555900+ entries in 0.321s

BingoBoingo: Birdman: It depends on
the wording of
the particular bet
assbot: BitBet - Bitcoin
to drop under 200$ before Feb :: 22.05 B (80%) on Yes, 5.38 B (20%) on No | closing in 1 week 16 hours | weight: 50`420 (100`000
to 10`000) ... (
http://bit.ly/1yaoRFc )
artifexd: Oh. I
thought you were discussing a bet about mpif.
Elian11: yawwwns, Sun has risen over
the Aegean again. i continue my
trip
artifexd: what bet are you
talking about?
mircea_popescu: course... it could go under in
the 16 hours atop a week...
dub: I
thought s/refunded/donated/
punkman: won't
those bets just get refunded due
to buffer clause?
cazalla: i
took no for a few bit cents, c'mon no whammy!
[]bot: Bet placed: 8.8 BTC for Yes on "Bitcoin
to drop under 200$ before Feb"
http://bitbet.us/bet/1095/ Odds: 80(Y):20(N) by coin, 70(Y):30(N) by weight.
Total bet: 27.43877896 BTC. Current weight: 50,464.
[]bot: Bet placed: 2 BTC for Yes on "Bitcoin
to drop under 200$ before Feb"
http://bitbet.us/bet/1095/ Odds: 80(Y):20(N) by coin, 70(Y):30(N) by weight.
Total bet: 27.43877896 BTC. Current weight: 50,464.
[]bot: Bet placed: 5 BTC for Yes on "Bitcoin
to drop under 200$ before Feb"
http://bitbet.us/bet/1095/ Odds: 80(Y):20(N) by coin, 70(Y):30(N) by weight.
Total bet: 27.43877896 BTC. Current weight: 50,465.
mircea_popescu: so is reddit generally pleasing with
the gavinesque attack on bitcoin or we're not seeing
the matter for
the shit between eyes ?
Elian11: DAMMMMMN 206? Im moving
to Africa
artifexd: Imma be pissed if it drops below 200 before
the next block confirms
assbot: BitBet - Bitcoin
to drop under 200$ before Feb :: 6.25 B (54%) on Yes, 5.38 B (46%) on No | closing in 1 week 17 hours | weight: 50`499 (100`000
to 10`000) ... (
http://bit.ly/1wYfnXD )
mircea_popescu: look at
that, exchanges holding on for dear life over 200
gribble: Bitstamp BTCUSD
ticker | Best bid: 206.51, Best ask: 206.65, Bid-ask spread: 0.14000, Last
trade: 206.77, 24 hour volume: 56651.01119185, 24 hour low: 203.0, 24 hour high: 250.01, 24 hour vwap: 228.336912025
mircea_popescu: i had honestly
thought
they were making dumb polack jokes.
mircea_popescu: hm, lisa kudrow is not actually polish.
that show's got nothing now ;/
mircea_popescu: prolly
the funniest
thing in spanish is
that "successful" is "exitoso/a".
mircea_popescu: your favourite song is michale jackson's man in
the mirror ?!
Elian11: It's my fav. song. And, i
think
that more people understanding is a good
thing
Elian11: You know
that song by Michael Jackson, Man in
the Mirror
Elian11: I mean up, as in: level up
their skills.
mircea_popescu: course a klm flight with a large russian hat atop
the cockpit would be kinda funny
to look at.
mircea_popescu: airplanes don't, generally, want clothes. and passengers are invited
to play dress-up at home, on
their blogs with css and whatever.
mircea_popescu: Elian11 helping people up does not consist of encouraging passengers
to bring
their own clothes for
the airplane.
Elian11: Whats
the point if you are not going
to help people up?
ben_vulpes: Elian11: i envision a future where journeymen write
their own bitcoin implementations
Elian11: reading scroll back :IMO a pure Python Bitcoin client would open up development
to a lot of coders
BingoBoingo: mircea_popescu: Aren't medical blogs
the best.
mircea_popescu: ar disorder with psychosis, it is difficult for him
to follow any sort of
treatment plan."
mircea_popescu: "Mr. [Patient] is a 39 year old gentleman who sustained several anterior dislocations of his right shoulder when he was involved in martial arts as part of an underground fighting group. He did not seek
treatment for
these and
the problem worsened after he lifted heavy weights while in prison. He presents
today with his caretaker, who states
that because of his impulsive and self-destructive behavior secondary
to bipol
mircea_popescu: eh it's not how it works, unless fella's a little broken in
the head.
mircea_popescu: im not a great fan of... whatever
the fuck
that was, german lumpenmodernism
artifexd: <ben_vulpes> so
that's
two exported versions of
the same function
that are "polymorphic" as i understand
the
term on argument
types? <<
The proper
term is "overloaded"
mircea_popescu: (and yes ftr /me is nonplussed with
the idiotic idea of ambiguously calling everythning "plus". it creates
the sort of idiots
that imagines
they can do statistics work because
they can add integers on
their fingers)
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform you're not going
to die man. at
the very most, you'll be set in a room for 30 years' stretch. at a
time where you're old enough
to not really miss women so much anymore, and old enough
to really appreciate
the stability of 3 regular, predictable meals a day.
ben_vulpes can't hear anything over
the sound of brain fabric ripping
mircea_popescu smiles at
the original premise of
the entire foss movement rebirthed. "by working on intelligent
tasks with intelligent people you become more intelligent yourself.
this is more important
than money"
ben_vulpes: "Without such a
tool you often end up greping
through dozens or even hundreds of files." << yeah exactly. EXACTLY.
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform
that book doesn't exist because o'reilly didn't publish it.
ben_vulpes: okay i guess i'm not getting anything done on
the cpp for a few days while i get up
to speed on ebrowse
mircea_popescu: as opposed
to misguided efforts at "let's bloat everything with more of
the same stupid"
ben_vulpes will now have
to shelve and reserve Siebel for late night palate cleanser
ben_vulpes is still hung on
the CKeyStore coercion
ben_vulpes: my problem with
the bitcoin codebase is not cpp (that's just another language), but
the insane class hierarchies i have
to hold in my head
ben_vulpes: no, i understand
the
this pointer. what i'm failing
to understand is how
the reference
to
the object from which SignSignature is called can in any way be coerced
to a CKeyStore
ben_vulpes: i'm still not understanding how
the *this argument (which looks like a bool?!) is
turning into a CKeyStore
mircea_popescu: export a differently defined prototype of
thje same function same name
mircea_popescu: i apparently understsnd even less of coding
than i had
thought.
ben_vulpes: asciilifeform: yeah,
that's
the current version
ben_vulpes: so
that's
two exported versions of
the same function
that are "polymorphic" as i understand
the
term on argument
types?
ben_vulpes: okay cool well i guess
that makes sense
ben_vulpes: the first of which doesn't even seem
to be a keystore
ben_vulpes: this is probably me not grokking c. how does
the function with a signature of like 6 args get called legitimately with 4?
mod6: suckstarter will be
the new facebook for broke hoz
ben_vulpes: no wai emojiterm is
the missing piece of wimminz in
tech
mircea_popescu is waiting for
terminal 2.0, extended with css instead of language.
ben_vulpes: also explains why soooo many
terminal programs are extensible with you know "perl, and maybe some other languages if you absolutely must"
mod6: i dunno, i like it. it's built around lexigraphical parsing and list processing. i've gotten comfortable in
there over
the years.
ben_vulpes: explains why so many sages under whom i've labored have been all about
the perl
mod6: left my memorzation of all
the nuances of
the shells in
the past