343600+ entries in 2.708s
EmanuelDeOrtego_: boonies4u: It's part of
a collection about the artist's wife's death or something
boonies4u: mircea_popescu: does MPOE-PR have
a handle here?
boonies4u: I took
a break following the bubble :P
BTC-Mining: Maybe so each line contains
a positive or negative BTC value when appropriate, along other things
exahash: there's
a php script out there
Obsi: Yeah I'm gonna chalk it up to bad memory for now... I'd have to write
a script to parse my CSV
exahash: thus btc may be
a very good choice in such
a place
exahash: and you can't move USD cash across
a border
BTC-Mining: Looking to purchase shares at
a discount. If there's not enough bidding, query me, might just place
a bid
gribble: *BANG* Hey, who put
a blank in here?!
BTC-Mining: ;;eightball Is pirate on an island, sitting in
a chair, telling his investors not to worry by chatting in his channel on his laptop?
assbot: [GLBSE] [NYAN.
A] 20 @ 1 = 20 BTC [-]
mircea_popescu: sort of like how people think everyone they see on tv
a lot is really rich.
rdponticelli:
A lot of businesses are desperate trying to get some capital....
EmanuelDeOrtego_: Anything Erik makes, it goes into
a chest that will not be opened until 2050
rdponticelli: Let's hope that
a lot of the flow can get there, and not going into the exchanges to be dumped....
exahash: on the fence, thinking about which ones will spike, many seem depressed atm... you don't have to buy ppt's to find
a play on the pirate instability
exahash: and she lives at
a mail forwarding company
assbot: [GLBSE] [FZB.
A] 1 @ 0.064 BTC [+]
assbot: [GLBSE] [FZB.
A] 1 @ 0.03689999 BTC [+]
assbot: [GLBSE] [FZB.
A] 8 @ 0.036 = 0.288 BTC [+]
assbot: [GLBSE] [FZB.
A] 17 @ 0.0359 = 0.6103 BTC [+]
assbot: [GLBSE] [FZB.
A] 25 @ 0.033 = 0.825 BTC [-]
smickles: (and i kow tha m00t isn't trying to run
a cryptocurrency exchange)
smickles: do you think 4chan is
a porn site too?
smickles: so why do you think that polimedia.us is registered with
a fake name,
smickles: you know that in order to have
a .us domain name as
a foreiner, you need
a 'bona fide' presence in 'merica, right?
smickles: exahash: no site an just
a few users right now. Thanks for you input to my query :D
smickles: exahash: well, as that may be true, I think this solution would be better. The user would actually be making
a decision about trusting my site based on wether or not they trust me rather than someone paid off the browser-maker and charged
a fee, claiming to have fact-checked the site's owner
exahash: smickles, thats
a lot more work than grabbing
a free startssl cert
smickles: exahash: we'll see how it works out, i suppose, I shoud probably do
a nice infographic instruction
usagi: gotta have
a bowl, gotta have cereal
smickles: do you thik it could work if i signed
a cert and said, hey, import this to trust me
smickles: in chrome i see
a place where i can import
a cert
exahash: nefario, are there
a lot of undocumented/unadvertised api commands?
smickles: also, i like the idea of being able to get both parts of ssl without having to appeal to an authority like
a fucking slave
nefario: paid for
a *.glbse.com cert
exahash: didn't know you could get more than just
a trial one for free
smickles: exahash: i think you are correct there, i just want to present the informantion where by
a user could trust the self-signed cert and know it was the correct on and not some kind of attacker
rg:
a free, non self signed
rg: why not just get
a free SSL cert?
smickles: that way
a user could compare the cert's fingerprint
exahash: give me
a sec, I'll go see what I see when I hit
a self-signed cert
smickles: would that be the best solution without actually using
a CA?
smickles: i can clearsign the data that the user would see in such
a viewing
smickles: when you accept
a self-signed cert, the browser gives you the chance to view the cert right?
exahash: there may be
a way to add to the default certs in some browsers, but I'm not aware of it
smickles: ssl is bonk then, there should be
a way for
a user to accept
a self-signed cert and confidently know that it is the correct key-pair because they have
a signed file wich points out that it is/isn't the proper key-pair being used
Obsi: if I put in
a bid it corrects self
exahash: if you want that to happen automatically, you have to pay for one signed by
a cert their browser already trusts
BTC-Mining: It happened before, issuers that issued
a master certificate that were eventually leaked and could pretend to be any of their client's website afterward.
exahash: people have to click
a few extra buttons to accept it
exahash: smickles, you can make
a 'self-signed certificate'
BTC-Mining: No, browser only recognize
a few issuers because they're stupid
smickles: I haven't looked into ssl all that much, but is it possible to use
a self-signed cert and in place of
a 'trusted third party' such as verisign, couldn't i sign something with my gpg identity that would provide the same info the trusted third party would?
assbot: [GLBSE] [TYGRR.BOND-
A] 80 @ 0.1 = 8 BTC [+]
assbot: [GLBSE] [NYAN.
A] 5 @ 1 = 5 BTC [-]
area: Indeed, it was apparently
a news story today that Tom Cruise went to get
a curry and couldn't pay with AmEx
area: You can get AmEx in the UK, but
a surprisingly large number of places don't take it
Azelphur: but yea I don't really care too much, I'll use this thing for
a year for general shopping / online purchases to build up
a score
rg: after you do
a good job
rg: sometimes they invite you to get
a real amex
Azelphur: I have to do that anyway since I have
a debit card
Azelphur: Congratulations, We've approved your application for
a Capital One Secured Card
Azelphur: figured I should get one since I buy shit online all the time it'd be good to have the fraud protections that come from having
a CC
Azelphur: my credit check is real assy though, it doesn't show the bills I pay, it says all my bank balances are 0, and apparently being 22 is
a point against me getting
a card \o/
exahash: you use them carefully for
a while to get your rating, then go for
a "real" card
Azelphur:
a secured capital one card to build my rating up \o/
rg: Azelphur: you'll have to get
a shitty credit card to start
Azelphur: exahash: I wasn't particularly expecting to get it baring in mind I'm unemployed and wanted
a rewards card lol
Azelphur: mircea_popescu: I don't have
a gf or
a landlord, the studies must be true!
mircea_popescu: and i think there was
a study that most likely reason for gfs dumping blokes
rg: counts as
a hard query on your credit report too
Azelphur: got rejected for
a credit card today \m/
rg: i didn't really hit
a monkey
rg: i punched
a monkey in the face. he didn't even do anything wrong
DeaDTerra: it says this program is used by Python's os.popen function to work around
a limitation in windows 95/98. It is not designed to be used as
a stand-alone program
smickles: hey, i contributed to Azelphur (just
a little bit) so it's not entirely his, it's like 99% his
mircea_popescu: DeaDTerra there's
a precompuiled windows with libraries thing
DeaDTerra: Okay sure, will you be around in
a couple of hours to help me?