log☇︎
502000+ entries in 0.316s
BingoBoingo: Type-03 and others in their "export version" are so chambered
decimation: wouldn't surprise me if the north vietnamese were supplied with american 5.56
decimation: most of their 'allies' were communist moles
decimation: usg was hustled by the vietnamese
BingoBoingo: Built too late for 'Nam.
decimation: was it built for their little brown brothers in vietnam?
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: Later than that
asciilifeform: BingoBoingo: if pre-dates the ru switchover, probably built for expert to hanoi
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform: There is a variation of the Chinese type whateverthefuck chambered in American 5.56, Russian 5.xx didn't exist yet
asciilifeform: BingoBoingo: it was actually chambered in the american 5.56 ?!
decimation: point is, there's a third party involved. but crypto doesn't require a third party to machine the keys
decimation: some locks are neigh 'unpickable' too
asciilifeform: the thing is there for the convenience of locksmith so he doesn't have to mutilate your car or whatnot with picks
asciilifeform: decimation: any lock on which you find an engraved number, is this
BingoBoingo: <trinque> in fact we both value constraints, just that yours are in your noggin and I want mine in the thing << Knowing that a thing fails deadly is a value all its own.
decimation: but in that case the end user isn't capable of crafting his key
decimation: asciilifeform: makers of fine locks often retain the 'master key list'
assbot: Socialist Shill Announces Launch of Third Key Solutions | Qntra.net ... ( http://bit.ly/1GJVhbK )
BingoBoingo: asciilifeform thestringpuller: http://qntra.net/2015/04/socialist-shill-announces-launch-of-third-key-solutions/#comment-16242
asciilifeform: i can hardly think of a less-appetizing name for anything!
asciilifeform: does 'third key' not immediately evoke an unwelcome interloper to everyone ?
assbot: Socialist Shill Announces Launch of Third Key Solutions | Qntra.net ... ( http://bit.ly/1GJV3kI )
BingoBoingo: What, fail deadly is a thing.
trinque: in fact we both value constraints, just that yours are in your noggin and I want mine in the thing
trinque: I hear ya; still I always like systems where I can declare constraints and have the thing blow up should the constraint be violated
BingoBoingo: <trinque> I want to say "no fuck you, never gnome anything, never kde anything, so help you flamethrower" << in my limited experience mostly involves checking version of packages of building with delete key
asciilifeform: and hammer things in by hand
asciilifeform: trinque: in my (since '04) life with gentoo, many times the only 'fix' was to go barbarously outside of portage
trinque: I want to say "no fuck you, never gnome anything, never kde anything, so help you flamethrower"
trinque: pkg_add can be "friendlier" in terms of happily pulling down all kinds of deps
BingoBoingo: And trying to walk someone through that is/(would be) hell
trinque: ^ there are plenty of times when portage just tells you to fuck off and fix it yourself
asciilifeform: portage is 'easy' until the first multihorned merge conflict
BingoBoingo: <trinque> that imo is the killer feature << Portage seems too much a user friendly feature for OpenBSD. They have features, but avoid the kind that attract users with "easy"
scoopbot: New post on Qntra.net by thestringpuller: http://qntra.net/2015/04/socialist-shill-announces-launch-of-third-key-solutions/
asciilifeform: trinque: if you put aside 'portage', gentoo is largely good for the 'unfeatures'
trinque: that imo is the killer feature
trinque: ports seems almost the way there, but I don't see a way for example to globally mask a package or option as you can with portage
BingoBoingo: trinque> anyone ever tried portage on openbsd? << port are supported and pkg_src are supported porting portage to my knowledge is a work in progress or abandonware
trinque: anyhow it's a nice thought
trinque: must be true
trinque: redirect from the new site to that from the google result
trinque: anyone ever tried portage on openbsd?
trinque: gentoo is a labyrinth within which one transcends the derpitude
mod6: ah good deal, thanks.
mod6: i've used gentoo exactly 2x: for testing bitcoind hah
asciilifeform: a default gentoo (to the extent it even makes sense to utter such a thing) built by someone carelessly reading the cookbook will end up with systemd as likely as not
BingoBoingo: Also some gentoo people spent enough time on OpenRC that OpenRC cannot be easily disappeared
mod6: oh. ok, didn't even know that.
mod6: (is it the only hold out left?)
asciilifeform: nubbins`: msdos is considerably more alive than riscos
asciilifeform: mod6: there's be substance to that if i hadn't just built a 3.18 kernel and full userland into <5MB with no systemd crapolade
mod6: what about all the "linux is dead" memes?
BingoBoingo: <mod6> You think that gentoo would be better than openbsd? << Not better, just vastly different targets
BingoBoingo: mod6: Sure. Gentoo is still at its heart Linux. As best as I can tell having lived with it as sole OS for a few months OpenBSD compared to linux is more of an exotica like HP/UX or Slowaris.
mod6: You think that gentoo would be better than openbsd?
mod6: BingoBoingo: all of this was very recently tested on gentoo. both 64 & 32 bit.
thestringpuller: I really need to run OpenBSD soon just to start learning it.
gribble: gcc-local(1) - OpenBSD: <http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=gcc-local&sektion=1>; 2 - Getting to know OpenBSD: <http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq2.html>; OpenBSD 5.5: <http://www.openbsd.org/55.html>
BingoBoingo: <mod6> asciilifeform: huh. im not sure what'd that be. i did a lot of testing on amd64, ever saw that error. i did see something similar just now though on openbsd, but i suspect that something totally different because, well, openbsd. << I'll go on the record as saying OpenBSD should not be considered "gold standard" unix in the way gentoo is. OpenBSD goes way out of its way to prevent user from hanging self.
mod6: the build im trying to work through on openbsd uses like (I can't remember off the top of my head) 4.2.x or something
asciilifeform: unrelated, someone needs to take ben_vulpes's rm_rf_upnp patch and turn that into a separate executable that does upnp.
mod6: most of our testing we were successful with seemed to be gcc 4.4.5
asciilifeform: mod6: may have to do with gcc version
mod6: asciilifeform: huh. im not sure what'd that be. i did a lot of testing on amd64, ever saw that error. i did see something similar just now though on openbsd, but i suspect that something totally different because, well, openbsd.
danielpbarron: if you mean my test pogos
asciilifeform: in the same way (the integers thing)
BingoBoingo: hanbot: Seriously. I haven't seen the old lady sockpuppet though in a while
hanbot: BingoBoingo ahaha what a horrorshow. that guy's idiocy is like kudzu.
trinque: if it's small stuff should be able to ifdef it
nubbins`: so far, at least, i think there's only minor changes needed for the various platforms
nubbins`: ^ this
BingoBoingo: platform specific patch sets may end up being a necessary evil, even if there isn't a full split
mod6: anyway, food for thought.
mod6: iirc ascii mentioned it, said he'd maintain the pogo project. it's not a horrible idea.
nubbins`: the two auto.sh are close enough
nubbins`: ah, i think it's a bit early for that
mod6: we really need two branches of code now i think.
mod6: if you wanna do that cross compiling stuff, you gotta use ascii's original one.
mod6: ok, so remember, version that we have for auto.sh (v0.0.5 & v0.0.5-32) are NOT to be used for cross compiling.
nubbins`: i suspect the latter
mod6: so i got everything to compile on obsd, but getting segfaults when trying to run the static binary. core dump looks like its something with threading...
nubbins`: not sure if he's targeting the same, or the pogo via portatronic
danielpbarron: ironically enough, the same computer that successfully built bitcoind for pogo way back when the project first began
mod6: there is a version number in the top of the auto.sh script, which version are you using?
danielpbarron: i think that was me, and it's most likely a problem with my computer
mod6: many of us were able to build, not just me this time ;)
mod6: yes, was tested on a hand full of environments ( as stated in the ADDRESS ): deb6 (64/32), gentoo (64/32), ubuntu 12/14 (64) and apparently macosx too. not sure what you're running into.
mod6: <+ascii_field> ben_vulpes, mod6, et al: auto.sh leads to 'util.h:650:8: error: ‘uint32_t’ does not name a type' on my boxes. << what os/arch?
BingoBoingo: nefario: Thinking about taking up Burnside's BTC-TC code sale?
BingoBoingo: !b 2 test ✂︎
scoopbot: New post on Trilema by Mircea Popescu: http://trilema.com/2015/ok-ok-you-had-me-d/
jurov is going to bash whole day
assbot: Switch Flasks, Switch Products. In the Pipeline: ... ( http://bit.ly/1OWSmjf )
BingoBoingo: http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2015/03/31/switch_flasks_switch_products.php << Tiny differences
BingoBoingo: I thought last year was good, buy kako puts the cess in success
mod6: <+BingoBoingo> kakobrekla: Best log error evar << that is pretty good hehe
pete_dushenski: alright you jokesters, i'm re-heading back out into the world. until tomorrow!
pete_dushenski: sounds suspiciously like "taxes are good for you and the economy"
mircea_popescu: pete_dushenski that's what they WANT YOU TO THINK