log☇︎
729300+ entries in 0.35s
BCB: mircea_popescu, did you see that new paper about regulation
mircea_popescu: so are we getting a proposal on how to fix bitcoin or noit just yet ?
TestingUnoDosTre: how long will the openSSL bug persist in everyday use?
danielpbarron: yeah, I read all about them on bitcointalk lol
TestingUnoDosTre: how quickly was an openSSL bug patched in the bitcoin community when released
minersdidit: all the failures of the dotcom crash resurfaced in bitcoin
danielpbarron: there is probably some truth to that one (re: amateurs from dotcom)
minersdidit: how is it laughable, theres persistent amateur bugs discovered
benkay waits for this thread of troll to spin out
minersdidit: its a circus of amateurs from the last dotcom crash
benkay: read the conformal source. next.
minersdidit: bitcoin developers are poor quality because their is zero incentive to attract proper professionals
Duffer1: minersdiditnobody pays them to sprout up >> have you heard of github?
minersdidit: nobody pays them to sprout up
benkay: reference client isn't the only client
minersdidit: no they wont
danielpbarron: this is ridiculous, it's open source; if the devs really did suck (arguable..) then new ones will sprout up
benkay: yeah it's expensive and hard to get. what of it?
minersdidit: plus horrendous bid/ask spread when trying to get some
benkay: see now jump to a new topic, a new stupid claim
danielpbarron: i think multi sig already exists
TestingUnoDosTre: bitcoin utility hasn't budged a bit, but the value has most definitely dropped
minersdidit: bitcoin will be at version 0.92 in a decade with the current developmeant team
benkay: not you, TestingUnoDosTre
benkay: make this argument in a decade.
TestingUnoDosTre: alright, but if you had 10 dollars waiting to invest in bitcoin last week, versus today, how much more bitcoin would it buy benkay?
benkay: the txn net is stronger than ever.
benkay: say we clear back to 10
danielpbarron: that's not most, and that's also an exageration
TestingUnoDosTre: like a coin that you can hack by pealing off the adhesive?
minersdidit: what will it take for you to see most of its value? 51%?
minersdidit: danialbarron its lost what 40% in the last 24hrs alone?
MGK: never heard of those?
danielpbarron: i've never seen Bitcoin lose most its value, but I wasn't around for that first MtGox hack
TestingUnoDosTre: wtf is that
akstunt600: danielpbarron, hahhah so true
minersdidit: 5 years on the internet with instant information awareness is like 100-200 years
danielpbarron: well it only took the dollar a century to lose most of its value; Bitcoin's looking pretty good
minersdidit: thats a century in internet time.
danielpbarron: exactly, 5 years old... that isn't very long ago
akstunt600: minersdidit, Sooo that why dogecoin is better?
minersdidit: its not my theory, its reality look how bitcoin acts
danielpbarron: i'm starting to get what you are saying, minersdidit, but I still don't agree
benkay: resorts to ad hominems
minersdidit: yea you too stupid to see it
benkay: lay off the entheogens, kid.
minersdidit: making it more difficult to attract more
ozbot: The 10 Most Insane Things You Didn't Know About the Universe | Marvels of the Science | Episode 6 -
minersdidit: miners drain that pool constantly
minersdidit: bitcoins value is relative to the liquidity pool of bids that is available
TestingUnoDosTre: i lost, and I also lost the 1% by trying to bid last minute
minersdidit: money has to reflect what the economy is doing, which is a fractal it expands and contracts hence elastic
mike_c: TestingUnoDosTre: um, i actually lost. seems worse than almost lost :)
minersdidit: its not a question of that
benkay: so make the perfect alt
minersdidit: no it doesnt. the quantity theory of money that bitcoin is based on, guarantees insane volatility
TestingUnoDosTre: mike_c, at least you didn't almost lose .5 btc at the last minute like this guy <-----
danielpbarron: either there is too much BTC or not enough? which is it?
Duffer1: capital flight will seek precious metals and other solid commodities imo, btc a bit too
danielpbarron: ok, that statement seems to completely contradict the other stuff you've been saying
minersdidit: and for every seller of BTC there is also a buyer
minersdidit: bitcoin has no liquidity to support any type of wealth fleeing into it
danielpbarron: well that's my bet
danielpbarron: minersdidit: there is a lot of wealth that will be fleeing FIAT soon, and it will choose Bitcoin
minersdidit: they will be constantly on the ask side
minersdidit: to "secure" a network that only transfers 67k
minersdidit: 3600 coins per day x 400 is what the miners are being paid in subsidies
mike_c: is there any fiat demand? who wants fiat?
minersdidit: theres not enough fiat demand to support what miners are creating out of thin air everyday
benkay: now or then?
Duffer1: since that's the reward for doing the work..
minersdidit: hence its what theyve been doing
minersdidit: miners had obscene margins and every incentive to realize them
benkay: miners got paid 25 bitcoin to move some other number of btc around, plus txn fees
danielpbarron: minersdidit: do you know how much wealth is wasted running the current financial system?
minersdidit: the subsidy is like a $40 per transfer tax
benkay: how is the subsidy different and the txn value the same?
minersdidit: do you see the problem here? as the real value rises so does the cost to run the network
minersdidit: miners now get paid what 1million to secure the same 80k transactions
minersdidit: it was impossible to sustain becuase we dont even have 1billion of fiat on order books
benkay: no, those are still worth 1B too.
mike_c: my bitcoin is still worth a bitcoin. except the ones i lost on that stupid $400 bitbet.
minersdidit: @ $1200 a btc miners were being subsidized to the tune of 5million dollars to secure 80k transactions
benkay: if it's still blow stamps for kiddies at that point, no big.
minersdidit: i dont have to claim anything the evidence is all around you
benkay: government will always dilute the currency, given the opportunity.
danielpbarron: the old states used to water down the gold coins; nothing new under the sun
benkay: claim, claim, claim, wait for sucker to bite, argue, say 'you're too stupid for me to possibly explain this'
mike_c: actually 5% gold 95% tungsten
minersdidit: bitcoin cant work alone its already been tried with 100% gold
benkay: <minersdidit> thats beyond your primitive understanding to even bother explaining << tiberius move, iirc
minersdidit: prices need to move around
Duffer1: minersdiditand im not talking about fiat price >> yes you are, your btc work will always be worth x btc, the only volatility is fiat market pricing of that work
minersdidit: its not about PRICE satbility. its about mechanisms that respond to market needs hence reducing volatility
mike_c: try speaking english, that will help.
minersdidit: thats beyond your primitive understanding to even bother explaining
minersdidit: i wouldnt stabalize the price. i just told you, you need something like decentralized discount bills that settle in BTC
benkay: i find that rather satisfying.
mike_c: curious, where would you have "stabilized" the price? $1? $10?
benkay: the other side is that i know the fraction of the monetary reserve my work is worth