867700+ entries in 0.651s

ThickAsThieves: <bobbabad>
TAT you being a boardmember and all, when are
they gonna bring gen2
to
the market? <<< I don't recall
the official (public) company line on
this, but
the idea is
to effectively keep a step ahead. Remember
that
the competition has yet
to fully materialize, and all
the new kids
trying
to make ASICs will have
to go
through
their fair share of "2 weeks" moments
ThickAsThieves: <bobbabad> faith seems pretty low in both asicminer and actm <<<<<
those
two stocks are not in
the same league
bobbabad: TAT you being a boardmember and all, when are
they gonna bring gen2
to
the market?
Rawted: couldnt happen
to a more poorly managed op
bobbabad: bitcoin billionaire by
thursday?
bobbabad: big news from labcoin
team on monday?
thestringpuller: I'm making more money on my measely 500 shares from
the retarded speculators
than from
the interest you're paying
ThickAsThieves
mod6: ThickAsThieves: You are correct, MPEx was mentioned in
that video. But actually before
the spot in
the video where your link
takes you
to. I had
to watch
to
the end,
then back all
the way
to 11:34
to hear
the mention.
Diablo-D3: ThickAsThieves: btw,
tell
the am
thread
that video mentioned
them
Diablo-D3: I just dont get why people consider monetary gold a
thing
Diablo-D3: monetary gold isnt a commodity unless you intentionally remove it from
the monetary gold pile
Diablo-D3: commodity means
that I can use it for something in
the real world
Diablo-D3: ThickAsThieves: currency means I can go
the corner store and buy something
matuszed: I
think
the metals asset comparison downplays
the usefulness of BTC
Diablo-D3: in fact, Im not even sure its
there
Diablo-D3: its not a commodity in
the useful sense
Diablo-D3: bitcoin isnt a currency in
the useful sense
Diablo-D3: matuszed: because
there isnt a useful comparison
to anything
to be honest
matuszed: Why do people want
to compare bitcoin
to gold all
the
time
ozbot: [76] Bitcoin vs Gold: Getting
the Most Bang For Your Buck - YouTube
Namworld: But it's
too small and I don't like
the name.
Namworld: I might go.
There's something good
to
the right.
The yellow building.
VanCleef: prety good idea, wish had something here like
that
to
talk
to and collaborate etc
VanCleef: isn't
this bitcoin foundations job?
Namworld: Something some people are
trying
to start in Montreal
Namworld: So, what do you guys
think of
the Bitcoin "Embassy"
Namworld: I don't keep up much with new consoles and what gets on
them until a decade after
they're out eh
VanCleef: suppose
to be on wii u soon no?
nubbins`: have you ever been
to
those places?
Namworld: They would go blind in short order,
they'd probably pop holes in
their heads with 100
Terawatt
Namworld: No, it would add a much needed science fiction element
to make
the story more interesting.
VanCleef: you should read
the art of war sometime
Namworld: What if I had a 100
Terawatt portable laser minigun and gave it
to
the virgins and whiners? WHAT
THEN?
VanCleef: i
think with lawyers and social media
trolls it could be a intresting war
VanCleef: anyone want
to do an ipo
to hire 100 lawyers
to
take on usa?
Kleeck_: So, fill me in on what I missed regarding CFIG. Someone mention eVoorhees whaling on it. Any evidence of
this?
afrotec: coinbase should let you hold usd without sending
to bank
ozbot: [HAVELOCK] Crypto Currency (CFIG) Official
Thread
Rulother: If
they had
to pick a democrate
that is
Rulother: Clinton nothing more
than another puppet
Rulother: They need
to forcus on Elizabeth Warren
ThickAsThieves: they are making boycott
threats
to
the media outlets
they need because
they plan
to air Hilary movies 2 years before
the elections
ozbot: BBC News - Republicans vow
to boycott CNN and NBC over Clinton films
Namworld: Sadly, I don't have
time
to apologize every sentence.
Namworld: Yes, yes,
that would be very canadian I suppose
jurov: apology for repeating
the obvious comes
to mind
jurov: oh you already
thoroughly explained yourself what you meant and what not... but we're still waiting for apology =)
Namworld: "[15:21] <thestringpuller> Namworld is
the uber canadian"
jurov: <Ukto> [00:28:45]
the20year:
the reason
the other bot doesnt list bf
trades is because
they want 8 btc for it
the20year: Why don't
they have a bitfunder feed here?
Hollywood: you used up your extra guy- you need
to go find a green mushroom
Hollywood: Namworld , you need
to go
to bed and start over again
ThickAsThieves: An analogy would be Record companies
trying
to stop music piracy (P2P, copies, whatever) sure
they slowed it down and shut down some of
the early innovators.. but
the idea of P2P sharing remains, better
than before
Namworld: That it's not
too late, it's still feasible.
Namworld: [14:40] <Hollywood> ah, it is
too late anyway -
the network will be at 1PH soon, scattered all over
the planet
Namworld: I was merely commenting back
to Hollywood
Namworld: I'm just denying
that I ever
tried
to imply it would be interesting/profitable/someone would do it.
jurov: yes, it's
the idea. it can't now be uninvented (unless our whole civilization fails)
Namworld: It would be a
total waste of fund just
to destroy something.
Namworld: I never said it was or
that anyone would
think its a good idea ._.
Namworld: No,
that it's currently not unaffordable
to do a 51% attack, wether it be any government or many private group/entities.
jurov: well, nobody argues about
that either
Namworld: Don't
try
to assume more out of it because I agree with pretty much all what you're saying.
Namworld: I'm just saying it would be currently completly possible and affordable
to do a 51% attack.
Namworld: I never said
they would or would
think its a good idea
Namworld: Not
too costly in
the sense
that
they could easily afford it.
ThickAsThieves: "They'll never justify
the expense.
That doesn't mean its
too costly"
Hollywood: I could be way off base here-
the Chinese seem
to
take business advice from Hong Kong because it makes money
Namworld: That doesn't mean its
too costly
Namworld: That's why
they won't do it.
They'll never justify
the expense.
jurov: i wonder why nobody mentions chinese govt.
they can do whatever
they want now practically for free