log☇︎
7900+ entries in 0.09s
ThickAsThieves: yeah it stores when you rated someone
ThickAsThieves: assessing*
ThickAsThieves: it helps someone add context when asessing ratings
ThickAsThieves: time-stamping is useful
ThickAsThieves: sold separately
ThickAsThieves: apparently even the spork needed innovating
ThickAsThieves: http://cache.backpackinglight.com/backpackinglight/images/items/light-my-fire-spork-xm-M.jpg
ThickAsThieves: ;;ud spork
ThickAsThieves: wouldnt it be more productive to improve the existing one by helping with decentralization efforts or such?
ThickAsThieves: it seems odd to me that you are recreating the WoT, when it already exists
ThickAsThieves: so by my subtheory, i'd say you need all the mircean features in both systems
ThickAsThieves: if both, handle them separately
ThickAsThieves: or a lending one?
ThickAsThieves: your goal is to make a rating system?
ThickAsThieves: hold up
ThickAsThieves: ick...
ThickAsThieves: you can rate people AND get paid?
ThickAsThieves: so it has two?
ThickAsThieves: hehe
ThickAsThieves: oh
ThickAsThieves: ratings right?
ThickAsThieves: what is your system's MoE?
ThickAsThieves: right
ThickAsThieves: his theory doenst outright require decentralization either
ThickAsThieves: first it is not yet proven that all systems require an "mircean" economy, though i suspect they do
ThickAsThieves: well
ThickAsThieves: ok
ThickAsThieves: and maybe see if you have a hole
ThickAsThieves: we could run it through the test
ThickAsThieves: whats your project again?
ThickAsThieves: and punish one
ThickAsThieves: you must only have ability to identify one
ThickAsThieves: nowhere does it say you must be able to remove threat
ThickAsThieves: well is that a feature required within Mircea's theory?
ThickAsThieves: but i think it qualifies nonetheless
ThickAsThieves: it's certainly not a typical or, arguably, ideal, economy
ThickAsThieves: and that the original owner can take them back at any time
ThickAsThieves: the rules of the economy state thpse coins can only be used with that user
ThickAsThieves: in WoT? For every user created, each other user received 10 pos "coins" and 10 neg "coins"
ThickAsThieves: they always exist
ThickAsThieves: you take them back
ThickAsThieves: you dont destroy points
ThickAsThieves: in WoT,
ThickAsThieves: "destroyed" is not always an easy thing to identify
ThickAsThieves: (just pointing out the value is dynamic)
ThickAsThieves: well, theyre only as good as the person assessing the issuer decided
ThickAsThieves: i was exploring whether the the WoT itself contains an economy
ThickAsThieves: read yesterdays log
ThickAsThieves: in the WoT the moe is rating points
ThickAsThieves: no
ThickAsThieves: for every post every user gets one pos coin and one neg coin
ThickAsThieves: same as with WoT ratings
ThickAsThieves: yesterday it was already established that a point system could work as an economy
ThickAsThieves: karma / points
ThickAsThieves: those could still be identified as such
ThickAsThieves: doesnt really change my question though
ThickAsThieves: Would it be correct to say that Reddit is broken economy in that downvoters are not identified?
ThickAsThieves: trolled by Hearn
ThickAsThieves: wouldnt that be a great way to start my day
ThickAsThieves: someone is suggesting that Hearn is trolling
ThickAsThieves: or sumth
ThickAsThieves: well it's more likely to work early
ThickAsThieves: and when that is the same person whom, if i recall, helped the last fork occur
ThickAsThieves: who knows what's possible when you add a new feature that already exists
ThickAsThieves: he's basically building a BETTER BitUndo, i think/....
ThickAsThieves: they are like a backup plan or someshit
ThickAsThieves: Darling I don't know why I go to extremes
ThickAsThieves: It's all or nothing at all
ThickAsThieves: And if I stand or I fall
ThickAsThieves: Too high or too low there ain't no in-betweens
ThickAsThieves: Darling I don't know why I go to extremes
ThickAsThieves: Mike Hearn
ThickAsThieves: i guess he really is a NSA plant
ThickAsThieves: these people...
ThickAsThieves: i wonder if he'd build the best way to double spend by trying to make the best way to prevent it
ThickAsThieves: because "honesty"
ThickAsThieves: he wants to put more system in his system
ThickAsThieves: well, bitcoin also happens to already have a system for preventing double spends
ThickAsThieves: "The above approach works as long as the majority of hashpower is honest"
ThickAsThieves: it's the best of the worst!
ThickAsThieves: some of the others being thrown around."
ThickAsThieves: how you know it's a good idea? "This may seem a radical suggestion, but I think it's much less radical than
ThickAsThieves: and other meanie miners
ThickAsThieves: to prevent BitUndo
ThickAsThieves: he's proposing some sort of meta double-spending for the motherland
ThickAsThieves: Hearn "Although I never expected it when I first started using Bitcoin, nowadays most of my purchases with it are for food and drink. If Bitcoin could not support such purchases, I would use it much less."
ThickAsThieves: would you enjoy some broken glass for breakfast? http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04972.html
ThickAsThieves: morning
ThickAsThieves: she's a journalist, she's good at making shit up by now
ThickAsThieves: like bitcoin gambling is somehow doomed due to its volatility
ThickAsThieves: i agree though ive seen recent articles disagreeing with that mp
ThickAsThieves: itd probably grow in some proportion to bitcoin's growth
ThickAsThieves: assuming he's still in CR...
ThickAsThieves: just in case you REALLY need a connection
ThickAsThieves: but he's into bitcoin, in CR
ThickAsThieves: a nobody really
ThickAsThieves: here's is blog if you wanna try to reach him http://cryptocoinblog.com/about/
ThickAsThieves: furuknap, i think he's in CR
ThickAsThieves: the sharepoint guy
ThickAsThieves: i think whats his name is in costa rica