log☇︎
510100+ entries in 0.284s
mircea_popescu: bitstein what are you trying to do incidentally ?
mircea_popescu: sole purpose the world even exists.
bitstein: mircea_popescu: Thanks. I'll continue reading/thinking about it.
mircea_popescu: computer is a woman. it's the woman's job to make loser's life insufferable.
mircea_popescu: this notion that "any people is a people" and computer should be nice to everyone that touches it is nonsense.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 17:54:27; ascii_field: the basic idea - owner-hostile hardware - is gaining ground.
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065314 << the basic idea, idiot hostile hardware, is a brilliant idea.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 17:30:36; PeterL: what I mean is there is such a small amount bet on the bet, you might spend more than you would win holding the price up. Spend tens of btc to win .003 btc?
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065298 << yeah that's kinda what keeps these in line.
artifexd: The implementation isn't that hard. It is the education that is time consuming.
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065270 << there is the !t command. but i think the idea is, if you see it happen you hafta say.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 16:34:10; *: Adlai is fairly certain that phuctor is written in cl
mircea_popescu: hm, he had a link with the fixing the lightbulb thing. anyway.
gribble: artifexd was last seen in #bitcoin-assets 2 weeks, 4 days, 16 hours, 16 minutes, and 45 seconds ago: <artifexd> Oh, actually that is complaining about one of the golang tools. And it would be dangerous if you had a MITM that could swap out code inflight and were importing external code directly.
mircea_popescu: takes a while to implement, because
mircea_popescu: bitstein inasmuch as you want a central repository, you're stuck with a central repository. if you look into the design papers / discussions around gossipd, this is also a well solved problem, just,
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 16:29:55; Adlai: still a little silly for the platform bandied about as turing-complete to lack actual bignums
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065261 << omaigawds stop your fud, everyone knows the turing machine only had 1 and 0. 2256 should be plenty for everyone.
bitstein: mircea_popescu: Right, it wouldn't prevent the server from not publishing a rating
mircea_popescu: bitstein take otc-wot rating #14167 on pirateat40, made 2012-08-29 03:14:41. how do you know this is current ?
mircea_popescu: talkin to guys. you ?
mircea_popescu: how would you know when the rating's supposed to be ?
bitstein: mircea_popescu: you would have the hash of the db timestamped, so you can verify that the rating is current as of a certain point (given you have the data to recreate the hash)
mircea_popescu: on the other side of the fence there is this (i suspect irrational) notion that pumping out signed material weakens the signer key.
jurov: bitstein, looks like you want to reinvent the blockchain or sidechain
bitstein: mircea_popescu: b is an important point, thanks. As for old rather than current ratings, that's where shasums and deedbot could come in to help.
mircea_popescu: note that changing this model for "maintain signed ratings" does not help : either of them could show OLD rather than current ratings, which would still be undetectable.
mircea_popescu: as pere the entire "wot is not an oilfield with trust as oil".
mircea_popescu: bitstein this is true for both of them, currently. this happens to also not be a problem because a) they could do this once ; and b) the way you're supposed to use this tool is by asking the raters about their ratings.
bitstein: mircea_popescu: I am under the impression that if they wanted to, kako or nano could publish ratings under any name as they please. Is this correct? If so, how can someone viewing the WoT db have certainty that information they see is as the rater intended? GPG signing would be one solution.
mircea_popescu: fluffypony im sure it's so totally going to work like all the previous attempts did, which is why we're here.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 16:05:03; thestringpuller: when did businessinsider become gawker?
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065236 << once they couldn't find anything but the same social studies rejects to "write"
fluffypony: and if you shout it loudly enough and often enough it must be true, amiright?
fluffypony: of going "BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY IS IMPORTANT, BUT BITCOIN IS NOT"
fluffypony: it's this new trend
mircea_popescu: lol at the fluffypony businessoutsider link. EXCITING! may become the new AMAZING, as a new generation of idiots moves into bitcoin scam pushing.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 15:28:39; nubbins`: (how? because the yellow tank contains black ink!)
mircea_popescu: well lets start by you stating the problem ?
bitstein: mircea_popescu: assbot model is much improved over gribble model. there's no more sessions, so you're mostly battling with a solved problem there. << doing an auth for each request is definitely an improvement, but can you elaborate on how that solves the problem?
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065185 << in sovietlandia one had to "Register" his typewriter, after all.
mircea_popescu: god fucking help any piece of machinery that "just says no"
mircea_popescu: like this lazy cd rom that wouldn't spin properly which ended up plucked out, connected straight to power and let spin until it ground itself off.
mircea_popescu: i suppose i might be the only techno-enabled sociopath that disassembled misbehaving hardware/software and let them do X for a while, by themselves, in the dark.
danielpbarron: "i don't want to learn a new thing"
mircea_popescu: and the user's reaction is anything but getting a 28 inch dropforged wrench and beating it into a pulp. without grease. ?
mircea_popescu: ahahaha who the fuck came up with this shit. seriously, photoshop "Refuses to open" somethng ?
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 15:07:09; Adlai: this is a good point... even if each wot rating is signed, this can be a false friend - what if you're not looking at the latest version of the ratings? if only we had some way of achieving trust-minimized consensus... ☟︎
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065154 << consensus is undesirable. but actually, as implemented, assbot does work perfectly for the purpose(s).
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 14:45:54; funkenstein_: that's right "the gold market" is a single entity which works towards being "less manipulated".
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 14:25:35; thestringpuller: its up to kako if he wants to support it with asswot
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065107 << no dood, the situation's exactly reversed here. assbot fixed some problems, it's up to nanotube to support it in gribble, which he said he was going to eventually do.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 14:22:44; bitstein: That just allows the server to know it is talking to who it thinks it is talking to, but it doesn't guarantee the server hasn't fabricated data.
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065100 << assbot model is much improved over gribble model. there's no more sessions, so you're mostly battling with a solved problem there.
mircea_popescu: not like people can't do that if they wish, via deedbot.
mircea_popescu: well, you're stuck publishing all this signed material in that model.
jurov: what? everyone being able to check rating entries independently of assbot would do that?
mircea_popescu: phrased like that it's obvious.
mircea_popescu: jurov so the question was more "why does assbot not implement the drawbacks to privacy of a strong crypto verification scheme" ?
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 14:22:40; Adlai: and trusting that people don't leave authenticated irc accounts idle accessible to random passersby
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065099 << this is not how assbot works, tho.
jurov: imo that was what was meant
jurov: does assbot store the !v verification string?
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 14:21:16; bitstein: Is there a reason WoT ratings are not required to be GPG signed?
mircea_popescu: http://log1.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065093 << they are.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 21:31:49; BingoBoingo: Bitcoind (and a number of the other 'wallets') grind balances to dust over time.
jurov: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=23-03-2015#1065889 fyi, electrum does not and has opposite problem - you must freeze addresses to prevent it always spending everything ☝︎
mircea_popescu: at which the leader goes "Yo! Alifie! come over we got one."
mircea_popescu: so the guy eventually decides to go with.
mircea_popescu: listen dude, you're getting fucked whbether you want to or not. it's a fact. the only questrion to you is, if you want to do it with alifie or without.
mircea_popescu: they struggle a little, he's taken to the ground, at which point the leader of the pack goes
thestringpuller: mircea_popescu: too late alfie. << ahahhhahaha. The nickname is sticking!
mircea_popescu: guy walking through street at night. suddenly, jumped by some burly dudes.
mircea_popescu: btw, want me to tell you a romanian joke ?
mircea_popescu: dun worry sir whiteknight, b-a brings the best out in everyone.
assbot: Logged on 23-03-2015 13:45:09; nubbins`: (given that free advice can only cost $0, the set of possible costs for said free advice is a zero ring, which precludes the set from being a field, which means that division by zero is not required to be undefined, which means that your assertion that it's infinitely more valuable is, at least superficially, true)
mircea_popescu: (if you read teh trilematograph heading you prolly know i've been working on a very similar question)
mircea_popescu: before that, it was randoim shit.
mircea_popescu: originally, it was actually max hardcore i think. after that, it was mostly bangbros.
ascii_field: meaning, roughly speaking, the set of conventions re: what the heroes look like, what they do, etc.
mircea_popescu: not there.
ascii_field: i often wonder where the 'kabuki' of modern western porn came from
ascii_field: this is the nice thing re: dead folks
mircea_popescu: lovelace is this 70s bs.
BingoBoingo: !up thomas
ascii_field: it doesn't get any hotter than lovelace, imho
mircea_popescu: thestringpuller if you want to talk "women in tech" it really starts with noether.
ascii_field: https://www.google.com/doodles/emmy-noethers-133rd-birthday << l0l that google remembered this actually interesting figure and not some wanker
mats: is Merck still general counsel for TBP?
mircea_popescu waves @ Patrick Merck, who realised all this shit too late and ran off through the wall.
mircea_popescu: (and by "too expensive to be useful" i don't mean anything but, for every btc in gains it makes us, it gives that terrorist we shall not name 10 to 100 btc worth of ammo)
mircea_popescu: which pretty much brings us to date.
mircea_popescu: because whatever, i'm going to hang them anyway, and usg isn't going to hang them no matter what, so that leaves a space in the middle.
mircea_popescu: pretending now that hey, "they are publishing reports". of the new entity.
mircea_popescu: which pretty much brings us to 2014, when the thing became too expensive to be useful, so it had to run out of usg jurisdiction (went to uk)
mircea_popescu: except no worthy goals were willing to work with them, and so moved to "default worthy goal" = pay gavin a salary.
mircea_popescu: once got called out on that, shed some bits (coinlab, anyone recall that ?) and moved to "worthy goals" (stioll not releasing any reports, because vessenes, like all clueless idiots involved, thinks taint is a thing, and also thinks i don't know his addresses, because whatever, he's magically protected by nulandine)
mircea_popescu: but no, the two got merged late. originally, foundation was transparent scam to syphon and repurpose bitcoins to prop up "vc entreprises".
mircea_popescu: well perhaps the discussion of which lice spawned what scorpion is not directly interesting to engineers, being more in the vein of politics and law. so i guess you actually have a fine aproximation.
mircea_popescu: foundation not directly related to this.