974300+ entries in 0.555s
mircea_popescu: can you put it somewhere in a
text format ? pastebin maybe ?
mjr_: i was hoping
that a few people would
take a quick skim and let me know if
there are any glaring errors
mjr_: it briefly explains bitcoins in what i hope is easy
to understand
terms
jurov: favicom omg. coinbr has favicon
too. hand drawn by myself :D
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 20.41001, Best ask: 20.48000, Bid-ask spread: 0.06999, Last
trade: 20.41001, 24 hour volume: 50513.17507919, 24 hour low: 20.40000, 24 hour high: 21.13000, 24 hour vwap: 20.72567
mircea_popescu: okay.
totally different configuration of shit engaged.
Namworld: long
term,
the 64000x has as much chance earning money for SD
JohnGalt: I want
to be
they guy who won 130k dollarz, not 100k, will it go back
to 0.1?
evoorhees: JohnGalt...
the max bet for
that is .0783 right now
JohnGalt: are you
the s.dice guy evoorhees? fill up your wallet I wanna play 0.1 on 64000x :P
Bugpowder: To certify
that
the aforementioned holds as of
the quoted
time
the following with MPEx :
To which add orders in
the book fully paid in advance :
To which add sums deposited as surety for 4th Friday settled option and future contracts :
mircea_popescu: they're not diff sales. just
the same batch re-reported
mircea_popescu: lol who was complaining about
trades not going
through ?
Namworld: I see a bot eating 5 S.DICE at a
time
DeadWeasel: zeroconfirmations.com I
think
this is a great URL for a bitcoin blog.
jurov: well... now everyone go
to coinbr and issue orders furiously :D
mircea_popescu: lol Bugpowder is going
to have a child with
this rally
Namworld: price is already
through
the roof
Bugpowder: that's it, I'm
turning
the sound on
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 21.08910, Best ask: 21.09970, Bid-ask spread: 0.01060, Last
trade: 21.09970, 24 hour volume: 45928.75755893, 24 hour low: 20.40000, 24 hour high: 21.13000, 24 hour vwap: 20.74014
jcpham: terrible humor.
try
to keep mpex running
though for sure ;)
jcpham: when it's over. call
the bitcoins gifts
jurov: i
told you, mpex works on multiverse & miltidimensional scale
jcpham: mine em' into
the ground
that's what i say
mircea_popescu: jcpham you have no idea i
tell you. i bet
there's pools
that do less hashes
than mpex does
txs
Namworld: Is
that sarcastic? If it is, all I can imagine is someone: Look... if I press harder... more lemon juice comes out.
jurov: will be desync
to end all desyncs
mircea_popescu: mkay,
the good news is
the brightest man i know has found a way
to squeeze more out of less.
jcpham: although i called it a goblin, so
that's a comment
Namworld: So you should get a full dividend in
the next days
Namworld: Gregoriano: you get full dividend if you're
the one holding
the share at
the
time of dividend
jcpham: no comment on
the bitcoin goblin
that is satoshidice
Gregoriano: Just became a shareholder. Not sure if I need
to wait a full month or will dividends will be pro rated
jcpham: i'm just watching
the show i guess
Gregoriano: happy
to be a SDICE shareholder and put
the
tuition of my kids in safe hands
gesell: wow, welcome back
to
the real world bcEUR (exchange finally not giving as many arbitrage opps)
Chilca: mircea_popescu: should I
try again?
Bugpowder: mpex was seriously fucked up
this morning
Chilca: mircea_popescu: Your order
to BUY 4056 S.DICE @market price has been received and will be processed.
Bugpowder: Just when I reach
the depths of despair... Someone starts buying bitcoins again.
Chilca: mircea_popescu: hey are you
there?
dub: mircea_popescu: where are you getting net speed from? I
think regardless of where its
too noisy
to infer much from spot checks
Ukto: did you see
teh favicon he made for us? :)
Ukto: he asked for an icon for his, so I made one for sdice
too
ssssssss: hi... anyone experienced with Irc bots? I mean
to install and support a channel
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 20.85001, Best ask: 20.99660, Bid-ask spread: 0.14659, Last
trade: 20.85001, 24 hour volume: 50983.80273450, 24 hour low: 20.40000, 24 hour high: 21.24500, 24 hour vwap: 20.72846
mircea_popescu: apparently
there's still people with balances on intersangro !?
mircea_popescu: smickles cool. still coming
to
terms wuith
the ergonomics of
this entire satoshi insanity.
jurov: lol i read
that as deceive
smickles: mircea_popescu: yeah,
the leading zeros help me conceive
the number. I mentally break it into
two groups of four
jurov: i meant, it's no on-purpose generated input on hash.
they are signed mpex orders
that must observe some pretty
tightly defined format.
jurov: maybe
there's a bounty
to make sha1 collision of meaningful strings.. so you'll get rewarded
then
jurov: lol, worrying about sha1(order+signature) collisions... it's like mpex is going
to become used across whole multiverse
mircea_popescu: even if it's 2 bytes, your odds
to create a 2 byte collision... heh.
jurov: and if it's auxiliary field, something like 10chars fro
the hash is sufficient
jurov: there will be much sooner bit flip from cosmic rays
than sha1 collision
mircea_popescu: i *could* use it as an extra field, but
the db bloat may be an issue.
mircea_popescu: now re
the other
thing : i can't readily use a hash of
the order itself as
the only identifier cause
the one
time
there's a collision i'm going
to be so fucked
there's no
telling.
jurov: so
this will have
to wait
till i buy more accounts
jurov: but as
the last digit is fully relevant
this isn't
the way
to go
jurov: the problem actually arises only if
there are simultaneous orders with exactly same price
jurov: was also
thinking
to reserve right
to change last satoshi for order identification purposes
jurov: o far i'm only fixing
things manually every few days.
time well paid. maybe i'll outsource it :D
mircea_popescu: but i guess if you open multiple sessions
things may well get quantumified.
mircea_popescu: if you use a single
thread
this would be equal
to
the order you sent
them in
mircea_popescu: jurov when i say
they're ordered historically i mean
they're ordered in
the absolute historical sense. if
there's five orders on
the same
timestamp
they're in
the order
they were received.
jurov: such as,
trades for older orders are further
to
the end of
the list?
jurov: thanks, just last question. when he
trades have same
timestamp, can i assume any secondary ordering?
mircea_popescu: jurov now, all
that aside, webserver desyncs really should not happen.
mircea_popescu: jurov yeah,
time only. not sorted by whether you buy or sell or anything else.
jurov: just a small confusion, yes
they are by
time
jborkl: is
there a ex-div date, or what
the server has in it
the second
the div is pushed?
jurov: first by order,
then by
time?
mircea_popescu: jurov
trade history is also sorted list.descending, historically.
jurov: i have no issue with "Book" part. once order appears
ther all is willy nilly.
mircea_popescu: one second i'll check on
trade history
too so i don't say something stupid
mircea_popescu: this means first 1k executed 3,4,5 and 750 of
the 2nd 1k executed 6
jurov: you mean
the "TradeHistory" part of statjson?