683700+ entries in 0.471s
pankkake: what do you mean?
they sell it
to users, probably at a loss (for
the users)
kakobrekla: so if you dont find block your payouts will still be
too irregular and you cant do pps
pankkake: the solution would be
to stop buying
that crap cloud mining!
pankkake: the difference with ghash.io is
that most of
their hashrate is also controlled by
them
kakobrekla: and
then spread
the blocks found over x rounds
kakobrekla: now everyone is on rounds
that last x of
time
mdev: if ghash abuses everyone will know and
they'll be done,
they don't control
the users hardware anyway
mdev: BingoBoingo
that's an interesting point, and bitcoin is still standing
BingoBoingo: mdev: It's why going back in
the logs and
the older parts of
the forum is valuable. Many of
these
things happened before.
assbot: To all of
the deepbit whiners.
kakobrekla: prolly better
to own gear
than coin in such case.
BingoBoingo: kakobrekla: Well starting a pools
takes a lot of coin which really limits
the number of people who can do it.
assbot: For
the love of Bitcoin, Stop mining at BTC Guild! -
They'll control
the network if
they reach +50% : Bitcoin
kakobrekla: x<BingoBoingo> Pools rise and fall. <
thats
true but its incredibly hard
to start one
these days
pankkake: mircea_popescu: oh no it was for a bit
too
mircea_popescu: pankkake btc guild somehow never was
the big bad guild
pankkake: also, remember when Deepbit was
the big bad pool? reddit was all over it
too
mdev: bitcointalk btw has some of
the same mods, at
the very least gmaxwell is
there
mdev: I been banned in
there a lot, in
the past some ops agreed
the ban shouldn't have been set but didn't do anything
to lift it!
mircea_popescu: <mdev>
them at
the helm
that insult and put down everything, from andreas,
to blockchain.info,
to /r/bitcoin
to altcoins, list goes on and on << you know
this sounds like cheap copying -assets :D
mdev: I
talked
to another op in private about it, and lol...that channel is just not good with
them at
the helm
that insult and put down everything, from andreas,
to blockchain.info,
to /r/bitcoin
to altcoins, list goes on and on
pankkake: like bitcointalk. wonderful.
that's
the
tool of scammers.
pankkake: stealth ban = ban but
the mod stays anonymous?
Apocalyptic: fluffypony, no, he's actually clueless and a
time waster
mdev: I was having a disagreement about private companies being forced
to disclose income, with various other users, and a bitcoin op stealth banned me(used a bot), for apparently a month
pankkake: keep in mind 51% attack = 51% *attack*. bitcoin relies on
the majority of miners being honest
BingoBoingo: mdev: Ghash fucks up, hopefully enough miners like money
to flee.
fluffypony: let me guess...you dared
to question someone?
mdev: that channel is so
toxic, admins so incredibly abusive lol
mdev: no reason
to risk
that
mdev: bingo
that's what I was
thinking, plus
they're a legit business in london
BingoBoingo: mdev: Bitcoin is
too valuable for ghash.io
to do serious damage at 51% plus so long as miners are economically motivated...
mdev: apparently
they've had over 20% for awhile and even at
that level
they could have done some damage with double spend had
they wanted
BingoBoingo: Well, once
this USG dumping is over hopefully come hosting
time next year
these contributions will go for a nice handle of something while I weld
the server shut
to drop off at
the colo
mdev: since I was banned in #bitcoin, what's your guys
thoughts on
the ghash.io and
the 51%?
jurov: we all know with what stuff is
the blog sustained
BingoBoingo: jurov: No,
this is incoming for
the blog's sustainment fund.
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo
they
thyemselves do not.
the unfortunate noobs
that
they
try
to buddy buddy however do.
jurov: kako it went
to booze
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu:
The peeps pete wrote on
today.
The kind
that just might have enough coin
to BitBet but burn it because
their WoTs are broke.
kakobrekla: at least
this
time its not going
to some schmuck
jurov: that's gonna be my legacy. first b-a donation address,
then
this.
kakobrekla: <jurov> hahaha kako spamming
teh blockchain < yeah at some point somebody will do something about
that.
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu: Do
those peeps still have coins
they aren't buring on Mastersafe and stuff like
that?
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo aff is kinda intended for
the peeps
that don't even know
there's something
to check
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: if you're 'mad hatter' enough
to have
these baked, i'll send you
the vectors. << i'm not.
too big (thick, bulky) for my
taste.
BingoBoingo: Now I imagine everyone will check
their cookies for
the right cookies before betting.
jurov: hahaha kako spamming
teh blockchain
jurov: yes, it is, i
tried
mircea_popescu: jurov: and it needs 200M RLIMIT_LOCKMEM or such << yes
that ;/
jurov: pankkake: it must be persistent, i did not open his ref link
today
jurov hugs BingoBoingo, starts
to sway and sing uneasily
pankkake: jurov: actually
the ref cookie expires at session, I
think
mircea_popescu: jurov: lol what i wanted
to say? << jurov caught drunk in
the logs ?
jurov: i understand it's better
this way, just venting
assbot: What
the WoT is for, how it works and how
to use it. pe
Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
gribble: (later
tell <nick> <text>) --
Tells <nick> <text>
the next
time <nick> is in seen. <nick> can contain wildcard characters, and
the first matching nick will be given
the note.
assbot: What
the WoT is for, how it works and how
to use it. pe
Trilema - Un blog de Mircea Popescu.
mircea_popescu: pankkake:
this is probably
the first example of
the wot for +v selection failing << honestly i don't
think so.
jurov: i just bought bingoboingo a beer or
two
mircea_popescu: ;;rate mrstickball -10 apparently kiddo
thinks himself some sort of rate warlord or something.
mircea_popescu: midnightmagic: your
transitive rating
to nano at a certain level, correct. without
trust from nanotube you can't rate. << good
thing
they finally moved away from
the
total rating model,
that was silly.
kakobrekla: well
theres a whole charade goin on in #bitcoin-ratings :)
mircea_popescu: cheeky
the -otc derps. fucking periphery of
the periphery, somehow
they imagine
themselves central and unique in
that.
mircea_popescu: ;;later
tell
thebutterzone suppose you clear asciilifeform and
that way i don't have
to neg you
too.
mircea_popescu: ;;rate Ssateneth -10 apparently kiddo
thinks himself some sort of rate warlord or something.
BingoBoingo: Prolly
the ultimatum brought some action. Ultimatum or not, I just can't care about any "competition"
that usually ends in a draw and hugs for everybody.
kakobrekla: generally i dont like cookies.
too dry.
kakobrekla: >As bitbet grows more popular,
there SHOULD be a greater number of bets imo. And
that includes sports.
assbot: BitBet - South Korea will advance from
the 2014 World Cup group stage :: 0.27 B (51%) on Yes, 0.26 B (49%) on No | closing in 1 week 5 days | weight: 92`292 (100`000
to 10`000)
jurov: kakobrekla: okay,
they appeared now
Mats_cd03: does anyone want
to buy my No stake in
the spurs bet?
mircea_popescu: ;;rate ognasty -1 pirate shill ; currently running a "security"
that made a 60% loss over
two years. a fine example of
the scum
that unwarrantedly imagines itself somehow part of Bitcoin.
jurov: kako seems i broke bitbet
twatter :D
mircea_popescu: but all
this is moot in
the discussion at hand. nasty is some random dork and Blazedout419 is woefully uneducated. mpex is
transparency, go read up on
the corps
that have been publishing
their results each month for
the past YEARS and so on.
mircea_popescu: if
thjat were
the proposition,
then it'd have been just a dumb as fuck deal. even in
that case, claiming it's not a scam is marginal, much in
the way adding a nuclear device
to your doorknob is endangerment, even if you
think people shouldn't have fucked with
the doorknob.