log☇︎
687700+ entries in 0.42s
Namworld: Simulating/scanning a live one properly and actually controlling thoughts through simulations and predictions of inputs effects would probably require computing power and an amount of energy that just isn't realistically feasible for centuries.
Namworld: I never said we were there yet. The brain is extremely complex. So many molecules of all kinds, complex structures.
jurov: even neural network simulators were found to have weakness - researchers were able to imperceptibly (to humans) change the samples which the neural networks miscategorized
punkman: the technology of the demagogue is as old as dirt, who needs brain-controlling computars
jurov: do we really have such machines? i don't think so
Namworld: Yes, I didn't mean mechanical in that fashion. More that chemical reactions are akin to machines. Although I guess it's not good practice to speak casually like that.
jurov: the brain is not "mechanical" in contemporary technology sense. it's wetware with myriads of interlocking electrochemical processes
Namworld: Eh, misuse of new technologies for the purpose of enslavement is nothing new.
pankkake: well, that's the next step
Namworld: I was more hinting about technology eventually reaching brain control chip level and the technology being applied to everyone. Because let's face it 1. The brain is mechanical 2. You can control just about any sort of machine given the time to develop the approriate tools 3. Someone at some point in time will try to get it installed on everyone for selfish purposes.
FabianB: kakobrekla: thanks, works great :)
pankkake: they're already feeding a large chunk of the population with antidepressants
Namworld: I really hope the "mentally ill" group doesn't include the whole Earth population
jurov: pankkake: i really hope these electrodes end up as ignobel candidates, too
assbot: Gay bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
assbot: DARPA Program Seeks to Use Brain Implants to Control Mental Illness | MIT Technology Review
fluffypony: I was just quoting Derek Zoolander - ban HIM from Twitter!
BingoBoingo: fluffypony: OMG going to get banned from Twitter nao!!!
fluffypony: KILL THE MALAYSIAN PRIME MINISTER!
assbot: Malaysian Online Retailer Accepts Bitcoin, Won't Convert to Fiat Currency
Namworld: So I'm well aware of those issues... but not everyone will run proper background checks.
Namworld: If there's no criminal record, it's good enough. Notice I said the real world didn't care about REALITY.
fluffypony: or even worse - they could be 100% genuine and yet still be involved in completely baseless court action that someone has taken against them (pissed off ex-girlfriend or ex-employee or ex-business-partner)
fluffypony: Namworld: but what does knowing their real identity do? they could have run all sorts of scams and just not (yet) been caught, they could have had out-of-court settlements and all sorts
Namworld: fluffypony, the real world doesn't care about reality. You dox people and that's it.
assbot: BtcAlpha.com F.MPIF Tracker estimated NAV per share: 0.00021704 BTC (Total: 434.10 BTC). Last trade for F.MPIF on MPEX was at 0.00021725 BTC [+]
jurov: <assbot> [00:33:43] BtcAlpha.com F.MPIF Tracker << kakobrekla you said you don't do assbot ad slots :D
jurov: this is how england worked, back when it was still a respectable country, up until the socialist revolution of the 80s. << lol if only margie t. heard you
fluffypony: the person is a) known, b) trusted by some when trading / lending / borrowing / dealing, c) has been around for a while, d) has not absconded with funds in the history of their presence on the WoT
fluffypony: which is what the WoT provides
fluffypony: Namworld: I think that a starting point would be historicity
Namworld: What kind of checks can they run at all anyway? Dox people? Seems limited to that.
fluffypony: "havelock should hv done their checks on him and not offer scam companies."
assbot: Neo & Bee talk (spam free thread)
Namworld: That's the most logical explanation I can find, and it's not very logical, but eh.
jurov: <benkay> [00:00:24] no no, coinbr resolves to hookers << what?
fluffypony: ;;later tell benkay F.OLD as the symbol?
cazalla: the one with the crooked fkn zebras
TheNewDeal: not familiar with the one you're referring to
cazalla: dw, it's like the Oklahoma Michigan bet and nobody had that one
TheNewDeal: cazalla would you like to buy some of my exposure to the bastille day bet?
TheNewDeal: that's kinda neat that all mpex people can create i.diff futures
gribble: Photoshop Inspiration, Photoshop Information | Photoshop.com: <http://www.photoshop.com/>; Photoshop Online Tools | Photoshop.com: <http://www.photoshop.com/tools>; Download Photoshop CC by joining Creative Cloud today | Adobe ...: <http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html>
gribble: Claire Danes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claire_Danes>; Claire Danes - Biography - IMDb: <http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000132/bio>; Claire Danes Biography - Facts, Birthday, Life Story - Biography.com: <http://www.biography.com/people/claire-danes-20691429>
thestringpuller: yea or that
TheNewDeal: it said midnight of third wednesday, or 6/18, no?
TheNewDeal: it said midnight of thi no?rd wednesday, or 6/18
TheNewDeal: that's with a 13.35 day total time between diff changes
TheNewDeal: I've got the diff change happening around 06:00 on 6/18 GMT time
cazalla: don't sweat it TheNewDeal, it's a lock
TheNewDeal: totally just updated my prediction to 4.8%
TheNewDeal: who runs that?
thestringpuller: i'm also one of the few people here who's fiat cashflow > crypto cash flow
TheNewDeal: getting very tired with btc price bets
TheNewDeal: I felt the desire to take a risk with an a decent amount of my capital on something that actually can be calculated easily
thestringpuller: IDIFF may be a better bet to make overall
TheNewDeal: I've got a lot of my stake invested in the Bastille Day, starting to make me sweat
TheNewDeal: http://bitcoin.sipa.be/growth.png this one makes it look like august/september (if the trend continues*)
TheNewDeal: I haven't the slightest clue
benkay: TheNewDeal: care to take a guess at when the diff will finally reverse?
TheNewDeal: so I skipped that
TheNewDeal: I'm pretty noobish at modeling a random walk though
TheNewDeal: trying to be conservative
gribble: Error: Something in there wasn't a valid number.
TheNewDeal: still looks like there should be a third change unless things start going backwards
TheNewDeal: I'm updating TheNewDeals estimate to 4.8% increase
BingoBoingo: I'd be thrilled if it stalled out until Bastille Day
gribble: Next difficulty estimate | 11861036168.8 based on data since last change | 11960937288.6 based on data for last three days
TheNewDeal: bitcoin network needs some steriods this week
smickles: they are tired, i did it too late in the day
TheNewDeal: how did bathing the little shits go?
smickles: ah, speaking of that. I have to give them a bath. bb in 20 min or so
BingoBoingo: smickles: Either that or the kids will be out of the house.
smickles: so much to read, no way i'll get current hehe
mircea_popescu: smickles if it's <1 they justcan't self voice anymoar.
smickles: do people get de-voiced if assbot has a low L2 of them?
smickles: what a thing this is now!
smickles: oh my, can I even type words properly anymore?
smickles: maybe just the beginning
mircea_popescu: haha. i don't even recall, where you here when logs were introduced ? the bash ?
smickles: it's like the channel just went on without me
assbot: #bitcoin-assets +m pe Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
mircea_popescu: smickles in pm tho
mircea_popescu: TheNewDeal well yeah that can happen. it's rare
gribble: Currently authenticated from hostmask smickles!~ec2-user@ec2-54-227-61-57.compute-1.amazonaws.com. Trust relationship from user assbot to user smickles: Level 1: 0, Level 2: 8 via 8 connections. Graph: http://b-otc.com/stg?source=assbot&dest=smickles | WoT data: http://b-otc.com/vrd?nick=smickles | Rated since: Wed Jan 4 21:28:52 2012
mircea_popescu: you gotta id with gribble then pm assbot !up to get permavoiced.
TheNewDeal: but now bets are greater than incoming revenue
mircea_popescu: meanwhile the channel went +m
mike_c: catch you guys tomorrow.
TheNewDeal: the way they report it now - with bets made taken as a windfall, and bets resolved as a gain, kind of hides their results of their bets
mike_c: although mp has proposed that ballers swap shares of mpoe like it's cash. which is interesting.
TheNewDeal: btc not the king?!?!
mircea_popescu: which is why the stability of the investment universe is actually drastically more important for bitcoin than for fiat.
mircea_popescu: which brings us to the problem : because bitcoin is fixed, a 95% investment situation will be unavoidable statistically. as the value of all paper will much exceed the value of cash btc available, willy-nilly.
TheNewDeal: regardless, Buffet's capital is how many times greater than most people?
mircea_popescu: mike_c well amusingly enough i actually am holding tons of paper. just, it's to a large degree my own.
mircea_popescu: soyou know, gotta take what the man says with a gtain of salt.
mike_c: ok.. perhaps this will bring our lines of thought closer: in my theoretical model, someone with as much bitcoin as you should absolutely not be 95% invested.
mircea_popescu: he also says that he's not going to discuss his strategy given that it's valuable and easily replicated
mthreat: buffett talks about that a lot, e.g. from 1994: "Though there are as many good businesses as ever, it is useless for us to make purchases that are inconsequential in relation to Berkshire's capital. … We now consider a security for purchase only if we believe we can deploy at least $100 million in it. Given that minimum, Berkshire's investment universe has shrunk dramatically.