log☇︎
248100+ entries in 0.071s
mircea_popescu: this is not very clear.
mircea_popescu: where's that ?
mircea_popescu: prolly for cheap as nobody cares.
mircea_popescu: so at some point the corp's gonna go bankrupt and you can buy the code then
mircea_popescu: it's not hand written straight into bytecode.
mircea_popescu: no, ida itself.
mircea_popescu: obviously, it has source code, right ?
mircea_popescu: true, this.
mircea_popescu: not enough need ?
mircea_popescu shrugs.
mircea_popescu: basically the problem is negative incentives. lots of money to be made from windows holes.
mircea_popescu: odd.
mircea_popescu: hm.
mircea_popescu: not the other way around.
mircea_popescu: if it were "it worked for us" it'd be mre latin america and less ru.
mircea_popescu: odd that foss got a lot further in latin america.
mircea_popescu: no dude seriously contemplates telling parents / prospect / parents of prosepct that "he contributes to wikipedia"
mircea_popescu: i suppose the problem is that the us is fully aspirational, whereas the ru world a lot more practical.
mircea_popescu: but that's not really what's deriving it.
mircea_popescu: odd.
mircea_popescu: yeah why the fucxk did the guy write it in win anywa
mircea_popescu: ie, that's the best that can be had.
mircea_popescu: it may be the case that the maxima is fine.
mircea_popescu: which is why not muchly discussed.
mircea_popescu: and you're right in pointing out that ida is probably a thing to rewrite, alongside gpg, etc
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform i understand that part.
mircea_popescu: so... don't.
mircea_popescu: but i can see his point. waste of time to go into the guts of windows.
mircea_popescu: every wish is sacred, every wish is good...
mircea_popescu: why do you wanna go in locales you don't like the maxima.
mircea_popescu: so then sit in your locale and be happy
mircea_popescu: so then.
mircea_popescu: pick two.
mircea_popescu: this can't be a problem. it's like mp's triangle : x sucks , no competition, anyone cares.
mircea_popescu: so far all we got is "x sucks"
mircea_popescu: but i mean the problem.
mircea_popescu: explain it to me.
mircea_popescu: i fail to see how it is a problem.
mircea_popescu: after all, "the net effect is same"
mircea_popescu: moreover, this "follow effects bs" is what leads one to "property is theft"
mircea_popescu: it's not a matter of effects. it's a matter of causes.
mircea_popescu: yeah. that's what's supposed to happen.
mircea_popescu: this is not supression.
mircea_popescu: this is good and proper natural-ness. things as they should be.
mircea_popescu: not a monopoly in any sense.
mircea_popescu: THIS monopoly is more like, i'm the only kid that washes.
mircea_popescu: well, normally monopoly is like this : i hire five ex convicts to beat up any boy that stands up, thus leaving me the only eligible teenager i nthe highschool. because no girl wants to fuck any of the other losers.
mircea_popescu: oh , im sorry. "do-ocracistst"
mircea_popescu: it's only a monopoly by virtue of everyone else being retards
mircea_popescu: asciilifeform am i hiding all the good nsa agents somewhere too ?
mircea_popescu: "it is not possible we just simply suck. our excellent goodness is hidden somewhere. if we coud just unleash the real we..."
mircea_popescu: "the good tzar"
mircea_popescu: ayup
mircea_popescu: it has the look.
mircea_popescu: pete_dushenski the vid is actually quite credible.
mircea_popescu: "we said so all along"
mircea_popescu: it all makes sense in retrospect!
mircea_popescu: lol
mircea_popescu: retrospectively ?
mircea_popescu: and twice the employees so half the real salaries.
mircea_popescu: so "twice the money" except it's probably the same value,
mircea_popescu: who knew that expropriation creates bureaucracy1
mircea_popescu: apparently accountancy become a pretty good business in the us, past decade.
mircea_popescu: funny, aa had like 80k iirc.
mircea_popescu: no more arthur andersen
mircea_popescu: o they just promoted one
mircea_popescu: are they bringing the corpse back in on the quiet ?
mircea_popescu: what big four ? one of them died with enron neh ?
mircea_popescu: every redditard's mother, can be measured in bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: the point of money is exactly this : that it may not itself be measured. there's no "utility" of money. it exclusively exists to measure everything else.
mircea_popescu: repackaging of ther "oh, utility of mining, all that electrictiy burned for nothing" crapolade.
mircea_popescu: and ship the results by horse courrier
mircea_popescu: all it has to do is make sure it's the best money. which it did. once that's done, utility is not a concern. you will work the blockchain if you have to do it by hand in dank cellars chained to the wall,
mircea_popescu: fucking period.
mircea_popescu: bitcoin itself is money. that means BEYOND ANY UTILITY CONSIDERATION.
mircea_popescu: the utility OF EVERYTHING justifies itself in bitcoin terms.
mircea_popescu: at any rate, all this talk of "utility of bitcoin" can get fucked. it's a flimsy if doomed and in any case transparent attempt to frame the question in fiat terms.
mircea_popescu: but anyway : it's not "mostly engineers". it's 100% of all the business people actually involved with bitcoin.
mircea_popescu: five years later... shit, it's the same thing. herp.
mircea_popescu: five years ago romania was replete with kids who rewrote trilema articles about this and that to be like all cool and civilised and worldly and whatnot.
mircea_popescu: what i find comedic is the sort of schmuck that thinks he'll survive on intellectual dishonestly. here's the story : if i made it and you stole it, whatever you think about it and however you're representing it... it'll still work for me. not for you. that's the thing with culture.
mircea_popescu: "something i heard from all the people that all read trilema but i won't mention this"
mircea_popescu: except they don't have a source, somehow, magically ?
mircea_popescu: o look at it, suddenly the arguments that didn't exist now exist ?
mircea_popescu: I think of it from the perspective of utility. "
mircea_popescu: "It's largely engineers who think about it in terms of game theory. They think that if you have unlimited blocksize, then the cost of transactions will go to zero because there will always be a competitor that is willing to include transactions even if you're charging X. They believe this will cause a race to bottom and there won't be any incentive for miners to secure the network because they can't cover costs.
mircea_popescu: back when you were shy ?
mircea_popescu: http://sexylosers.com/036.html << lolz.
mircea_popescu: is this like a blonde joke ?
mircea_popescu: i mean, neurosis is one thing. this however...
mircea_popescu: i dunno what's more alienating than the bizarre that obviously feeds this comic strip.
mircea_popescu: on my tenuous grasp of insanity, it'd seem that it's an entirely vacuous thing, which takes the shape you impose upon it. if you insist it's dangerous... it will probably grow some dangerous appendages. if you treat it as benign, it will basically be benign.
mircea_popescu: on the other hand, man... that's some serious issues.
mircea_popescu: on one hand, it does exactly nothing to anyone, including the kids in question, that some weirdo jacks off.
mircea_popescu: fwiw, this particular sort of strange would definitely benefit from support more than OUTRAGE OMG!!1
mircea_popescu: indeed.
mircea_popescu: mebbe he actually went because he wanted to jacvk off to 12yo jap gals.
mircea_popescu: english teacher ;likely thing for a foreigner there to do.
mircea_popescu: seems he lives in japan
mircea_popescu: much in the way kids used to replace the "made by" strings in the old 8086 days with a hex editor.