851000+ entries in 0.475s

mircea_popescu: except,
they misrepresent it as both future and avoidable, when it's really past and done.
mircea_popescu: because
the power rangers still cling
to
the delusion of relevance, but meanwhile are starting
to comprehend what killed
them.
mircea_popescu: why is jgarzik out of
the woodwork with
telling everyone
to make a decentralized exchange?
moose-hacker: there are
two guys going at it on havelock over cbtc shares, looks like a bidding war
kakobrekla: afaik you must be an established member
to give extra ignore points, but whatever
mircea_popescu: except most
those ignores come from socks/mains of people who read her avidlyh.
jurov: ;;seen
thestringpuller
kakobrekla: its a medal of highest order and now a bunch of ppl cant read you and
those who do, do not, so yeah
mircea_popescu: i can scarcely
think of a more absolute display of impotence. "oh i ignore your pr pls care"
kakobrekla: why bother you already achieved
the highest ignore level possible, its apropriatley golden color
mircea_popescu: and i asked you because you were discussing it in
the log earlier.
ozbot: For lack of a nail pe
Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
ozbot: Just Pop It In
The Microwave and Charge But Really, iPhone Owners should Know Better, Shouldn’t T
Rulother: Have you heard about getting
them
to recharge
the phone by using
the microwave?
Scrat: mircea_popescu: I
thought you were a large investor; 30k invested at -5.2k profit right now
benkay_: hey man i'd be
thrilled if i do a decent job of
the
training
benkay_: great idea mp
thanks a bunch
benkay_: or shit just pay someone far away
to do
benkay_: something
to
train a camwhore on, so
to speak
benkay_: but i don't
tend
to gamble with my working
time, i prefer
to sell
those hours.
benkay_: i suppose
that if i uncovered malfeasance during
the process i could place a bitbet
benkay_: if only
there were some profit
to be had in doing
that
mircea_popescu: in fact, a blog dedicated
to random-weekly audits of provably fair betting sites would be interesting
benkay_: more
than happy
to provide services
though
benkay_: assuming
this is one of
those
benkay_: seems like nobody's auditing
these "provably fair" operators
mircea_popescu: but
there's been
two large series and no numerous small serioes in between
them.
mircea_popescu: well
the first
time it was perfectly credible
that it's yiou know, random shit happens.
mircea_popescu: isn;'t
this exactly like
thart earlier guy, celeste or w/e ?
TomServo: What's
the story with JD? Over 4500 in
the hole.
gribble: nefario was last seen in #bitcoin-assets 52 weeks, 0 days, 23 hours, 39 minutes, and 10 seconds ago: <nefario>
Those assets are not listed or
traded anymore
kleeck: That's one for
the books.
mircea_popescu: so burnside's
timing is awesome <<
tis how one learns,
tat.
benkay_: are
things finally going
to quiet down around here?
jurov: butbutbut we will have colored coins and
they will solve all
these problems.. oh nevermind
pankkake: to add
to
the fun,
the exchange operator would be anonymous, and
thus, could decide
to close down anytime and
take all
the money
pankkake: everything goes - issuers can issue new shares,
there are no contracts
mircea_popescu: so
thus, i roil against equality, especially as contemporarily misunderstood.
mircea_popescu: like
the guys living in houses
they can't afford
to match all
the other "equal" guys who also.
mircea_popescu: but it seems
to me
the false idea
that "we're all equal" is at
the root of
the problem. obviously in reality we aren't. but
the pressure of confirming
this ideology makes people hurt
themselves.
mircea_popescu: this constant
temptation
to substitute
things for cheaper, easier, faster pseudothings is like our contemporary cancer.
dexX7: well, in
that sense i am indeed a noob, so it's fine
mircea_popescu: daytraders
trade actual companies.
these differences are important.
mircea_popescu: dexX7 no,
that's not a daytrader.
that's an noobtrader.
pankkake: maybe nastyfans isn't but
that's it
dexX7: labcoin is a daytraders dream due
to
the high volatility and large
trading volume,
the price etc. is not really based on fundamentals at
the moment
pankkake: a lot of other mining funds
too -
they are bigger
than labcoin and activemining combined
topace: and we didnt make a big deal out of it like some of
these other mining ops
dexX7: it's funny.
they announced 6
th/s but created so much drama
that people went nuts, when
they started
to mine with 800 gh/s
two weeks later
pankkake: actually
they have a proof for
their income now
mircea_popescu: deadlines must be
things
that are not wholly within
the operator's control. making a statement is also not a deadline.
mircea_popescu: lmao. deadline of "we will pay you 0.74% of what you send in
two months hence" is not a deadline, either.
dexX7: the div payment was more about being a positive sign
that
they didn't miss a deadline again
kakobrekla: well since men can lactate, im sure some bull somewhere can
too
pankkake: though it's less spammy
these days
assbot: [HAVELOCK] [LABCO] [PAID] 0.05886136 BTC
to 40`316 shares, 146 satoshi per share
pankkake: "They are already paying a higher dividend
than Active Mining.
This is amazing." I loled
gabridome: Probably it has been answered a lot of
time but I was away and I wanted
to be sure :)
kakobrekla: SD is no longer publically
traded or listed
gabridome: I'm a little ashamed
to ask but could someone please
tell me what can I do with my stocks on my account?
gabridome: I've
tried
to crawl
the forums but still I have one doubt on satoshi dice stocks
gabridome: it's a long
time I don't write and I have a little question
to pose
jborkl: no,
that is
the best way I have found
Doctor_Andonuts: Besides messaging burnside on bitcointalk, is
there any other way
to get in contact with him? I know he is really busy with all
the stuff going on right now =(
phungus: Revenue Share is just
that
phungus: cool, I will see about getting
that clarification in but I'm pretty sure it's on BTCT already
phungus: investment in our security entitles shareholders
to profits
phungus: because of
the
type of security
pankkake: yes,
that's specifically
the issue
phungus: so
they are entitled
to profits
phungus: I don't
think shareholders own our assets
pankkake: weird it disappeared. it was
the something like "shareholders do not own
the company assets"