log☇︎
867700+ entries in 0.651s
mircea_popescu: i hope they said it witgh smallcase x
ThickAsThieves: but yeah i was happy to hear them say MPEX
ThickAsThieves: sorry my timing on the link might have been off
mircea_popescu: ThickAsThieves that's pretty cool
ThickAsThieves: <bobbabad> TAT you being a boardmember and all, when are they gonna bring gen2 to the market? <<< I don't recall the official (public) company line on this, but the idea is to effectively keep a step ahead. Remember that the competition has yet to fully materialize, and all the new kids trying to make ASICs will have to go through their fair share of "2 weeks" moments
ThickAsThieves: <bobbabad> faith seems pretty low in both asicminer and actm <<<<< those two stocks are not in the same league
bobbabad: TAT you being a boardmember and all, when are they gonna bring gen2 to the market?
Rawted: couldnt happen to a more poorly managed op
bobbabad: bitcoin billionaire by thursday?
bobbabad: big news from labcoin team on monday?
thestringpuller: I'm making more money on my measely 500 shares from the retarded speculators than from the interest you're paying ThickAsThieves
thestringpuller: dude wtf are these people doing with XBOND
mod6: I've set this link to listen in at 11:29: http://youtu.be/LC3ZHRF_8kQ?t=11m29s
mod6: ThickAsThieves: You are correct, MPEx was mentioned in that video. But actually before the spot in the video where your link takes you to. I had to watch to the end, then back all the way to 11:34 to hear the mention.
Diablo-D3: ThickAsThieves: btw, tell the am thread that video mentioned them
Diablo-D3: going to bed
ThickAsThieves: ;;later tell mircea_popescu MPEX mentioned on RT! http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=LC3ZHRF_8kQ&t=699
Diablo-D3: I just dont get why people consider monetary gold a thing
Diablo-D3: monetary gold isnt a commodity unless you intentionally remove it from the monetary gold pile
Diablo-D3: commodity means that I can use it for something in the real world
Diablo-D3: ThickAsThieves: currency means I can go the corner store and buy something
matuszed: I think the metals asset comparison downplays the usefulness of BTC
ThickAsThieves: isnt it ONLY those things in the "useful" sense?
Diablo-D3: in fact, Im not even sure its there
Diablo-D3: its just there
Diablo-D3: its not a commodity in the useful sense
Diablo-D3: bitcoin isnt a currency in the useful sense
Diablo-D3: matuszed: because there isnt a useful comparison to anything to be honest
ThickAsThieves: it's a small part of the show so far
matuszed: Why do people want to compare bitcoin to gold all the time
ThickAsThieves: ASICMINER mentioned too
ozbot: [76] Bitcoin vs Gold: Getting the Most Bang For Your Buck - YouTube
Namworld: But it's too small and I don't like the name.
Namworld: I might go. There's something good to the right. The yellow building.
VanCleef: prety good idea, wish had something here like that to talk to and collaborate etc
Namworld: It's too tiny tho...
VanCleef: isn't this bitcoin foundations job?
Namworld: Something some people are trying to start in Montreal
Namworld: So, what do you guys think of the Bitcoin "Embassy"
Namworld: I don't keep up much with new consoles and what gets on them until a decade after they're out eh
VanCleef: suppose to be on wii u soon no?
nubbins`: have you ever been to those places?
Namworld: They would go blind in short order, they'd probably pop holes in their heads with 100 Terawatt
Namworld: No, it would add a much needed science fiction element to make the story more interesting.
VanCleef: you should read the art of war sometime
Namworld: What if I had a 100 Terawatt portable laser minigun and gave it to the virgins and whiners? WHAT THEN?
VanCleef: i think with lawyers and social media trolls it could be a intresting war
afrotec: gonna take more than that
VanCleef: anyone want to do an ipo to hire 100 lawyers to take on usa?
bloctoc: is it one of these pretenders: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Pretenders_to_the_Romanian_throne
mircea_popescu: dub they're just pretenders. no princess.
Kleeck_: So, fill me in on what I missed regarding CFIG. Someone mention eVoorhees whaling on it. Any evidence of this?
afrotec: coinbase should let you hold usd without sending to bank
ozbot: [HAVELOCK] Crypto Currency (CFIG) Official Thread
Rulother: If they had to pick a democrate that is
Rulother: Clinton nothing more than another puppet
Rulother: They need to forcus on Elizabeth Warren
ThickAsThieves: they are making boycott threats to the media outlets they need because they plan to air Hilary movies 2 years before the elections
ozbot: BBC News - Republicans vow to boycott CNN and NBC over Clinton films
Namworld: OTC trading and whatnot
Namworld: Sadly, I don't have time to apologize every sentence.
Namworld: Yes, yes, that would be very canadian I suppose
ThickAsThieves: then he can pay me 8btc to remove it
jurov: apology for repeating the obvious comes to mind
jurov: oh you already thoroughly explained yourself what you meant and what not... but we're still waiting for apology =)
Namworld: "[15:21] <thestringpuller> Namworld is the uber canadian"
jurov: <Ukto> [00:28:45] the20year: the reason the other bot doesnt list bf trades is because they want 8 btc for it
the20year: Why don't they have a bitfunder feed here?
thestringpuller: Namworld is the uber canadian
Hollywood: you used up your extra guy- you need to go find a green mushroom
Hollywood: Namworld , you need to go to bed and start over again
ThickAsThieves: thought maybe you were from the past
ThickAsThieves: sorry, i got thrown off by the French
Namworld: I'm aware, TaT
Namworld: Not that I think anyone would
ThickAsThieves: An analogy would be Record companies trying to stop music piracy (P2P, copies, whatever) sure they slowed it down and shut down some of the early innovators.. but the idea of P2P sharing remains, better than before
Namworld: That it's not too late, it's still feasible.
Namworld: [14:40] <Hollywood> ah, it is too late anyway - the network will be at 1PH soon, scattered all over the planet
Namworld: I was merely commenting back to Hollywood
Namworld: I'm just denying that I ever tried to imply it would be interesting/profitable/someone would do it.
jurov: yes, it's the idea. it can't now be uninvented (unless our whole civilization fails)
ThickAsThieves: if they try to kill it
Namworld: It would be a total waste of fund just to destroy something.
Namworld: I never said it was or that anyone would think its a good idea ._.
Namworld: No, that it's currently not unaffordable to do a 51% attack, wether it be any government or many private group/entities.
ThickAsThieves: we all know this
ThickAsThieves: your point amounts to, USG has a lot of money
jurov: well, nobody argues about that either
Namworld: Don't try to assume more out of it because I agree with pretty much all what you're saying.
Namworld: and that's it.
Namworld: I'm just saying it would be currently completly possible and affordable to do a 51% attack.
Namworld: I never said they would or would think its a good idea
ThickAsThieves: which they couldnt handle
ThickAsThieves: USG can't fight tech with tech
Namworld: Not too costly in the sense that they could easily afford it.
ThickAsThieves: "They'll never justify the expense. That doesn't mean its too costly"
Hollywood: I could be way off base here- the Chinese seem to take business advice from Hong Kong because it makes money
Namworld: That doesn't mean its too costly
Namworld: That's why they won't do it. They'll never justify the expense.
jurov: i wonder why nobody mentions chinese govt. they can do whatever they want now practically for free