129400+ entries in 3.306s

Luceo: The fact that he downrated me isn'
t THAT bad
Luceo: But gribble WOT is controlled by nanotube, and nanotube doesn'
t want to change it
Luceo: usagi: No, doesn'
t look like it
Luceo: Not really, you sold your silence and than didn'
t keep to it
BTC-Mining: Yeah, but didn'
t he pay you for your silence?
Luceo: Doesn'
t even read the post he's trolling
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining well if you have good volume maybe you move mkt. many ppl don'
t sell / buy on glbse cayse low volumes on book
Obsi: they don'
t think it be like it is, but it do.
mircea_popescu: the 50-100 btc they clear a month doesn'
t even cover server costs, so...
mircea_popescu: guruvan glbse can'
t make any management changes. the reason they are stuck with the current idiot there is that nobody competent is willing to work for free.
mircea_popescu: Obsi no, you have to deal with the stone silence of "we don'
t care about your thing, if we wanted to buy dollar stocks we'd use a real broker"
Obsi: then you don'
t even have to deal with the "I coulda held BTC and made 1000% more!" trolls
DeaDTerra2: I have worked on this asset, I pay out 50000% a week. How I do it is a secret and I can'
t guarantee that I can return your investment.
kuzetsa: I can'
t seem to comprehend. there's no way
copumpkin: I don'
t really see why usagi's gender is relevant to anything
Bugpowder: BTC-Mining: hurry up, these firesale prices for S.MPOE won'
t last much longer!
Azelphur: BTC-Mining: I don'
t really know then beyond it's a gpg issue
Azelphur: the second is that python libraries required arn'
t included in the binary
Azelphur: the main relevant one is that your keys arn'
t signed properly
BTC-Mining: Couldn'
t decode the reply from MPEx, perhaps you didn'
t sign the key? try running gpg --sign-key F1B69921
Bugpowder: I have a new rule, only daytrade shit that isn'
t a ponzi scheme
BTC-Mining: Ok, got it working, says couldn'
t decode reply from MPEx. But since MPEx doesn'
t have my key... seems totally normal =P
copumpkin: investment banking generally don'
t pay that much until you get past the first few years
copumpkin: entry-level analysts don'
t get all that much money, especially for how much time they spend on it
BTC-Mining: Even with a backup on USB, who's to say my key wouldn'
t burn along my PC?
BTC-Mining: That's one reason I don'
t want to go on MPEX
BTC-Mining: I know mircea_popescu enough to know he wouldn'
t allow people to recover an account with lost key
BTC-Mining: Eisenhower: He has to pay manually to each. For those who haven'
t claimed yet, he has to keep track of the balance owed to them until they claim the shares.
vampireb: The fact is: both of them are somewhat wrong. I wouldn'
t deal with either personally.
BTC-Mining: I don'
t approve the kicking out actually...
BTC-Mining: Because goat freaking received all the details he needs but keeps complaining. He got kicked for complaining indefinitly about how he didn'
t want to sell back the fake shares for 0.10 to start with and now keeps complaining how he can'
t go on without GLBSE but he's received a list of balances.
OneMiner: Yes, that's my understanding. I just put it that way because I can'
t independently confirm it.
gigavps: please don'
t bring me into this
Lucidize: I don'
t pretend to be a genius tho
guruvan-: no surprise - someone decided they don'
t want him to sell more bonds...
guruvan-: that doesn'
t make you correct though
guruvan-: usagi - you seriously didn'
t think anyone thought the opposite, did you? I don'
t think it will damage my credibility to the point you have done to your own
mircea_popescu: is this still about all that scammy shit with "can'
t say bad things about me cause i paid him 5 btc" ?
guruvan-: you couldn'
t possibly justify anything to me with your typical logic usagi
guruvan-: I don'
t give a fuck what they think - I'll still think you're an idiot - and I sure as fuck wouldn'
t sign any agreements with you...I don'
t trust you any more than I trust...say....The federal Reserve Board
vampireb: you didn;
t indetfied the breach
gigavps: guess ppl don'
t want to be on glbse anymore
Lucidize: wasn'
t it a rhetorical question, meaning there is no diff? =)
mircea_popescu: imsaguy2 i rarely give away btc, but when i do, i don'
t ask for it back.
mircea_popescu: but hey, they weren'
t at fault, reported it, what was i going to do.
kakobrekla: 14:52.10 ( mircea_popescu ) the one time i paid someone twice i didn'
t take it away
mircea_popescu: the one time i paid someone twice i didn'
t take it away
BTC-Mining: Bah, I don'
t have any orders being filled these days.
BTC-Mining: When I don'
t want to invest in something, I should short it.
BTC-Mining: Smoovious, the current stocks will certainly won'
t be allowed on the regulated GLBSE.
BTC-Mining: Weren'
t Smoothie and EskimoBob all over your threads?
BTC-Mining: If you don'
t get trolled like there's no tomorrow on bitcointalk.org, you obviously lack visibility.
mircea_popescu: and btw , why can'
t i have an address starting with 2 ?
mircea_popescu: who was telling me weeks ago that this isn'
t the way to go ?
farfi: nefario : PPT.A can be sold back at the insured 0.32 why can'
t we be allowed to do that?
vampireb: so i can'
t even sell at the loss? hmm
mircea_popescu: BTC-Mining so i take it you don'
t want to buy into glbse valued at
Bane_Capital: Yes, there is but I don'
t feel like digging it up
Bane_Capital: I used to be for free-for-alls but that just isn'
t working
mircea_popescu: the uk is in such close union with the us by now i wouldn'
t put much hope in that.
mircea_popescu: i can release the info, but it doesn'
t look good anyway.
mircea_popescu: "I can'
t publicly release any info about revenue, profit, or dividend payments."
jcpham: i don'
t see you doing it, but highly strategic