704600+ entries in 0.388s
davout: pankkake: it's only for
the font, nothing remotely comparable
to cloudflare
Apocalyptic: <dotcoin> hosting on 1&1 //
they are on online afaik
BigBitz: What do you want him
to do? use SFTI? :)
pankkake: I
think so, unless it's only for
the font
davout: pankkake: you serious about
the google
thing? shame on me
bounce: just so you know,
this is not
twittar.
dotcoin: @davout and you are qualified
to run a bitcoin exchange?
pankkake: bitcoin-central.net actually requires requests
to google
to work
dotcoin: thats not correct as i
tell you already
there is all
to see
davout: dotcoin:
this does classifies you as completely unqualified
to run a stock exchange,
that's all
BigBitz: You don't
think not publishing
trade information on a
trading platform is a positive?
dotcoin: many other
things in
todo list, so i not give
them so much priority yet as i don't know
this classifieds me as scammer
BigBitz: That shouldn't
take a mammoth development
task.
BigBitz: You surely have
the data at hand.
dotcoin: yes guys
think like
taht is under development
dotcoin: there are offers
to buy and sell, of course,
the only one not is
there are not showing sold shares
thats correct
davout: dotcoin: you need
to show offers
to buy and sell, publicly, not who is posting
these orders
BigBitz: You need
to show
trades :)
BigBitz: You don't need
to show people...
davout: dotcoin: you seem
to be confused about what an order book is
Apocalyptic: but you see
the
trades for every single
trading day
Apocalyptic: <dotcoin> do you see on Nyse or nasdaq
the name of
the shareholder? // no
dotcoin: do you see on Nyse or nasdaq
the name of
the shareholder?
davout: dotcoin: how can
the public have an idea of what
the state of
the market is without an order book ?
jurov: dotcoin "public has no right
to any information" is a scammer attitude
BigBitz: Yeah if NASDAQ can run
their engine for longer
than 2mins :P
dotcoin: you want see where are
the shareholders? do you see on your bank
the shareholder names of a company?
dotcoin: the merchant have
to know where
the shares are gone
dotcoin: but guys you
talking about
things like cryptostocks do
davout: dotcoin: how would you know
there were 10k shares yesterday without an order book ?
dotcoin: yes i use and i know but i not must copy
them as system works like
this
davout: dotcoin: making
the information public is also not optional
dotcoin: there is all
there, if 10k shares was on listing and
tomorrow are only 5000 means
that 500 are sold,
there is no order book need
jurov: dotcoin you ever use any stock exchange? every one of
them publishes what
trades were done
jurov: you pull
the code off crystal ball or what?
pankkake: I've been quite happy
to sell off all my havecocks at a loss
jurov: so dotcoin, when approximately can we expect public
trades feed?
jurov: hm, prolly i'll move all shares
to pankkake and watch whatever ensues
jurov: dotcoin, in fact i don't want
to be anymore. but have no other option
dotcoin: you are shareholder jurov you have right
to send us your feedback
davout: dotcoin: well
then, say "thank you for pointing
that out, i'll be working on it"
dotcoin: not saying
that, but is momently status of order book
jurov: okay. so why you can't publish
trades?
that's completely normal
thing all exchanges do
jurov: so dotcoin, you insist
the orderbook is completely fine despite everyone else saying it is not?
Apocalyptic: <mircea_popescu> because otherwise freiburg uni is like 600 years old. // you're sure about
this ?
davout: and
that it matches
the details posted
davout: mircea_popescu: i know for a fact
that
the name is real
mircea_popescu: davout so
then for all you know
this is NOT an actual name.
davout: mircea_popescu: no,
that's not him
davout: anyway, my point was
that he has actual corporate details on his bourse about page
davout: mircea_popescu: where did you find
this address anyway?
the name sounds like a common german one
davout: dotcoin: because you are being asked if you are in fact head of hydrology at
the freiburg university
bounce: we
tell lies/ sweet little lies/
mircea_popescu: dotcoin we're not interested in emailing you as
the bitcoin bourse fuckwit. we're interested in emailing you as markus whatever,
to verify davout's
theory
that you're not behaving like
the average forum scammer.
davout: dotcoin: "you want email me? contact@bitcoinbourse.eu" <<<
that's
the wrongest answer you could've come up with
davout: midnightmagic: aaah, i
thought you were still on dr foreskin
davout: "yep, i have correctly identified
this glass as containing water"
mircea_popescu: dude no fucking way somebody
that looks
too young
to have a phd even can be what i assume is a head of a department
ozbot: BitcoinBourse.eu - decentralised market place
to buy and sell Bitcoin person
to person Welcome
to
th
dotcoin: i not have need
to hide anything
mircea_popescu: he's just well known
to be a fucktard irl
too, so what's he got
to lose.
davout: mircea_popescu: no i was
thinking more about
the fact
that he's not anonymous
mircea_popescu: davout maybe his mastery of
the english language doesn't permit him
to ?
davout: to get back
to
the dotcoin case, it's slightly weird, because he doesn't display
the usual bitcointalk scammer attributes
davout: if some fucktards end up calling you a
troll you can count it as a success
pankkake: you're not necessarily
trying
to convince him
davout: but i can perfectly understand
that if you perceive
the person you are arguing with as intelligent, it makes
the arguing exercise different
davout: mircea_popescu: i was actually
thinking about
the alternative of not getting mad, in either case
mircea_popescu: otherwise you'd spend your
time angry at
the pet rocks
mircea_popescu: <davout> pankkake: wait, you're saying you're more inclined
to become mad whenever you have respect for
the person you argue with ? <<
this is how it works yes
pankkake: basically I just linked
to what others said
pankkake: I don't want
to argue with him, I don't know what's his deal
davout: pankkake:
try with dotcoin :D
davout: "i see
this guy as smart, but i see his opinion as dumb, AAAARRGH dissonnance"
pankkake: well, when I realize
they're dumb I change
them
davout: bounce: it just makes him mad
to have a cognitive dissonnance
pankkake: well, I don't accept
that people
that are not dumb have dumb (i.e. not mine) opinions
davout: i guess what you mean is
that you
take it more seriously
then, amirite?
davout: pankkake: wait, you're saying you're more inclined
to become mad whenever you have respect for
the person you argue with ?
bounce: tell it
to
the people in
the madhouse
davout: kakobrekla: yo, just fuck shit up from
time
to
time, randomly
pankkake: there is actually a lot of
things I want
to write in, so it will
take a while, but I want
to write it instead of arguing endlessly / being MAD