265300+ entries in 0.113s
mircea_popescu: adlai what if i select every 6th letter and it spells out "i did your mom"
mircea_popescu: you basically have to ask someone to go there confirm your screenshot is correct.
mircea_popescu: pretty much the only way to do this is with sworn testimony.
mircea_popescu: there's a reason the wayback machine is run as charity.
mircea_popescu: there are incredibly many problems with this. kinda why html is so hated
mircea_popescu: yeah, it'll be rare that it verifies so impossible to put to practical use.
mircea_popescu: it'd be a great thing, page verification, but so many things can fuck it up. like, any page that includes the current time. a theme upgrade.
mircea_popescu: yeah, but abusing availability is how availability goes away eh ?
mircea_popescu: so either they're dumb or you've not told 'em and they're dumb.
mircea_popescu: why are you telling him about them ? tell them about him.
mircea_popescu: adlai what i don't get is : some group is trying to do something punkman already did, and we're using.
mircea_popescu: nubbins` can you appreciate how damned rare it is, a few occurences over tens of thousands of LINES ?
mircea_popescu: and in so doing provides the perfect pill against the hearn idiocy of "let's import heardbleed into btc
mircea_popescu: bitbet does the same thing, it reuses addresses liberally.
mircea_popescu: once this one use per address thing goes away, "associated" is a lolzword.
mircea_popescu: the key to escaping responsibility if being one of a group that did whatever. the way to implement this in bitcoin is through address reuse.
mircea_popescu: "adlai, you are charged before this court with high crimes of having derped on the internet in a forbidden manner"
mircea_popescu: not reusing addresses is a bad idea ; reusing them makes them more ambiguous, which is good.
mircea_popescu: anyway, as a general point : breaking the address <-> user relation is the most important thing to do for bitcoin's success on an individual level.
mircea_popescu: srsly nao, isn't it obvious by now, whenever immutability is achieved without a db, a hash was involved ?
mircea_popescu: so it looks if it sent a mail for that amount. if it does and the recipient correctly hashes to it, it sends it an email with teh code.
mircea_popescu: you're aware that when you make an order you get sent an email. right ?
mircea_popescu: adlai anything can happen, but if you don't need a database you have less exposure to the things that can happen.
mircea_popescu: meanwhile using a single address has no cost associated, other than you know, one particular string of eight digits as opposed to another particular string of eight digits.
mircea_popescu: it also happens to be the wrong thing. it makes it easier for ~everyone~, which is bad for user privacy. it requires more complexity, which costs money and opens the door to errors
mircea_popescu: anyway, that was the van network, it was actuve for like a month.
mircea_popescu: kinda no practical way to make these not relate to one another
mircea_popescu: or more likely, because the theme they ripped came with the icons.
mircea_popescu: "you forgot your panties in my bed" "but i don't wear panties ?" "oh shit... um..."