166000+ entries in 0.04s
mircea_popescu: ascii_butugychag and i only don't say anything because i'm rahter unsurprised.
mircea_popescu: epic interview, i think the last one too, on the tv show of that guy with the camera in demo mode
mircea_popescu: the one that was going to save us through his boyish good looks and vctron smarts ?
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo i recall the "currently only bitcoinica and blabla" expert opinions of years past. anyone old enough to remember shtylman, the genius-boy-expert with a funny hat of 2013 ?
mircea_popescu: there's a delicious mockery of this, century+old. sadly, in romanian,
mircea_popescu: most likely go ask for an audience with hitler to complain.
mircea_popescu: BingoBoingo fuck you, hegel would totally kick your boy's butt.
mircea_popescu: people love to view the field of expression as unfinite. then again, they loved to see the west the same way.
mircea_popescu: nah it'll end up like "true because there in principle can't exist a system in which you could formulate a contradiction".
☟︎ mircea_popescu just realised we're actually in danger of falling into a unified theory of everything with all this, and nobody'll even understand it.
mircea_popescu: for your sins you'll have to brush almost as much crud off all that stuff as anyone trying to use linux today.
mircea_popescu: the saussure - derrirda debate prolly a good starting point.
mircea_popescu: jurov well if you're bored you can read up on literary theory. if not, your question can't really be answered.
mircea_popescu: if i were a sapper i'd have long ago moved on to relaxing by the maker's pool.
mircea_popescu: either that or i had the thing lying around on my hdd for two years to the day now
mircea_popescu: lol i guess this shows just how unreliable the non-blockchgain timestamp is
mircea_popescu: (indicative and dispositive are used here, ftr, as classical legal concepts. something's indicative if it contains or procures a means to evaluate the truth of a claim. something's dispositive if it is the means to resolve a claim.)
mircea_popescu: (not in the sense that the post-structuralist blabla is even indicative, nor that the original structuralist view dispositive. but even in a much more restrained, conservative view, the concept carries water.)
mircea_popescu: jurov you know what they mean by textuality, intertextuality and all that jazz ?
mircea_popescu: fun fact : # comes from a quick scribble of lb, which comes from libra pondo
mircea_popescu: i suppose blockheight with no almohadilla is a better notation
mircea_popescu: ironically enough, nobody is such an enemy of black achievement as the political party using color as a lever on the public treasury.
mircea_popescu: #b-a can always be trusted to ferrer out crushingly impossible tasks for people more or less alligned with their interests.
mircea_popescu: should any tim swanson want to show up later, it's rather trivial to !s anyway\
mircea_popescu: nah, enough to have the sort of crud in the logs, no need to put it in active db
mircea_popescu: !rate 8FF6B4382C3FE0C9700C7FD3DD2C5E65A090A6CE -1 less opining more reading.
mircea_popescu: what's the progress on this deeply uncontroversial technical solution ? hm ?
mircea_popescu: here's an idea : there's an enormous amount of crucial data coming from all arab speakers that muricans should sit on a fucking pike from now on. because satan and such reasons.
mircea_popescu: it hasn't happened yet! there's a pile of data about how people UNINVOLVED in bitcoin in ANY capacity want to "improve" it, preferabvly in such a manner that their continued uninvolvement is less to their own detriment.
mircea_popescu: what crucial data ? who who either holds any significant bitcoin, or runs any significant ~bitcoin~ business said ever anything about increasing block size ?
mircea_popescu: "When such an enormous amount of crucial data (on the need to raise the blocksize limit) is ignored, that is done at the peril of the project." dude what is with all the derps ffs.
mircea_popescu: >I have a long history of having a keenly skeptical eye, I have solid critical thinking skills, and I bat away wacky theories all day long. I have NEVER, in any forum, posted any comment of any type in regards to bitcoin, this is my first one- I believe in speaking humbly, thinking deeply and acting bravely.
mircea_popescu: "all p programs correctly evaluate whether they terminate"
mircea_popescu: thinking atm something along the lines of "enough set theory to be able to define an algebra"
mircea_popescu for the first time in lyf regrets he's not been paying much attention to the whole pile of proofola.
mircea_popescu: one just has to correctly make the statement of their incorectness in a proper formed T.
mircea_popescu: ascii_butugychag i'm creaming my pants at the notion that footnote 2 is actually provable, mathematically.
mircea_popescu: mod6 you wanna write the [implementation] part and i bitch at you ? seems a better approach than the reverse.
mircea_popescu: bear with me, it's done, need just write it out. one hour.
mircea_popescu: ascii_butugychag mk, i've got it, and it is scandalous.
mircea_popescu: ascii_butugychag yes, but reading code is reading code.