log☇︎
891300+ entries in 0.658s
davout: might be an interesting addition, as, if i understand subkeys correctly they make the master key very very hard to compromise
mircea_popescu: nope, it just uses one fingerprint and that's it.
benkay: this bodes well for my travels
benkay: all the most bitcoin fun happens outside of the us
mircea_popescu: darkee i imagien there must be.
davout: mircea_popescu: isn't there a haters thread already somewhere ? :)
mircea_popescu: lol DiabloD3 actually, there's a shocker re the bitcoin girls in the pipeline
DiabloD3: he got prostitutes to accept bitcoins?
jborkl_: MP, congrats to you . Excellent job and well- excellent job
mircea_popescu: saulimus Scrat qxzn http://polimedia.us/trilema/2013/smpoe-takes-strategic-investor/ there you go
qxzn: Scrat is that for reals?
deadweasel: or if they will just bail on the whole Exchange.
deadweasel: i have no idea, tyring to figure out if profit motive is enough for them to remain legit...
deadweasel: what are they doing with customers funds? Lending them out? Getting 1% in a bank account?
deadweasel: so you think fractional reserve is breaking down?
peterl: no, there were a couple steps up
deadweasel: causing price bulge on gox.... I am not sure Gox has a bank that will do USD withdrawals for them...
deadweasel: y'all talked about the two week gox USD withdrawal freeze yet?
TomServo: Some time stamps on the comments would be welcomed.
jborkl_: not everywhere will take bitcoin and that is not important
furuknap: If you can at most get 10K BTC at $10, you won't invest that.
mircea_popescu: technically speaking the better stuff you eat was paid for in euros.
jborkl_: but to me bitcoin is a commodity - I have a barrel of oil - I know what it is worth, but I can not go buy food with it
furuknap: They don't, but those that get BTC will pay in $ so the exchange rate matters to the extent that it affects whether someone will invest the $200 million required to keep the current hash rate growth up until February 2014.
mircea_popescu: furuknap the fact x involved party needs to eat is not more a germane point in discussing btc deonomination than in discussing dollar denomination,
ThickAsThieves: will not come into play til that year
jcpham: i don't think it's possible to predict or factor
ThickAsThieves: all things bitcoin require investors to stay savvy of all factors
furuknap: It must, or someone will have a rude awakening in 2016 if the block reward doesn't explode from TX fees.
furuknap: mp; it isn't. It's sold in BTC, but foundries and designers still need to eat.
ThickAsThieves: really though, the halving simply should not be factored into current investments
furuknap: If halving effect is 50% then each month, with a price of 3BTC/share, AM 'loses' 0.0340909BTC.
mircea_popescu: mining equipment seems to be denominated in btc.
furuknap: mp, dollars will have an effect because mining equipment and expenses are still denominated in $. If BTC/$ drops to 10$ then less mining will happen reducing difficulty increasing profits.
mircea_popescu: jborkl_ dollars don't entyer into this discussion really. it's all btc
mircea_popescu: 20 and over ain't in the books
mircea_popescu: prolly 13-14 total per block, i can see that.
mircea_popescu: furuknap obviously to his mind bitcoin=his own interest.
mircea_popescu: they may be half a btc per block, but they won't be 10
furuknap: friedcat said that TX fees must be at 15BTC per block to protect Bitcoin. That's a very scary statement.
ThickAsThieves: we also dont know what tx fee rewards will be in 2016
jcpham: we'll be at 0$ or over 9000 by then
jcpham: that's three years
furuknap: I'd put it slightly lower than that, but it's still starting to look like a loss project. My numbers from two months ago are still holding true.
jborkl_: yes, that is correct
jcpham: the next price halving is too far away for me to care about
mircea_popescu: if you consider your weekly amortisation to be 1% (it is a mining thing after all) then each week is a ~0.013 loss per share.
jborkl_: just like it did last time
furuknap: Yeah, but problem is that we don't know what happens to price when halving becomes more prevalent in mining discussions.
assbot: I thought I told you not to touch me.
mircea_popescu: if they manage to do that til 2017 it's not bad.
furuknap: That's about the only thing that could be worse than what they were already doing...
ThickAsThieves: the % of nethash that equals that
ThickAsThieves: it looks like AM is trying to maintain .015+ weekly divs from mining
jborkl_: I just go off the number of coins I expect the network to produce, which is more or less constant across a long time period- / percentage of network owned /number of divisible units (shares) + hw sales
mircea_popescu: based on the actual block frequency and the diff i mean.
mircea_popescu: you know the "network rate" is backwards-interpolated based on the actual nethash right ?
furuknap: It's been lower when AM fell out. I think I saw 135 within the previous 24 hrs. Can't be bothered to look it up, though.
jborkl_: and the network rate has been holding steady at 139-141 for the last few days
furuknap: Nah, too much of a hassle. I only calculate AM based on network share, not hash rate :-)
jborkl_: that is tto short of a time frame, the variance on that is huge
jborkl_: It is stated the calculation is based on 36 hours of blocks found solo mining
furuknap: Just seems backward to me.
furuknap: Sure, but I'm still wondering why the live chart shows average for 48 hours (if this is the case) when the non-live chart shows current.
ThickAsThieves: the top meter might 48hrs?
furuknap: Yeah, I know that, but why is the top ones, on a live chart, sying 26 when the average is higher?
ThickAsThieves: to the time breakdown
jborkl_: ok, I was wrong the div will be lower
jborkl_: what percentage of the network are they
jborkl_: without hardware sales AM div should steady out at .01239 share at this rate, unless they gain or lose market share
furuknap: True, it's a bit up. The point remains, when nethash flattens out, and it must at some point, it will doubly affect DMS.* assets.
furuknap: It was almost positive this morning and more negative now.
ThickAsThieves: that will go positive by tomorrow
furuknap: If that keeps happening, it will be a double reverse.
ThickAsThieves: but I'm really not sure what will happen to the market with them
mircea_popescu: he disappeared tho
furuknap: I'm somewhat cautious about the DMS.* assets, though, as they effectively have somewhat of a double exposure.
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves ironically enough a guy vby the name brendio was drafting the same thing about may 2012
ThickAsThieves: I have my first turds harassing me
ThickAsThieves: now that DMS released and devalued hashes even more than I did,
jesuschristporno: bitangels invested in that
mircea_popescu: banks routinely keep mpoe-pr people on staff, to berate idiots over the phone for being idiotic in the hopes they may be pushed to suicide.
ThickAsThieves: likely it was he that never warned them
mircea_popescu: Chase bank and another bank, have both decided that we as a Bitcoin based business are "Too High Risk" of clients, and have frozen/shut down our accounts. We were NOT given notice, and we were simply told "your funds will be sent to you by check within 30 days". This is not something we were ever warned about, given notice of, or even received the courtesy of a phone call from the bank beforehand.
mircea_popescu: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=238474.msg2530579#msg2530579 lol mnw trying to cause trbl
mircea_popescu: and i think more stuff
mircea_popescu: well actually he's a fat guy from the midwest who pretends to be a juvenile japanese female with magicval powers, karate expertise
ThickAsThieves: i'll just pretend he's the dad
ThickAsThieves: should i watch the remix?
mircea_popescu: that';s basically the summary of it.
ThickAsThieves: if someone gets ignored, they simply need to be
ThickAsThieves: this is the first week where I finally stopped clicking Unignore to see what people I ignored said
mircea_popescu: was a sight to behold. course like 1k posts were meanwhile deleted
mircea_popescu: 're newer herer than his large meltdown last summer ?
mircea_popescu: i think you
ThickAsThieves: i'd have him on ignore if he weren't so polite to me
ThickAsThieves: fascinating indeed, talking to usagi just gives me a headache
mircea_popescu: usagi : MPOE-PR likes to make quips at me for some reason.
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves teh bitcoin scamdation huh.
ThickAsThieves: lol, first comment on Facebook in response to the USD thing "What is really a joke is that we don't have LTC yet"