log☇︎
738800+ entries in 0.483s
mircea_popescu: nothing much harder than that.
mircea_popescu: bounce it's a balance point. the whole idea is that stable situations are stable, and derivation from that mean is unstable.
Mats_cd03: it has had its maiden flight... a long time ago
Mats_cd03: f-35 is useful for air to surface, whereas f-22 is designed for air to air
bounce: f35 is a brilliant scam, actually. getting permission to deliver production planes when the prototype hasn't had its maiden flight
Mats_cd03: anyway, not all the f-35 series planes are the same
bounce: yeah no, I don't think it's straight up incentive, or at least not as strong as implied as there's strong pull the other way too. eg gangs don't extinguish themselves
mircea_popescu: i would imagine that's how it lands.
jurov: it should be able to to burrow, too
Mats_cd03: that'd be awesome, we should do that next
bounce: it'll be inferior to the harrier, like as not.
Mats_cd03: or for that matter, svtol
mircea_popescu: bounce and wide availability and a commodified market reduces the pull.
the20year2: I'm curious what signfiicant tech the f35 produces that the f22/f35 didn't have
Mats_cd03: even if its basically a laundry list of cool shit we want our super plane to have
bounce: likewise, getting robbed often enough is a strong incentive to no longer run a shop (or at least not here, or maybe not a jeweller but a gunsmith, who knows)
the20year2: corrupt politicians vying for money to their districts makes alot more sense
Mats_cd03: well no i think the project is cool and i dont have a lot of problems with pouring R&D money into potentially useful technology
jurov: i heard funny hypothesis that f35 is chinese inside job to bleed usg dry
bounce: whether it's her girlish friends pulling her in or a pimp looking for more meat to sell is a different mechanism but with the same effect; question then is which'll be stronger
Mats_cd03: maybe in 30 years we'll be fielding Transformers models of Starscream
mircea_popescu: benkay so maybe tell her about this marvelous wot thing we got ? liz i mean.
the20year2: compared to the f22/yf23?
mircea_popescu: Mats_cd03 how's that go ?
Mats_cd03: i rather appreciate whats being done with the f35 personally
mircea_popescu: thinking the girl acts of her own volition is a little rich.
mircea_popescu: but that's not the real edge. the guy selling it to her is more likely to not bother, is the real edge.
bounce: dunno. "everyone's doing it, it's fun!" appears to be a powerful motivator.
the20year2: The airplane that does nothing more than the plane we built in the early 90s for $200m/unit
mircea_popescu: and by the latest reports couldn't fight against the russians even if it wanted to.
pLambert: is F35 the one which was designed to fight against russians and has never been used?
mircea_popescu: bounce take whores. if there's a whore on every corner and prices are low, is your pretty daughter more likely or less likely to start cutting class for to taking it up the tail ?
bounce: re minimum crime, how does upping the crime rate increase the incentive not to go into crime?
the20year2: Which I have a problem with, when programs like LCS and the F35 are front and center taking up significant sums of money for low results
benkay: mircea_popescu: naw man i like 'em effeminate and making dinner not deep in the server room.
mircea_popescu: pLambert his intuition is correct, in that the us has no economy, and no technical ability. cutting the army is like cutting its own throat.
mircea_popescu: benkay wait, that's not your girl, is it ?
the20year2: The budget is 600-650b, and they want to decrease it to around 500b
pLambert: And he thinks we should spend just as much, even though we are not actually fighting anybody?
the20year2: Granted, in my personal opinion (As controversial as it is), it's like every other government program, cutting things that are important, expanding things that buy votes
the20year2: pLambert: yes, it's set to diminish by a decent amount due to iraq, afghanistan and drawdowns
pLambert: this guy bitching about "sequestration", has the US defense budget actually gone down at all? I thought we were still spending more every year?
Mats_cd03: but they like having american money flowing into local economies
Mats_cd03: funny enough, some countries wont admit to liking having american troops on their soil
mircea_popescu: if some guy in my neighbourhood decided to go around telling everyone he's the bestest there is, i'd also expect him to send a nubile young woman around for purposes with some frequency.
mircea_popescu: because yougotta pay to play.
pLambert: and a corrolary: why do we STILL have so many troops in Europe?
mircea_popescu: pLambert i suspect it was part of the marshall plan
benkay: no options, no statement, thestringpuller. who cares, anyways? it's a scam under investigation by the SEC. doomed, I tell you (to enjoy the new scion TC!)
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller since the option thing is ended ima report it end of month line normal assets.
pLambert: "In 1974, one could easily find company-sized organizations in U.S. Army Europe" wth does the US have so many troops in Europe?
benkay: blackwater will eventually own texas, much like the roman mercs ate the empire.
the20year2: to secure europe from the evil russian bear?
mircea_popescu: anyway, just some retired something or the other harping about how expensive and hard it is.
mircea_popescu: yeah, that's what the planning mostly planned for.
the20year2: Very much correct, it was always assumed to go nuclear within 24hrs of the outbreak of conflict
mircea_popescu: that the us army at no point past ww2 had a standing chance in europe.
mircea_popescu: "On alert, this tattered, morally compromised army was to clear post in under an hour, move to its defensive positions on the West German border with the Warsaw Pact, fight outnumbered five to one and win. Such odds were daunting."
benkay: vegetables in the mail for bitcoin
benkay: the rest of us grub in the dirt for spuds.
benkay: what's so novel about that?
mircea_popescu: you'd think it's 1984 all over again or some shit.
mircea_popescu: but it's fucking ridiculous that i have to maintain a private supply network in fucking 2014
mircea_popescu: i don't think i've ever bouight supermarket-anything
jurov: every time i'm shopping in austria i must fight rage, everything is really fresher
mircea_popescu: (they recently had a case about how illegal all this is)
mircea_popescu: the20year2 that data is corrupted, and milk is a fine example.
the20year2: Median supermarket margins in the US are 15%
mircea_popescu: that's a 95% margin for the supermarket.
mircea_popescu: meanwhile, independent romanian farmers sell 5% milk for 0.5 lei, and 1.5% milk is on sale in the supermarkets for... 6 lei.
the20year2: Certainly is if the population is to continue to grow, if you continue on with less efficient methods of food delivery people starve
mircea_popescu: but this recent "can't eat an apple with a spot" neurosis is not naturally occuring in human populations.
mircea_popescu: the20year2 moreover, that's phase 2 material. obviously the supermarket can train the clueless consumer in a number of ways to build a moat around itself.
joecool: it still works for some merchants that don't have access to their own in-house mailing list
mircea_popescu: had it succeeded to make it so "all the buyers are on groupon", it's model of "give us everything for free" would have worked on the merchants.
mircea_popescu: many lines aren't amenable to the supermarket model, but groupon tried to bring them into the same economics.
the20year2: The reason they exist is because the consumers demanded year-round goods
mircea_popescu: this allows them to buy everything very cheap and sell it as expensive as they want.
mircea_popescu: and it can similarly tell any town dweller to stfu and starve.
mircea_popescu: specifically : supermarkets exist to scam consumers, because the supermarket is large, so it can tell any small farmer to stfu and get lost
mircea_popescu: more complicated than that. the groupon business model was basically to try and create a scale advantage on both ends.
joecool: except they don't do anything but hold the money for awhile and gamble before paying the merchants
benkay: that's essentially net 45. think of the float you could be making on our backs!
benkay: fifteen days after the postmark date, we expect to see remuneration.
benkay: this in fact is how we run our shop. we sit down, figure out what crazy ideas you have, how to make them into an actual thing, and then work on it at a predetermined rate for a period of time.
mircea_popescu: well obviously. the us can't quite afford to abandon the notion
benkay: this is very similar to the constant ongoing mining fiasco and how product tends to get delivered (in my extremely limited experience): "you ship a thing. it shows up on my door. if it works, 30 days later i send you a check. otherwise, get out of my face."
mircea_popescu: "There is an empirical problem with the debate over United States military strategy towards China: aircraft carriers are “dead,” but they can still be seen patrolling the Western Pacific."
mircea_popescu: now that's definitely a thing.
benkay: another thing is, as i said to my colleague recently re a contractor: "ain't nobody motivated by money in the bank."
asciilifeform: 'i promise to ship a shitload of xxxx. send me xxxB.'
benkay: i want to ship a shitload of features! it's going to cost 500B.
benkay: it's the estimation, constraints, fractal nature of coastline, overreaching ambitions, unmanaged expectations...
benkay: sure, it's never the actual software.
benkay: man this is what i have to say to people who crowdfund software: http://iconicphotos.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/johnny-cash-finger-2.jpg?w=700
ozbot: Report: RSA endowed crypto product with second NSA-influenced code | Ars Technica
ozbot: Looks like Darkwallet was a scam [x-post TheHub] : Bitcoin
nubbins`: new regulation requires all cars to have under-the-nuts-view cameras by 2015
Mats_cd03: i'll take a copy of the zip if you'd upload it
mircea_popescu: heck, let me send you a list of this shit :D