900100+ entries in 0.623s
ThickAsThieves: "We also finalized
the decision on making
the next-gen (65/55nm) chips also fit in a USB powered device so
that we could make Block Erupter USB II possible, instead of integrating
too many cores into one big chip."
ThickAsThieves: "Shipped USB Sticks: 530. A lot more in
the following week."
ThickAsThieves: Friedcat: "Shipped Blades: 278.
The sales keeps a slow but steady pace."
BTCOxygen: How long does it
take
to open an asset on BTCTC ?
BitHub: yeah i dont know why
these guys haven't it
this way, annoying
ThickAsThieves: man, i feel like i'm
totally
the
tinfoil-hatter in
this channel now
ThickAsThieves: but it's a little shakey for him
to be running his own PT imo
Namworld: and it keeps coming in all day like
this
Namworld: 0.18 BTC for
the last PT
trade
Namworld: You're one order of magnitude
too high
Namworld: 12968.8 Volume x 0.4% = 51.872 BTC
this week.
furuknap: Yeah, and better
than 100%. He still reaps from every sale.
Namworld: 0.4% x 1200 BTC
trade earlier = 4.8 BTC
BTCOxygen: He could have a agreement with
the site operator.
ThickAsThieves: At current BTC/USD value
that means
that I would be getting paid $3500/mo
to be liable for assets worth $1,575,000.
BTC0xygen: If your PT owns more
than 5k shares you become a board member and get a free blade.
ThickAsThieves: because if i dont get a board seat before he send
them
BTC0xygen: Think should be working
to get
the free blade. :P
ericmuyser: BTC0xygen: I dont get it you want people
to WORK for FREE? doesn't
that scare you?
ThickAsThieves: yes but he has some sort of arrangement with
the owner
BTC0xygen: Bitfunder ASICMINER-PT is not owned by
the site owner. and does not charge a fee.
Namworld: So it's at his advantage
to encourage people
to get his PT shares instead of
the others by charging no fees on dividends
Diablo-D3: two straight
throughs, and
then
tat
ericmuyser: the other PT is operated by
the BTC
TC owner, so he has good reason not
to charge if people are
trading on his site and he's getting fees
Namworld: Because passthrough managers
typically charge a fee
BTC0xygen: May I ask why are you charging 5%
to manage
the shares ?
BTC0xygen: Think, IIRC
there is 2 ASICminer passthroughs, One does not
take a management fee, And your do.
ThickAsThieves: Friedcat has enough work
to do without a million requests from me
ericmuyser: ThickAsThieves: so? cheaper
to pick up
the PT and request a
transfer if you want direct?
ericmuyser: instant profit for
the next dump:
there will be more
to come!
BTCOxygen: burnside: PM me when you get some
time.
ericmuyser: good
time
to sell
then lol,
ThickAsThieves
gribble: BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 126.00000, Best ask: 126.20999, Bid-ask spread: 0.20999, Last
trade: 126.00000, 24 hour volume: 22389.83248438, 24 hour low: 122.20000, 24 hour high: 126.93446, 24 hour vwap: 124.62009
PsychoticBoy: If asicminer hits 3 btc (if ever) ill sell
them all
Anduck: asicminer soon ITS REAL VALUE
that is about 1 btc
gribble: There are currently 14043730 bitcoins demanded at or over 0.0 USD, worth 19669987.6621 USD in
total. | Data vintage: 0.0630 seconds
furuknap: C'mon, you know what I'm
talking about.
furuknap: We should do a public debate on
this. :-D
furuknap: If you buy and hold now, in
three years, your share value drops
to 50%, costing you ฿1.25 if you buy at ฿2.5.
furuknap: No, but
that's because
the herd doesn't realize it.
ThickAsThieves: no one is going
to let 3 years from now factor into current price
furuknap: Even at half
that, and let's guess
that every competitor fails for
the next
three years, in
three years, AM revenue must go down because hw sales won't be as profitable and block reward goes down.
furuknap: They'd need
to sell 300 blades and 10K USB miners _every month for
three years_
to make up what people
think
they're getting with
that ludicrous 50% yield idea.
furuknap: Of course, because
the halving effect every week
takes away 0.05 of dividends at ฿2.
furuknap: AM cannot grow much further in
terms of revenue and dividends at
these price points do not add up when you
take halving effect into account.
furuknap: Sure, and
that demonstration is already priced into
the share.
ThickAsThieves: I
think
that friedcat's long
term actions have earned him a bit more respect and
trust
than your average mining asset
Bugpowder: They don't all start
that way, but
they all end
that way.
furuknap: 'The other' ASIC hardware company. Popped up a few weeks ago. KXCminer or something along
those lines.
furuknap: I live in Scandinavia, I know
the culture, and running a scam like
that wouldn't be even close
to feasible.
furuknap: Even
then, people scream SCAM with
their outdoors cvoice.
furuknap: KXsomethingMiner.
They're
the first company
to
talk about a 28nm chip and
they're working with a highly reputable chip company
to achieve
that.
furuknap: See how much
trouble
the swedes have.
furuknap: No, but
that's
the change
that might be useful. If
they intend
to float a new hardware asset,
that would require a lot of overhead and
time
to build confidence, which isn't easy for hardware startups.
furuknap: That depends. If
they hold shares in
the company,
the rise in share prices would be profitable and
they wouldn't have
to worry about floating a new asset.