221500+ entries in 1.628s

jurov:
i'll teach them the error of their ways
supay: benkay: no sir,
I shall not!
supay:
I do hope however that someone voices me every half-hour till
I get some rating.
jurov:
i don't even have a doggone wallet
supay: BingoBoingo:
I get it. Good deal.
supay: jurov:
I'll give you 1doge. Interested?
jurov:
i can give some +1 for 5BTC or considerable coinbr volume >:D
BingoBoingo: supay: Not atm. If you do something that impresses people and provides benefit
I might, of course other people might as well.
supay: But
I am very familiar with C and C++.
BingoBoingo: thestringpuller:
I'll start thinking about games
supay: so that
I can continue talking here and learn a thing or two :)
supay:
I'm asking for rating on bitcoin-otc
supay:
I'm authed
i guess..
supay: Could someone give me a +1 rep so
I could chat here?
BingoBoingo:
I like that the honeypot is covered in Web 2.0MG hipster BBQ sauce
dub:
i been that nigger in a rice bowl waiting to pop a cap
rithm: ^
i have a feeling
i wouldn't have to change nicks then
fluffypony: cMLD is only 5k, but
I can live with that
kakobrekla: hmm
i think
i had a good reason regarding that lemme think
nanotube: benkay: also,
i see you're talking about irc nick and wot username differences - shouldn't be an issue, the output of 'ident' command includes wot username... so you have both pieces of info.
supay: kakobrekla:
i understand..
supay:
I don't have any btc to trade to get a rating.
supay: so if
i just register on bitcoin-otc with a gpg key,
I can continue chatting here?
kakobrekla: anyway
i still think you should hit the wiki first on your quest, supay .
cgcardona_: supay: no prob. :) glad to help.
I can pass the newb crown to you
supay: mircea_popescu: interesting.. looks like
I can learn from this chan after all..
supay: So
I thought
I would watch, and learn.
supay:
I was told that
I could learn a lot from this channel.
bounce: the uplink was 64kbit ISDN back then.
I think we split it out on a box on campus with 100Mbit, which was pretty good for ~2000. for (possibly fake, as in from the next room over the pabx) dialin we cut up an old "second ear" on a phone.
bounce recalls "doing internet radio" with a kick mike (nice and low response on the voices), homemade spit filter, a (PA) mixer panel,
I forgot what for playing records, and, uh, a couple peecees for the recording and streaming. (winamp on w95 with encoder plugin to icy server on linux, then somethingorother for multicast)
cgcardona_: but
I'm working on a bunch of new stuff so that's why
i ordered the gear
cgcardona_: so
I'm starting over w/ some cheap gear just to get set up.
cgcardona_:
i just moved back to kauai from SF and sold all of my gear before
I left the city
Naphex:
i never understood drinking games
moiety: lol fluffypony
i could do with some wine today
fluffypony: he pumps out shitty sites with IPO PDFs more often than
I drink wine
fluffypony: "proslimbs_ink
i am not irish. keep working maybe you find a potato. "
jurov: fluffypony
i actually had to look to lulzbourse, if PISS is there.. but sadly, it's shopped
fluffypony: mod6: yeah,
I remember pf being all the rage, and switching a couple of boxes from fbsd to obsd because
I wanted to use pf
mod6: maybe its because
i learned on ipfw tho.
mod6:
i always thought it was a pain to get it just right. once it worked, it worked good,
i mean it did it's job. but
i found it more painful for some reason than PF.
mod6: did anyone here ever use ipfw and feel that pain?
i mean, it worked, but it was tricky with that match-first ruleset as opposed to the filtering and match-last system of PF.
mod6:
i always have that in my pf ruleset, but
i need to rebuild anyway :)
benkay:
i was going to ask why some people are willing to spend more money to fix the bug their shitty prioritization imposes than doing it right in the first place and then
i realized 'o yeah most people are stoopid monkeys'
benkay: mike_c
i'm trying to ship some goddamn software over here mkay?
midnightmagic: lol @ weird article though, those aren't the reasons as
I understood them.
benkay:
i'm just highlighting people getting it.
fluffypony:
I wonder if you could reverse attack those spam comment systems
mircea_popescu:
i suppose one could imagine this far away island where the greatest delicacy is pubic hair lice
moiety:
i know someone else that used smf for an altcoin forum, lasted like 2 months before they migrated to other software
moiety:
i see john re-appeared
moiety: owait it doesnt work like how
i was thinking
moiety:
I RAPORT THIS TO INTREPOLL. << lol
moiety:
i thought moolah was closing
mike_c: one piece
i was missing is that you will allow the share price to grow. this is different from many funds that keep their share price constant.
assbot:
I don't know those people, and they don't look very friendly.
assbot:
I don't know those people, and they don't look very friendly.
mircea_popescu: bounce no because most of the time
i don't remember what
i said
mircea_popescu: note tho that they're my shares, if
i sell them under nav... well... tough tits for me.
mircea_popescu:
i have, for like...
i dunno, a year or two ? BILLIONZ OF LINES!11
mike_c: yes. so this goes back to what
i said about the fund will end up carrying a huge cash balance
jurov: so
i can now undercut the 21726 ask? but dunno if that recovers selling fee
mircea_popescu: let me make an illustrative working model by what
i mean by the size breeds security thing.
mircea_popescu: suppose instead of 1.5% (or the initial .88%)
i charged 45%.
mike_c: (
i don't think that's my objection)
mircea_popescu: so
i guess your objection reduces to this not being a high risk/high reward enough for you thing ?
mike_c:
I'm going to try again. Funds can sell at a premium or a discount to NAV. You are basically saying you won't allow this above +/- 1.5%. The only way
I can see to do this is to carry a massive cash balance in the fund.
ThickAsThieves:
i'm still lost on how continual issuance of shares doesnt affect NAV
mircea_popescu: jurov yes, went out of your bounds.
i was at .88% before
i enacted the 1% collar for you.
mircea_popescu: someone else wants to pay over 15 pips or why do
i issue more shares ?
mircea_popescu: he can't overpay by 6%, because
i sell to him at 101.5
ThickAsThieves: so
i'll instigate further, what vetting does general manager do for bot software used by managers? basically enough rope to hang themselves?
mircea_popescu: mike_c there are some things conflated in there
i don't follow.