log☇︎
772700+ entries in 0.522s
greenspan_fan: mircea_popescu you're right, it does seem to beg the question...
mircea_popescu: no, it does not "store value" any more than "empathy" as used by the libertard is either human or virtuous.
mircea_popescu: greenspan_fan this seems to me a completely unwarranted generalisation that actrually breaks logic.
asciilifeform: we can talk about 'storing energy' and come to rational conclusions about physically-real things (e.g. organisms.) and then we can talk about storing 'value', and end up with pseudo-scientific strange...
benkay: or rather it's astronomically difficult to do so.
greenspan_fan: I can't spend "knowing how to make an engine", but knowing that I can do that (and having the plans/information to do so) stores value
benkay: it's arguably only contextual in a world in which nobody can really ant their hard work away.
greenspan_fan: perhaps things that would fall under the category of intellectual property?
asciilifeform: and whether the phrase 'store of value' even makes sense here.
asciilifeform: trying to think of items which act as store of value in some useful sense without really being spendable
asciilifeform: in the sense of the ultimate 'trading sardine'
greenspan_fan: wouldn't the degenerate case be a strangelet?
benkay: more like "o now i have credit for a billion pizzas at this local bitcoin brokerage"
benkay: but the "you" here can vary, and does not include pizzas
greenspan_fan: at some point, you need to be able to exchange for things to have value
mircea_popescu: greenspan_fan not clear, but er is the clap.
asciilifeform: to go back to the 'peasant never saw a gold coin' scenario. a peasant, correct. how about a shipyard?
benkay: i expect a new whore at the door
mircea_popescu: reality does not care what we expect, turns out.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform> time to digest a meal: ~6 hours. does that mean that one should be able to go without meal for ~72 yrs << yes, if they were a payment processor.
greenspan_fan: Well, given the above, I expect that btc is just a placeholder for something that will have numerous quantitative technical improvements.
mircea_popescu: course this is more of a case of hawala reduces to bitcoin
benkay: "stench of the cube farm"
benkay: you can say that again.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform if one takes a conceptual hawala rather than any particular historical implementation, no.
benkay: i'm going back to figuring out how to represent a 32-bit int in ragel on java.
asciilifeform: is there a scenario with 'paper & pencil btc' that does not reduce to simply 'Hawala' ?
benkay: well what does it mean for bitcoin to be stopped!?
mircea_popescu: this was actually tested back in the old days of mpoe, works just fine.
mircea_popescu: "here, take this pre-signed tx, put it in your block"
benkay: now, you're dependent on the technical ability of your counterparty to track and not double-spend.
mircea_popescu: benkay actually, no trust needed.
benkay: "here - take this pre-signed transaction"
benkay: not that this actually prevents anyone from exchanging btc, provided they're sufficiently trusty
asciilifeform: time to digest a meal: ~6 hours. does that mean that one should be able to go without meal for ~72 yrs?
greenspan_fan: which is the case for the short term
mircea_popescu: obviously presuming liniarty and so on and so forth, but just for the sake of it.
greenspan_fan: absent some other similar currency overtaking it due to the delay
mircea_popescu: thus therefore, tolerable btc outage should be something like 2 years.
mircea_popescu: well, more of a long term slower moving thing yeah
greenspan_fan: OK, so the contention is that things that are faster to process (such as cash or credit) are expected to allow for retail level/immediate transaction, while btc is more of a long term store of value, right?
mircea_popescu: and no, you should not rely on bitcoin. this has been explicitly stated since day one. bitcoin is not here for you to rely on.
Duffer1: software changes, it'd be annoying sure and the media shitfest will be epic, but neither of those things matter
greenspan_fan: mircea_popescu as you say, not a problem for reasonably wealthy individuals, but it means that if you don't already have a lot of fiat currency, you can't rely on bitcoin
greenspan_fan: and that doesn't constitute a huge problem?
greenspan_fan: in the interim between breach, patch being devised and patch being promulgated, you'd have zero activity
greenspan_fan: well yeah, but there comes a point when subverting btc is the most profitable use of a breakthrough, hence the first thing it'd be used for
mircea_popescu: when you say sha was breached you're not describing some nitnoy thing nobody cares about.
greenspan_fan: well look at transaction malleability; doesn't seem like a huge problem, but it hasn't been fixed yet
mircea_popescu: (your q was as to coordinate moving, not as to patching, mind)
mircea_popescu: what's the thinking ?
greenspan_fan: I think you're underestimating how hard it would be to patch
mircea_popescu: it takes all of five minutes
greenspan_fan: but how do you coordinate moving to the new system? and what if that takes too long?
mircea_popescu: and you can do whatever you want on the old chain.
mircea_popescu: if it IS known however the code will just be patched to take it out, and people will move on the new system for cause
mircea_popescu: if your crack is not known, then maybe for a while you can benefit from it.
greenspan_fan: then couldn't you block the migration?
greenspan_fan: if you're able to break SHA-256 you'd end up w/ a majority of the hashing power if you were smart
mircea_popescu: and stuff will have to be emergency-migrated.
greenspan_fan: (or, if you prefer, value) and it's hard to account for those
greenspan_fan: there's a few things like mathematical breakthroughs re: hash functions or serious bugs in the client that could tank the price
greenspan_fan: but it's also pretty experimental, is the thing
mircea_popescu: bullocks would be ok, but the "six digits or less" is equal to saying in that other context "60 kgs or over"
asciilifeform: the answer here, i suspect, depends on whether you like the taste of bullocks.
greenspan_fan: mircea_popescu worth how? I have less than 100 000 btc, for example
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform and perhaps we'll be fucking rid of all the forum investors.
asciilifeform: what does cocaine cost. or, for that matter, aluminum.
asciilifeform: perhaps if the public exchanges perish, people will be cured of the habit of treating 'btc price in X' as a scalar.
greenspan_fan: it kinda depends if it's past the point where adoption is widespread enough to sustain an economy w/o needing easy conversion between fiat and btc
Chris_Sabian: it stayed that way for several months
Chris_Sabian: look the last 2 steep rises, april and nov-dec. the price shot up then peaked and dropped to ~1/2 value
mircea_popescu: speculation of the sort and type that the exchanges enable and reddit/forum/.etc support is about as fundamental to bitcoin as druggies were.
greenspan_fan: the concern is that speculation is pretty fundamental to current price and exchanges facilitate that
greenspan_fan: people immediately bought on the dip
asciilifeform: (for anyone unfamiliar with 'djvu', it's an old but irreplaceable format specifically for warez scans. wavelet-compressed images. no turing-complete vector rendering as in pdf.)
Chris_Sabian: save the drop in price from 135-88-120
mircea_popescu: people imagine exchanges are fundamental to bitcoin price. they'll close, no ill effects to be recorded.
greenspan_fan: there were ill effects, but it was kinda priced in at that point
mircea_popescu: people thought silk road is fundamental to bitcoin value. it closed, no ill effects recorded.
Chris_Sabian: dont think that is possible
greenspan_fan: anyone seriously concerned about a price collapse if it turns out most exchanges were as incompetent as mt gox?
mircea_popescu: sorta mess) is jumping on board the "o no malleability is preventing us
mircea_popescu: i've been back to say hey next time listen to me before you get into this
mircea_popescu: which i beat the shit out of when they decided to start letting people
mircea_popescu: crypto-trade (neotrix's deal that used to be an altcoin marketplace, and
Bugpowder: I built the gene in the mouse video... the fish video is 2 more series of evolution better...
moiety: cya Bugpowder thanks for le links!
ozbot: Watching a mouse's brain think about running with GCaMP3 - YouTube
Bugpowder: Works best in fish tho
Bugpowder: downstream application... Total brain network activity imaging.
moiety: A Japanese-American Team created green-fluorescent cats as proof of concept to use them potentially as model organisms for diseases, particularly HIV.[42] I volunteer to look after them
Bugpowder: BTW this work won the 2008 Nobel prize.
moiety: it is really cool, i started an album after the illustrating science challenge last year
ozbot: Green fluorescent protein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bugpowder: I think I put it there many years ago
Bugpowder: I think.
moiety: Bugpowder, may i please use this picture?
Bugpowder: Then a friend made a pallete of different color bacteria and painted the plate with a dilute solution of them. Waited 48 hours and that was the impressive result
mircea_popescu: i can't help but think you're pretty close to biofilm 3d printing.