192200+ entries in 0.043s
mircea_popescu: because the thing shows some very promising AI in arranging the boxes.
mircea_popescu: dun tell me there's some dudes right over the horizon ganging together to beat me up ?
mircea_popescu: <anton_osika> By the people who understand the situation. << by the who ?
mircea_popescu: o wow check it out, he actually managed the level enforcement. nice stuff mod6 !
mircea_popescu: <mats> otherwise it'd be meatfacebook << lol. it's either pgp or meat, baby.
mircea_popescu: <ascii_field> who saw the palaces and ludicrous 'stotting' << sure, i'm privy to teh arab wastage.
mircea_popescu: just saying, expenditure's not the measure of the world. but anyway.
mircea_popescu: shit, you actually do that every day ?! IT'S BAD FOR YOU
mircea_popescu: and coke was "degree-1" involved, iirc buffett still owns lots of it.
mircea_popescu: for that matter, i spent a million like you spend a dollar in a coke machine.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field are you in a position to negrate this "degree-1" "meatwot" ?
mircea_popescu: you're to tell your jokes freely as much as possible, so as to learn how it works.
mircea_popescu: for as long as you don't have a method to make them laugh, you're not to epxect to be paid for your "Comedian services".
mircea_popescu: anyway. this entire "if you only got one and don't know how you got it, either - you therefore must publish" thing is exactly because that's how one learns.
mircea_popescu: what you can not make you can only give away. never sell.
mircea_popescu: ascii_field they can beg all they want, it's adequate to them.
mircea_popescu: apparently the web doesn't have the quote. something like "my dear, i'm going out to find my pride. and if i ever find it, we'll see if it's still worth a damn to either of us."
mircea_popescu: or else he can not make them, just found some meteor, in which case he has no business being a seller. because nobody may sell what he can't make.
mircea_popescu: either he can make them, at some rate whatever it may be, but nonzero (even if it's so low in the end it ends up being 0), and then he has a business being a seller.
mircea_popescu: this precludes any bothering. because bothering is a thing of work, which is a reason to suspect.
mircea_popescu: mno. words have meanings. " no reason to suspect he will ever have more".
mircea_popescu: it's provably the best usage, if you don't secrete it.
mircea_popescu: and he should just play the good researcher and publish it.
mircea_popescu: but the caveat being that if seller has exactly one, and no reason to suspect he will ever have more, this entire thing is a wot. aka, waste of time.
mircea_popescu: and if seller doesn't want to burn one, seller can just ask (PRIVATELY) friends to rate it.
mircea_popescu: seller has a minimum of two 0 days. he creates a wot account for the purpose of selling these and future ones indefinitely. seller publishes one freom that account as a proof, announces he has more, explains what it costs. sends it encrypted once gets paid. gets rated. what's the big deal.
mircea_popescu: stop trying to force the inept mental jump on me. i am neither inept nor am i making it.
mircea_popescu: yes it works once. how many times do you want it to work.
mircea_popescu: suppose someoine who isn't us registers 0day_bourbaky in the wot.
mircea_popescu: and by uncomfortable i mean, the places where yo ususpect the solution may lie.
mircea_popescu: for all you know it can literally say "i don't trust him".
mircea_popescu: ascii_field what part of wot requires any deal be public!
mircea_popescu: ascii_field couldja for five minutes stop with this "i know how things are in direct proportion of how little i know about them" ?
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo i'm not sure why such a concern would be of any interest. this "fund" is not represented in the wot. consequently, any piece of email purportying to be from them ACTUALLY IS every time that is detrimental to them
mircea_popescu: ascii_field> and what is ~his~ assurance that i won't immediately pastebin the goods << you ever heard of teh wot ?
mircea_popescu: but yes, trivial to find this sort of shit once you got the guy
mircea_popescu: and with the force the 4th guy... the whole thing looked more like turf war between rival drug lords, on of which being the usg, than anything legitimate.
mircea_popescu: "how" they found ulbricht = "we discovered this github post" or what was it ?
mircea_popescu: anyway, anyone know this Jenna McLaughlin chick ? invite her over.
☟︎ mircea_popescu: (lying, of any kind it might be, always takes more clever than speaking the truth. it also always enbds up taking more cleverf than is available, but that's secondary here.)
mircea_popescu: "Hess said that data currently available on investigations, including the annual wiretap report indicating that agents encountered encryption only a handful of times during the course of the year, is simply wrong." << it is simply wrong, because it never figures in court matter, because they parallel construct to all hell and don't know how to do it well
mircea_popescu: you are a SERVANT. nothing more. just like your mom used to be, minus the assfucking.
mircea_popescu: nobody cares what some anon goat fucker thinks on any topic. on your knees, answer humbly and move on.
mircea_popescu: listen up raj your mother-s a whore go back to india : you don't fucking get to score the questions
mircea_popescu: "Asked how often investigations are stymied by encryption, Kiran Raj, a senior counsel of the Department of Justice, responded with a non-answer. “It is an important point that you make, that we have to provide the sense of a scale,” he said."