log☇︎
560600+ entries in 0.393s
asciilifeform: 'those who will not' xxx 'are doomed to' yyy 'it'
mircea_popescu: you'd have to ask an elder or two anyway.
asciilifeform: that is an ad-hoc, bug-ridden reimplementation of the blockchain!
asciilifeform: which in this one respect is an arguable improvement over the hypothetical apparatus
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform no, but you can sign it with yours, if you wish. which correctly reflects the situation. "here are the words of great X i attest to"
mircea_popescu: if i die tomorrow who will maintain my wot ?
mircea_popescu: which ius no different from the current situation
asciilifeform: aye i have an old list. but that's quite ad-hoc.
asciilifeform: worse yet, if the boat were to perish in honourable combat, with all hands aboard, the global state of wot shall return to as if he and the crew had never lived ?
asciilifeform: barque << haha yes, knew this
asciilifeform: during these five days, how many sc4mz0rs will find themselves temporarily rehabilitated ?
assbot: Mircea (ship) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ... ( http://bit.ly/1HJOI85 )
mircea_popescu: lol. the actual ship mircea is an old barque. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mircea_(ship)
asciilifeform: a martian death ray takes out a satellite. the ship is now within five day's steam of the next chance for net connection
asciilifeform: let's imagine the good ship Mircea, a four-reactored former soviet nuke sub;
asciilifeform: well then:
asciilifeform: rather than permanent blockchain-style world record
mircea_popescu: incidentally, the evolution of this dev session clearly proves the superiority of chat over say bbs, of which forums and trilema comments are implementations.
asciilifeform: in mircea_popescu's scheme, my wot-graph exists as a bitstring that my particular node will disgorge if asked?
mircea_popescu: without a requirement to sign.
mircea_popescu: and if i am in your list and you in mine the same is preserved by gossipd.
artifexd: Signing messages would provide that same assurance. But automatically.
artifexd: When you and I have a conversation on here (and gribble is around, and you ident to a key), then later you and I have another conversation (and, again, gribble is around and you ident to the same key), then I can trust that I am talking to the same person I was before.
mircea_popescu: the only entity served by this nonsense is nsa. users don't actually exist, outside of what the parties you trust say.
mircea_popescu: moreover, i wish to take this opportunity and link the important point of the "unsheathe your sword". inasmuch as people proceed on the "user objectively exists" and then try to "create anonimity" the unavoidable result is "anonimity is hard lolz".
artifexd: It would be a timestamped "No".
BingoBoingo: <mircea_popescu> for that matter, imagine a "No" string signed. what now ? << This is the big.
mircea_popescu: this "objective existence of user" is a trap in our task here. it doesn' tserve, it hinders.
mircea_popescu: in the sense your friend sayus he does.
mircea_popescu: for that matter, imagine a "No" string signed. what now ?
artifexd: If by "sign" you mean "have some effing clue who just said that"
mircea_popescu: than sign a contract there.
mircea_popescu: well, i don't. i more often have sex with someone in the bus
mircea_popescu: do you ordinarily sign contracts with people you chat with in the bus ?
artifexd: Everyone is already identified by crypto. Why not ensure that messages that say they are from a keyset actually came from the keyset?
mircea_popescu: good idea that bb.
artifexd: Because we are building a new system from the ground up.
artifexd: That seems... less than ideal.
mircea_popescu: in fact, for all you know A sends whole different novels to B and C.
mircea_popescu: don't trust people you don't trust and so you won't have to answer unpleasant questions from people whose trust you value.
mircea_popescu: his job to police his lists.
artifexd: Maybe A is trustworthy but got the message from D.
artifexd: When a message A for B C comes over the wire, how can I trust that B actually said C?
assbot: Logged on 05-01-2015 17:59:47; davout: i was thinking rely on GPG and simply encode a nonce in the message
artifexd: There is not. I took that as an oversight.
mircea_popescu: there's no signing in there, is there ?
asciilifeform: and to pet neglected pet
asciilifeform marches off to thinking room to properly think about this.
mircea_popescu: each server maintains his wot ratings, and theyt are sent out as part of hello procedure
asciilifeform: (wot operations still need to be signed, as well as 'hello' session negotiations.)
asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: complicates your design a bit, as now you have two classes of message
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform sure, but not the same thing.
mircea_popescu: since by very definition gestapo can't trust A B C
mircea_popescu: perfect deniability, much better than forward secrecy
mircea_popescu: anyway, THAT is why not signed messages.
asciilifeform: highly recommended to anyone who took part in or enjoyed reading this thread.
artifexd: Ok. The layers are forming in my head.
Apocalyptic: how long are the bans typically scheduled for ?
mircea_popescu: lettuce continue this convo while asciilifeform feels all left out :D
artifexd: I refreshed the post page. :)
mircea_popescu: a there it is.
asciilifeform probably caught in spam/ddos trap
mircea_popescu: is this some routing mishmashing or something ?
assbot: Russian hedge fund founder disappears with all the firm's money. ... ( http://bit.ly/1Kk0GYd )
artifexd: Piss... trilema is 502ing again
assbot: Logged on 12-11-2014 01:24:54; asciilifeform: ^ my ancient failed attempt at 'wot.' was to be used with another (never happened) apparatus, 'sollipse,' for running a 'multiverse' of wots.
asciilifeform: the notion of 'trustworthiness' as a scalar is fundamental to scamatrons of all stripes. ☟︎
asciilifeform: before i learned of the wot that we now use.
mircea_popescu: as assbot's usage over timne has shown
asciilifeform: i've been wishing that folks would let go of it for quite some time.
mircea_popescu: the current implementation favours what is fundamewntally an erroneous view of thew wot as "one thing". it is not one thing.
mircea_popescu: which is kind-of why the "total score" nonsense is so hard entrenched.
asciilifeform: only if it, as it does presently, lives in just one specially-designated temple
mircea_popescu: for that matter, a "total score" is nonsense predicated on this mistaken view.
mircea_popescu: thjere is no such thing as "one" wot.
asciilifeform: i doubt that this can be avoided entirely
asciilifeform: inescapably one will end up seeing slightly different WoTs, at least on their peripheries, at different times.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform that's in the hello message.
artifexd: Side question: How do you quote a previous comment on trilema?
mircea_popescu: how you slice the 99% is uninteresting.
asciilifeform: through the ravages of time
asciilifeform: except in degenerate case, where modem and owner both crumble to dust before the transmission can finish
asciilifeform: even when they are.
mircea_popescu: yes, because they're not signed nor crypted.
asciilifeform: perhaps root of disagreement is that i originally contemplated something more along the lines of a very fast usenet, rather than potentially slow chat.
artifexd: asciilifeform: What you want sounds very similar to bitmessage, no?
mircea_popescu: if i were to connect to irc with a 360 baud modem i would similarily lose messages.
mircea_popescu: this is what the definition of "Slow" is.
mircea_popescu: it's okay for slow nodes to lose messages
artifexd: Sure it would. If you have a connection to another server, it will send you all the messages it gets. Although I imagine some manner of "screw you, you're too slow" code will be needed eventually.
asciilifeform: if i'm on a satellite modem, i doubt that one in ten messages of 5-second window will make it through to my node.
asciilifeform: the distinction between 'log' and 'allow very high-latency chat' is very thin.
mircea_popescu: because it's chat. if someone wants to log it, that's a diff story.
artifexd: Why? If you're connected when a message comes across the wire, you get it. If not, you don't. Much like irc now.
asciilifeform: why not allow a node to store as much history as he wishes to expend on disk
mircea_popescu: artifexd ah that's a point. my 1hour was outer limit.
artifexd: An hour? Shit. I was thinking 5 seconds.
asciilifeform: notice you don't have to store the chain permanently
Apocalyptic: mircea, I get a timeout for both trilema and qntra, looks like we may have been banned, which is surprising because I didn't refresh the page too quickly
mircea_popescu: but basically the bundle should cover the last hour.