log☇︎
773300+ entries in 0.488s
ThickAsThieves: note: they specifically edited it to say "person" instead of "corporation, flexible purpose corporation, association, or individual"
davout: diametric: it doesn't say it's the *only* allowed form of alt currency
diametric: "A person shall not issue or put in circulation, as money, anything but the lawful money of the United States." first sentence.
diametric: davout: lets break this down.
asciilifeform: the correct engineering philosophy here is to treat law the way satellite designers treat cosmic rays.
davout: diametric: i didn't see any part where it said it *had* to be, it says it isn't forbidden
diametric: davout: If the alternative currency is based on the USD its okay. So you can buy/sell with bitcoin so long as the value you give to bitcoin is coupled to USD you're fine.
davout: diametric: which does't imply that alternative currency based on the usd is forbidden
ThickAsThieves: it says a lot more than that
diametric: davout: thats exactly what i said.
diametric: of course, they have to maintain the theater
davout: diametric: i read it as "issuing alternative currency based on the usd isn't forbidden"
diametric: really any law at this point
diametric: ThickAsThieves: you can read everything like that
ThickAsThieves: you could also read that as "it's legal until the fed says it isnt"
diametric: The second allows it so long as its coupled to USD
diametric: davout: the "value based on" part.
diametric: davout: "Nothing in this section shall prohibit the issuance and use of alternative currency that is redeemable for lawful money of the United States or *that has value based on* the value of lawful money of the United States but a person shall not be required to accept alternative currency."
ThickAsThieves: or if i use a rate convenient to me
ThickAsThieves: what if i charge a service fee to accept bitcoin?
davout: diametric: where does it say that ?
diametric: its something that realistically won't come into play until Bitcoin becomes large enough that very large communities (in the US) begin transacting solely in bitcoin
ThickAsThieves: what if i offer 5% discount to bitcoin buyers?
diametric: ie I want to sell you a $500 phone for BTC. I figure out how much BTC is worth about $500, thats fine. If I decide based on other factors then I wouldn't be.
diametric: davout: It says you can exchange bitcoin for money, and you can exchange goods and services for bitcoin so long as that bitcoin value is based in USD.
ThickAsThieves: of course i do adjust my rates, but not often enough to be remotely "coupled"
diametric: you forgot the word not
davout: "shall prohibit the issuance and use of alternative currency that is redeemable for lawful money"
diametric: ThickAsThieves: individually its hard to prove that kind of decoupling.
davout: you guys seem to be confusing redeemable, and exchangeable
diametric: But if I decouple the USD value from bitcoin, and begin using it based on my own interpretations (or the community at large) then I'd be in violation I guess.
ThickAsThieves: theyve been editing it i think
diametric: Theres also a subtle distinction. So long as goods and services sold for bitcoin, calculate their cost in bitcoin based on USD, all is fine.
diametric: the last part is probably the most relevant
dexX7: and that's from 2013? weren't there news recently that alt currencies are illegal and this shall change in the future?
ThickAsThieves: "A person shall not issue or put in circulation, as money, anything but the lawful money of the United States. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the issuance and use of alternative currency that is redeemable for lawful money of the United States or that has value based on the value of lawful money of the United States but a person shall not be required to accept alternative
ThickAsThieves: to see details of the bill and votes
diametric: its how a ponzi needs to work. If the ponzi shuts down immediately after it opens, its not really a ponzi, its just an regular scam to steal your money.
KRS-One: isnt it safe to say they'd all be a loss
ThickAsThieves: might be an interesting study across all bitcoin securities, how much would have been made/lost if you bought into every bitcoin IPO and sold the day after it's first payout/dividend
benkay: lots of human in the loop there
benkay: man that's a risky play
ThickAsThieves: someone make an IPO that invests for 1 profit period in every ponzi that appears PDF - Ponzi Destruction Fund
benkay: the scam is in lying about the reality
benkay: like the lotto or anything with expected -ev outcomes
mike_c: i do like this new breed though that is upfront about the ponzi-ness.
benkay: "GET YER BITCOIN PONZI SCHEMES UP AND RUNNIN BOYS WE GOT A NEW CROP OF SUCKERS IN TOWN"
benkay: mike_c: throwaway pun of the day ;)
benkay: mike_c: thanks
ThickAsThieves: forum is advertising this http://makebtc.org/
benkay: virtual memory pointer to web of trust backups updated: http://cascadianhacker.com/blog/2014/02/19_bitcoin-otc-web-of-trust-backups.html
ThickAsThieves: "According to our own internal audit we have never had a 2FA account compromised. We offer a BTC10 reward to anyone that can repeatedly prove that he can hack an account which has 2FA enabled." ~Havelock Investments
pankkake: maybe to link users between services, but for now just backups
Apocalyptic: will backup that too
benkay: nanotube keeps backups in public, i knew where they were at one point. that memory block has been gc'd for more useful things tho
pankkake: that's what I feared. well, I'll eventually write a lib to explore it anyway
benkay: hey nanotube where do you stuff the wot backups again?
Apocalyptic: you'll probably have to write a custom spider
pankkake: yes, that's exactly why I was looking into doing that :)
mike_c: yeah, sry. in the arguments the other day mp said the wot can be backed up by anyone (similar to mpex db). that is my basis for "yes". idk how, but it should not be fruitless to keep looking for how.
pankkake: is there a way to download the bitcoin-otc wot db?
mike_c: bitbet needs moar links. where's that list of proposed/rejected bets?
BingoBoingo: mike_c: I've found bitbook.biz reliable, but who knows if they will continue to be reliable.
mike_c: BingoBoingo: is there a btc line-betting sportsbook that isn't a total scam?
asciilifeform: idiots will turn in $30mil rembrandts if those are banned one day.
the20year2: i just hate seeing people find and turn in $30,000 guns for destruction
asciilifeform: 'grandfather found a grenade in the field. over to the town hall he went. pulled the pin, threw in window. grandpa is old, he doesn't care.'
the20year2: People do that all over the world still :)
the20year2: The US M240 GPMG is based off the BAR which was designed in 1918
asciilifeform: people in the 'iron curtain' lands still often find 'grandfather's schmeisser' in the attic, etc.
the20year2: There are few if any modern arms that are vastly superior to those made during ww2. Sure things are lighter today, but that's it
the20year2: That's why I collect them. There's something fun about handing a 1895 issued rifle to a person and reminding them it's effective to 1,000 yards
asciilifeform: people tend to bury or otherwise hoard them
asciilifeform: heh, yet another reason for the immortality of vintage small arms
the20year2: Even though it's 120 years old, and made with hand tools
the20year2: Buy one without a ton of permits in the US and it's jail time
the20year2: my favorite example is the colt potato digger
the20year2: And if you got surplus from ww1, means there's a good chance you have pre-1900 weapons too.
asciilifeform: just rubs in the point that nothing fundamentally new has happened in the field since those times.
the20year2: There are many, many firearms from WW2 and pre-ww2 eras still being used in most of the middle east, africa and asia
the20year2: In future wars there will be plenty of ww1 era firearms used
asciilifeform: interesting to picture future 'apocalyptic' war fought with ww2 arms.
the20year2: ascii, to a point yes, but the bulk of it was given to USSR client states
the20year2: Much of the 8mm/mauser equipment ended up in Romania and Yugoslovia. The MG42 tooling ended up entirely almost in Yugoslovia, specifically the zavasta plant in Serbia. They still produce the MG42 and K98 on original german equipment
asciilifeform: there are russian factories still running various machine tools with nazi eagles stamped on them.
mod6: bought my buddy a mauser once, thing bucks like a mule.
the20year2: The USSR broke up much of the fabrication equipment from Eastern Germany and sold or gave it to client states
the20year2: Yes, they still have the dies that the USSR plundered from Germany
asciilifeform: i'm told that yugoslavia still produces german 8mm rounds
asciilifeform: whose supplies you are to be plundering.
asciilifeform: general rule for 'partizan,' historically, is to stick to the caliber of the prospective enemy.
the20year2: The leadup to the yugoslovian wars saw some sides doing quite well with armament programs.....the ones that lost didn't prepare
the20year2: Plenty of empires or smaller players have had time in the past to prepare for wars, ect. Many people in many nations have had time to prepare for civil wars
the20year2: Depends on the scenario
asciilifeform: my understanding is that people generally get whatever's lying around in the ruins of whichever great 20th c. empire they happen to live in.
the20year2: I'm sure it won't happen like that, but the gun within grabbing ditance, ready to go in my house is a colt AR15, not my AK
asciilifeform: when this is said, i always picture a game-like scene, where a godlike narrator proclaims 'world has ended! choose your small arms'
the20year2: Additionally, up until the Sino-vietnam conflict, the Chinese doctrine was to issue everyone with T53 bolt action rifles because they were 'more reliable' than the AK
the20year2: I love my AK, but I can't say it's the gun I want to use if the world ends
the20year2: the AK and M16 are two different guns. One is for people who are educated and trained, the other is for everyone else