024 = 0.024 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 170 @ 0.00236 = 0.4012 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 25 @ 0.002353 = 0.0588 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 4 @ 0.002353 = 0.0094 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 250 @ 0.002352 = 0.588 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 100 @ 0.002352 = 0.2352 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 500 @ 0.00235 = 1.175 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 1 @ 0.002318 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 100 @ 0.0023 = 0.23 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 50 @ 0.00224 = 0.112 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 121 @ 0.002203 = 0.2666 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02689 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 119 @ 0.003581 = 0.4261 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1231 @ 0.003583 = 4.4107 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 437 @ 0.003499 = 1.5291 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 95 @ 0.01598 = 1.5181 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 105 @ 0.003466 = 0.3639 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003465 = 0.0693 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.003464 = 1.3856 BTC [-]
Rulother: There's one phrase that drives me nuts more than any other phrases that's being said on the forums
Rulother: "Amazing company"
Rulother: stfu already
kleeck: "Best company NA!"
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5 @ 0.003585 = 0.0179 BTC [+]
kleeck: We should start a mining company tournament bracket.
kleeck: Maybe a leader board would be more suited.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.001242 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 57 @ 0.026485 = 1.5096 BTC [+]
Ogedei: yea the threads are terrible
kleeck: Yifu: http://imgur.com/Tr8HVI6
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [SMG] 2 @ 0.0002447 = 0.0005 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003579 = 0.179 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 24 @ 0.01257 = 0.3017 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 150 @ 0.01257 = 1.8855 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 360 @ 0.01258 = 4.5288 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 2 @ 0.01258 = 0.0252 BTC [+]
Rulother: lol
Rulother: a company bracket eh?
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003572 = 0.1786 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003573 = 0.3573 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003573 = 0.1787 BTC [+]
Rulother: Soon we'll have a draft
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 66 @ 0.003499 = 0.2309 BTC [+]
Rulother: who gets ken, swede and friedcat
kleeck: I don't know, getting knocked out doesn't really work, it would have to be power rankings or something.
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 29 @ 0.00361 = 0.1047 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14500 @ 0.0008708 = 12.6266 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 14500 @ 0.0008708 = 12.6266 BTC [-]
Rulother: Total hashing power
Rulother: Burnside will be the overlord
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 27 @ 0.01258 = 0.3397 BTC [+]
gecko_x2: the CEO of Council of Forum Relations
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 10 @ 0.004717 = 0.0472 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 4 @ 0.0264888 = 0.106 BTC [+]
Rulother: of bitcoin
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 98 @ 0.000882 = 0.0864 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 2 @ 0.000882 = 0.0018 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.000882 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 6 @ 0.000883 = 0.0053 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 5 @ 0.000884 = 0.0044 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003572 = 0.0714 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 19 @ 0.003584 = 0.0681 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.001242 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.000883 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 6 @ 2.7 = 16.2 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004715 = 0.2358 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 20 @ 0.004715 = 0.0943 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 50 @ 0.02689 = 1.3445 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003501 = 0.07 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 41 @ 0.0035 = 0.1435 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 273 @ 0.003483 = 0.9509 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.68 = 5.36 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.667 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.666 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 3 @ 2.662 = 7.986 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 3 @ 2.66 = 7.98 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.641 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 5 @ 2.64 = 13.2 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.628 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.628 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.62 = 5.24 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.618 = 5.236 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.613 = 5.226 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 39748 @ 0.0008708 = 34.6126 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003469 = 0.1735 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7 @ 0.003468 = 0.0243 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 63 @ 0.003453 = 0.2175 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 254 @ 0.003452 = 0.8768 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.003414 = 0.8535 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003413 = 3.413 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 117 @ 0.003413 = 0.3993 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 429 @ 0.00456 = 1.9562 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2 @ 0.004554 = 0.0091 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1492 @ 0.004554 = 6.7946 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2 @ 0.004554 = 0.0091 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 209 @ 0.004554 = 0.9518 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2868 @ 0.004553 = 13.058 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.18999 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.612 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.611 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 20 @ 0.026485 = 0.5297 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 3 @ 0.026485 = 0.0795 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.02647 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 70 @ 0.00349 = 0.2443 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 9 @ 2.61 = 23.49 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.61 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.601 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 15 @ 2.6 = 39 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.6 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 9 @ 2.59 = 23.31 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.59 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 200 @ 0.004553 = 0.9106 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003489 = 0.1745 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3000 @ 0.004553 = 13.659 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003479 = 0.174 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 254 @ 0.003415 = 0.8674 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 177 @ 0.003412 = 0.6039 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1008 @ 0.00341 = 3.4373 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.0034 = 0.34 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003351 = 0.3351 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.00335 = 1.34 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003341 = 1.6705 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.00334 = 6.68 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003333 = 0.0067 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003331 = 1.6655 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.00333 = 6.66 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1165 @ 0.003211 = 3.7408 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3023 @ 0.00321 = 9.7038 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.59 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 4 @ 0.176 = 0.704 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 3 @ 0.1751 = 0.5253 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 2 @ 0.175 = 0.35 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 1 @ 0.175 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003225 = 3.225 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.613 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 52 @ 0.0033 = 0.1716 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 725 @ 0.003295 = 2.3889 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: motherfucker.
mircea_popescu: so overnight the hdd of my server holding my blog has died.
mircea_popescu: fsck is done, new os installed, restoring from backups atm. trilema should be back online within a few hours.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2900 @ 0.003279 = 9.5091 BTC [-]
KRS-1: a wise man is one with backups
Rulother: how many visitors do you usually get a day?
KRS-1: feed me trilema...MOAR
mircea_popescu: KRS-1 for some reason it has failed in such a manner you can't just dump a hdd in the raid hotswap and repropagate
mircea_popescu: which meh
mircea_popescu: Rulother it varies considerably, a few thousand at the low end
Rulother: Nice
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003265 = 0.1633 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: anyway, jurov : http://trilema.com/2013/art-over-time-a-graph-of-progress/ for when it's back.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003264 = 0.1632 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 73 @ 0.003265 = 0.2383 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.649 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 15 @ 0.003265 = 0.049 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 115 @ 0.003266 = 0.3756 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.649 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 4 @ 0.00361 = 0.0144 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 60 @ 0.003265 = 0.1959 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 56 @ 0.003267 = 0.183 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 29 @ 0.003268 = 0.0948 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 56 @ 0.003268 = 0.183 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02655 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4 @ 0.003428 = 0.0137 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [CB.IDIFF-E] 10 @ 0.029 = 0.29 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4 @ 0.003428 = 0.0137 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003476 = 0.0695 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1878 @ 0.0035 = 6.573 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 70 @ 0.00355 = 0.2485 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003555 = 3.555 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 970 @ 0.00358 = 3.4726 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1635 @ 0.003586 = 5.8631 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003587 = 3.587 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.00359 = 1.795 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 851 @ 0.003592 = 3.0568 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003597 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 850 @ 0.003597 = 3.0575 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0036 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 860 @ 0.0036 = 3.096 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.0036 = 3.6 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 198 @ 0.0036 = 0.7128 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.649 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 132 @ 0.003426 = 0.4522 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 198 @ 0.003427 = 0.6785 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.585 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.18999 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02655 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 22 @ 0.0261 = 0.5742 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 67 @ 0.1001 = 6.7067 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.02604 = 0.0781 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-BOND] 4 @ 0.01 = 0.04 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 30 @ 0.02603 = 0.7809 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 312 @ 0.003566 = 1.1126 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 156 @ 0.003567 = 0.5565 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 120 @ 0.003569 = 0.4283 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 60 @ 0.00357 = 0.2142 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 860 @ 0.003584 = 3.0822 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 430 @ 0.003585 = 1.5416 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 199 @ 0.003589 = 0.7142 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1895 @ 0.00359 = 6.8031 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1500 @ 0.003598 = 5.397 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003599 = 3.599 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003599 = 7.198 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 850 @ 0.00364 = 3.094 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003643 = 0.7286 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 850 @ 0.003644 = 3.0974 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.003645 = 0.5468 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 84 @ 0.003645 = 0.3062 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 3 @ 0.0259 = 0.0777 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 10 @ 0.0259 = 0.259 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 65 @ 0.01258 = 0.8177 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 156 @ 0.00362 = 0.5647 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 1 @ 0.1004 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 34 @ 0.1005 = 3.417 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.00362 = 3.62 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 2 @ 0.1935 = 0.387 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 344 @ 0.00362 = 1.2453 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 10 @ 0.0259 = 0.259 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 140 @ 0.003618 = 0.5065 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 360 @ 0.00362 = 1.3032 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 362 @ 0.003621 = 1.3108 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 199 @ 0.003645 = 0.7254 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0261 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 9 @ 0.02609 = 0.2348 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 2 @ 0.195 = 0.39 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 7 @ 0.1932 = 1.3524 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 15 @ 0.02609 = 0.3914 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02608 = 0.0522 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 30 @ 0.02603 = 0.7809 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.026 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.026 = 0.52 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.026 = 0.26 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.026 = 0.078 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0036 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.00355 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 140 @ 0.00368 = 0.5152 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003682 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003682 = 3.682 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003692 = 0.3692 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 159 @ 0.003693 = 0.5872 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1087 @ 0.004553 = 4.9491 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 5 @ 0.00455 = 0.0228 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 200 @ 0.004506 = 0.9012 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 300 @ 0.004503 = 1.3509 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2 @ 0.0045 = 0.009 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 300 @ 0.004403 = 1.3209 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 500 @ 0.004353 = 2.1765 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1750 @ 0.00435 = 7.6125 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 120 @ 0.00433 = 0.5196 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 508 @ 0.004329 = 2.1991 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 350 @ 0.004304 = 1.5064 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 250 @ 0.004302 = 1.0755 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1440 @ 0.004302 = 6.1949 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2000 @ 0.0043 = 8.6 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.0042 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.0042 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 189 @ 0.0042 = 0.7938 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1000 @ 0.0042 = 4.2 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 30 @ 0.00415 = 0.1245 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2000 @ 0.004142 = 8.284 BTC [-]
matuszed: Vrooom
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MG] 10000 @ 0.00019 = 1.9 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MG] 3986 @ 0.00018001 = 0.7175 BTC [-]
kleeck: Well. I might just get to buy at a discount ON btct.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MG] 6700 @ 0.00018 = 1.206 BTC [-]
kleeck: Deal.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MG] 7314 @ 0.000171 = 1.2507 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 450 @ 0.003692 = 1.6614 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 25 @ 0.101 = 2.525 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 40 @ 0.026 = 1.04 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 100 @ 0.0002311 = 0.0231 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 42 @ 0.0002311 = 0.0097 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 406 @ 0.0002301 = 0.0934 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 10 @ 0.000228 = 0.0023 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 10 @ 0.000227 = 0.0023 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 200 @ 0.0002253 = 0.0451 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 45 @ 0.0002251 = 0.0101 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 1000 @ 0.000225 = 0.225 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 330 @ 0.000224 = 0.0739 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 100 @ 0.000223 = 0.0223 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 100 @ 0.000222 = 0.0222 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 197 @ 0.0002152 = 0.0424 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 1000 @ 0.0002151 = 0.2151 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 2809 @ 0.000215 = 0.6039 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.613 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 111 @ 0.00369 = 0.4096 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.003692 = 1.4768 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 40 @ 0.00416 = 0.1664 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.00415 = 0.2075 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.00413 = 0.413 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 48 @ 0.004111 = 0.1973 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 70 @ 0.004106 = 0.2874 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3610 @ 0.004105 = 14.8191 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.004101 = 0.4101 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 22 @ 0.0041 = 0.0902 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.0041 = 0.41 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.0041 = 0.41 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 250 @ 0.0041 = 1.025 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1360 @ 0.0041 = 5.576 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 200 @ 0.004095 = 0.819 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 350 @ 0.004011 = 1.4039 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.00401 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 25 @ 0.00401 = 0.1003 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 150 @ 0.004006 = 0.6009 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 5000 @ 0.004005 = 20.025 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 100 @ 0.0012419 = 0.1242 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 30 @ 0.004004 = 0.1201 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.004 = 0.4 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 25 @ 0.004 = 0.1 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.004 = 0.4 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1200 @ 0.004 = 4.8 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2 @ 0.004 = 0.008 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 70 @ 0.0039 = 0.273 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 572 @ 0.003896 = 2.2285 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1000 @ 0.00385 = 3.85 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1000 @ 0.0038 = 3.8 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2500 @ 0.0038 = 9.5 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 30 @ 0.004005 = 0.1202 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 68 @ 0.026 = 1.768 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 45 @ 0.0012419 = 0.0559 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 4 @ 0.0012419 = 0.005 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 22 @ 0.026 = 0.572 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.723 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02599 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.02595 = 0.1298 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02581 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 8 @ 0.0258 = 0.2064 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0257 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02562 = 0.0512 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0256 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 7 @ 0.02558 = 0.1791 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 36 @ 0.02557 = 0.9205 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02556 = 0.0511 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02556 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003513 = 0.7026 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.722 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.6 = 5.2 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 71 @ 0.003513 = 0.2494 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 33 @ 0.003513 = 0.1159 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 6 @ 0.0036 = 0.0216 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.02659 = 0.0798 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 4 @ 0.1997 = 0.7988 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 1 @ 0.0027 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 1 @ 0.002399 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 5 @ 0.00235 = 0.0118 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 206 @ 0.002301 = 0.474 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 25 @ 0.0007579 = 0.0189 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 6 @ 0.0036 = 0.0216 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.61 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3 @ 0.003999 = 0.012 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 27 @ 0.003999 = 0.108 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3 @ 0.003999 = 0.012 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 30 @ 0.004 = 0.12 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 62 @ 0.003524 = 0.2185 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 251 @ 0.003523 = 0.8843 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 104 @ 0.003521 = 0.3662 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 418 @ 0.00352 = 1.4714 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 518 @ 0.003513 = 1.8197 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 75 @ 0.003512 = 0.2634 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.00351 = 7.02 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 12 @ 0.003445 = 0.0413 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003444 = 0.1722 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 437 @ 0.003436 = 1.5015 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1750 @ 0.003435 = 6.0113 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 75 @ 0.003411 = 0.2558 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.00341 = 1.023 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 207 @ 0.003408 = 0.7055 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 20 @ 0.025 = 0.5 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 17 @ 0.02556 = 0.4345 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 25 @ 0.02556 = 0.639 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 50 @ 0.02555 = 1.2775 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 15 @ 0.02553 = 0.383 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.02553 = 0.5106 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 25 @ 0.02552 = 0.638 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 9 @ 0.02551 = 0.2296 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 6 @ 0.02551 = 0.1531 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 51 @ 0.0255 = 1.3005 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 63 @ 0.0255 = 1.6065 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.0255 = 0.51 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.0255 = 0.255 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.0255 = 0.255 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0254 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.0254 = 0.254 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 78 @ 0.02521 = 1.9664 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02521 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 436 @ 0.0252 = 10.9872 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 8 @ 0.0252 = 0.2016 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 300 @ 0.0251 = 7.53 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.02505 = 0.1253 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.02501 = 0.2501 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.025 = 0.125 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 4 @ 0.025 = 0.1 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 600 @ 0.025 = 15 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 17 @ 0.025 = 0.425 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 22 @ 0.025 = 0.55 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 56 @ 0.025 = 1.4 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 30 @ 0.025 = 0.75 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 30 @ 0.025 = 0.75 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.599 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 3 @ 2.6 = 7.8 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003555 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 32550 @ 0.00087177 = 28.3761 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 864 @ 0.00087421 = 0.7553 BTC [+]
thestringpuller: mircea_popescu hey this is unprecedented
thestringpuller: trilema is down
thestringpuller: but I guess you already know that
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0035 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: say it aint so
thestringpuller: give it a try ThickAsThieves may just be from my location
deadweasel: is down
mod6: scroll up
thestringpuller: i see mod6
thestringpuller: thanks for that
thestringpuller: mr. lurker
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.584 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 102 @ 0.003497 = 0.3567 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 232 @ 0.00341 = 0.7911 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1985 @ 0.003407 = 6.7629 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 632 @ 0.003401 = 2.1494 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 4 @ 0.0036 = 0.0144 BTC [-]
kleeck: Reposting - Yifu:http://imgur.com/Tr8HVI6
kakobrekla: lmao
kleeck: I'd like to thank ArcticWolf for the .gif idea. Also Yifu, for the fuckin' best quote I've read in a long time.
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 1 @ 0.3251 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 1 @ 0.3251 BTC [-]
mod6: thestringpuller: :D
mod6: ive been in perl mod hell all night.
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 500 @ 0.01258 = 6.29 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller lol it's in the log
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/#269652
ozbot: #bitcoin-assets log
assbot: [BTCTC] [COGNITIVE] 3 @ 0.325 = 0.975 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: lol @gif
mod6: i added this part to the bot that /should/ tweet the MPEx part of assbots stream. But i keep hitting these snags with not found modules. mainly because the host it runs on doesn't allow me to run CPAN. So I have to drop everything in by hand lol.
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 74 @ 0.01258 = 0.9309 BTC [+]
thestringpuller: i have a question
thestringpuller: why are you writing anything in perl?
mircea_popescu: mod6 hopefully twitter doesn't go all bonkers again.
mod6: well, i registered this app in their OAuth thing and have keys and everything. should be ok.
thestringpuller: you can only tween 400 things from client within an hour
thestringpuller: or it might be 200
thestringpuller: tweet*
mircea_popescu: or it might be "less than 200 but we won't twell you how many"
mod6: ahh
mircea_popescu: "and yes we advertise ourselves as this exact service"
pankkake: also can't tweet the same thing twice in a row
thestringpuller: they have API restrictions that refresh every hour
thestringpuller: to prevent le spammors
mircea_popescu: pankkake i had added a random number at end for the case where people do one of thiose
pankkake: haha
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 200 @ 0.01259 = 2.518 BTC [+]
mod6: well, i miss the @MPEx1 feed, so i figure i'd play with my own. if i break the thing, whatever.
mircea_popescu: well the alternative is missing trades. wtf am i to do.
mod6: that was a pretty good idea. thought about re-adding it
mod6: to the end of the tweets. we'll see how it goes. first i gotta get the damn PM problem wrapped.
mod6: and thestringpuller: because its what i know. and i kinda hate python
mircea_popescu: just as long as its not rubyjava
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.025 = 0.05 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 32 @ 0.025 = 0.8 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 20 @ 0.025 = 0.5 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.025 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 37 @ 0.02488 = 0.9206 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 25 @ 0.01259 = 0.3148 BTC [+]
mod6: eek yah.
mircea_popescu: in other news : someone spent 1.3billion isk to buy 2 shares of 1Bitcoin, the eve corp
mircea_popescu: they are backed by 100 s.mpoe shares each, and so do we have the first isk -> btc asset trade ?
ThickAsThieves: are you gonna give up bitcoin for Eve?
mircea_popescu: i think they're just trying to protect from iskflation.
ThickAsThieves: ;;nethash
gribble: 593536.083496
ThickAsThieves: ;;bcstats
gribble: Current Blocks: 254870 | Current Difficulty: 6.5750060149084814E7 | Next Difficulty At Block: 256031 | Next Difficulty In: 1161 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 5 days, 21 hours, 26 minutes, and 29 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 77441634.6326 | Estimated Percent Change: 17.78185
ThickAsThieves: ;;estimate
gribble: Next difficulty estimate | 77441634.6326 based on data since last change | 82914767.813 based on data for last three days
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves and no im not gonna give up bitcoin wtf nonsense is that.
ThickAsThieves: phew
ThickAsThieves: :)
mod6: heheh
thestringpuller: .d
ozbot: 65750060.14908 | Next Diff in 1161 blocks | Estimated Change: 17.4921% in 6d 15h 37m 13s
mircea_popescu: lol
thestringpuller: LOL it jumped 5% overnight?
daybyter: mircea_popescu: java rules...
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 9 @ 0.0036 = 0.0324 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller bitfury deliveries!~
mircea_popescu: daybyter ya it rules a dedicated circle in hell.
thestringpuller: I wanna read your asicminer article
mircea_popescu: see ? you didn;'t read it five times each day, now SUFFAR!
thestringpuller: that's something the girl would say
thestringpuller: Hello girl
thestringpuller: lol
mircea_popescu: you could have handwritten it on waistbands and daisy petals
mircea_popescu: to have in a dark time such as this
thestringpuller: doesn't that violate the paywall?
thestringpuller: printing out trilema articles?
thestringpuller: I might as well print out best of trilema, and sell it at the n00b conventions :P
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.17000001 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 1 @ 0.17000001 BTC [-]
gecko_x2: what is the difference between a trilema and a dilema?
mircea_popescu: lol
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 6 @ 0.17 = 1.02 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: gecko_x2 trilema has 50% moar.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 8 @ 0.16 = 1.28 BTC [-]
thestringpuller: a dilema is a normal gun duel
gecko_x2: don't you mean 33.33%?
thestringpuller: a trilema is a mexican stand off
mircea_popescu: i don't, no.
gecko_x2: ok
thestringpuller: ;;google mexican standoff
gribble: Mexican standoff - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_standoff>; Urban Dictionary: mexican standoff: <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mexican%20standoff>; Mexican standoff - Wiktionary: <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Mexican_standoff>
gecko_x2: copy that.
VanCleef: so uh, is the girl real?
mod6: this is like a meme now
mircea_popescu: i will be getting this in like 2018 too won't i
mircea_popescu: she'll be all old and shrively by then and live entirely off the fame
thestringpuller: in 2018?
thestringpuller: is like 50 now?
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 5 @ 0.00124189 = 0.0062 BTC [-]
VanCleef: you can tell me
VanCleef: i'm good either way, not judging
mircea_popescu: well these days girls age fast.
mircea_popescu: 30+ one's like a ruin.
VanCleef: you're not like having a chelsea manning moment or something are you?
thestringpuller: mircea_popescu: are you kidding? I would tap a 35 year old over a 20 year old any day of the week.
mircea_popescu: dude, it's a sad statement on the castration level in the west that people think someone's going transsexual is about as likely as a female existing.
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller yeah i'm kidding
VanCleef: just asking
mircea_popescu: VanCleef yes, yes, the girl is real.
mircea_popescu: Chelsea Elizabeth Manning (born Bradley Edward Manning, December 17, 1987) dude... lmao.
VanCleef: i thought maybe it was like an inside joke like amethyst
mircea_popescu: it is an inside joke like amethyst, but the other way around
mircea_popescu: (ie, forum ppls keep assuming she's me)
mircea_popescu: they keep asuming scams are real and reality fake. it's a disease.
thestringpuller: the funny thing mircea_popescu is people believe you exists on the forums, even though you never post there
thestringpuller: but because the girl doesn't get on IRC and only exists on the forums she's "not real"
thestringpuller: oh and that she's a girl
mircea_popescu: actually i saw some theorizing that it's really a girl all along, and i'm just the fake irc personality thereof.
VanCleef: i'm thinking about doing a ipo to raise funds to install female toilets at bitcoin conventions, really good investment
mircea_popescu: cause you could return them untouched after the convention for 100% money back ?
Graet: pay per view VanCleef ?
mircea_popescu: lol
VanCleef: what a waste heh
mircea_popescu: it should be pay per gram.
mircea_popescu: im not paying to watch 200lbs violently & odorously expell a small child in a brown color scheme
VanCleef: lol
thestringpuller: now I can't finish my breakfast
mircea_popescu: yw.
VanCleef: oh jesus
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 28 @ 0.0036 = 0.1008 BTC [-]
VanCleef: i'm still laughing
VanCleef: classic line
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.025 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.025 = 0.075 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 50 @ 0.025 = 1.25 BTC [+]
kakobrekla: are you implying you would take it if it was free
mircea_popescu: unintentionally.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 68 @ 0.02499 = 1.6993 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: http://girls.twistys.com/preview/totm/09-2013/p01/image/12.jpg there. fake tits and dry lips to forget all about it.
VanCleef: heh looks a lil like denise richards
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 22 @ 0.02499 = 0.5498 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 350 @ 0.00354 = 1.239 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.025 = 0.25 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 24 @ 0.025 = 0.6 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: actually it's nicole aniston.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.0012 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.6 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: she's like 25, looks 40
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.00121174 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.02499 = 0.2499 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 34 @ 0.025 = 0.85 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.628 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: "Do you seriously think this company is correctly valued at twice labcoin's value? All this guy is doing is buying 3rd party mining hardware while companies are out there developing their own ASICs"
matuszed: Which company is in reference
ThickAsThieves: peta-mine or whatevs
matuszed: ooo yea
matuszed: that things a fucking joke
ThickAsThieves: i like how they are measuring jokes in increments of jokes
matuszed: haha
matuszed: thats like a 4joke
ThickAsThieves: this scam is so much less believable than that scam, therefore valuation must be lower
mircea_popescu: lol
mircea_popescu: as amusing as it may sound, it's exactly how the dysfunctional mind works.
ThickAsThieves: another intersting thingy,
mircea_popescu: i guess someone should start an ipo selling indulgences to get in Bitcoin heaven
mircea_popescu: it's what all this shit is anyway.
ThickAsThieves: Ukyo randomly pays extra on his bond/loan
ThickAsThieves: so price goes up for a day
ThickAsThieves: people buy
ThickAsThieves: then get sad
ThickAsThieves: when he pays normal again
ThickAsThieves: "What! it means I bought overprice shares yesterday Sad"
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 1 @ 0.65 BTC
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 5 @ 0.01598 = 0.0799 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: !last havelock dealco
assbot: Aren't those tins of tobacco right there behind you?
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.621 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 6 @ 0.01259 = 0.0755 BTC [+]
topace: !ticker h dealco
assbot: [HAVELOCK:DEALCO] 1D: / 0 / (0 shares, 0 BTC), 7D: / 0 / (0 shares, 0 BTC), 30D: / 0 / (0 shares, 0 BTC)
topace: :p
ThickAsThieves: :)
topace: !ticker h cfig
assbot: [HAVELOCK:CFIG] 1D: 0.16000000 / 0.18011605 / 0.19000000 (86 shares, 15.48998002 BTC), 7D: 0.12010000 / 0.15153721 / 0.24000000 (3652 shares, 553.41387312 BTC), 30D: 0.12010000 / 0.15071224 / 0.24000000 (7882 shares, 1187.91387312 BTC)
ThickAsThieves: another performance in irony for you: "You're wasting time trying to explain anything to the average 'investor' here. They simply aren't smart enough to get it, though they imagine themselves to be towering geniuses. It's better if they don't get it, anyway. Cheaper shares for those of us who do." (labcoin)
kleeck: Poetry.
mircea_popescu: lolk
mircea_popescu: i guess time to stir the pot a little.
gecko_x2: i'm a towering genius
ThickAsThieves: we all are
gecko_x2: that's fo sure
ThickAsThieves: just a matter of the view
gecko_x2: silent you little ant
gecko_x2: :D
ThickAsThieves: it's a mc escher reality
ThickAsThieves: where you get to look down on me looking down at you
gecko_x2: that's called socialism
gecko_x2: one of the most dangerous plagues mankind has ever faced
gecko_x2: the other is called inflation
ThickAsThieves: http://thefalloutgirl.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/escher-big.jpg
ThickAsThieves: that's me with the loot in the middle
Rawted: that's not loot, thats a trash bag
ThickAsThieves: it's cheap shares! shh
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 82 @ 0.003585 = 0.294 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 189 @ 0.003586 = 0.6778 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1264 @ 0.003588 = 4.5352 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 632 @ 0.003589 = 2.2682 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 75 @ 0.003595 = 0.2696 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003599 = 0.7198 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0036 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.0036 = 0.36 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.0036 = 1.08 BTC [+]
Rawted: lol
zoinky: tick tick tick
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003619 = 0.181 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003622 = 7.244 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2900 @ 0.003623 = 10.5067 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2275 @ 0.003657 = 8.3197 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 303 @ 0.00367 = 1.112 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1081 @ 0.003671 = 3.9684 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003674 = 3.674 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003674 = 0.3674 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003674 = 11.022 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003675 = 0.735 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5692 @ 0.003675 = 20.9181 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 6000 @ 0.003675 = 22.05 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 100 @ 0.01259 = 1.259 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 189 @ 0.003674 = 0.6944 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003676 = 0.3676 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003677 = 0.3677 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 111 @ 0.003677 = 0.4081 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 300 @ 0.65 = 195 BTC
gecko_x2: wow lol
matuszed: Thats a big orde
matuszed: rhaha
gecko_x2: good luck with that
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 42 @ 0.65 = 27.3 BTC
gecko_x2: they only need 32000 btc more
Rawted: ;;tslb
gribble: Time since last block: 28 minutes and 13 seconds
Rawted: oops
gecko_x2: but who they gonna buy from?
matuszed: Such a 4joke
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.00403 = 0.403 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003674 = 0.1837 BTC [-]
gecko_x2: "PETA-MINE deployment is scheduled for mid December, 2013"
matuszed: Might as well be 2020
ThickAsThieves: maybe it's a typo
gecko_x2: "The core hardware for the mine will be a 28nm chip from Cointerra. These chips have outstanding specifications when it comes to power consumption and hashing power, which, in turn, means CryptX will be able to keep power and hosting costs at a minimum. What’s more, the hashing power of the Cointerra 28nm chip is +500 GH/s, which means CryptX will be able to deploy the PETA-MINE
gecko_x2: quickly and efficiently. This strategic partnership with Cointerra means CryptX will have access to future chip developments at the most competitive rates on the market."
mircea_popescu: mine-a-pet
mircea_popescu: strategic partnership with a napkin calculation.
mircea_popescu: verily strategic.
ThickAsThieves: translation: we want to short mining by reselling shorting mining
jborkl: why did they call it Pedo-mine anyway
gecko_x2: "The IPO will prove successful with the sale of at least 30,000 shares. If fewer than 30,000 shares sell within 30 days, CryptX will refund the entire IPO to shareholders. What’s more, the fact that no shares beyond those offered at IPO will ever be issued means shareholders need not fear dilution of the value of their shares."
gecko_x2: ;;calc 30000 * 0.65
gribble: 19500
gecko_x2: ;;calc 19500 * 130
gribble: 2535000
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004289 = 0.2145 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.00429 = 0.2145 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 728 @ 0.004327 = 3.1501 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 250 @ 0.004328 = 1.082 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 478 @ 0.004329 = 2.0693 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: no bother calc'ing, some private investor will surely gobble any leftovers
gecko_x2: hmm
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 7 @ 0.026 = 0.182 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 144 @ 0.003671 = 0.5286 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0261 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 56 @ 0.003673 = 0.2057 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.0261 = 0.261 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 640 @ 0.004563 = 2.9203 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 35 @ 0.004563 = 0.1597 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 2 @ 0.5612 = 1.1224 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.0258 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 2 @ 0.5611 = 1.1222 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 4 @ 0.0261 = 0.1044 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: I should start TAT.HAMBURGERS as performance art
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 222 @ 0.003602 = 0.7996 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: Hallelujah, cheap hamburgers!
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1657 @ 0.0036 = 5.9652 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: heh
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 106 @ 0.0036 = 0.3816 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 129 @ 0.003671 = 0.4736 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 8 @ 0.002989 = 0.0239 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: maybe i'm onto something
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 120 @ 0.003673 = 0.4408 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 4683 @ 0.00087421 = 4.0939 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: Trendon Shavers Acquited on First Amendment, Claims Performance Art
gecko_x2: "Yes, this mine will be using Cointerra chips that will release in mid December."
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 482 @ 0.003677 = 1.7723 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003677 = 1.8385 BTC [+]
kleeck: The $/Bite is SO much better with TAT's 76,200,,000nm burgers.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5000 @ 0.003678 = 18.39 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 357 @ 0.003679 = 1.3134 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.00369 = 7.38 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 656 @ 0.003692 = 2.422 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 650 @ 0.003694 = 2.4011 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003696 = 1.848 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003696 = 11.088 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003699 = 1.8495 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.003699 = 1.4796 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 964 @ 0.0037 = 3.5668 BTC [+]
gecko_x2: oh so they will then begin to deploy hehe
mod6: damnit
thestringpuller: ThickAsThieves: is that real?
gecko_x2: hashing maybe 2-3 months later
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7176 @ 0.0037 = 26.5512 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0037 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 70 @ 0.0037 = 0.259 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.0037 = 0.0074 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: i think bitcoins should come with a copy of Benjamin Graham's books.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 122 @ 0.0037 = 0.4514 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2500 @ 0.00371 = 9.275 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: but it already comes with a Mircea Popescu
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 9 @ 0.02525 = 0.2273 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 11500 @ 0.00371 = 42.665 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003711 = 0.3711 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.00372 = 0.372 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 138 @ 0.003744 = 0.5167 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.003749 = 0.5624 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003749 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003749 = 0.3749 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 6000 @ 0.00375 = 22.5 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.00375 = 3.75 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.00375 = 3.75 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 362 @ 0.00375 = 1.3575 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 6213 @ 0.00375 = 23.2988 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.00375 = 0.1875 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2600 @ 0.00375 = 9.75 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: well ya but graham's better.
mircea_popescu: So Lennay Kekua, T-Bone, and Amina Abdallah Arraf al Omari walk into a bar and the bartender says, “Nobody is going to get this joke.”
ThickAsThieves: !ticker h labco
assbot: [HAVELOCK:LABCO] 1D: 0.00261000 / 0.00329278 / 0.00330000 (288 shares, 0.94831930 BTC), 7D: 0.00224000 / 0.0028066 / 0.00345600 (14896 shares, 41.80709333 BTC), 30D: 0.00115000 / 0.00228134 / 0.00345600 (65067 shares, 148.43964770 BTC)
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0252 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.621 = 5.242 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003757 = 0.3757 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003788 = 3.788 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003789 = 7.578 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003799 = 0.19 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 5 @ 2.622 = 13.11 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.0038 = 0.38 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0038 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 599 @ 0.0038 = 2.2762 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 95 @ 0.003798 = 0.3608 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/29/4671692/blackberry-q10-sales-just-up-and-died-report
ozbot: BlackBerry Q10 sales have 'hit the ground and died' according to WSJ report | The Verge
ThickAsThieves: cheap shares?
mircea_popescu: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.msg3036308#msg3036308
ThickAsThieves: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23886031#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 29 @ 0.003798 = 0.1101 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1401 @ 0.0038 = 5.3238 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 42 @ 0.0038 = 0.1596 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.586 BTC [-]
ozbot: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.586 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 4 @ 2.585 = 10.34 BTC [-]
KRS-1: Blackberry with Kodak pride, falls to the wayside.
mircea_popescu: curious how long they take to cover that
ozbot: BBC News - US fast-food workers on strike over pay
assbot: [BTCTC] [CRYPTO-TRADE] 1 @ 0.2 BTC [+]
deadweasel: in other news, fat people hungry.
jborkl: They still make Blackberry?
KRS-1: just released a new one
jborkl: I have not seen one in years now
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4 @ 0.003798 = 0.0152 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 40 @ 0.003825 = 0.153 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003829 = 0.3829 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 60 @ 0.003829 = 0.2297 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: jborkl probably they buy it in africa.
ThickAsThieves: there was a huge blackberry video ad in times square when i was there
jborkl: ah, yeah I bet your are right
jborkl: you are
ThickAsThieves: i was amazed they still had the bidget
ThickAsThieves: budget*
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02511 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: bridget ? :D
jborkl: lol, we all fail at spelling
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 40 @ 0.003829 = 0.1532 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0251 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23869462
ozbot: BBC News - How one man turns annoying cold calls into cash
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 955 @ 0.00383 = 3.6577 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: "In November 2011 Lee Beaumont paid £10 plus VAT to set up his personal 0871 line - so to call him now costs 10p, from which he receives 7p."
ThickAsThieves: "The Leeds businessman told BBC Radio 4's You and Yours programme that the line had so far made £300."
mircea_popescu: ahaha scammer's response to the bitbet thing ? he doesn't bet on his own scam because "it would be dishonest"
ThickAsThieves: awesome
ThickAsThieves: feels so good it hurts
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003837 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.003843 = 1.5372 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003845 = 1.9225 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003858 = 0.7716 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 738 @ 0.003868 = 2.8546 BTC [+]
thestringpuller: mircea_popescu: is that in your link?
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 262 @ 0.003868 = 1.0134 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003869 = 1.1607 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 638 @ 0.00387 = 2.4691 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 362 @ 0.00387 = 1.4009 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 111 @ 0.003871 = 0.4297 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller "that" ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 433 @ 0.003875 = 1.6779 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.00388 = 0.388 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1650 @ 0.00388 = 6.402 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 121 @ 0.003888 = 0.4704 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1273 @ 0.003888 = 4.9494 BTC [+]
thestringpuller: nvm I see it
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 1 @ 0.01498 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 111 @ 0.003868 = 0.4293 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02503 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 1 @ 0.01594 BTC [-]
pankkake: we need a bet for active mining too
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 110 @ 0.00386 = 0.4246 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: pankkake just as soon as they get a few BTC together to make one./
mircea_popescu: you know, out of the 3498756 billion bitcoins that were traded this month.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02502 BTC [-]
jborkl: So, what is the new deal with Avalon? They are refunding chip orders?
pankkake: they have the stupidest shareholders, when I go to their threads, half of them are already ignored :p
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 24153 @ 0.00087421 = 21.1148 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 15747 @ 0.00087495 = 13.7778 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23881928
mircea_popescu: will be funnay
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 2 @ 0.002989 = 0.006 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-TRADING-PT] 1 @ 1.085 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 40 @ 0.00386 = 0.1544 BTC [-]
ozbot: BBC News - US economic growth revised upwards to 2.5%
mod6: *sigh*
ThickAsThieves: photo in article is man holding the Sorry game
ThickAsThieves: intentional?
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 2 @ 0.0008799 = 0.0018 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003875 = 11.625 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 527 @ 0.003888 = 2.049 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 700 @ 0.003888 = 2.7216 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.00389 = 1.945 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 25 @ 0.0039 = 0.0975 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0039 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.0039 = 7.8 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0039 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0039 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003911 = 1.1733 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003912 = 0.3912 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4000 @ 0.00392 = 15.68 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4300 @ 0.00393 = 16.899 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: "The terms of coinlenders have changed - there's no longer a personal guarantee on the loans. As there's no guarantee AND there's no disclosure of assets backing the deposits (and they can be used for speculation not just for safe loans) I'm not certain Coinlenders even meets our investment criteria any more." says Deprived
pankkake: so housing and investment >+10% yet the rest is much lower. totally not a bubble
mircea_popescu: in other news... https://www.google.com/search?q=the-anatomy-of-a-scam&complete=0
mircea_popescu: im #3.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 3 @ 0.0002418 = 0.0007 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: not for everyone
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 4 @ 2.586 = 10.344 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.585 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.585 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.584 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.583 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.581 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.58 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.58 = 5.16 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.565 = 5.13 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.562 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.562 = 5.124 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: google SEO is impossible to peg now
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 3 @ 0.003499 = 0.0105 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.625 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: pankkake ello sir. we here at us house proud to say we no serve bubble here. no bubble at all!
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves what do you see ?
ThickAsThieves: #7
ThickAsThieves: still pretty good tho
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 1 @ 0.01594 BTC [-]
pankkake: 3 for me. I am not logged in, when you are, it's often different
ThickAsThieves: yeah
mircea_popescu: i used to think if you use random ip w/o history of search they jsuit give you "the" results
mircea_popescu: seems not anymore.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.02512 = 0.1256 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 24 @ 0.003499 = 0.084 BTC [-]
pankkake: I use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-cookie-for-google-search/
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.1963 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 2 @ 0.002988 = 0.006 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.02512 = 0.0754 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003897 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 2 @ 0.0008797 = 0.0018 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves anyway, it's especially good because it's rare for a month-old article to compete well with year+ old articles.
ThickAsThieves: it's funny cuz trilema is obv MORE relevant to me
ThickAsThieves: yet ranks lower when google knows its me
mircea_popescu: lol ai wins
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 72 @ 0.003925 = 0.2826 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003928 = 0.7856 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 28 @ 0.003929 = 0.11 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [B.YABMC] 1 @ 0.0023 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: i wonder if the girl's post irked the scammer so now he's going to push his scamset to 5 just to prove how very wrong we all are.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003929 = 1.1787 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.003897 = 3.897 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02589 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 1 @ 0.01594 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 340 @ 0.004114 = 1.3988 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 279 @ 0.003899 = 1.0878 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 150 @ 0.003897 = 0.5846 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: is there a finance term for this specific type of manipulation? where you sell something, then use the same money to buy up your own thing and run the price up and up
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 571 @ 0.003897 = 2.2252 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 2 @ 0.0002407 = 0.0005 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 7 @ 0.00346 = 0.0242 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: Activemining and Labcoin do it so much
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 700 @ 0.00393 = 2.751 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.00393 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: ActM did sorta fade away from it when Labcoin started
ThickAsThieves: but daily you see the pump then the dump
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3743 @ 0.003929 = 14.7062 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: i guess that term is good enough
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003939 = 0.3939 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 130 @ 0.00395 = 0.5135 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.00395 = 0.1975 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.00395 = 1.975 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 7247 @ 0.00395 = 28.6257 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1050 @ 0.00397 = 4.1685 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003974 = 1.987 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.00397 = 0.0794 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1800 @ 0.003975 = 7.155 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: cheap LABCO shares on Havelock
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves wash trading, for the wash trading part.
mircea_popescu: pump and dump, for the pump and dump part.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.003975 = 0.9938 BTC [+]
jurov: i see the mp's anatomy in the very end of first page
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 17 @ 0.00397 = 0.0675 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: jurov so 9 ? 10 ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.686 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.00395 = 1.185 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves what are they at on havelock ?
jurov: 10
ThickAsThieves: 33ish
mircea_popescu: heh.
ThickAsThieves: very little movement there too
mircea_popescu: i guess this suggests topace's not in on the scam.
ThickAsThieves: spread is 26 - 33
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 118 @ 0.00345 = 0.4071 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 50 @ 0.00345 = 0.1725 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 21 @ 0.00345 = 0.0725 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 8 @ 0.003411 = 0.0273 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 3 @ 0.003405 = 0.0102 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 211 @ 0.003405 = 0.7185 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 100 @ 0.0034 = 0.34 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 300 @ 0.0034 = 1.02 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 48 @ 0.00337 = 0.1618 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 10 @ 0.00337 = 0.0337 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 8 @ 0.003355 = 0.0268 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 6 @ 0.003354 = 0.0201 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 4 @ 0.003353 = 0.0134 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 2 @ 0.002857 = 0.0057 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.1933 BTC [-]
pankkake: "I think people are missing the significance of a 50% div payout. Most people will reinvest it into ACtM and that will give the share price much needed buying pressure and stabilise the stock at a reasonable level.
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 440 @ 0.004122 = 1.8137 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.004121 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 5 @ 0.00412 = 0.0206 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 114 @ 0.004118 = 0.4695 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 16 @ 0.004116 = 0.0659 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 743 @ 0.004112 = 3.0552 BTC [-]
pankkake: that would be shareholders buying shares the money the gave to buy shares
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 355 @ 0.01245 = 4.4198 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: pankkake because paying dividends out of investor's capital is not fraudulent now.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 129 @ 0.003937 = 0.5079 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 84 @ 0.003938 = 0.3308 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: people just don't want to grok what a ponzi is.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 55 @ 0.003939 = 0.2166 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 141 @ 0.00394 = 0.5555 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 87 @ 0.003941 = 0.3429 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 21 @ 0.003942 = 0.0828 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 133 @ 0.003949 = 0.5252 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 99 @ 0.00395 = 0.3911 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 131 @ 0.003951 = 0.5176 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 91 @ 0.003959 = 0.3603 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 950 @ 0.003959 = 3.7611 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 58 @ 0.003959 = 0.2296 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 21 @ 0.003959 = 0.0831 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 120 @ 0.003959 = 0.4751 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 33 @ 0.003959 = 0.1306 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1200 @ 0.00396 = 4.752 BTC [+]
johnnyfootball: OMG LABCOIN
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 72 @ 0.003952 = 0.2845 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 33 @ 0.003953 = 0.1304 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 114 @ 0.003954 = 0.4508 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 85 @ 0.003955 = 0.3362 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 111 @ 0.003956 = 0.4391 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 79 @ 0.003957 = 0.3126 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 117 @ 0.003958 = 0.4631 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 90 @ 0.003959 = 0.3563 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 88 @ 0.003958 = 0.3483 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 282 @ 0.003959 = 1.1164 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.00396 = 1.584 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 5000 @ 0.003969 = 19.845 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 808 @ 0.00397 = 3.2078 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003958 = 7.916 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2312 @ 0.00397 = 9.1786 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 4640 @ 0.004115 = 19.0936 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 5750 @ 0.004114 = 23.6555 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 9000 @ 0.004075 = 36.675 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 250 @ 0.004071 = 1.0178 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 359 @ 0.004065 = 1.4593 BTC [-]
louong: LABCOIN passes ACTIVEMINING soon?
Rulother: soon
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.02531 BTC [+]
Rulother: They actually posted pics of "chips" :P
Rulother: or a chip rather
louong: yum, chips.
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 101 @ 0.004065 = 0.4106 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004032 = 0.2016 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 400 @ 0.00403 = 1.612 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1270 @ 0.004022 = 5.1079 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.00395 = 0.9875 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10000 @ 0.00395 = 39.5 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 105 @ 0.003953 = 0.4151 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003957 = 0.3957 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003957 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 215 @ 0.003968 = 0.8531 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.003969 = 7.938 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2088 @ 0.00397 = 8.2894 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003977 = 0.7954 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003978 = 1.989 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4541 @ 0.003978 = 18.0641 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: lol
ThickAsThieves: amazine
ThickAsThieves: g
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 600 @ 0.004114 = 2.4684 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 400 @ 0.003978 = 1.5912 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 77 @ 0.003978 = 0.3063 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1840 @ 0.003978 = 7.3195 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.003978 = 0.0398 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 28 @ 0.003959 = 0.1109 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 446 @ 0.003853 = 1.7184 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: i wonder if labcoin holders realize that no single one of them has 39.5btc to make orders like these
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 267 @ 0.003852 = 1.0285 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003851 = 0.077 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1500 @ 0.00385 = 5.775 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 500 @ 0.003801 = 1.9005 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2000 @ 0.0038 = 7.6 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 125 @ 0.003707 = 0.4634 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003706 = 0.1853 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 350 @ 0.003704 = 1.2964 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003704 = 0.3704 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 322 @ 0.003701 = 1.1917 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 950 @ 0.0037 = 3.515 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 340 @ 0.0037 = 1.258 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.00368 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 310 @ 0.003674 = 1.1389 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003673 = 0.0073 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1240 @ 0.003671 = 4.552 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1549 @ 0.003653 = 5.6585 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2100 @ 0.00365 = 7.665 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2500 @ 0.003604 = 9.01 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10000 @ 0.003603 = 36.03 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1041 @ 0.003601 = 3.7486 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.0036 = 0.36 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 4065 @ 0.0036 = 14.634 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3611 @ 0.0036 = 12.9996 BTC [-]
Rulother: someone is cashing out lol
zoinky: there it is
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 5 @ 0.09701 = 0.4851 BTC [-]
johnnyfootball: dat volume
johnnyfootball: *dump*
ThickAsThieves: time to buy stock in BTCT
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.0039 = 0.39 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.0041 BTC [-]
johnnyfootball: BTCTC IPO coming soon?
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 69 @ 0.0041 = 0.2829 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1400 @ 0.004539 = 6.3546 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 4640 @ 0.00454 = 21.0656 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2475 @ 0.004549 = 11.2588 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 1 @ 0.01259 BTC [+]
johnnyfootball: "this is not money"
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 787 @ 0.003799 = 2.9898 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 247 @ 0.00369 = 0.9114 BTC [-]
thestringpuller: mircea_popescu: what's ETA on trilema going back up?
thestringpuller: if you have one lol
TradeFortress: coinlenders is closed :P
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003684 = 0.3684 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 255 @ 0.003683 = 0.9392 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: should be hours.
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.657 = 5.314 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 15 @ 0.003682 = 0.0552 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 455 @ 0.003681 = 1.6749 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.00415 = 0.415 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 5 @ 0.003459 = 0.0173 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 140 @ 0.003773 = 0.5282 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 60 @ 0.00415 = 0.249 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] 2 @ 0.00327 = 0.0065 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] 1100 @ 0.00328 = 3.608 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] 148 @ 0.00329 = 0.4869 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 40 @ 0.00415 = 0.166 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.0042 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 660 @ 0.003699 = 2.4413 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.619 = 5.238 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.63 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.652 BTC [+]
mod6: let's see how it does now...
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.0044 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 49 @ 0.004455 = 0.2183 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 9298 @ 0.00364 = 33.8447 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 702 @ 0.003646 = 2.5595 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02515 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: At a Chaos Computer Club event in August 2011, Daniel Domscheit-Berg announced its preliminary launch and invited hackers to test the security of the OpenLeaks system, as a result of which the CCC criticized him for exploiting the good name of the club to promote his OpenLeaks project and expelled him from their club, despite his lack of membership.
mircea_popescu: teh lulz.
mod6: YOU CAN'T RENT HERE ANYMORE!
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003635 = 0.3635 BTC [-]
mod6: <3 clerks
TomServo: What a domscheit.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.0008752 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: guy destroyed the leaked us no fly list, among a bunch of other stuff. total mole.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003606 = 0.0721 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 236 @ 0.003603 = 0.8503 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 250 @ 0.003601 = 0.9003 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10000 @ 0.0036 = 36 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 116 @ 0.0036 = 0.4176 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 236 @ 0.003592 = 0.8477 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 264 @ 0.00359 = 0.9478 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003647 = 0.0073 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 236 @ 0.00359 = 0.8472 BTC [-]
TradeFortress: anyone that has some intelligence mind replying? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=283756.0
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003647 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 4 @ 0.02577 = 0.1031 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 201 @ 0.003592 = 0.722 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 19 @ 0.003647 = 0.0693 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003648 = 0.073 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 341 @ 0.003685 = 1.2566 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: TradeFortress what are you trying to do there ?
mircea_popescu: provide software for people trying to run their own bonds ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 7 @ 0.003459 = 0.0242 BTC [+]
TradeFortress: mircea_popescu, ok, I guess I did a bad job explaining the changes cuz you don't get it
TradeFortress: I'll pm
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 71 @ 0.003459 = 0.2456 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 229 @ 0.003499 = 0.8013 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 18 @ 0.00364 = 0.0655 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004454 = 0.2227 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.0045 = 0.45 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 460 @ 0.00454 = 2.0884 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 500 @ 0.004549 = 2.2745 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 250 @ 0.004569 = 1.1423 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1000 @ 0.0046 = 4.6 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 430 @ 0.0047 = 2.021 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 20 @ 0.004722 = 0.0944 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 40 @ 0.004777 = 0.1911 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 200 @ 0.00479 = 0.958 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 250 @ 0.0048 = 1.2 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 462 @ 0.00481 = 2.2222 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3397 @ 0.004878 = 16.5706 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 350 @ 0.00489 = 1.7115 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1360 @ 0.0049 = 6.664 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.004945 = 0.4945 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 720 @ 0.00495 = 3.564 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 67 @ 0.005 = 0.335 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 100 @ 0.005 = 0.5 BTC [+]
Rulother: Time for the balancing act
Rulother: sell this buy that
Doctor_Andonuts: lol
Graet: gotta say "demo instance" makes me want to withdraw my coins
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.63 BTC [-]
Rulother: looks like you baited Swede in, mp
mircea_popescu: Rulother it's funny how he simply went through the scammer argument list.
TradeFortress: Graet, anything you want to ask me about?
mircea_popescu: supposedly if he affirms the oldest btc business is bad that makes his shit fine.
Graet: i was just going to bed when i noticed changes
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.639 BTC [+]
Rulother: Frankly I couldn't see a way to truly debate the acquisition without any sort of evidence
Rulother: from both sides
TradeFortress: Graet, go to bed (I should too), look at what has changed
TradeFortress: I expect the dust will settle soon
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 10 @ 0.65 = 6.5 BTC
fractal: has anyone here recieved a working 400Gh/sec Bitfury miner?
fractal: http://bitbet.us/bet/520/bitfury-eu-august-orders-will-ship-before-1st/
ozbot: BitBet - Bitfury EU August orders will ship before 1st September 2013
Graet: well since i deposited coins the site has changed to have a disclaimer about nothing being real and now its a "demo" not sure what to think/ask atm
fractal: trying to see if this bet will resolve no... it looks like punin missed performance specs and is trying to ship additional hardware to make up for it
mircea_popescu: fractal afaik the one report was of one guy doing 60gh at 54 watts
TradeFortress: Graet, the same way you should think about a " fictional fantasy stock market simulation" or a site that "takes no responsibility"
Graet: hmm need to edit "support" page What is CoinLenders?
Graet: CoinLenders is a website that offers (and keeps track of) bitcoin loans, and also offers credit ratings / ID verifications. We also plan on additional features over time.
fractal: so, there needs to be at least 5 reports, and one of them has to at least show a working, self-contained 400Gh unit?
TradeFortress: Graet, that's technically correct, it's just part of the demo.
zoinky: too many technicalities
Rulother: technically
fractal: punin has admitted the hardware is falling short on performance, and is shipping additional hardware to make up for it. there is a lot of discussion on bitbet. If you do the math, -- it makes it imporssible for 400Gh unit to hit specs.
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.64 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: perhaps.
mircea_popescu: what i've seen was two boards each hashing > 25gh tho
fractal: mircea_popescu: If noone posts evidence of a 400Gh unit then the bet is a NO. correct?
mircea_popescu: yeah, need at least an example of each type
fractal: mircea_popescu: can you fwd a link for that? nobody on the forums has a single board above 25Gh.. they're all running around 19-20Gh.
mircea_popescu: how do you do the math coming out that 400gh is impossible ?
mircea_popescu: wasn't anduck's thing hashing ~60gh at 54 watts ?
mircea_popescu: or was it 50gh
Anduck: 68 ghash
Anduck: at 52 watts actually
mircea_popescu: fractal https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=250249.msg3025781#msg3025781 this thuing
Anduck: or 67 ghash..
Anduck: it varies a little
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 46 @ 0.003559 = 0.1637 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003558 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.62 BTC [-]
fractal: mircea_popescu: the bitbury architecture is modular -- inside the 400Gh miner case, there is a M-board with 16 slots on it -- each M-board is only hashing around 20Gh, as per punin's admission. ... therefore the maximum hashrate inside a single self-contained unit, or device, is 320Gh.
Anduck: they were sold as kits
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.59 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.58 BTC [-]
Anduck: a kit promised 25 ghash or 400 ghash
Anduck: they all get what they were promised
Anduck: and their kits deliver the _promised performance_ that the bet was about
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] 2 @ 0.00329 = 0.0066 BTC [+]
Anduck: the bet was about "promised performance" and 5 confirmed deliveries, right?
fractal: Anduck: No, you're wrong, read the bet language. a 400Gh 'DEVICE' has to exist... as in a single unit.
fractal: This does not exist.
mircea_popescu: o boy. this is gonna be one of those huh.
Anduck: there never was going to be a device of 400 ghash???
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 219 @ 0.00366 = 0.8015 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2281 @ 0.003662 = 8.353 BTC [+]
Anduck: fractal: they were and always were sold as kits
Anduck: the wording "unit" means "kit" in the bet
Anduck: i know it because i wrote it
Anduck: i chose a little bad word
Anduck: but what i meant is that customer gets the performance he ordered
fractal: Anduck: 'Kit" ... not 'KITS' .... they missed performance. punin has admitted it
Anduck: a kit is a kit..
Anduck: the customer promised performance is met within the kit
Anduck: people who bought starter kit will be delivered atleast 25ghash hashing miner
fractal: thats not what the bet says -- sorry
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 10 @ 0.003499 = 0.035 BTC [+]
fractal: Anduck: thats great -- but thats not what they bet says
Anduck: i don't really see how one could understand the wording so wrong
Anduck: thats really only semantics
fractal: Anduck: Words are words. No 400Gh miner exists. mircea_popescu stated that one has to be posted to the forums as a confirmed delivery. the only way this bet can be a yes at this point is for someone to lie --
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02575 = 0.0515 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 6 @ 0.0255 = 0.153 BTC [-]
Anduck: dude fractal... "Devices must meet advertised performance (25 GH/s unit 40W, 400 GH/s unit 400W)" < as you can see, the condition is in the ( and ). and the condition is met
Anduck: 400 ghash kit is built from the h-boards that are used in the 25gh kit, too
fractal: Anduck: no, you're wrong.
Anduck: i also do not see it as a requirement that someone from the 5 confirmed deliveries must have ordered exactly 400 ghash kit
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 203 @ 0.003602 = 0.7312 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 797 @ 0.0036 = 2.8692 BTC [-]
Anduck: well it's only semantics after that. Customers got what they were promised.
fractal: Anduck: mircea_popescu himself stated that it needs to be 400Gh AND under 400W. I have chat logs. it was from 2 days ago.
fractal: Anduck: sorry for you, but the language in the statement disagrees with you.
Anduck: that is only semantics as i said.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.00366 = 0.0732 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003661 = 0.0732 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 70 @ 0.003671 = 0.257 BTC [+]
fractal: Anduck: which means the bet is a NO.
Anduck: the customer promises _are_ met 100%
Anduck: and the bet was about that
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.0253 BTC [-]
fractal: Anduck: no they weren't. no 400Gh unit exists as per punin's admission --- also, thats not what the statement says.
Anduck: the "promised performance" means that customers will get the hashing rate they ordered at the energy cost they were told it will eat
fractal: punin: "We're currently shipping 2 H-cards with starter kit (until we have boards and software that delivers 25GH)"
fractal: Anduck: not according to mircea_popescu's comments 2 days ago.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.02525 = 0.0505 BTC [-]
fractal: Anduck: sorry, be more carfeful next time when you read the bet statement.
Anduck: i don't see why it wouldn't be as i said.
fractal: Anduck: because "English"
Anduck: it's only semantics after the real deal: [20:33:31] <Anduck> the "promised performance" means that customers will get the hashing rate they ordered at the energy cost they were told it will eat
Anduck: it's ONLY semantics
fractal: Anduck: again, thats not what the bet says. I'm very sorry.
Anduck: but that was exact quote from the bet... i'll stop fighting with you now :I
mircea_popescu: well the best i can do for either side atm is to say we'll see how this turns out.
Anduck: mircea_popescu: just a question, how much do the semantics affect the bet outcome?
Anduck: if the _bet_ itself is a clear thing how it should be understood
kleeck: lol
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 25 @ 0.02522 = 0.6305 BTC [-]
kleeck: Are you asking if words matter?
fractal: Anduck: Which means there needs to be a 400Gh unit delivered that provides 400Gh in a single 'DEVICE', or 'UNIT' as per language in the bet.... punin has stated that they are shipping additional hardware "(until we have boards and software that delivers 25GH)" --- 16H-cards less then 25Gh means they failed to produce a 400Gh unit
Anduck: kleeck: i am asking that is the actual wording/semantics more important than the bet itself
kleeck: Don't the words comprise the bet?
fractal: Anduck: yes. What the bet actaully SAYS matters more then statement -- I specifically came in here 2 days ago to ask mircea_popescu specifics about this
Anduck: kleeck: if one thinks that unit/device is not a kit (in this bet)
fractal: err, the statement i mean
fractal: Anduck: The word 'KIT' is totally non-existant in the bet languge
Anduck: the statement is absolotely clear in my eyes, except there should've been better words
Anduck: all the units and devices shouldve been "kit" so there wouldn't be this semantics mess
mircea_popescu: lol. i guess this is how a good bet works, it's totally clear to everyone except it doesn't match.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6249 @ 0.0008708 = 5.4416 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9972 @ 0.00087071 = 8.6827 BTC [-]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 10600 @ 0.00087063 = 9.2287 BTC [-]
Anduck: fractal: but everyone knows that a device or unit means a kit since they only sold kits
Anduck: they didnt sell units or devices
Anduck: only kits
Anduck: so i think it's perfectly clear we're talking about kits when we talk about units
fractal: Anduck: Thats not true...
kleeck: In my experience, the wording is always important. It frames the expectation of any given interaction.
Anduck: but it is, fractal. they sell KITS
fractal: Anduck: You are spreading misinformation... there is a specific 400Ghash miner -- look at this picture. http://imageshack.us/a/img407/6741/1bzj.png
assbot: [BTCTC] [LTC-ATF.B2] 2 @ 0.01043 = 0.0209 BTC [+]
fractal: I dont know how I can be any more clear that this is a single device --- Notice how it is a 'box' that has '400Ghash miner' written on it with white letters? http://imageshack.us/a/img407/6741/1bzj.png
mircea_popescu: kleeck there's always going to be some edge. natural language is what it is.
Anduck: fractal: that case is not part of the bet nor is that case in the bfsb.com shop
fractal: Anduck: please let me know if you have trouble loading this image, i can mirror it for you somehwere else
Anduck: or ever was
kleeck: Yes. The "edge" is in clearly communicating. :)
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 50 @ 0.0250001 = 1.25 BTC [-]
Anduck: that picture is not bfsb.com product. the customer made it himself
Anduck: i mean, the case in that picture*
mircea_popescu: "clearly communicating" is not something of reality sadly.
fractal: Anduck: http://imageshack.us/a/img11/6249/krlv.png
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 90 @ 0.00224 = 0.2016 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 210 @ 0.00222 = 0.4662 BTC [-]
Anduck: fractal: as i said, that case is not a bfsb product
Anduck: it's customer made
fractal: Anduck, i'm not done posting picture.... http://imageshack.us/a/img11/6249/krlv.png see inside the case? the M-board. it only fits 16 cards.
Anduck: fractal: http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/shop/
Anduck: they dont sell units or devices, they sell kits
Anduck: who says a kit can't include 2 m-boards?
fractal: Anduck: The language on the bet says it can't.
kleeck: I disagree mircea_popescu. I understand that there are situations, like this one, but there are ways of being more clear and less clear. Therefore clearity exists even if on a spectrum..
Anduck: i think the statement is more importnat
kleeck: (Sorry to derail!)
Anduck: kleeck: what do you think, what's clearer way to understand the statement of the bet?
mircea_popescu: kleeck the problem is that you only have clear communication in retrospect.
fractal: Anduck: I came in here specifically to ask mircea_popescu and he said that a 400Gh 'UNIT' must exist --- based on the math, it can't
mircea_popescu: otherwise any statement can be elongated ad infinitum with requests for definitions
Anduck: fractal: it can.. and based on math it does
kleeck: I haven't read it yet. I will if you want. I was chiming in more to the point of "do semantics matter" - I'll read the bet.
mircea_popescu: as all words are ultimately circular constructs.
fractal: Anduck: no, it doesn't.
Anduck: i have 3 h-boards.. they eat 54 watts from the wall
Anduck: and give 68 ghash
fractal: Anduck: Shipping additonal hardware because the company missed spec does not mean that there is a 400Gh UNIT
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02589 = 0.0518 BTC [+]
Anduck: fractal: they sell kits, not units
Anduck: they ship what they promised
fractal: Anduck: Thats not what the bet language says
Anduck: they just said that the kit will include more h-boards than it was meant to
assbot: [BTCTC] [BMF] 1 @ 0.0398 BTC [-]
Anduck: that doesn't mean it doesn't meet the performance promise of the kit/unit
fractal: Anduck: Sorry, again, thats not what the bet language says
Anduck: but that is the statement, isn't it??
kleeck: Is the debate around the phrase, "mining units"?
Anduck: yeah
Anduck: bfsb only sold kits
Anduck: so i think unit should be understood as kit
Anduck: customers were promised 25gh or 400gh miners
Anduck: which would use 40W or 400W or less
Anduck: and the customers are getting delivered those performances
kleeck: So, they are getting kits instead of completed devices and those devices are meeting spec?
fractal: Anduck: 68 /3 = 22.... 22*16 = 352Gh maximum in a single 'Miner', or selft contained 'unit' or 'kit..... This does not exist because the manufactuere missed performance specs.... The bet says nothing of customer relations by refunding or sending more hardware
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 307 @ 0.002848 = 0.8743 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 43 @ 0.002849 = 0.1225 BTC [+]
Anduck: no need for 16 h-boards in the 400gh kit
fractal: Anduck: I only placed a NO bet because I didn't belive they'd hit 400Gh in a single unit. BFL missed, and others. The bet says that there should be a 400Gh unit shipped, and it should be under 400W.... it might be under 400W, but its not 400Gh
Anduck: there can be (and will be) enough h-boards so the 400gh kit does 400 ghash
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 82 @ 0.000803 = 0.0658 BTC [-]
kleeck: Are the assembled kits meeting spec once made into a mining unit?
fractal: Anduck: not on a single unit -- as the language says in the bet
fractal: Anduck: thats not what the bet language says.
Anduck: kleeck: yes. a starter kit includes 2 h-boards and 400gh kit includes 18 or 19 h-boards
fractal: Anduck: you can't make a vague bet, and then claim 'semantics' when you lose
mircea_popescu: <fractal> Anduck: I came in here specifically to ask mircea_popescu and he said that a 400Gh 'UNIT' must exist --- based on the math, it can't <<< which snippet is this ?
TomServo: I don't understand the debate over kit, unit, whateverthefuck. Does the 'thing' do 400GH/s @ 400W or not?
TomServo: Isn't that the question?
mircea_popescu: this ?
mircea_popescu: Aug 27 17:25:45 <fractal>what if they ship 2 units to make up for lower hashrates?
mircea_popescu: Aug 27 17:25:58 <fractal>is the bet yes or no?
mircea_popescu: Aug 27 17:26:54 <mircea_popescu>(25 GH/s unit 40W, 400 GH/s unit 400W)
mircea_popescu: Aug 27 17:28:25 <mircea_popescu>fractal seems pretty clear cut neh ?
mircea_popescu: Aug 27 17:28:43 <fractal>mircea_popescu: just double checking.
fractal: mircea_popescu: yeah thats it...
kleeck: TomServo, no, that isn't the question.
fractal: 400Gh 'UNIT' --- UNIT people ---
Anduck: and as customers weren't sold specifically 1 or 16 h-boards, the kits can include any amount of those.. the kits must meet the promised performance and they seem to do so
kleeck: ;ud unit
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 1 @ 0.65 BTC
kleeck: im so bad at irc
Anduck: a mining unit, 400 gh mining unit, is built from several h-boards and m-boards
mircea_popescu: ;;define unit
gribble: Error: "define" is not a valid command.
fractal: Anduck: well I only placed a no bet based on the language of a UNIT being a self-containted device that is attached....
mircea_popescu: awell
kleeck: we certainly can't google this...
Anduck: fractal: then you tried to work the semantics against the statement of the bet or what?
mircea_popescu: fractal in fairness, the "self contained device" part is also not in the bet text.
mircea_popescu: kleeck bitbet is a fascinating exercise in the limits of communication.
Anduck: the statement is super clear in my eyes, really. people get what they ordered. people get the hashrate at the watts they were promised. the performance requirement (which the bet was about) IS met.
fractal: mircea_popescu: right.... but in fairness, the bet doesn't say that the manufactuere can miss hashrate performance on a single 25Gh board, and ship more to make up for it!
kleeck: mircea_popescu, I rather enjoy what is coming of it.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003654 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: human language is not meaningful unless the receptor supplies context to make it meaningful. the contexts receptors supply often vary.
mircea_popescu: the attempt to make the context entirely explicit is burdensome and provably doomed.
mircea_popescu: fractal right.
mircea_popescu: hence my "o, this is going to be one of those".
fractal: Anduck: The performance requirement was *not* met. No single H-card operates at 25Gh!
Anduck: fractal: the 25gh unit is a 25gh kit as sold for customers, doesn't say it must include 1 h-board.
fractal: Anduck: Sorry, the language doesn't say 'KIT'
Anduck: but the UNIT does!!!
mircea_popescu: fractal also why i asked you if it's your first time and advised you go small. these things do happen.
Anduck: the -performance- promised to customers is met. customers get exactly the performance they ordered.
fractal: Anduck: Again, the language of the bet doesn't match up with the fact that performance was missed on the 25Gh board,,, the fact that they got more or were satisfied is irrelevant
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 20 @ 0.003499 = 0.07 BTC [+]
kleeck: Yes. What I'm seeing is the classic, "Oh come on, we all knew the intended bet!" Which isn't a sound defense. The debate must center around the words used to describe the bet. If the product is a "mining unit" and meets the spec in the bet, then Anduck is correct, else fractal is correct.
Anduck: a mining unit is a mining kit, isn't it?
fractal: kleeck: Just like BFL shipped out multiple units to compensate, that is what punin is doing.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 217 @ 0.003654 = 0.7929 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 217 @ 0.003656 = 0.7934 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 333 @ 0.003659 = 1.2184 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1000 @ 0.00366 = 3.66 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3000 @ 0.003674 = 11.022 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2999 @ 0.003675 = 11.0213 BTC [+]
fractal: kleeck: If it's multiple mining units, then Anduck is not correct..
Anduck: there was and never could've been a single card producing 400 ghash, it was sold as a "h-cards enough to make 400 ghash unit". RIGHT?
kleeck: The Honorable Judge Kleeck Presiding!
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 50 @ 0.01594 = 0.797 BTC [-]
kleeck: Bring forth your evidence!
Anduck: customers ordered 400 gh mining kits.. and they got what were promised
mircea_popescu: fractal bfl didn't actually ship tho,
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02588 = 0.0518 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: it wasn't the case they shipped MORe units.
fractal: Anduck: No, its not. The bet says nothing of a KIT. it says a mining unit. Somehing that is a single prodcut attacted..... 2 seperate products adding up to more then 400Gh mean that the manufacturer missed performance spec for that unit
kleeck: "RIMSHOT!"
Anduck: well the customers were promised 400 gh miner.............
fractal: Anduck: Thats not what the bet says
Anduck: well the bet is about performance, not the amount of h-boards used to produce the performance of the unit
kleeck: There are multiple clauses in the bet that must be true for it to be "YES".
Anduck: yes
Anduck: they must be delivered this month
kleeck: and?
Anduck: bfsb kits must be delivered this month.. .and
fractal: Anduck: If the bet language said "If punin can't make a 400Gh single device, he's allow to ship as much hardware as he wan'ts, and we'll just consider it a 'KIT' "" --- if it said that, there's no way in my right mind i would have bet NO... it would be an impossible bet to win
Anduck: they must meet the advertised performance (25gh @ 40W and 400gh @ 400W)
assbot: [BTCTC] [BITVPS] 4 @ 0.0023 = 0.0092 BTC [-]
Anduck: and 5 deliveres of bfsb kits must be confirmed
fractal: you removed the word UNIT didn't you??? very sneaky!
kleeck: and they have to be a "mining unit" and they have to hash at the given rates and draw at the given powers.
mircea_popescu: fractal why'd it have impossible to win ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003675 BTC [+]
fractal: mircea_popescu: becaucause he could ship as much hardware to make up for it -- provided the power usage was low enough.... but I placed the bet based on Power usage AND hashrate in a single self-contained UNIT
Anduck: fractal: he's allowed to ship as much h-boards and m-boards needed to get the performance. it wouldn't break the bet.... if they would eat more watts than promised, that would be a bet-breaker
fractal: UNIT
fractal: Anduck: Not according to the language though...
Anduck: fractal: yeah i did, can be unit or miner or kit
Anduck: we're talking about kits as units anyway since they never sold single units. they're KITS
mircea_popescu: fractal well ya but it wouldn't be economically feasible to do so
mircea_popescu: he can't like, ship gpus
Anduck: indeed
Anduck: the performance must be met. and it is met
fractal: Anduck: I dont see any mention of KIT on there. And If i read the language the performance is not met in a device.
Anduck: if he shipped GPU's, the performance (400 gh @ 400 watts) wouldn't be met
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.192 BTC [-]
fractal: Anduck: No its not met.. punin admits they are under-hashing
Anduck: the unit is the same thing as a kit
Anduck: it's clear because it says 25gh unit and 400 gh unit
fractal: Anduck: No, 400Gh unit is a single device, not multiple devices.
Anduck: it's very clear it means the promised miner ( a kit or a unit)
fractal: UNIT.... not 'oh we ship as much hardware to make up for it if the manufacturer misses specs'
fractal: Anduck: actaully, its not clear at all
Anduck: fractal: they can ship as much h-boards as they want but the PERFORMANCE must be met
Anduck: the promised performance of the customer-bought kits must be met¨
Anduck: or units, anything you want to call it
fractal: Anduck: not according to the language of the bet.
mircea_popescu: anyway, for the lovers of history, here's a recent previous dispute http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=03-08-2013&display=show#202828
kleeck: Oooh. precedent!
fractal: http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/400gh-miner-october-2013/
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 3 @ 0.1936 = 0.5808 BTC [+]
fractal: From the website " What’s included: 1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips"
mircea_popescu: kleeck there's also a very lulzy one on the forum and here from back in march. some guy named rikur and some other guy
fractal: thats what was advertised
mircea_popescu: but that was hardly bringhing any solid points
Anduck: fractal: the bet was about promised performance, not about promised hardware
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 388 @ 0.00375 = 1.455 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 194 @ 0.003751 = 0.7277 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 418 @ 0.003755 = 1.5696 BTC [+]
kleeck: Does bitbet need an arbiter of justice? I'd love that role... also the title.
fractal: Anduck: Thats not what the English on the bet says. It says the 400 Gh 'UNIT'
Anduck: mircea_popescu: that log you linked is about the s.dice vs s.mpoe bet?
mircea_popescu: yea
fractal: UNIT. as in what was advertised -- From the website " What’s included: 1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips"
fractal: They weren't able to deliver this
fractal: that is a fact.
Anduck: mircea_popescu: when s.dice dropped out of MPEX, the value was considered zero?
Anduck: fractal: they didn't deliver the promised hardware, yes. but they delivered the promised performance of the units
Anduck: the units that were sold, they were 25gh unit and 400gh unit
fractal: Anduck: No, they didn't the units don't hit 400Gh as advertised --
fractal: They have to ship additional hardware SPECIFICALLY Because they missed advertised specs
fractal: I hope you can understand this
Anduck: they missed specs of the h-board but not the kit/unit/miner
mircea_popescu: Anduck iirc it weas like "bbet mkt cap on mpex will exceed sdice mkt cap"
fractal: Anduck: and the 400Gh miner includes 16 H-bords -- AS ADVERTISED
Anduck: well mircea_popescu.. wasn't that kinda clear? if there's no cap of s.dice at mpex, it's same as zero cap
fractal: Anduck: for the bet to be yes, "1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips" has to exist -- and it doesn't
Anduck: fractal: wasn't about advertised hardware... it was about the performance
Anduck: and the performance is absolutely met
mircea_popescu: Anduck no argument, it is clear. was just giving exampel of previous contentions
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0259 BTC [+]
fractal: Anduck: It missed performance. It's not 400Gh
fractal: Anduck: No, performance is not met.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 31 @ 0.0262 = 0.8122 BTC [+]
fractal: Anduck: thats why they're shipping additional hardware. Why would they send more hardware then promised if performance is met? They woudln't.
fractal: Anduck: they are shipping additional hardware because performance was NOT met
fractal: Again, 1 unit was advertised as "1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips"
Anduck: the performance is met.. performance of the unit: hashrate @ power usage
Anduck: the units that customers get do have the performance of 25gh at 40 watts max
Anduck: OR 400gh at 400 watts max
fractal: Anduck: No, performance is not met. The 400Gh miner does not perform 400Gh.
fractal: A miner is as advertised ""1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips""
Anduck: and as the 400 gh units are built from same h-boards as 25 gh units, it's clear that 400 gh @ 400 watt performance is met like the 25gh @ 40W is met
Anduck: the 400gh miner performs 400 gh at the promised watts.
kleeck: I think there's only one solution to this. Duel to the death!
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0262 BTC [+]
Anduck: atleast my 68 ghash at 53 W _from the wall_
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0263 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 8 @ 0.02639 = 0.2111 BTC [+]
johnnyfootball: but it uses 3.5 boards instead of 4.26 boards Anduck GAH!
fractal: Anduck: That is not what was advertised. What was advertised was not met. 400Gh was not achived with the hardware, so they had to re-imburse customers at their own expense --- I knew they would miss these targets, which is why i bet NO
johnnyfootball: get with the program
Anduck: and 3 h-boards.. each h-board using 18 watts
jborkl: how many watts is it going to take to do 400gh with said device?
mircea_popescu: why are they underhashing anyway ? any word from manufacturer ?
fractal: jborkl: There is no 400Gh device....
Anduck: if bfsb shipped 20 h-boards for the 400gh unit, it would draw only 360 watts. and it'd provide 400gh
mircea_popescu: jborkl if we liniarly extrapolate about 350ish
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 1 @ 0.01594 BTC [-]
Anduck: mircea_popescu: theyre underhashing most likely due to the quality of the fab and software
fractal: Anduck: they can't fit 20h-boards on a 400gh unit..... a 400gh unit can fix 16h-cards maximum.... hence UNIT
jborkl: and they are going to provie customers with 400 gh as promised for the 350w draw?
Anduck: the performance of the h-boards itself will be most likely fixed by software, still
mircea_popescu: Anduck but nothing definite ?
fractal: jborkl: yes, but thats not what the language of the bet said.
jborkl: they bet is a yes then
Anduck: mircea_popescu: it doesn't really matter since the customers get what they were promised. and in the future they might be able to turn their miners for even powerful miners with software update
mircea_popescu: jborkl that's the stated intention. nobody has yet come forward having received a 400gh order
mircea_popescu: afaik at least.
fractal: Anduck: No, punin said they need to change hardware and it will be done on the next batch -- but not before september 1
jborkl: power is less than 400 and hash rate is at least 400
mircea_popescu: Anduck just curious is all.
fractal: jborkl: No, not in a single device
Anduck: mircea_popescu: will there be needed a 400 gh unit delivered?
mircea_popescu: Anduck what do you mean by "unit" :p
Anduck: fractal: yeah but it still can be -possibly- fixed with sw.
jurov: so, nobody actually ordered 400gh unit?
Anduck: mircea_popescu: the thing bfsb sold
fractal: Anduck: if i recall logs correctly, mircea_popescu stated a 400gh device would have to be proven.... i'll have to check logs again tho.
Anduck: 25gh unit and 400 gh unit
jborkl: the word "units" in the bet is irrevelvant
jurov: or they did order and got 2 boxes instead?
jurov: for the same price?
jborkl: since unit is not defined
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 950 @ 0.0052 = 4.94 BTC [+]
fractal: jborkl: Its not irrelvant since its in the bet.... UNIT means a single device
Anduck: fractal: i don't see why.. the performance is met and it can be proven from the hashrate@power usage of the smaller hashrate miners
fractal: jborkl: a 400Gh was advertised as "1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips"" -- this will not be shipped
fractal: it says int he bet 'AS ADVERTISED'
Anduck: jurov: people ordered 25gh unit (was meant to be 1 h-board + 1 m-board) but they were delivered 1 m-board and 2 h-boards instead.. for the same price. that was because the performance of the single h-board didn't meet the 25ghash -> they had to add another 25gh board in the kit)
mircea_popescu: in retrospect i think this is absolutely the first time a genuine wording problem has come to fore. the previous one (on the bfl specs) was thoroughly manufactured by dishonest blf.
jborkl: advertised performance, not size or space taken up as i see it
Anduck: indeed
Anduck: nor the hardware
fractal: I went to bitfurystrikesback.com and looked at what was advertised -- I thought, no way they'll get 400Gh on that M-board with 16 cards -- they might hit power -- but I don't think they'll get 400Gh out of that --- I put my money where my mouth is, and I was right--
fractal: again, this is only as advertised
Anduck: it's only about the advertised performance, 400 ghash miner for 400 warrs
Anduck: watts*
kleeck: http://imgur.com/npay8GA
ozbot: imgur: the simple image sharer
Anduck: lol
mircea_popescu: .bait
fractal: hahah
ozbot: http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdiv61SY3E1qksua0o1_500.jpg
jurov: http://thegenesisblock.com/bitfury-400-ghs-bitcoin-mining-rig-hits-us-shores/ interprets it so that "the miner gives only 380GH/s"
ozbot: Bitfury 400 GH/s Bitcoin Mining Rig Hits US Shores - The Genesis Block
jurov: "Full kits include a main board, 16 hashing boards, a raspberry pi, and cables to set up the miner."
jborkl: Network passed 600TH
Anduck: jurov: the units/kits will be hashing the promised hashrate
fractal: jurov: " Bitfury 400 GH/s Miner – currently hashing at 380 GH/s on 16 cards. " -- thats correct -- punin admitted it missed hashrate specs -- they will fix it in next manufacturing batch, but its impossible to do that and ship by sept 1---
jurov: but they aren't 400gh yet
Anduck: jurov: full kits include more h-boards because of the performance problems with h-boards. but the unit of 400ghash is 400ghash, dependless of the amount of h-boards in the unit/kit/miner
fractal: jurov: Anduck's argument is that if they send more hardware for free then it counts as being part of the same device
Anduck: the bet was about the advertised performance, that be 400gh unit will produce 400gh and it will do it for less than the 400 watts
fractal: Anduck: That's not what the language in the bet says though.... seriously... I'm sorry you weren't more specific
jurov: so, are the kits with multiple h-boards actually sold?
Anduck: the bet wasn't about the amount of hardware delivered... it was about the kits/units and thheir performance
fractal: jurov: No kit with multiple H-board was ever sold
Anduck: jurov: yeah
Anduck: i mean
fractal: jurov: http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/400gh-miner-october-2013/
Anduck: 400 gh kit includes enough h-boards to make 400 gh miner
fractal: they are sold with 1 M-board
fractal: Anduck: Thats not what was advertised
mircea_popescu: anyway, fractal, since you're new : are you familiar with how you can cancel out bitbet bets ?
Anduck: fractal: they didn't meet the advertised hardware amount. but they meet the advertised performance by far!!
jurov: if anyone ordered that, he will receive 1 board or more?
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 40 @ 0.0002228 = 0.0089 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 50 @ 0.00111192 = 0.0556 BTC [-]
fractal: Anduck: A 400Gh unit with "1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips" was advertised
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 700 @ 0.00111192 = 0.7783 BTC [-]
fractal: mircea_popescu: no, i'm not..... can both sides agree to cancel the bet?
mircea_popescu: mpoe-pr "lol yknow eventually there's gonna bet a channel dedicated to debating bitbet wording"
mircea_popescu: lemme see if i manage to dig up this
kleeck: #bitbetwars
jurov: i think if they don't ship more boards as a kit to fullfill the 400gh, then it's clearly false
jurov: the bet. i mean
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.MINIGAME] 67 @ 0.0002218 = 0.0149 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 1 @ 0.02531 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003676 BTC [-]
Anduck: fractal: that was the advertised hardware... the bet wasn't about advertised hardware. it was about advertised performance. 400gh for 400 watts. people ordered a kit which produces that and they get what they ordered
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 11 @ 0.02579 = 0.2837 BTC [+]
fractal: Anduck: Thats not what the bet says
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 35 @ 0.005049 = 0.1767 BTC [-]
fractal: Anduck: The best doesn't say 'If the 400Gh miner only mines at 380Gh' they can ship more hardware and its a yes
jurov: Anduck: if you bought 400gh for some amount of money and then you'd found out you have to buy more hardware to get 400gh
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 19 @ 0.0258 = 0.4902 BTC [+]
jurov: then it would *not* meet expected perf
jurov: for you
Anduck: jurov: you don't..
Anduck: jurov: you pay for the 400 gh and you get the 400 gh
jborkl: jurov: they are shipping 400gh that draws 350w
fractal: jurov: they're compensating. and thats great... But the bet doesn't say that
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 2 @ 0.025801 = 0.0516 BTC [+]
jborkl: so I see it as a yes
jborkl: but I don't get a vote
fractal: jurov: there needs to be a 400Gh UNIT -- which doesn't exist
Anduck: everyone gets the hashrate they paid for. and the hashrate will be made within the power usage promised
fractal: Anduck: that's irrelevant to the bet language
jurov: so you will get one box with two mainboards for original price?
Anduck: jurov: yes
Anduck: the mining kit promised performance is met
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.005049 BTC [-]
Anduck: doesn't matter how many m-boards or h-boards are needed for the performance of the mining unit
Anduck: or kit
jurov: then that's an unit, imho... but as nothing such was actually delivered, it's undecidable
Anduck: or whatever you want to call it
fractal: jurov: thats just good customer support -- but doesn't make the fact that the 400Gh miner isn't 400Gh any different --- and thats what the bet language is about
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004808 = 0.2404 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.004611 BTC [-]
fractal: Anduck: to be honest -- i'd rather cancel the bet then have a long forum discussion that takes hours of debate over the next few days -- if you'd agree... otherwise I'll have to clear my schedule ;)
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 4 @ 0.00461 = 0.0184 BTC [-]
jurov: so, i prefer to ask whether anyone actually ordered that product (regardless of actual HW)
jurov: because if someone ordered and did not get it yet, then bet is false
Anduck: mircea_popescu: can the bets be canceled, then?
Anduck: and is there a fee or something for that
Anduck: i am not canceling anything right now
Anduck: but i just want to know is it even possible
fractal: I'd cancel if Anduck agrees.
fractal: This will give me a headache
fractal: ;)
Anduck: well, i was right anyway
Anduck: they deliver the promised performance. that's it
Anduck: the bet was about that
fractal: No, you weren't -- not according to the bet langugage -- which is what matters
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02637 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 5 @ 0.000811 = 0.0041 BTC [+]
fractal: you can't just say 'Oh, that langugage is not what I meant!!'
Anduck: you're just trying to make "unit" be a "h-board"
Anduck: i think unit is the mining unit.
fractal: I'm trying to make a unit what was advertised -- 1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips
fractal: thats a UNIT
Anduck: the mining unit can include anything
jurov: we need at least one 400gh fullfilled order (regardless of how many boards), does it exist?
fractal: its right on their website -- 400Gh mining unit "1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips"
Anduck: thats hardware promise - that wasn't met. but it wasn't about hardware
Anduck: it's about performance
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 348 @ 0.003713 = 1.2921 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003718 = 0.0074 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003719 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 423 @ 0.003768 = 1.5939 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 174 @ 0.003769 = 0.6558 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003772 = 0.3772 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003773 = 0.1887 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 152 @ 0.003785 = 0.5753 BTC [+]
fractal: jurov: it can't be regarless of h-boards because thats not what was advertised on a performance basis -- "1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips"
jurov: fractal, it's usual that specs are subject to change
jurov: promies was only about performance of whole setup
fractal: jurov: i dont disagree -- but not according to the bet langugae
jurov: for me unit = whetever was ordered
fractal: jurov: for most objective people a unit is a single device and 'UNITS' are multiple
jurov: and now i want to know whether *any* 400gh order was fullfilled
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 50 @ 0.003768 = 0.1884 BTC [-]
jurov: because it seems it was not
fractal: I only made the bet based on what I say on the bitfury website -- that a 400Gh unit was "1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips"
Anduck: jurov: yeah there isn't any delivered yet
Anduck: but there might be shipped 400 gh units.
jurov: and thus any bickering about what hardware the 400gh means is noot
assbot: [BTCTC] [CB.IDIFF-O] 1 @ 0.009899 BTC [+]
jurov: *moot
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 450 @ 0.00368 = 1.656 BTC [-]
Anduck: jurov: what do you think, does it require a delivery of 400 gh unit?
Anduck: since it's proven that 400gh unit will meet the spec
jurov: yes, certainly
Anduck: why?
Anduck: it says "5 deliveries confirmed"
fractal: the other thing i'm worried about is punin sending pictures to a forum user and paying them to post a 400Gh unit saying its hashing at 400Gh -- rumour has it punin made the 10BTC yes bet
jurov: and it's proven only of someone actually builds 400gh rig from it
Anduck: i made the 10btc bet
jurov: when has not happened either
jurov: *what
Anduck: well
Anduck: there actually was weeks ago a 400gh rig built from these h-boards
Anduck: the same that were shipped to me
Anduck: same kind of
fractal: Anduck: I'm in for nearly that on the NO side...
jborkl: have there been 5 deliveries of either of the units?
jurov: jborkl, only the 25ghs
Anduck: there are most likely going to be 5 deliveries of the 25gh units
mircea_popescu: fractal Anduck http://pastebin.com/JgudvNWW that's a paste of the article.
mircea_popescu: since motherfuckin server is still diddling ;/
assbot: [BTCTC] [CB.IDIFF-O] 1 @ 0.007914 BTC [-]
fractal: Anduck: according to the wording its totally not fair for 2 M-boards or multiple hardware considered a 400gh 'unit' since the company advertised a 400Gh unit as "1 Master board 16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips"" --- to be honest -- the vagureness of the langugage makes it unfair for either side to win or lose --
jborkl: jurov: I would think reading it first order of business is the 5 delivery, as you were looking at
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02637 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.02637 = 0.0791 BTC [-]
jurov: now the question is, whether we require proof of one 400gh order filled, too
jurov: or are 5x25gh sufficient
jborkl: I think the 5 25 would be sufficient
fractal: jurov: it's not just 400Gh being shipped --- its 400Gh in a single unit as advertised -- if they ship more hardware to make it up for it -- its because performance wasn't met
jborkl: What if no one ordered a 400?
fractal: jborkl: I asked mircea_popescu this question , in the logs he said he'd like to see proof of a 400Gh unit as well as a 25Gh unit ... i dont have logs tho
fractal: i can get them if needed tho
mircea_popescu: fractal they're in the topic
Anduck: i think the 5x 25gh would be sufficient too (but my opinion must be non-counting due to the fact i am on "yes" side of the bet)
Anduck: :P
mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com
fractal: the problem here I think is what is a 'UNIT' --- this is what we're debating ;)
jurov: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/#270705
mircea_popescu: jborkl how much was the 400 ? like 150 btc or something ?
ozbot: #bitcoin-assets log
jborkl: i am not sure actually
fractal: mircea_popescu: i'm reading the bet cancellation policy link now... thanks
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 1 @ 0.0149 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: what were the 25 selling for ?
mircea_popescu: Anduck what'd you pay ?
Anduck: mircea_popescu: there is an example of 400 ghash unit but it was a demo, not delivered unit. but that can be delivered if anyone bought it. it's the same m-boards and h-boards.. just enough of them to make the hashrate of 400gh
Anduck: mircea_popescu: 25gh sold for 1000 euros
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.004896 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 19 @ 0.004897 = 0.093 BTC [+]
jurov: as i said if no 400gh order was delivered, and we require at least one, then the bit was not filled
Anduck: i paid for 2x 25 Ghash starter kit
mircea_popescu: it'd be pretty crazy if nobody bought a 400 then
jurov: regardless whether it can be built out of smaller ones
Anduck: mircea_popescu: true. but we don't know was the first orders (that were shipped this week) including a 400gh miner. but it's proven that it does work if one actually bought one
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 31 @ 0.004897 = 0.1518 BTC [+]
jborkl: the bet does not specify which 5 devices
fractal: mircea_popescu: so you suggest cancelling bet buy betting on the other side ... the weight is too low though ;) i dont have enough BTC ;(
Anduck: and it works = meets the adverticed performance. it's been proven earlier
jborkl: and to clarify I do not have a order or a bet
mircea_popescu: fractal pretty much the only way it works, make your bet neutral.
BigBitz: What is the bet?
jurov: http://bitbet.us/bet/520/bitfury-eu-august-orders-will-ship-before-1st/
mircea_popescu: this is an important point to remember : you NEVER bet on a bet such that you can't neutralize it later should you need to.
mircea_popescu: just one of them things.
ozbot: BitBet - Bitfury EU August orders will ship before 1st September 2013
mircea_popescu: jborkl the rationale is that since there's an A and a B in the bet, and 5 proofs, you want those 5 proofs rto include both A and B
mircea_popescu: somehow, somewhere. else the bet is only half satisfied
Anduck: but B = X*A
jborkl: well, then we have our answer
jurov: if they failed to sell 400gh then..well it's a failure
Anduck: jurov: but that's just plain wrong..
mircea_popescu: jurov it'd be fucking crazy tho. what, they sold like 9 boards to 5 ppl ?
fractal: i'd agree.
jborkl: I do think the wording on the bets needs work, more people would bet if they were clearer
fractal: Forget about the 400Gh being shipped -- the issue is what defines a 'UNIT' as advertised and meeting performance specs
Anduck: so about the bet.. can the 5 confirmed deliveries be any orders?
fractal: Anduck: of course not -- if they dont ship a 400Gh order they are just like BFL
mircea_popescu: what do you mean any orders ?!
Anduck: mircea_popescu: 25gh or 400gh
jurov: fractal: i agree
mircea_popescu: well so far all we have is yours afaik.
mircea_popescu: more confirms of any kind can in no way hurt.
Anduck: they can ship 400gh.. it's built from same m-boards and h-boards.
Anduck: mircea_popescu: true
ThickAsThieves: "Further to the above, TradeFortress has announced that Coinlenders is closing - and that the current site is only a demo, but one which has the same functionality as a real site would (a similarish approach to BTC-TC's "it's just a game" stance - though actually a worse one from an investor's perspective)."
Anduck: mircea_popescu: how about if a 400gh unit was shipped this week but not delivered?
ThickAsThieves: a ponzi dies before its time?
Anduck: and 5 25gh starter kit orders were delivered?
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 19 @ 0.003676 = 0.0698 BTC [-]
fractal: Common man!! the bet specifically says "Delivered"
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 13 @ 0.003675 = 0.0478 BTC [-]
Anduck: 5 units delivered, yes
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 57 @ 0.003555 = 0.2026 BTC [-]
Anduck: but doesn't specify which kind of units, 25 or 400 ghash
Anduck: the bet is about that they will ship their boards in time and they meet the performance
Anduck: and i think that is met if there are 5 confirmed deliveries
mircea_popescu: jborkl re the wording : any time one sees a badly worded bet they can make a better worded one, which at least theoretically would create an advantage for his bet over the old bet and people would flock there.
Anduck: the 25gh kit and 400gh kit are built from same modular units
fractal: there needs to be at least 1 400Gh UNIT hashing as advertised -- and if they miss performance, sending more UNITS doesn't count
mircea_popescu: Anduck well no, it has to be delivered.
assbot: [BTCTC] [NASTY-PT] 3 @ 0.002989 = 0.009 BTC [+]
Anduck: mircea_popescu: what if nobody ordered one?
jurov: "will ship their 25 and 400" << it's AND not OR
mircea_popescu: well then wtf they made the bet including it for ?!
fractal: Anduck: then the statement in the bet fails.
fractal: its a no
Anduck: jurov: shipping =/= delivery
Anduck: the delivery is about 5 units, shipping is about 25gh and 400gh..
Anduck: both unit are built from same modular parts
Anduck: which in my eyes doesn't really need both of the mining units shipped
jurov: obviously the delivery and shipping should be subject to same conditions
mircea_popescu: i guess that's an argument.
fractal: Anduck: Honestly, it seems to me like you wrote a vague bet, that other people have read totally differently, and you're trying to change 'what you meant' .... its not fair man, seriously.
mircea_popescu: not sure how strongly persuasive
mircea_popescu: fractal he wrote it ?!
Anduck: i wrote it yes
Anduck: i bet the 10 btc
fractal: mircea_popescu: he claimes he wrote it
Anduck: i already said it
mircea_popescu: a.
mircea_popescu: well you know it's always good policy to get the manufacturer to write the bet, even if you want to bet on yes.
Anduck: yes
mircea_popescu: they know wtf is going on, don't include 400gh if they have no orders to ship for 400gh etc
Bunnyh: i see 3 requirements: a) they must ship both kinds of devices (25G and 400G) before 1st. b) both kinds of devices must meet power/speed requirements. c) 5 deliveries confirmed (this req. doesn't specify which kind of devices)
fractal: mircea_popescu: which I think would make it a conflict of intrest for him to debate it -- I think 3rd parties who are neutral should strictly look at the language -- otherwise he can just say 'oh, thats not what i meant!' and fuck over the NO bets ;(
Anduck: mircea_popescu: yeah, true. but that the bet shouldnt be failed due that.. they're all same modular cards that the mining unit is built from
jurov: Anduck, you really meant different conditions for shipping and delivery? i don't believe that
mircea_popescu: fractal he has no involvement in the decision of it tho, so why shouildn't he argue it ?
Anduck: it's been proven that a mining card does meet the advertised performance..
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 9 @ 0.004899 = 0.0441 BTC [+]
Anduck: jurov: not really
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla : http://bitbet.us/bet/520/bitfury-eu-august-orders-will-ship-before-1st/#c1295
Anduck: but if there wasn't any 400gh units ordered in the first ordered units
mircea_popescu: FIRST SPAM ON BITBET!
mircea_popescu: it took 8 months.
fractal: mircea_popescu: maybe the deciders will read these logs and the conversation on the page and be influenced
kakobrekla: LOL
mircea_popescu: i doubt they give a shit.
ThickAsThieves: that was me, I'm selling Chinese Kitchens
kakobrekla: ha
bobbabad_: seriously wtf is wrong with mpoe-pr? what a fucking assclown
ThickAsThieves: gotta have a place for the hamburgers!
mircea_popescu: bobbabad_ care to phrase a complaint ?
johnnyfootball: i heard bitfury already has a killer mining pool
ThickAsThieves: all this bitbet delivery betting is a chore
mod6: i like her, she delivers butthurt to the bitcoin masses
bobbabad_: mircea_popescu: is it you or is it someone working for you/mpex?
ThickAsThieves: i like the concept
ThickAsThieves: but oh bitching when they resolve...
mircea_popescu: it is someone working for me.
jurov: http://bitbet.us/bet/472/kncminer-will-deliver-asic-devices-before-october-1st/ << this will be interesting then, too
ozbot: BitBet - KnCMiner will deliver ASIC devices before October 1st
Anduck: jurov: the "will ship their 25ghash and 400gash units in time".. if there wasn't any 400 ghash units ordered in the first orders... but it's been proven that it can be built (why wouldn't it be possible? just attach the cards) and it will meet the spec
jurov: at least i did not mix shipping and delivery there
mircea_popescu: jurov word.
kleeck: Wow. We're still talking about this?
Anduck: kleeck: yes
ThickAsThieves: if sent via teleportation does it count as delivery?
mircea_popescu: dude, the may bfl delivery bet took what, two weeks ?
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.5711 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [VTX] 1 @ 0.613 BTC [+]
kleeck: ffs.
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves receipt is the measure of delivery :D
bobbabad_: mircea_popescu: you both seem to enjoy the occational rant but posts like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263445.msg3036369#msg3036369
fractal: Bunnyh: if the 400Gh doesn't actaully hit 400Gh, would you say that the unit did not meet performance ? (Then , if the company was nice and sent a refund, or more hardware, would it change the fact that the 400Gh unit didn't hit performance hashrate" ?
jurov: Anduck, if no one bought 400gh unit, then they failed in bigger sense
Anduck: mircea_popescu: what's your opinion about the "5 delivered orders"
Anduck: jurov: but thats not really part of the bet
Anduck: they ship what people ordered
Anduck: thats the bet¨
kleeck: Are we just saying the same thing over and over, guys?
mircea_popescu: bobbabad_ she is exacrtly right.
Anduck: if nobody ordered 400 ghash, then they only shipped 25 ghash
jurov: Anduck, both was already answered
ThickAsThieves: i missed this whole argument, but i say, when shit is this hard to sort, you are solving the wrong problem
KRS-1: i am win
Anduck: and 5 orders delivered.. it should be a yes,then
fractal: Anduck: The bet says what the bet says. if no 400Gh device is delivered, the bet is a NO
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves that's not even true
fractal: it says 25 and 400GH units must be delivered
Bunnyh: fractal: i don't really have a good opinion on how to decide, if they did deliver 400GH for everyone who ordered 400GH, and the total hardware doesn't consume more power than advertised (but would consist of more than 1 master board with 16 hashing boards)
fractal: AND
ThickAsThieves: just one unreasonable dude?
Anduck: actually it says that they will ship the units
bobbabad_: mircea_popescu: I get you the two of you like to cause drama and stir the pot... but with posts like that you both just looks like assclowns
Anduck: shipping is not delivering
assbot: [BTCTC] [MININGCO.ETF] 3 @ 0.1193 = 0.3579 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves it's a problem this, getting language to work for the purpose of communication in a novel space.
fractal: Bunnyh: right -- they're getting more , but the actual hardware itself missed specs -- this is what i based my NO bet on
mircea_popescu: most intellectual spaces have what's called "Terms of art" to come to terms with the problem
mircea_popescu: we don't. yet.
mircea_popescu: but that's the problem bitbet is resolving. slowly and verbosely.
Bunnyh: fractal: if the yes/no decision comes to that issue, it will be a really tough call
mircea_popescu: as it should.
jurov: Anduck, they did not even ship 400gh unit/order/whatever. problem solved
kleeck: Yes. Let's argue over what a "mining unit" really means. :D
Anduck: Bunnyh: the bet was about advertised performance, not about advertised hardware amount
mircea_popescu: bobbabad_ who are you and why do you think it matters how things look to you ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 39 @ 0.01256 = 0.4898 BTC [-]
fractal: Anduck: and it missed performance
fractal: thats why they're shipping more hardware
Anduck: ...to meet the promised performing of the unit
Anduck: the unit that a customer has bought
fractal: and the unit didn't meet performance , so they had to send more
fractal: UNIT
Anduck: they didnt send more units
bobbabad_: haha, nice comeback... It fascinates to try to understand the underlieing motivation of self destruction
fractal: http://thegenesisblock.com/bitfury-400-ghs-bitcoin-mining-rig-hits-us-shores/ this is a UNIT -- any more hardware is just making up for it missing performance hashrate numbers
Anduck: they send the mining unit that people ordered
ozbot: Bitfury 400 GH/s Bitcoin Mining Rig Hits US Shores - The Genesis Block
mircea_popescu: bobbabad_ it's not a comeback. it's an attempt to help you start on the work of self-education. do try and answer the question, it's important.
fractal: Anduck: and that unit is hashing at 380Gh... if they send some more hardware, it doesn't change the fact that the 400Gh unit is only 380Gh.
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 11 @ 0.01256 = 0.1382 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 19 @ 0.01258 = 0.239 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: i sort-of wonder if after this people will go have some nice icecream and argue over the cones with the poor hapless waitress.
Anduck: fractal: the unit is hashing at 400 ghash. the unit has more h-boards that was told at the site (when they ordered) but that doesn't change the performance of the ordered unit
mircea_popescu: little will she know that BITCOIN!!! touched her life.
fractal: I think most people, looking at a picture would call 1 thing a UNIT, and 2 things multiple UNITS
mircea_popescu: fractal what about the power brick ?
fractal: Anduck: No, its not. The unit missed performance numbers
fractal: mircea_popescu: its attached
mircea_popescu: is it two units ?
jurov: fractal, one unit is one order
bobbabad_: mircea_popescu: so you seriously believe that "Your entire "asset" (Labcoin) consists of Burnside pasting fake trades to create an illusion of interest"..
mircea_popescu: but seriously, if i buy a laptop, which comes as two item (power supply + laptop) am i buying one or two units ?
fractal: jurov: thats totally wrong. thats like saying a BFL single is a UNIT if they ship 2 to make up for it
bobbabad_: the two of you are clearly trolling, there is now way you can be that stupid
mircea_popescu: bobbabad_ i can ignore you if you absolutely want that.
fractal: mircea_popescu: you're splitting hairs now i think ;)
mircea_popescu: fractal ok, but do answer. is it a unit or two ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.68 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.681 = 5.362 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.684 BTC [+]
fractal: mircea_popescu: depends what your definition of unit is, i suppose.... i think most people would say its one unit.... but if there were 2 laptops, because the first laptop wasn't fast enough, it would be 2 units
ThickAsThieves: mp Pale Phoenix really doesnt like you (labcoin thread) "Perhaps I should be more tolerant of manic, shrill bullies like PRBot. It must be quite tragic to be so sure that you stand at the center of the universe, only to realize that you're just another decaying bit of yesterday's news."
ThickAsThieves: towers and geniuses
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves not sure why they're that aggitated anyway.
ThickAsThieves: you know exactly why
Rulother: lol
mircea_popescu: well ok, i know exactly why. you caught me :p
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 38 @ 0.003769 = 0.1432 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 19 @ 0.00377 = 0.0716 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 156 @ 0.003797 = 0.5923 BTC [+]
fractal: mircea_popescu: So, 1 UNIT would be what was required to operate the original laptop at advertised specs.... if the company sent you a 2nd laptop to make up for the fact that your first laptop wasn't good enough -- you received 2 UNITS
fractal: mircea_popescu: but your first laptop+brick as a UNIT wasn't at specs
mircea_popescu: but you can't really run the laptop w/o power except for two hours
mircea_popescu: you bought a laptop that'd run for months not for hours.
fractal: mircea_popescu: right -- i meants the 2nd laptop comes with a power cord also
Rulother: So there's like two arguements going on at once in here I see
Anduck: Rulother: yes
ThickAsThieves: wanna start another?
mircea_popescu: anyway, niot saying the laptop example controls
fractal: ;)
mircea_popescu: just saying that the definitions of words aren't at all that pinned down as we like to think them
mircea_popescu: which has been perpetually a problem in any attempt at justice.
ThickAsThieves: I respect Miley Cyrus as an artist an female
fractal: mircea_popescu: i agree.... thats why law is a difficult field
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves i think it died once fractal said the magical word i agree
mircea_popescu: you're not allowed to agree with anything if you want a good argument to keep going
ThickAsThieves: reason prevails
ThickAsThieves: oh well
Rulother: I think she's a crazy mastermind
Rulother: She has everyone talking about her
Rulother: So she's relevant again
ThickAsThieves: why are people surprised, isnt this the Madonna/Cher/Britney formula?
ThickAsThieves: who started this formula Marylin Monroe maybe?
Rulother: Mozart before that
mircea_popescu: what, skin them, fill the husk with hay and reannimate it with the dark arts of necromancy ?
ThickAsThieves: just add in sexualness, and yes
mircea_popescu: masturbatory sexualness, i think it comes as a food additive.
Rulother: Mozart was a sexual freak
ThickAsThieves: meanwhile Taylor Swift is relieved she is still allowed to have a soul
Rulother: Well she just consumes souls and then writes about it and makes money
Rulother: She's a succubus
ThickAsThieves: possibly
mircea_popescu: Swift moved to Nashville, Tennessee at the age of fourteen to pursue a career in country music.
ThickAsThieves: a siren, more appropriately
mircea_popescu: you know i never heard of her.
mircea_popescu: recommend something ?
ThickAsThieves: dont bother
Rulother: I can't do that
mircea_popescu: a ok
ThickAsThieves: bubblegum stuff
ThickAsThieves: she's still a good kid though
Rulother: Actually, look up "22"
mircea_popescu: i wouldn't want to miss up on the next cher.
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 9384 @ 0.00087065 = 8.1702 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 5466 @ 0.00087157 = 4.764 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: i wanna scoop her up early
mircea_popescu: hm, did that bobbard character only drop by to bitch about mpoe-pr ?!
Rulother: He's a big labcoin guy
Rulother: fanboi that is
mircea_popescu: at this rate she's going to be more famous than me
ThickAsThieves: i wonder how many forum geniuses lurk here
mircea_popescu: i wonder why people don't just say "dude, i'm a big labcoin fan, because x y z"
mircea_popescu: rather than this underhanded bs. does anyone actually imagine it works ?!
ThickAsThieves: they do
ThickAsThieves: accept x y z all translate to "cuz i bought some"
Rulother: AMAZING COMPANY
mircea_popescu: well that's not so very great a reason is it.
Rulother: I'm going to automatically ignore anyone that says that on the forums
Rulother: so I know who to weed out
mircea_popescu: "please agree X is a great company to spare me the emoptional cost of readjusting with a contrary and grossly dissinterested reality"
ThickAsThieves: theyd rather make money by mistake than on purpose
ThickAsThieves: so much cooler
mircea_popescu: ^
mircea_popescu: dude you've been touched by truth. that's true innit.
mircea_popescu: that's exactly true.
fractal: well, i gotta run... talk to you guys later.
ThickAsThieves: peace
fractal: hey mircea_popescu , what do you think of just-dice.com ? very impressive IMO.
fractal: although the investment ROI has stalled in the past couple weeks... but i think whoehver bought SD madea mistake ;)
mircea_popescu: fractal i was one of the large early investors.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003797 = 0.0076 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: there;s anarticle on trilema discussing it somewhere, remind me to link you sometime
ThickAsThieves: ;;google trilemanjust-dice
gribble: No matches found.
ThickAsThieves: ;;google trilema just-dice
gribble: Perfect money corrupts absolutely pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea ...: <http://trilema.com/2013/perfect-money-corrupts-absolutely/>; A compedium of compressed Bitcoin points pe Trilema - Un blog de ...: <http://trilema.com/2013/a-compedium-of-compressed-bitcoin-points/>; I state problems, I receive solutions. A happiness is me. pe Trilema ...: <http://trilema.com/2013/i-state- (1 more message)
ThickAsThieves: oh its down still
mircea_popescu: sadly.
fractal: nice... you must have done well... they need a few more whales to play to get the profit up to 1% tho... can't belive 1 guy took them for 4000BTC
pankkake: well, I'm still at a loss from my small investment on JD. bad timing
mircea_popescu: i hadn't realised how fucking integral to btc ecosystem trilema is. i'll have to get redundancy for that too now ?!
mircea_popescu: fractal iirc i made ~20 btc betting too
fractal: I made an investment a couple weeks ago,,, profit seems to have stalled there for a bit
mircea_popescu: bujt nothing like the whale.
mircea_popescu: same principle, not same volume
mircea_popescu: http://bitbet.us/bet/521/labcoins-own-130nm-design-sample-chips-will-be/#c1302 << SHOCKING!!!
ozbot: BitBet - Labcoins own 130nm design sample chips will be received by testers by 12TH SEPT 2013
mircea_popescu: someone actually rtemembers what scamlab was claiming a few weeks back
mod6: ok, well maybe i aught to add a random number to this thing now...
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.1921 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 5 @ 0.192 = 0.96 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 3 @ 0.1917 = 0.5751 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 13 @ 0.1916 = 2.4908 BTC [-]
fractal: mircea_popescu: have you ever thought about lowering your fee to join mpex? maybe you'll get more volume/make more in fees?
mircea_popescu: the fee was originally 0, for people who wanted to beta. it went up from 20 to 30 when glbse failed.
mircea_popescu: i've said it's only going to go up in the future, and it's a fact.
Rulother: There's a service out there, that will do the trading for you with a small % per transaction. Forgot the name :P
mircea_popescu: Rulother coinbr.com you mean ?
fractal: I bet you could get 100's of people at 1-2BTC,
Rulother: yeah
mircea_popescu: fractal there's brokers doing exactly that.
mircea_popescu: this is deliberate, helping the community professionalize.
ThickAsThieves: https://coinbr.com/ref?c=Q9gPSuUvYS
ozbot: About CoinBr
ThickAsThieves: :)
mircea_popescu: if random chinese asic manufacturers would help rather than hinder we'd be moving a lot faster, but even so, we're moving.
Rulother: hah
fractal: mircea_popescu: if significant competition comes around would you adjust to the market?
mircea_popescu: significant competition would participate in the same market, face the same constraints and take the same measures,
mircea_popescu: ifg they're smart.
ThickAsThieves: i have mpex AND coinbr
ThickAsThieves: big pimpin
fractal: mircea_popescu: why not start a btct.co type site using your backend code? ;) you can own the small-fish market and big-fish
mircea_popescu: they'd certainly fail otherwise. so no, i'd just wait for them to die.
deadweasel: nobody wants to deal with bitcoin small fish.
mircea_popescu: because the goal is to make bitcoin work, not to try and finesse a few coins out of the masses.
fractal: very noble ;)
ThickAsThieves: that's my job
jurov: deadweasel, actually everybody except mircea does
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.003794 = 0.0379 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: fractal i have a history, by now it's long in btc terms.
deadweasel: but do you want to deal with them? or someone with their head screwed on?
fractal: mircea_popescu: i've always thought that becoming my own competition is the best way to provide the most efficient service to a market...
jurov: deadweasel lol how long are you around?
deadweasel: not long enough.
fractal: i..e launching multiple sites with diff fees/features and seeing what works
mircea_popescu: maybe.
matuszed: Maker taker!
matuszed: someone do it with maker taker
fractal: but i suppose 'if its not broken, dont fix it' can be a valid argument sometimes as well
mircea_popescu: the thing is i know what doesn't work, i don't need to experiment to discover what's wrong with boiler rooms, wash trading, pump and dumps or all the rest of the "internet investment" stuff.
ThickAsThieves: matuszed, you could probly convince Havelock
matuszed: You serious
ThickAsThieves: even Burnside has considerd it
thestringpuller: you can build a lot with mpex as is
thestringpuller: the optiins and diff market are very open
mircea_popescu: well actually mpex has always had it eh ?
mircea_popescu: 0% fees to sell stuff.
mircea_popescu: 0.2% to buy stuff
Anduck: http://pastebin.com/p9gjgiKu
ozbot: Bitfury EU August orders will ship before 1st September 2013 This is met. B - Pastebin.com
Anduck: please let me know is there something wrong there
mircea_popescu: Anduck why not start a blog at thius point ?
Anduck: mircea_popescu: i just want the bet to be resolved correctly :)
mircea_popescu: ppl will want to comment on the pastebin lol
mircea_popescu: but since you're here, link the pix to the other two ?
Anduck: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=250249.620
Anduck: this thread, 2 or 3 last pages
Anduck: dyaheon and foofighter
Anduck: mircea_popescu: there's nothing to comment in that pastebin. it's all just facts and how the bet is
Anduck: but if someone wants to comment it, comment here..?
jurov: anduck put it as comment to bitbet and you'll see
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] 6 @ 0.00329 = 0.0197 BTC [+]
Anduck: ok
Anduck: i put the link there.. no need to spam it more :O
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 19 @ 0.0262 = 0.4978 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: well it's relevant.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0262 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.0262 = 0.0786 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0262 BTC [-]
jurov: ;;bc,stats
gribble: Current Blocks: 254910 | Current Difficulty: 6.5750060149084814E7 | Next Difficulty At Block: 256031 | Next Difficulty In: 1121 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 5 days, 15 hours, 11 minutes, and 45 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 78136705.381 | Estimated Percent Change: 18.83899
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 3 @ 0.1799 = 0.5397 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 37 @ 0.0262 = 0.9694 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 60 @ 0.01594 = 0.9564 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.684 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.685 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.685 = 5.37 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004429 = 0.2215 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 950 @ 0.004425 = 4.2038 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.7 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 2 @ 0.02628 = 0.0526 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.02628 = 0.0788 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 9 @ 0.0037 = 0.0333 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: "I'm extremely happy that Friedcat returned that transaction fee mistake. Integrity is worth a lot more than 200 coins (no matter what BTC ends up being worth)."
ThickAsThieves: (regarding a block that has an insanely high tx fee in it)
ThickAsThieves: what am i missing here?
ThickAsThieves: how is this a sign of integrity
ThickAsThieves: sure it's nice n all
kleeck: FC returned the tx fee, instead of keeping it.
ThickAsThieves: but if he hadnt returned it he'd be a bad guy?
zoinky: yes.
zoinky: sure!
zoinky: im mad as share holder
zoinky: !
ThickAsThieves: what if he just didnt even notice?
zoinky: thats mining revenue wasted
ThickAsThieves: is he now a neglectful bad guy?
jurov: ThickAsThieves: karma is a bitch
ThickAsThieves: maybe the guy losing the 200btc had the bad karma
kakobrekla: is bad for his chi
ThickAsThieves: and no FC has it
ThickAsThieves: now*
fractal: ThickAsThieves: the ownder has over 10,000 BTC -- likely a criminal/money launderer -- friedcat sohuld have kept it, he has a responsibility to shareholders
ThickAsThieves: whoa waity a sec
pankkake: wat
gecko_x2: over NINE THOUSAND?!
fractal: if it was a guy with 201 BTC who lost 200BTC , id say return it right away.... how bad can you feel about someone with 10,000+ BTC laundering coins losing 200?
ThickAsThieves: if you have 10000btc you are presumed a criminal now?
fractal: ThickAsThieves: no.
mircea_popescu: lol what, rich people are bad mkay ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.PURCHASE] 1 @ 0.01594 BTC [-]
jurov: http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr05/2013/8/28/14/anigif_original-grid-image-17411-1377714301-29.gif
jurov: (unrelated)
ThickAsThieves: lol
ThickAsThieves: irllol
kleeck: <kakobrekla> is bad for his chi <<<<<<< YESSSSSSSS! REPOSTED FOR POSTERITY: YIFU - http://imgur.com/Tr8HVI6
gecko_x2: lol
fractal: the 200BTC was returned to this address --> https://blockchain.info/address/12HUyZeNFqk4db2EM7GY5e6homTVTpPd7Z
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 8077 @ 0.00087157 = 7.0397 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 13957 @ 0.00087254 = 12.178 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: ;;ticker
gribble: MtGox BTCUSD ticker | Best bid: 128.92001, Best ask: 129.00000, Bid-ask spread: 0.07999, Last trade: 129.49995, 24 hour volume: 9171.09358164, 24 hour low: 128.18000, 24 hour high: 131.72442, 24 hour vwap: 129.34495
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1200 @ 0.00368 = 4.416 BTC [-]
fractal: It's likely , but not certain, that people who stole large amounts of bitcoins will try to launder them before cashing out on MTGOX.
ThickAsThieves: re labcoiners hating mp "I agree 100%. Right after his little post I thought "wow, didn't he show this same distaste towards asicminer at one point?" This was the biggest signal for me, and I bought up a shitload.. "
fractal: I've been short AM since 0.4
fractal: on paper.. ;)
ThickAsThieves: oh wait, one more dig
fractal: i'll buy under .1 , maybe
ThickAsThieves: "and just for the record, I think he's really good at running an exchange that has no securities."
ThickAsThieves: i think it will hit 0 before .1
fractal: How many entities do you guys think own over 10,000 BTC? 100, 200, 500?
mircea_popescu: someone should send the labcoiners a digest list of glbse muppets hating mp back in like... august 2012.
ThickAsThieves: 200+
mircea_popescu: 1-200.
mircea_popescu: there's not that much space, plenty of people own more than 10k
mircea_popescu: bitcoin is quite top heavy
fractal: you think 200 max?
mircea_popescu: well it's hard to say.
fractal: What about 1000 BTC? 5000?
ThickAsThieves: there is some analysis out there on this topic
ThickAsThieves: ive stumbled over it at times
fractal: ThickAsThieves: its hard to do, unless addresses are linked
fractal: MTGOX has a great idea though ;)
ThickAsThieves: heh
Scrat: 10k+ is ter(r)anode?
fractal: I'm just thinking that, if someone wanted to be top 5000 richest BTC in the world, how many would he need to buy right now?
ThickAsThieves: not much
fractal: 500? 1000?
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003699 BTC [+]
fractal: take a guess
mod6: https://twitter.com/modsix/status/373176507159433216
ThickAsThieves: 500
ozbot: Twitter / modsix: @BitOTTer [BitOTTerBot] is ...
ThickAsThieves: neato
jurov: mod6 , #mpex is something else
fractal: cool.. I think 2,100 is a good goal for someone with a lot of money, and very bullish on bitcoin -- mathmatically no more then 10,000 people can own as much as you, and in reality it will likely be 1000 or less in the future
ThickAsThieves: top 5000 isnt exact;y a monument
ThickAsThieves: how many bitcoiners are there with any btc?
fractal: ThickAsThieves: worldwide? you're 0.000001% rich in 2050
ThickAsThieves: maybe 200k?
mod6: jurov: lol.
fractal: ThickAsThieves: i'm extrapolating for world-wide BTC usage in the future
mod6: i care not.
ThickAsThieves: fractal, that's too unclear to attempt imo
ThickAsThieves: bitcoin will have competition
assbot: [BTCTC] [CB.IDIFF-E] 10 @ 0.029 = 0.29 BTC
fractal: ThickAsThieves: competition that will replace it?
ThickAsThieves: obv no one can answer that
mircea_popescu: fractal prolly 1k gets you in the top 5k
ThickAsThieves: on a long enough timeframe yes
mircea_popescu: prolly 1k gets you in the top 1k for that matter.
ThickAsThieves: yeah
ThickAsThieves: probably
ThickAsThieves: i wanna know how many people have bitcoins
zoinky: well coinbase claims to have 238,000 users
zoinky: who knows how many have coins
matuszed: Im like 5000 users on there alone
zoinky: theres been millions of downloads of the client
ThickAsThieves: haha
zoinky: so id say.. maybe 15k?
mircea_popescu: lol matuszed
fractal: well. around 2-3 million coins have never been moved right? 1 Million is satoshi and 1-2Milion lost -- lets say theres 8M coins in real peoples hands -- 5000 people holding 1000BTC would take up 5M BTC and mean only 3M is left as float
ThickAsThieves: rreally 1-2mil lost?
fractal: i think less then 5000 people have 1000BTC
ThickAsThieves: nice
mircea_popescu: fractal large holders are part of the float as much as small holders.
fractal: ThickAsThieves: thats what i've gathered from reading forums -- one guy talked about mining 50K coins and then formatting his HD
mircea_popescu: basically there's a 1-200 people that matter, holding like 90% of all coins. there's ~10k people with modest holdings, doing another 9%
fractal: it was fake money in 2009
ThickAsThieves: yeah but then there are some people with 10000_ and 100,000+
mircea_popescu: then there's ~100k people who have some dust, post on forums, what have you
zoinky: it was just as real in 2009
ThickAsThieves: this conversation just makes me wanna hoard harder
mircea_popescu: i would guess group 1 median is somewhere in the 50k range. group 2 median probably about 80-150 btc
mircea_popescu: group 3 median like 0.05 to 0.1
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 7 @ 0.01258 = 0.0881 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 300 @ 0.003699 = 1.1097 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: biggest design flaw in bitcoin: the decimal
ThickAsThieves: :)
KRS-1: heh
fractal: So, if 1 million people use BTC in 2015, what amount do you think would put you in top 10,000 ?
matuszed: Thats the most impossible question in the world to answer
fractal: the price will likely be $1000 by then, and lots of large holders would probably sell
jurov: fractal, just buy 100k S.MPOE now
ThickAsThieves: but theyd need to sell less if price was that high
mircea_popescu: fractal i doubt large holders will ever sell.
mircea_popescu: they jhave no incentive to, as they already have more fiat than they know what to do with
mircea_popescu: which is how they ended up with btc in the first place.
fractal: not that hard -- we can use Gold as model for BTC -- kings and tyrants were the largest gold holders, and slowly holdings moved
mircea_popescu: you can steal gold. you can't hardly steal btc.
fractal: mircea_popescu: right... so rich fiat btc users will hold , and poor btc users who mined will sell
ThickAsThieves: tell that to labcoin
mircea_popescu: fractal pretty much.
mircea_popescu: we're her to take over the world and reshape it drastically
mircea_popescu: not make a few million. fuckall cares. the idea is that the us president will take office upon swearing an oath to the conclave of bitcoin.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.02628 = 0.0788 BTC [+]
fractal: mircea_popescu: hahaha amazing response.
fractal: bravo.
mircea_popescu: which as a side point makes all the sec posturing rather lol.
mircea_popescu: as in "sec who and quo warranto ?"
ThickAsThieves: whats the command to see the avg price up and down the gox orderbook?
fractal: I really think world governments have no clue what is going to hit them in 2-3 years
fractal: it will be interesting to see MPEX replace carlos slim on forbes top 100 though ;)
ThickAsThieves: i tried telling my wife this stuff last night
ThickAsThieves: she now sees me as a little crazier than before
mircea_popescu: ya well. but it's what it is.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [HIM] 1 @ 0.2055 BTC [+]
fractal: ThickAsThieves: which makes it even better when you end up being right... your brilliance will shine throughout the ages
mircea_popescu: "o, we have a mandate fgrom the voters" "well, d othose voters hold any birtcoin ?"
ThickAsThieves: it's very difficult for people to digest that bitcoin will disrupt
mircea_popescu: "no" "then stfu and get back in line"
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves s/that/what
mircea_popescu: fractal it'd never be forbes top 100.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 10 @ 0.025801 = 0.258 BTC [+]
jurov: ...and bitcoin-assets logs will be studied carefully by historicians.
jurov: ^ i have a bit of an issue with this :)
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.7 = 5.4 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.729 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.74 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.742 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.744 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.748 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 4 @ 2.75 = 11 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 8 @ 2.76 = 22.08 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.76 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.782 = 5.564 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.79 = 5.58 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 4 @ 2.795 = 11.18 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.8 = 5.6 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.81 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.813 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.818 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.819 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.825 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.829 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.848 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: heh
zoinky: pump it up
fractal: ThickAsThieves: although, I see when governments realize what crypto-currency implications are -- they will issue state-sanctioned alt-chains.... this the the only thread to BTC
ThickAsThieves: thats ok
mircea_popescu: fractal would you buy it ?
Scrat: the sheeple might buy it
ThickAsThieves: they could never hold to it being deflationary
fractal: USACoin would be adopted quickly with government backing, and likely grow to a larger marketcap then BTC
ThickAsThieves: even if they said they will
fractal: mircea_popescu: yes, due to sheep using it
Scrat: fractal: dude it's "than"
zoinky: even if they did, i bet the exchange rate to BTC would be the same as USD
mircea_popescu: zoinky pretty much.
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.845 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.849 = 5.698 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: actually state sanctioned chains would make bitcoin worth more than the sum of all the chains just on that strength alone
ThickAsThieves: if they want to commit to even attempting an Americoin, theyd need to back it
mircea_popescu: put 10 units of faith in your state chain and by that fact 14 into bitcoin
ThickAsThieves: and not print more of it
fractal: its more of a 'USCoin is legal tender, and you can pay taxes in USCoin' that means people will have to sell BTC to buy USCoin to pay taxes -- UScoin will be more valuable
ThickAsThieves: which would be progress
ThickAsThieves: but theyd never hold to it
ThickAsThieves: just like the gold stanadrd
mircea_popescu: fractal not really. people would keep their savings in btc and buy chinacoin/uscoin/swisscoin as needed
mircea_popescu: the only way the state thing could seriously disrupt was if there were only one state.
mircea_popescu: which there isn't, and so bitcoin is soon enough on this score.
fractal: mircea_popescu: maybe... it will be interesting to see how it plays out in a few years. i predict the US minting virtual currency is a certainty at some point
ThickAsThieves: more likely to have Amazon or Google coin as a threat than the usacoin
mircea_popescu: but yes, in a historical perspective this is correct, had it been a few decades late it'd have bnever vbeen possible as such
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves usacoin wouldbe implemented as a googlecoin
mircea_popescu: it is a fascist state after all. uses statal corporations.
fractal: haha... you've been reading the zerohedge article on assange and schmidt meeting?
fractal: ;)
ThickAsThieves: nope
ThickAsThieves: not familiar
mircea_popescu: nope
ThickAsThieves: ;market buy 50000
fractal: Basically the NSA government uses large corp's to help them gather information -- nothing that is surprising or out of the ordinary. i dont know why people are shocked at the news. all states , communist, fascist, or otherwise do this
ThickAsThieves: ;;market buy 50000
gribble: A market order to buy 50000 bitcoins right now would take 8575337.2782 USD and would take the last price up to 300.0000 USD, resulting in an average price of 171.5067 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0045 seconds
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003693 BTC [-]
fractal: the corporations and the state share the same intrests -- its obvious they would help eachother
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6282 @ 0.00087334 = 5.4863 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1599 @ 0.00087114 = 1.393 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: fractal this particular state-corporation ammalgamation is what historical fascism is known for economically.
mircea_popescu: the mechanisms and physiology is quite different from the capitalist state
ThickAsThieves: so if bitcoin is this powerful
ThickAsThieves: why is the price so low?
fractal: mircea_popescu: yes, but the actual impact of it is mostly overblown in americas case.... its mostly a laissez fair keynesian capitalist state
ThickAsThieves: gotta be more nerds with money
mircea_popescu: i disagree.
ThickAsThieves: willing to throw millions at it\
fractal: ThickAsThieves: we're smarter then everyone else. im actually serious.
ThickAsThieves: than!
zoinky: people still laugh if i mention bitcoin
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves because while it could end up realising that power, odds are it won't. judging by the average iq and ability of people involved...
fractal: ThickAsThieves: no idea why tech billionaires haven't bought up 100K+ BTC
mircea_popescu: (where involved = self reportedly involved)
zoinky: because they are billionaires
mircea_popescu: fractal large holders are usally risk averse.
fractal: hahahah you gotta love mircea_popescu's confidence ;) i actaully love seeing MPOE-PR posts on the forums and the rage replies.... although it will only work as long as he's right about everything ;)
fractal: better not be wrong!
mircea_popescu: it's happened that i was wrong im pretty sure.
fractal: and did it humble you at all? ;)
mircea_popescu: what, i'm very humble.
fractal: you were wrong?? when?
ThickAsThieves: i recall the girl not realizing how many coins AM had actually paid out to shareholders
jborkl: wtf is going on with the Avalon chips, they finally admitted there are none coming?
fractal: jborkl: they're coming, but delayed....
fractal: jborkl: then shipped to chineese resellers first, according to rumours , before international orders... thats why people are mad
mircea_popescu: heh. ethical :D
jborkl: you sure, I have seen stuff today that is leading to think they are never coming
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 1303 @ 0.00087495 = 1.1401 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 21997 @ 0.00087501 = 19.2476 BTC [+]
jborkl: not that i did before heh
mircea_popescu: jborkl link ?
fractal: of course, delayed is just as bad as not shipping at all since if difficulty is too high, the chips are useless ..... but thats another argument
jborkl: one sec lemme find it
ThickAsThieves: ;;nethash
gribble: 613384.094317
ThickAsThieves: yum
Scrat: ;;echo .d
gribble: .d
ozbot: 65750060.14908 | Next Diff in 1114 blocks | Estimated Change: 18.5786% in 6d 7h 3m 0s
ThickAsThieves: ;;estimate
gribble: Next difficulty estimate | 78149439.9984 based on data since last change | 85687460.5852 based on data for last three days
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 500 @ 0.004818 = 2.409 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004819 = 0.241 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 450 @ 0.00482 = 2.169 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: 20% in 6 days ?! didn't it JUST switch ?
mircea_popescu: like, yesterday ?
fractal: Am I the only person who thinks that the network will be stronger if the PoW was changed to a algo that couldn't be performed in custom hardware? (i..e gpu's only)
jborkl: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=177827.1260
mircea_popescu: you're not the only person, but you're wrong along with the rest of em
fractal: All I see is mining centralization which will end when Intel builds 14nm chips in 2015
ozbot: [CLOSED] Avalon ASIC chip distribution
jborkl: that is just one of the pages, lemme find more
Scrat: fractal: you're implying that algo's cannot be done in custom hardware
Scrat: any algos*
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 1 @ 0.00345 BTC [-]
jborkl: you cant make a algo that could only be done in gpus
mircea_popescu: midnightmagic seriously, how's the ethicalness going these days ?
fractal: Thats correct -- my assumption is that the best PoW would be one that performs best in common computer hardware -- using all aspects -- RAM, Memory, and computing power
fractal: it would ensure a decentalized network
jborkl: that is scrypt and it sucks
mircea_popescu: fractal there's such a thing as a turing machine
mircea_popescu: you're trying to solve a problem by dancing around it
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.0008717 BTC [+]
kakobrekla: rahter dance inside it
mircea_popescu: lol
fractal: mircea_popescu: I understand that custom hardware could be build for any algo, but my goal would to make it not cost-effective until the coin had a market cap of say $100B
mircea_popescu: what makes you think i'm not humble when you display the unmitigated audacity to pick numbers ?
mircea_popescu: why 100b ?
ThickAsThieves: it doesnt work like that anyway
mircea_popescu: indeed.
fractal: A PoW that required lots of disk-access, RAM, and processing power, would sort of make custom hardware useless to build --- assuming that such a PoW algo could be made
jborkl: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=179769.2600
ozbot: [Work in progess] Burnins Avalon Chip to mining board service
jborkl: burnin, that actually made a nice board with Avalon sample chips
ThickAsThieves: so you want uselessness to be a factor?
mircea_popescu: because why ?
jborkl: gone to complete shit also
mircea_popescu: sucks.
fractal: gmaxwell said that a tough PoW algo that used all aspects of a general-purpose computer could still probably be sped up by up around 20% on custom hardware --- but that isn't much of a margin to make it worth it until the market cap and mining reward are very high
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.839 BTC [-]
jborkl: Activemining - also seen information that they are not getting the 20,000 chips
mircea_popescu: that's one sad turn of events tbh, they certainly impressed back in the fpga days when they figured out what old chips bfl sanded off to pass as their ip
fractal: mircea_popescu: also, Dan Kamisky thinks the SHA algo will be replaced due to centralized mining --- he seems to be a pretty smart guy ;)
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 10 @ 0.02628 = 0.2628 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.839 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 4 @ 0.02628 = 0.1051 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02628 BTC [+]
kakobrekla: but big miners will not want to change it
kakobrekla: so how is that gonna happen
jborkl: why would we want to go to scrypt?, screw that
mircea_popescu: fractal there's two layers. on one layer, all this is roughly aggitation from a bunch of dishonest people trying to serve the interests of their political masters.
jborkl: burns up gpu's like butter
mircea_popescu: what with gavin going on about introducing a server that can turn off transactions etc.
mircea_popescu: on the other layer, there's no particular advantage to any one structure of transistors.
fractal: kakobrekla: big miners will lose the vote to small miners who would likely start using a new PoW if it meant they could mine on their own rigs again from parts they buy at the store
mircea_popescu: they're all man made, they'll all be man made.
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [CFIG] 2 @ 0.1799 = 0.3598 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: "With ASICMINER today announcing blades for as low as 3.5BTC, it appeared that Avalon chips that do not mine today are not going to break even any more. While those blades went already out of stock after some hours, the new price for mining rig is officially set. Essentially this means that if Avalon does not ship the remaining chips fully within the next two weeks, they become worth
ThickAsThieves: less than their shipping costs."
ThickAsThieves: shitty
mircea_popescu: we have absolutely no problem producing parts as it is now.
kakobrekla: fractal imo you maffs are off
jborkl: wait, you know there is LTC right?
jborkl: and frecoin, bigcoin, smallcoin ....
kakobrekla: and vagcoin
jborkl: oh yeah
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003697 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 44 @ 0.003698 = 0.1627 BTC [+]
jborkl: wasnt there a buttsexcoin?
mircea_popescu: basically diff explodes at an exponential rate and somehow people are concern-trolling about how there's not enough parts out or some shit.
fractal: kako, a PoW that was most efficient on standard computer hardware would be the best to use, IMO, it would make centralized mining more difficult.
jborkl: no, that was called a botnet
ThickAsThieves: would it?
fractal: I dont know if its possible for such a PoW to exist -- but i think it can be close
jborkl: we just got rid of that shit
fractal: jborkl: good point on the botnet -- not sure if thats worse then centralized ASIC mining though.
mircea_popescu: fractal what centralized ?
fractal: id rather have the botnets
mircea_popescu: lol.
mircea_popescu: i guess that's why you don't get a vote then
jborkl: not centralize, gigas private pool is like 50th
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 112 @ 0.003698 = 0.4142 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 28 @ 0.0037 = 0.1036 BTC [+]
jborkl: it is just private peoople
fractal: mircea_popescu: some devs expressed the same sentiment as me regarding botnets
mircea_popescu: jborkl yeah, all the shit he stole from people, and all the shit his friends stole from people.
mircea_popescu: amazingrando, hashking, the lot.
jborkl: I am not advocating giga, btw
mircea_popescu: fractal you do realise the devs don't get a vote, either, do you ?
fractal: what vote?
mircea_popescu: as to whether we break bitcoin to make teh gobernmint happy or no.
jborkl: hash vote?
jborkl: if you have 100 gh, you get to vote as a miner with 100 gh
ThickAsThieves: devs vote to install voting system
ThickAsThieves: can we do if you have 1000btc instead?
jborkl: do you pool mine, solo mine, rent out your hash to gpumax
mircea_popescu: as it stands right now, any attack on the bitcoin network requires the attacker spend some dough on making chips.
jborkl: last one was so fucking stupid
mircea_popescu: this is a fixed cost of money and time.
fractal: mircea_popescu: if you follow the inevitable logic -- the entity with access to the smallest manufacturing process will control a PoW such as SHA256. There is 1 entity who always has the smallest fab process -- Intel.. they can do 14nm and put the rest out of business. They won't until the US Government asks them to, or until mining is worth $5B / year or so to make it worth it
mircea_popescu: if we fall for this poisonous nonsense, about six different governments can attack the network just out of spare parts they got laying about.
fractal: so basically, Intel controls bitcoin
mircea_popescu: this is out of the querstion, pretty much.
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 26 @ 0.003698 = 0.0961 BTC [-]
jborkl: no, we have been through this a year ago
mircea_popescu: we already have in private hands the technoklogy to make miners.
ThickAsThieves: looks like Samsung, not Intel
mircea_popescu: we DO NOT have the technoplogy to make "Average computers"
ThickAsThieves: plus you are forgetting all about my quantum miner
fractal: Intel is the ONLY fab in the world going to do 14nm chips -- that practically puts all other ASIC out of business
mircea_popescu: a move away from sha would be a move away from free market and independece.
mircea_popescu: fractal does not.
ThickAsThieves: how does intel make money taking over bitcoin?
jborkl: they would just fuck up and deliver in 5 years or so
mircea_popescu: right-o.
gecko_x2: http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate
ozbot: Bitcoin Hash Rate
fractal: mircea_popescu: you're right... i just looked it up and samsung is making 14nm as well...
gecko_x2: something is gonna have to change soon.
mircea_popescu: fractal more important : there are dozens of people who can make their own miners as it is now.
mircea_popescu: this has been proven.
ThickAsThieves: then we'll have nanocarbon and biochips etc
fractal: mircea_popescu: ok, basically, i suppose state actors have the most resources, and can centralize mining if they wished ...
mircea_popescu: the only way to make miners on your system is to buy parts made by corps.
mircea_popescu: this is a huge difference,
ThickAsThieves: Avalon update https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=177827.msg3038356#msg3038356
fractal: mircea_popescu: they still have to buy chips made by corps now?
mircea_popescu: fractal nope.
fractal: bfl/avalon/etc
mircea_popescu: you can just make your own.
fractal: mircea_popescu: I can fab my own chips at home?
mircea_popescu: not at home.
jborkl: fractal: you are advocationg cpu mining with a sata and ram? I just want to clarify
mircea_popescu: but you CAN fab your own chip.
mircea_popescu: you CAN'T fab your own hdd+ ram+etc for a "normal computer"
fractal: mircea_popescu: you need more resources to do that. only a handful of entities can afford it
mircea_popescu: the entire thing is a ploy to try and take some control back from the people.
jborkl: my spelling sucks btw, last time I will say that
mircea_popescu: let's consider a similar case. if the 3d printer people could print guns
mircea_popescu: this would be equivalent to saying "let's change death so that people no longer can get killed by projectiles"
mircea_popescu: dude... it's clearly your attempt to anull 3d printing.
fractal: jborkl: no, just saying it would be better if no single entity could have an easy time manufacuring chips that could attack the network..... i.e. its easy for Intel to make 1Th/sec chips and own 50% right away.... but its hard for a signle entitity to buy and setup 250,000 computers mining in a warehouse to own 50% right away
dub: I thing killing everyone so they cant die fits better
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 125 @ 0.003698 = 0.4623 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 656 @ 0.0037 = 2.4272 BTC [+]
fractal: the space / resource requirements of full computer mining make it harder to own the network
mircea_popescu: dub lol or that.
mircea_popescu: fractal do the math. what'd it take intel to 50% the network right now ?
ThickAsThieves: ;;nethash
gribble: 613384.094317
jborkl: 600th
fractal: mircea_popescu: $5 mil. tops.
dub: are we forgetting the reason nobody wants to get 50% of the network?
jborkl: ok 614th
mircea_popescu: they need a 620 TH run delivered this second, or else a 1.2Ph run delivered in a coupla months.
ThickAsThieves: no i mentioned it earlier dub
mircea_popescu: i tjhink you need to do the math harder.
mircea_popescu: $5mn is not even proof of concept, at intel.
mircea_popescu: dub yes.
assbot: [BTCTC] [RSM] 1 @ 0.0147 BTC [-]
jborkl: They would probably spend 50m to get the masks and designs ready
dub: good
fractal: mircea_popescu: their chips would be 10TH/sec each on 14nm. they'd need 70 chips.
mircea_popescu: yes, the budget for all this is easily half a bn.
jborkl: not including lost time on other projects
mircea_popescu: fractal you don't know so much about chips, do you ?
mircea_popescu: what 10th/s.
dub: ok yall getting trolled
mircea_popescu: 14nm is MAYBE 3x as efficient per gram of silicon as 28nm.
mircea_popescu: maybe. if you get lucky with your resonances.
fractal: Cointerra is doing 500Gh/chip. 14nm would be around 4 times more efficient, so 2TH, but they have smarter engineers who could fit the logic better on the silicon and unroll more cores.
mircea_popescu: fractal dude get serious.
fractal: even with 2TH chips. thats only 350 Chips.
mircea_popescu: 2th chips ?
mircea_popescu: we'
mircea_popescu: re currently at 1watt/gh.
jborkl: wtf are 2 th chips?
Scrat: babby's first troll
mircea_popescu: your 2th chips eat what, 500 watts per chip ? wehat is this, 1955 ?
fractal: mircea_popescu: Cointerra is claming 500Gh chips.
ThickAsThieves: fractial, why isn't someone 51%ing the chain right now?
mircea_popescu: ok, im claiming i have a miniaturized woman that's 2 inches tall and shits little diamonds.
fractal: they're on 28nm. i think intel could do better... 2TH at 14nm.
jborkl: ok, i'm in now
ThickAsThieves: Cinderella?
fractal: mircea_popescu: I dunno, their CEO was a samgsumg lead designer -- he sounds credible
ThickAsThieves: why isn't someone 51%ing the chain right now?
jborkl: so, they will spend 1 billion by the time they get done fucking around
jborkl: and destroy the network and get 0 back
fractal: no, they won't spend anything -- its not like they're going to pay themselves for the chip mask
fractal: jborkl: they wouldn't destroy the network,
jborkl: nevermind you do not understand
ThickAsThieves: haha
fractal: understand what? I just said Intel could own 50% hashrate fairly easily
fractal: can't belive what sort of shitstorm i caused ;)
dub: lol
mircea_popescu: ya, but you're wrong.
ThickAsThieves: cuz chip masks dont cost anything, they just charge for em to be mean
fractal: ThickAsThieves: making a bitcoin chip would be a drop in Intel's R&D bucket
ThickAsThieves: why isn't someone 51%ing the chain right now?
ThickAsThieves: sry i'm breaking channel rules
jborkl: ok, I am out of here- my head is going to explode
mircea_popescu: kinda lulzy shit.
jborkl: and I am going to go pick up a free chip mask at AMD on the way home
mircea_popescu: incredible how complex bitcoin really is. no wonder so many people try to prey on the innocent.
fractal: mircea_popescu: they'd only have to make a couple hundred chips at 14nm
ThickAsThieves: aww you arent even gonna try to answer?
pankkake: the only way Intel would try to 51% attack the bitcoin network is by being forced to do it. it means a lot of lost money on other projects for no gain
fractal: they wouldn't attack it, they'll mine and make profit
pankkake: process size isn't everything anyway
mircea_popescu: fractal no dude. they would need, if they are starting right now, about half a billion in costs.
mircea_popescu: there's no way they can justify half a bn of expenditure.
pankkake: intel would likely beat other chips by doing it properly, not by doing it smaller
mircea_popescu: that's that.
ThickAsThieves: <fractal> they wouldn't attack it, they'll mine and make profit <<<< you realize this dismantles your points right?
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 9 @ 0.186 = 1.674 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves he seems in gmaxwell nonthink mode.
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 10 @ 0.1837 = 1.837 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: trapped in*
jurov: sha256 is power dense, it just isn't possible to throw 4x more transistors into the same space
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 4 @ 0.1826 = 0.7304 BTC [-]
fractal: mircea_popescu: really? thats way more then I thought... Cointerra and others are rumoured to be spending $5M on masks for their 28nm chips.... I never thought it would be such a big jump from $5M to $500M for 14nm... crazy...!!!!
fractal: who knew?
mircea_popescu: i've rarely met people capable of making others stupid just through contact, like gmaxwell is. some talent.
jurov: GPUs are already hitting the power wall
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 8 @ 0.1825 = 1.46 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: <fractal> they wouldn't attack it, they'll mine and make profit <<<< this is bitcoin working as intended
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.837 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: here's another point
fractal: ThickAsThieves: of course!
mircea_popescu: fractal you're confusing a) shoestring operations with intel and b) cointerra wityh someone that matters.
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.837 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: what costs 100k to make on b row costs 10mn to make in hollywood. simply how these things work.
ThickAsThieves: if they do all this, and mine 49%, what about tha halving
ThickAsThieves: and halving after that
ThickAsThieves: where's furuknap
fractal: mircea_popescu: I thinking is that that Intel is full of smart people, and they'd be able to build it for much less then $500mm.... I could be wrong, of course.
mircea_popescu: corporations spend in a certain way
mircea_popescu: this is why start-ups compete with them, and successfully.
mircea_popescu: this is why our miners are asicminer and bitfury not intel and samsung.
jurov: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/intel-technology/sha-256-implementations-paper.html
jurov: ^last year, they were here
fractal: why do corporations spend like that? wouldn't it be better if they became their own competition, instead of spending more to acquire competition when it pops up?
mircea_popescu: fractal not really. they're one thing, not all things.
fractal: interesting link jurov
mircea_popescu: "why do ocean liners work like ocean liners, rather than like salvage boats ? wouldn't it be better if they were salvage boats themselves, rather than dump salvage boats on the ocean when needed ?"
ThickAsThieves: "HashFast’s Golden Nonce GN ASIC successfully taped-out yesterday, Wednesday the 28th, and has been released for 28nm fabrication to a well-known, leading-edge foundry. More details will follow in next week’s joint press release. https://hashfast.com/tapeout/"
mircea_popescu: bleeding-edge now became leading-edge ?
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves drop them a bitbet link see what they say >D
mircea_popescu: http://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate << this fucking graph is mind boggling
ThickAsThieves: someone already has that job ;)
ozbot: Bitcoin Hash Rate
fractal: This mining unit contains one HashFast Golden Nonce (GN) 28nm ASIC chip that performs 400 Ghash/s
ThickAsThieves: so what will this chart look like in 1 year ythink?
fractal: mircea_popescu: I'm pretty confident that someone will make a 14nm chip that does over 2Th/sec ... care to make a BitBet on it?? ;)
mircea_popescu: same.
Anduck: btw mircea_popescu, about the bitfury bet... if those 5 deliveries (25gh unit and 400gh unit) both get delivered this month (total 5 deliveries atleast), is the bet "yes"?
mircea_popescu: fractal go for it.
mircea_popescu: Anduck more likely to be a yes than if they don't get delivered.
Anduck: is there a ruling about that yet i was wondering
Anduck: but is there anything that bet can fall after that?
jurov: ;;calc 70*1.02^365
gribble: Error: Something in there wasn't a valid number.
jurov: ;;calc 70*1.02**365
gribble: 96418.5804376
ThickAsThieves: i dont think they rule til its time
jurov: if 2% per day
jurov: ;;nethash
gribble: 613384.094317
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02638 BTC [+]
jurov: ;;calc 613384*1.02**365
gribble: 844880207.759
ThickAsThieves: lol
toffoo: put all-time and log scale on that chart and this year's growth doesn't look all that extraordinary
mircea_popescu: toffoo it does if you know what log means :)
mircea_popescu: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264758.msg3038516#msg3038516 here we go
ozbot: EVE Bitcoin Corp
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.775 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.839 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.84 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 3 @ 2.842 = 8.526 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.843 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.849 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.85 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.85 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: i wonder if Steam will carry BTCT one day
mircea_popescu: lol
Duffer1: they're perfect for btc
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM100] 7 @ 0.025801 = 0.1806 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: time for some fun news
ThickAsThieves: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/black-budget-summary-details-us-spy-networks-successes-failures-and-objectives/2013/08/29/7e57bb78-10ab-11e3-8cdd-bcdc09410972_story.html
ozbot: ‘Black budget’ summary details U.S. spy network’s successes, failures and objectives - The Was
ThickAsThieves: "The $52.6 billion “black budget” for fiscal 2013, obtained by The Washington Post from former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden, maps a bureaucratic and operational landscape that has never been subject to public scrutiny. "
ThickAsThieves: http://www.theverge.com/2013/8/29/4672524/blood-worms-infest-oklahoma-towns-water-supply
ozbot: Blood worms infest Oklahoma town's tap water | The Verge
ThickAsThieves: "THE CHLORINE WON'T KILL THEM, THE BLEACH WON'T KILL THEM."
ThickAsThieves: http://www.polygon.com/2013/8/29/4667470/the-strange-case-of-ouyas-free-the-games-fund
ozbot: Kickstarter responds to the strange case of Ouya's Free the Games program | Polygon
ThickAsThieves: "Dear Kickstarter, .... A good number of our backer profiles have no previous Kickstarter history. These profiles joined in July/August 2013, and have profile pictures of famous celebrities instead of real people. I previously reached out to Amazon Payments for clarification and they suggested I get in touch with you."
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 53 @ 0.01258 = 0.6667 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 947 @ 0.01259 = 11.9227 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: "Kickstarter: Hi Sam,Thanks for writing in, and congratulations on the success of your project! If you'd like to know more about backers who have found your project, you can always take a look at their profile to get a better feel for them. "
ThickAsThieves: kickstarter run by robots?
ThickAsThieves: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/08/29/justice-medical-marijuana-laws/2727605/?csp=breakingnews
ozbot: Justice Dept. won't challenge state marijuana laws
ThickAsThieves: "The Justice Department will not attempt to challenge state laws that allow for the medical and recreational use of marijuana as long as the drug sales do not conflict with eight new federal enforcement priorities."
ThickAsThieves: no link to the 8, sorry
ThickAsThieves: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/judge-nfl-players-settle-concussion-lawsuits
ozbot: NFL to pay $765M to settle concussion lawsuits
ThickAsThieves: "The NFL has agreed to spend close to $800 million to diagnose and compensate potentially thousands of retired players who develop dementia and other brain disorders they blame on the violent, bone-crunching collisions that pro football has long celebrated in its highlight reels."
Duffer1: TaT I think you would like a website called Fark.com :P
fractal: Are bitbet rulings made right after the resolution cut-off?
fractal: or sometime between the bet closing and resolution date/time
fractal: ?
jurov: there's some disease that causes ppl to turn into aggregator bots?
fractal: mircea_popescu: are you the sole decider for bitbet resolutions?
jurov: fractal: there's some grace periods, hours to days
mircea_popescu: we don't know im a decider at all.
mircea_popescu: i'm just part owner.
ThickAsThieves: sorry jurov
jurov: ThickAsThieves: np, just joking a bit
mircea_popescu: the resolution time is when the bet is actually resolved.
ThickAsThieves: i could weave in some porn links if you are feeling nostalgic :)
fractal: mircea_popescu: how do the deciders decide ;)... do they read the discussion on the page?
ThickAsThieves: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/satoshi-square-an-homage-to-wall-st/#.Uh-_2RtvOXs
ozbot: Satoshi Square: the BTC Wall St. | Lets Talk Bitcoin
mircea_popescu: that's nopt porn!
mircea_popescu: fractal i suspect they massacre goats.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 37 @ 0.02638 = 0.9761 BTC [+]
fractal: haha.. right.
ThickAsThieves: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1lc3is/pulled_article_from_tgb_5m_seizures_provide/
ozbot: Pulled Article from TGB: $5M Seizures Provide Insight To Mt.Gox Liquidity : Bitcoin
fractal: mircea_popescu: has there ever been a case there the wording is too vague to decide and the coins were returned back to their owners?
jborkl: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=192916.msg3033196#msg3033196
ozbot: Liquid Synergy Designs Inc. -ASIC mining hardware
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 65 @ 0.003588 = 0.2332 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 9 @ 0.003587 = 0.0323 BTC [-]
jborkl: mircea, there you go
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 76 @ 0.003587 = 0.2726 BTC [-]
jurov: fractal, there were some returs, hard to say if due to wording
mircea_popescu: fractal nope. the idea is that if the wording is too vague people don't bet.
fractal: do you know which ones were returned?
mircea_popescu: it's in the faq tho
fractal: "Bets can indeed be cancelled, but only if BitBet judges that material changes make the bet meaningless. "
mircea_popescu: jborkl they got a massive problem on their hands.
fractal: has that happened before?
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 12 @ 0.004471 = 0.0537 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.00447 = 0.2235 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 3 @ 0.004448 = 0.0133 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 145 @ 0.004433 = 0.6428 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 470 @ 0.004432 = 2.083 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 110 @ 0.00443 = 0.4873 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004426 = 0.2213 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 200 @ 0.004425 = 0.885 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: suppose people want refunds enough for a batch and a half. what then ? they refund one bach onl;y, as the 2nd isn't whole.
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 5 @ 0.004381 = 0.0219 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 20 @ 0.00438 = 0.0876 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 12 @ 0.004366 = 0.0524 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004365 = 0.2183 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 125 @ 0.00436 = 0.545 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 500 @ 0.004359 = 2.1795 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 62 @ 0.004356 = 0.2701 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 250 @ 0.004355 = 1.0888 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1946 @ 0.00416 = 8.0954 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: fractal i think it happened once or twice, there was some bet about some sporting event or pageant or w/e that got cancelled.
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 14 @ 0.00416 = 0.0582 BTC [-]
fractal: ah ok...
fractal: jurov: I had a friend who was close to ordering 10K chips from avalon -- i convinced him not to due to uncertainty, and that their batch1 and batch2 were late
fractal: he owes me a few drinks ;)
jborkl: bitsyncom is a asshat
fractal: its just terrible customer service
mircea_popescu: somebody with more hardware knowledge than me : wtf are the holes http://i.imgur.com/oLiVXmJ.jpg ?
mircea_popescu: they can't be mounts can they ?!
fractal: yes. screws
mircea_popescu: what the fuck is this paranoia. what are they anchoring it against, hurricane force winds ?
fractal: haha
Duffer1: fan mounts?
mircea_popescu: Duffer1 they're keeping the battery cool ?
fractal: well, you can screw whatever you want to/against it
jborkl: heat sink mounts in the middle
mircea_popescu: o o o i see
mircea_popescu: aha, makes sense
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.0043 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 184 @ 0.004161 = 0.7656 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 738 @ 0.00416 = 3.0701 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1182 @ 0.004151 = 4.9065 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 95 @ 0.00415 = 0.3943 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: what i dont get, is why anyone would spend money after batch 1
fractal: uhh im pretty sure the heatsink goes on the back -- just like aalon units
fractal: ThickAsThieves: batch 2 ROI in BTC terms... batch 3 did not
ThickAsThieves: that disclaimer pretty much told you you were gonna get fucked
fractal: oh, the 'no bullshit' disclaimer?
ThickAsThieves: yeah
mircea_popescu: i must agree, steamboat is handling tyhings pretty well considering.
fractal: they delivered sucessfully on batch 1 on ROI terms... i guess people took a chance.... batch 3 was a red flag on price from the get-go though
mircea_popescu: fractal yeah.
ThickAsThieves: and then people just kept throwing thousands and thousands of coins at them for chips
ThickAsThieves: all while the batches were late
ThickAsThieves: and being delivered used
fractal: i sat through flame wars telling n00bs their batch 3 would never ROI
mircea_popescu: where, this ?
fractal: BTW -- best mining calculator so far -- http://www.btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php
ThickAsThieves: "never ROI" has been a thing since before it was a thing
fractal: ignores dates and works on diff jumps , which is all that matters
fractal: the genesisblock calculator is pretty innaccurate as a 'month' could have an unknown number of diff jumps
ThickAsThieves: thank you for this
jborkl: I did not say which side the heat sinks sits on- just that was the mount hole for it
ThickAsThieves: nice calc
fractal: no prob...
fractal: i'm glad they also show you the BTC buy and hold -- most people say stupid things like 'well, if i dont get my entire BTC back, i'll still be up if the exchange rate rises!'
ThickAsThieves: while i agree, consider what they mightve done with the coins in their pocket instead...
jborkl: Mircea_Popescu - did you see that bug that basically boots mac users off IRC?
mircea_popescu: so basically you make over infinity time about 4x what you make in the first month.
jborkl: very lulzy
mircea_popescu: jborkl nop
fractal: they seem to think that spending USD to buy a machine that makes BTC is OK even if it you have less BTC then you'd get if you just bought the BTC itself
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves bought xbond at 1.4 ?
jborkl: خ ̷̴̐خخ ̷̴̐خ
ThickAsThieves: yeah right
mircea_popescu: fractal it's because they want to be part of the thing.
ThickAsThieves: more like labcoin at 40
jborkl: That crashes the webkit for mac users
mircea_popescu: so we have no mac users here !?
ThickAsThieves: bonds are probly the closest thing to a miner hedge around tho
fractal: mircea_popescu: so, losing money to be 'cool'? makes sense
jborkl: bgupta
fractal: ;)
mircea_popescu: fractal i'd link you to the article if i actually had a motherfducking blog ;/
pankkake: still down?
fractal: lol
pankkake: so amateurish
mircea_popescu: i know i sux
fractal: the thing i like about this calc http://www.btcinvest.net/bitcoin-mining-profit-calculator.php is that they also show a chart which will help n00bs understand exactly what diminishing returns look like ... i always hear 'oh, i'll just keep this USB Block Erupter going for the next 12 months until it ROIs'
fractal: asymptotes are fun.
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 3 @ 0.0008695 = 0.0026 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 5 @ 0.0265 = 0.1325 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 67 @ 0.003697 = 0.2477 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 6 @ 0.1826 = 1.0956 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: who made it ?
fractal: not sure...
mircea_popescu: Stefan Teupe
fractal: but i've been saying that this is the right way to do mining calcs for a while -- just too lazy to have done it myself ;)
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.839 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.84 = 5.68 BTC [+]
fractal: looks like they're starting to learn -- http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1lc025/so_today_is_the_day_i_start_mining_with_my_or_or/cbxt3w9
fractal: "If I would have taken that same $1500 I spent at that time and just bought bitcoins I would have gotten 214 btc, or in $27500 at current prices, FML"
mircea_popescu: heh
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02649 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003592 = 0.7184 BTC [-]
fractal: well... thats it for me... gotta run
fractal: goodnight
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 50 @ 0.01246 = 0.623 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 125 @ 0.01245 = 1.5563 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 42 @ 0.01245 = 0.5229 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.SELLING] 10 @ 0.01245 = 0.1245 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.02649 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 30 @ 0.0265 = 0.795 BTC [+]
jurov: http://bitbet.us/bet/302/bitcoin-standardized-protocol-approved-this-summer/ >2 btc on the way, yay
Neil: ;;nethash
gribble: 615935.175325
ozbot: BitBet - Bitcoin Standardized Protocol Approved this Summer
Neil: jurov: Has one been approved?
pankkake: was that a project? I thought the bitcoin standard was "bitcoind" for the devs
jurov: no i voted against. and RFC-style standard is meant, not just code
pankkake: which isn't that wrong. some standards are defined by one piece of source code too
jurov: *bet, not voted lol
Neil: Good, I bet against too
jurov: pankkake: if you need network of interoperating impelmentations, you can't just left it on code
jurov: maybe devs think so, but that doesn't make it true
Neil: I haven't even seen any effort at writing such a standard
pankkake: sure, ideally. but I think it's too soon
jurov: how so?
pankkake: there are still many things that could change, why write a standard?
jurov: we are just going to throw everything out and build Bitcoin 1.0 . riiiight.
pankkake: are there any other implementations running?
pankkake: well they could standardize some stuff I guess
Neil: Closest I've seen to a spec is the wiki, and that's full of holes and exceedingly vague in places
jurov: yes, they try. bitsofproof, libbitcoin, ...
jurov: and RFCs are amended, too.
pankkake: 2012 trilema is back
jurov: with /dtng/ ?
pankkake: with beautiful php deprecated errors
jurov: mircea_popescu: /dtng still exists somewhere?
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.0012 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: polimedia.us/dtng/c/
mircea_popescu: html archive only
jurov: why only archive?
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 49 @ 0.0052 = 0.2548 BTC [+]
pankkake: http://polimedia.us/dtng/c/res/16243.html can't do that with bitcoin
ozbot: cyber
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 1 @ 0.1019 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 10 @ 0.102 = 1.02 BTC [+]
kakobrekla: http://bitbet.us/bet/521/labcoins-own-130nm-design-sample-chips-will-be/#c1307
ozbot: BitBet - Labcoins own 130nm design sample chips will be received by testers by 12TH SEPT 2013
kakobrekla: >Congratulations BitBet on allowing and actively promoting yet another scam bet. Those of you who actually use this betting service run by scammers need your head testing.
kakobrekla: i think commenting counts as using the service.
jurov: http://polimedia.us/dtng/b/src/128216887595.jpg sfw. kinda.
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-GROWTH] 2 @ 0.1028 = 0.2056 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 4 @ 0.1826 = 0.7304 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 1 @ 0.1823 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 5 @ 0.1823 = 0.9115 BTC [-]
jurov: pankkake: reptilia tried to invent redeemable vouchers for this
jurov: iirc was not very successful
pankkake: there is a printable bitcoin tip service
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 59 @ 0.00335 = 0.1977 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 59 @ 0.003395 = 0.2003 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 6446 @ 0.00087501 = 5.6403 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [DMS.MINING] 248 @ 0.003399 = 0.843 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003601 = 0.072 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003601 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 8 @ 0.0036 = 0.0288 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.0036 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 65 @ 0.003609 = 0.2346 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 65 @ 0.003609 = 0.2346 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 10 @ 0.003586 = 0.0359 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 460 @ 0.003586 = 1.6496 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 75 @ 0.003586 = 0.269 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 382 @ 0.003589 = 1.371 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: kakobrekla im pretty sure that if anon says "scammer" many times things happen.
ThickAsThieves: i am stil on BFL's mailing list
ThickAsThieves: "What's going on with the network difficulty rate?
ThickAsThieves: As we continue to ship more product, the majority of the hashrate on the network is provided by Butterfly Labs equipment. There are other, smaller ASIC bitcoin mining device manufacturers entering the market with products as well, but the difficulty will continue to rise in proportion to the shipping of our 65nm miners."
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003688 BTC [+]
ThickAsThieves: "I'm not sure I'm interested. Should I be?
ThickAsThieves: This is a question of mining strategy and is a personal decision. As a hardware manufacturer, BFL only guarantees the performance of our products, not the market conditions of their use. This makes it hard to give advice on mining strategy."
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 2 @ 0.003688 = 0.0074 BTC [+]
jborkl: i miss reptillia
ThickAsThieves: get ready for it
ThickAsThieves: "The counter argument is that the Monarch is still in development and won't start shipping until December. The 65nm products shipping now have a good ROI as of this writing. Market conditions are changing of course, but an increasing BTC price extends the life of all mining hardware. There is great value in taking delivery of your 65nm now."
mircea_popescu: As we continue to ship more product, the majority of the hashrate on the network is provided by Butterfly Labs equipment. <<< lol.
mircea_popescu: is it all in the securesauna room ?
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 140 @ 0.0043 = 0.602 BTC [-]
ThickAsThieves: "an increasing BTC price extends the life of all mining hardware. "
pankkake: got the BFL mail too, but I don't remember ever giving it to them
mircea_popescu: "other, smaller venues which deliver actual mining units which you are invited to consider as peripheral to our five boxes of fans"
pankkake: and the mail they used is… odd
ThickAsThieves: maybe you signed up to their forums
pankkake: no and certainly with my real name mail
pankkake: +not
ThickAsThieves: maybe they buy lists from gox or such
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2698 @ 0.004385 = 11.8307 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1777 @ 0.004386 = 7.7939 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 50 @ 0.004392 = 0.2196 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 61 @ 0.004699 = 0.2866 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 500 @ 0.004792 = 2.396 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 190 @ 0.004849 = 0.9213 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 470 @ 0.00485 = 2.2795 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 9 @ 0.004899 = 0.0441 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 12 @ 0.0049 = 0.0588 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 600 @ 0.0049 = 2.94 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 20 @ 0.0049 = 0.098 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 350 @ 0.004991 = 1.7469 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 185 @ 0.004998 = 0.9246 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 750 @ 0.004998 = 3.7485 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 43 @ 0.004999 = 0.215 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 489 @ 0.004999 = 2.4445 BTC [+]
pankkake: it may be possible. mtgox's accounts were hacked and I started getting a lot of bitcoin scams by mail on that mail
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1000 @ 0.005 = 5 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 1 @ 0.005 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: well... it's to be expected, scam slowly moves towards the bottoms of spamvertising
mircea_popescu: blf, pills, knockoff shit...
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] 1 @ 0.000803 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 49 @ 0.02656 = 1.3014 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 30 @ 0.02656 = 0.7968 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 749 @ 0.004504 = 3.3735 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 2493 @ 0.004503 = 11.226 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ACTIVEMINING] 505 @ 0.0045 = 2.2725 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 38 @ 0.00111191 = 0.0423 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.0011119 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 151 @ 0.00111189 = 0.1679 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 5 @ 0.001111 = 0.0056 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 4 @ 0.00111 = 0.0044 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1 @ 0.001108 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 10 @ 0.0011 = 0.011 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 2 @ 0.0010919 = 0.0022 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 2458 @ 0.00109002 = 2.6793 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 380 @ 0.00109001 = 0.4142 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 100 @ 0.00109 = 0.109 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 100 @ 0.00109 = 0.109 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 772 @ 0.00108 = 0.8338 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 1000 @ 0.001077 = 1.077 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 13 @ 0.00106007 = 0.0138 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 123 @ 0.00106006 = 0.1304 BTC [-]
gatz: lol friedcat http://i.imgur.com/KxEuXnt.jpg
gatz: :DDD
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.799 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: lol
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-TRADING-PT] 1 @ 0.9807 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BTC-TRADING-PT] 9 @ 0.9805 = 8.8245 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 99 @ 0.0269 = 2.6631 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 61 @ 0.02698 = 1.6458 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 1 @ 0.6499 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.76 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 190 @ 0.02699 = 5.1281 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 2.64999999 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 2.521 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [AM1] 1 @ 2.52 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 20 @ 0.003688 = 0.0738 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 3 @ 0.0268 = 0.0804 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 3 @ 0.003689 = 0.0111 BTC [+]
assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 2900 @ 0.00087225 = 2.5295 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 398 @ 0.003696 = 1.471 BTC [+]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 3500 @ 0.0011 = 3.85 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003696 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 75 @ 0.003696 = 0.2772 BTC [+]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 1 @ 0.003696 BTC [+]
mircea_popescu: http://bitbet.us/bet/496/btc-network-hashrate-will-exceed-1-000-th-s-before/
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 200 @ 0.003693 = 0.7386 BTC [-]
ozbot: BitBet - BTC network hashrate will exceed 1,000 TH/s before December 14th 2013
mircea_popescu: 10:1 on yes.
mircea_popescu: what the fuck already. can it grow 15x in a season !?
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 3 @ 0.6499 = 1.9497 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LTC-ATF.B2] 41 @ 0.01031 = 0.4227 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [TAT.ASICMINER] 1 @ 0.0268 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: ;;hashrate
gribble: Error: "hashrate" is not a valid command.
mircea_popescu: ;;hash
gribble: Error: "hash" is not a valid command.
mircea_popescu: ;;nethash
gribble: 617828.880395
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 2 @ 0.00106006 = 0.0021 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 3 @ 0.00106006 = 0.0032 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 10 @ 0.00106001 = 0.0106 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 3 @ 0.00105001 = 0.0032 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 350 @ 0.00105 = 0.3675 BTC [-]
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [XBOND] 10 @ 0.00105 = 0.0105 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [LABCOIN] 100 @ 0.003688 = 0.3688 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 1 @ 2.716 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [BASIC-MINING] 3 @ 0.1823 = 0.5469 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [ASICMINER-PT] 2 @ 2.711 = 5.422 BTC [-]
assbot: [BTCTC] [PETA-MINE] 1 @ 0.6499 BTC [-]