80200+ entries in 0.538s

a111: Logged on 2016-11-19 19:31 Framedragger: but yeah,
i've noticed that sshd works just fine (incl accepting new connections) even if cpu at ~100% and/or no free disk space. there's that.
Framedragger: anyway,
i imagine a bunch of d(a)emons fighting for
i/o... and yeah no one is saying that there's a straightforward solution...
mircea_popescu:
i dunno that alf is a db engineer by trade, so it's entirely possible specific measures could help, especially if they're of the magic number ilk of "set X to Y in config file, we didn't docum,ent this anywhere but its tru!"
a111: Logged on 2016-11-17 14:43 Framedragger: (and on a side note, "hang out on #trilema after splitting with gf" has been one of the more constructive choices
i've made in my life)
Framedragger: yah but there's also enough of stuff to be done :) if trinque does WoT browser
i won't do in parallel just so that there are two
mircea_popescu:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-11-19#1570790 << amusingly enough, this is actually true. "
i would like to lecture these monkeys in modern psychology" "ok ?" "can you design a shitproof semipermeable membrane that still allows my precious words to reach them ?" "uh. not really. whatever the fuck it is, sooner or later the shit will clog it"
☝︎ Framedragger: sure. "javascript in the backend", etc etc etc.;
i mean, it's still a horrible language. but yeah.
mircea_popescu: tbh
i think javascript is not ever hated in the context of its original domain, "make drawn man move his arms" ; it's whenever it tries to be other things that it draws ire.
a111: Logged on 2016-11-19 16:57 Framedragger: re. visualization,
i like stuff like this (mouse over on labels around the circle), but it's a hella lot of JS, and
i share the hate towards the latter:
http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/7607999 - what's nice about btcalpha visualization is that it uses by-now standard html5 canvas directives (<path>) with no need for JS.
a111: Logged on 2016-11-19 16:45 Framedragger:
i suppose the idea could be to re-implement that, but using deedbot's view of WoT, and add additional things as desired.
mircea_popescu:
i'm not for a second saying HE could have done much better / differently.
Framedragger: asciilifeform: then,
i think, box needs to physically reside with someone in your WoT.
i'm just saying. maybe cheap slippery slope sophism.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you gotta learn to judiciously allocate your time ; Framedragger the problem isn't so much locking up the box - it's that the box will fuck up, this being "foss" bullshit, and then the owner will be like "
i dun wanna pay for a box
i can't use, notwithstanding this is what
i claimed
i want".
Framedragger: (this is a case where
i am more cynical than asciilifeform: a DC you don't know, what illusions does one have; okay, one could install a sensor which signals if box was 'tampered with'; they could still take box offline, clone memory, set up a replica. etc etc etc.)
a111: Logged on 2016-11-19 16:16 asciilifeform:
i wrote, in the qntra piece, 'examine debianized boxes for nsaware'. now 'owner' will have a chance to clean up before any mass 'examination' takes place.
Framedragger: by the way,
i haven't ever used it, but from reading around it appears that streaming replication may indeed be quite efficient. every time row is inserted, row is sent off to remote replica. but this does not really require cpu. so maybe it wouldn't slow things down further / wouldn't be particularly slow even if db being clobbered 24/7
Framedragger: (
i remember having use from a super stupid `free > memory.log` cron job every minute or so)
Framedragger: but yeah,
i've noticed that sshd works just fine (incl accepting new connections) even if cpu at ~100% and/or no free disk space. there's that.
☟︎ mircea_popescu:
i dunno that they actualy bother keeping it for client managed boxes.
mircea_popescu: though
i must confess syn flood had a better ring to it altogether.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform in point of fact
i have asked the public force to locate car drunk ho abandoned "dunno where". they did.
i didn't throw a shitfit about "o noes surveillance state". this because a)
i asked them to do it and b) obviously they just put the number in the stolen cars interface and then a patrol saw it.
mircea_popescu: well, until you insisted
i ask, nobody did. once
i ask, they gotta do specific things.
mircea_popescu: anyway, make a call, do
i have it rebooted or let it be for a while and see if it digs itself back out ?
Framedragger: (how can they even see the name? kvm?
i thought it was baremetal?)
mircea_popescu: and unless maz actuallty reads the logs instead of doing his work,
I TOLD YOU SO
Framedragger: asciilifeform: of course. and also don't treat this as high priority,
i prolly wont look at it before wednesday anyway. but would be interesting to take a look - and
i'd take a look
Framedragger:
i'm thinking whether it'd be worth it to just have a static replica of db-as-it-currently-is, for now. as in for "
i want to touch data, there's an outdated html file on loper-os
i guess?" cases.
Framedragger:
i'm sorry but you didn't convince me in regards to the 'amount' of data. > 100mil row postgres with > 100 gb of data in a 8GB ram server ran fine. and while phuctor may be a more demanding beast, shouting '5 mil keys, MILLION!' doesn't convince
Framedragger:
i have no doubt that a sillicon valley version would be a datacentre of mongodb nodes which constantly fail and corrupt data, and cost millions. :)
Framedragger: quite sure the diff'ing / updates were thought out thoroughly,
i.e. time complexity is constant.
mircea_popescu: "oh it's on phuctor and why do
i need to do anything", which is how we got "those debian experts are flyeyeing the code so why should
i have a clue".
Framedragger: by 'it',
i mean scriba submitting to archive.is
Framedragger: mircea_popescu: right, will get it done.
i had started on it, got sidetracked by the python encoding problem, and the got sidetracked by other stuff. need to re-trace, and will first do the archival bit.
Framedragger: (
i thought someone was supposed to retroactively archive all links in all logs of all times?)
mircea_popescu: Framedragger your scriba could crawl all links in chan and archive them. phf said a while back he almost has this but
i've yet to see it
Framedragger: asciilifeform: (instead of doing a more obscure "query-able phuctor-and-stuff db" thing
i could help with some kind of phuctor-public-display-vps infrastructure setup. just sayin'. thing's not clear in my head.)
Framedragger:
i've read,
i am doubly interested due to vagueness of said broadcasts :p
Framedragger: a couple of vps providers
i used have nice APIs
Framedragger: with regards to vps
i could help, if help/hands are needed.
i know you have other priority stuff asciilifeform. also, don't know what the meta-priority level here is. (
i.e., compared to other projects etc)
a111: Logged on 2016-11-19 15:52 asciilifeform: the folx whose chumpnet we blew open, with the debian boxes,
i suspect -- trying to make their displeasure known.
Framedragger: even if more than that - all of that shit can be cached, static html pages. maybe
i'm oversimplifying.
Framedragger:
i don't know why you need true real time, tbh.
Framedragger:
i'm not saying that going for cheapest ad-hoc option is accetabru. just, a display box showing static content needs much less.
Framedragger: asciilifeform: wouldn't be sure re. costs. vps can be $5/$10 a month, and stuff
i used for ssh key crawling (scaleway) can bill hourly
mircea_popescu: Framedragger
i've not yet got through the log because parsing threw exception on that line
i quoted :D
a111: Logged on 2016-11-19 16:52 Framedragger: asciilifeform: at least with public-static and phuctor boxes being separate, you'd have access to the latter if it were private. (but
i guess you could object with "private/undisclosed box on the internet, what is this oxymoron!")
Framedragger: (by other people's sites
i mean sites that
i'm responsible for.)
Framedragger: because 1) other sites' experience may be impacted, and 2) phuctor db would place some load on things. why = because
i'd create a few indices, those would hog some memory, and assuming users want to do quite a bit of sorting etc, would take some cpu time as well. just sayin'. nothing scientific.
a111: Logged on 2016-11-19 17:18 ben_vulpes: Framedragger:
i am also curious to know what kind of requirements you have for a vps that your current loggotron doesn't serve.
Framedragger:
http://btcbase.org/log/2016-11-19#1570793 << current loggotron also runs on vps, and in itself it requires very few resources. no db use, even. at this point there's a bunch of stuff and other people's sites running on that vps,
i don't feel comfortable adding additional load.
☝︎ mircea_popescu:
i can tell you what wtf right now : learn not to overload box.
trinque: that was me saying
I'll do it.
mod6: <+trinque> Framedragger: ben_vulpes: it probably makes the most sense for me to do the WoT browser << perhaps.
i'd be up for anything really at this point.
mod6:
I think the idea would be to get back to some sort of analog of what mike_c had in place. And then add improvments as necessary.