log☇︎
482100+ entries in 0.31s
Pierre_Rochard: ^ place this quote under “self-serving” in a dictionary
decimation: of course he's not a fan, because if suddenly 'talent' thinks they are worth $250k instead of $50k, his own business implodes
decimation: attracting" the worst cultural fits. "
decimation: "It's "a horrific idea," [paying $250k] said Sam Altman, the president of Y Combinator, Silicon Valley's most prestigious technology incubator. "It seems on paper like a really good idea [since] great engineers can create huge value. [But] here's why it doesn't work: You really want a company full of missionaries, not mercenaries. And so if your company is known as the place where you can make a huge cash salary, you end up
assbot: Silicon Valley talent wars: Engineers, come get your $250K salary - CNET ... ( http://bit.ly/1FLXpQj )
mod6: anyway, if my grub looks good, then maybe it's my kern. but it could be something else... not quite sure.
mod6: <+trinque> and otherwise if all else fails I'll be putting my own build script together before long << ok sweet!
mod6: <+trinque> may help; that's a working gentoo kernel out on ec2 << i'll try this out tomorrow
mod6: yeah isn't that what i have in grub? ^^^
trinque: and otherwise if all else fails I'll be putting my own build script together before long
trinque: may help; that's a working gentoo kernel out on ec2
mod6: oh well, i guess we can pick it back up tomorrow.
mod6: has the same error in the System Log.
mod6: trinque: same thing :/
livegnik: danielpbarron: Thanks for that link! With Identifi it could look something like this: https://twitter.com/timpastoor/status/585515976566960128/photo/1
livegnik: I enjoyed talking to all of you. See y'all in Round 2! :)
livegnik: Disregard that last one, miscommunication on my side. I think you're right about me going to bed then.
livegnik: I did? Oh, I might have become insusceptible to them then by now.
livegnik: I know who's beating I'll put my money on though.
livegnik: I'll try and do that.
trinque: livegnik: go to bed!
livegnik: In that case, sorry to bother you with the apology for the perceived bother.
danielpbarron: it's less of a bother than your apology for the perceived bother
livegnik: There's probably not much wrong with simple gpg messages. There's more to Identifi than rating messages however.
livegnik: Sorry for bothering you with level-upping me constantly. I won't be on for much longer now anyhow, so I won't waste too much of your typing and/or clicking ;)
trinque: rather than gossip protocols and all this other fancy shit, what's wrong with a simple gpg message format that constitutes a rating
livegnik: Not for this purpose, yet. I'll fix it later today (after I wake up).
danielpbarron: You can try it out at http://identi.fi. You can easily log in with FB/G+/Twitter/email and give ratings and verifications. It's still in alpha stage and the user interface is under constant development. My goal is to make it easier to use than the address book on your phone. << that part's got to go if it's going to be worth anything
trinque: the rest of the problem is what they said, about whom, and how that information is discoverec
trinque: I see two problems, one solved by gpg entirely, which is establishing an identity
livegnik: Thanks for your thoughts on this so far. I'll invite Martti to join us in here.
livegnik: I'm finishing up some things atm, and will then go catch some rest. My IRC server is up 99% of the time (the missing 1% was yesterday), so I'll be back in here :)
livegnik: I've been trying to find people to break this theory, but haven't bumped into them yet. At the same time, there aren't too many people working on these types of solutions throughout the world atm.
trinque: debate is how things operate around here
livegnik: I'm open for suggestions though, and again, I'm just the business developer. Martti is the real dev on this one.
trinque: livegnik: get in our WoT so you can self-voice, and invite him along too
livegnik: trinque: I'm not much of a coder, so I'm not able to answer that last remark at this point. Martti probably has a fitting answer for that one, according to my previous experiences with his mostly-always-sufficient answers.
trinque: seems there's a simpler way
trinque reserves judgment on whether this is a nice marmot yet
trinque: if you're not using the blockchain I dunno why you don't just use gpg keys and some gossip protocol; as I understand it bitcoin isn't even very good at that part
livegnik: Not far from the mark?
livegnik: You could put it that way. It's a layer to shuffle your marmot around, or whatever analogy you prefer.
livegnik: And we're working on a permission database / filter/firewall & communication application that can run between the node that stores the actual data, and the other trusted nodes, in order to set thresholds based on permissions for sharing info.
trinque: keypairs and gossip about ratings is probably not far from the mark
trinque: as I understand it you're basically using the bitcoin transaction propagation stuff to send out rating data?
trinque: and maybe you will; difficult position to be in to say the least
livegnik: Happy to elaborate on the others when I can make that info public.
trinque: yes but this is "if we get x and y consulting dollars" and so on?
livegnik: I can't say too much about it at this time, but I can tell you that we have an accountant who's helping us to crunch the numbers.
trinque: as noted earlier in the logs, these days our chief export is bullshit
livegnik: trinque: We plan to break-even within (max) a year or 3. ☟︎
trinque: the idea that profitability is something you can "figure out along the way" if at all, is a braindead american VC concept
trinque: livegnik: this killed my last employer, as it should have
trinque: livegnik | trinque: So would we. Sirius spent 1.5 half years working on the proof-of-concept, and I've spent the last 8 months working on this project << for the logs, it is never, ever a good idea to leap off into some venture with both feet when the venture has no profitability or plan to achieve it
danielpbarron: so there should be a link on your site to my "address book" listing ?
livegnik: I'll check dpaste. I've been using pastebin up till now for the most-part; years.
assbot: - One-way authentication, so that the party that you're authenticating with does - Pastebin.com ... ( http://bit.ly/1FLTH9q )
livegnik: Sure thing.
danielpbarron: any of the many free txt file hosting services
livegnik: Can I drop a few lines (like 15 or so) in here to give some examples of what Identifi nodes could be applied to?
assbot: Logged on 24-04-2015 13:15:14; mircea_popescu: gribble went down at some point. this is rare, but whatever, happens. nanotube was also unresponsive. after a few days in this position assbot got enabled to wot
danielpbarron: it's in the log which you should read
danielpbarron: someone mined a block that was too big :p
livegnik: Hmm. How did that happen?
livegnik: What's the gribble/assbot divide problem, if I may?
livegnik: I'd even dare to predict that this should enable business models like, e.g, a decentralized credit rating agency.
danielpbarron: sounds like this idea can be adapted to the gribble/assbot divide problem
decimation: livegnik: what do you have to offer over properly using gpg? ☟︎
livegnik: Everyone in the Bitcoin-OTC WoT should be in there, if correct. There's a Bitcoin-OTC crawler for Identifi nodes :)
assbot: Trust relationship from user assbot to user Anduck: Level 1: 0, Level 2: -5 via 7 connections. |http://www.btcalpha.com/wot/trust/?from=assbot&to=Anduck | http://www.btcalpha.com/wot/user/Anduck/
livegnik: trinque: So would we. Sirius spent 1.5 half years working on the proof-of-concept, and I've spent the last 8 months working on this project full-time. I've actually quit my dayjob for it and am burning my savings. ☟︎
trinque: I'd be interested to see an example of that business model working for something that's not a) propped up by VC b) propped up by govt or c) already had a viable consulting business
livegnik: Services mostly. Helping business who want to integrate Identifi nodes within their existing environments mostly.
decimation: you get the government to pay you for other people's work?
livegnik: One size that fits all. Additional applications could be ran on-top of the node.
livegnik: The idea for business model for the company we have in mind probably comes closest to Red Hat, without the Enterprise edition. ☟︎
livegnik: I'm actually not interested in a very high valuation, to be honest, just to be able to pay a few devs to work on this full-time.
decimation: livegnik: what are you going to use your funding to do?
trinque: danielpbarron: what does that make us?
livegnik: Well, that info is there. It's up to you to filter.
livegnik: Within Identifi networks the max is infinite, but the proto-type of our front-end hands you the options 1st, 2nd, 3rd, or infinite degree.
danielpbarron: what would an L3 consist of? friend of a friend of a friend? no thanks
danielpbarron: in the real WoT, the max is 2
livegnik: danielpbarron: Identifi does the same with the trust ratings, you can set your viewpoint from 0 to infinite.
livegnik: danielpbarron: Ah, the viewpoints. Capice.
livegnik: trinque: There are 2 types of messages: 1.) verifications of identity's identifiers, and 2.) trust ratings ("Alice is a terrific barber!". "Bob is the worst car salesman!", "DID_REPAY_LOAN_ON_TIME", etc.)
danielpbarron: my L2 "level two" consists of all the users trusted by users in my L1
danielpbarron: livegnik, my L1 or "level one" consists of users that I trust (have given a rating) directly
livegnik: trinque: Yes, for the most part. And there's no blockchain.
decimation: livegnik: what are you going to use funding for?
livegnik: danielpbarron: Could you elaborate on the L1 L2 thing for me?
trinque: livegnik: so this is a haxed bitcoin where the payments are instead ratings, yeah?
livegnik: The first is a quite shallow explanation of the project, we'll update it within a few months or so (after rounding up the pilot projects, board of advisors, and funding).
danielpbarron: livegnik, do you get the whole L1 L2 thing?
livegnik: trinque: Would that be identifi.org or identi.fi?
livegnik: I agree that it can be ignored for the most-part, but Identifi doesn't even contain it.
trinque: livegnik: ah I'm looking at the website for that project now
danielpbarron: the general score can be ignored for the most part (in the OTC / assbot WoT)
trinque: mod6: yeah from whatever the bootloader is; there's also a way to build command line (meaning kernel command line) parameters into the kernel itself
livegnik: danielpbarron: The main difference between Bitcoin-OTC and Identifi, if I understand correctly, is that the Bitcoin-OTC WoT acts as a WoT-for-all, whereas with Identifi each identity has it's own WoT, and there's no 'general' score. ☟︎