1016700+ entries in 0.78s

midnightmagic: Do
they sell
to just one customer? If yes, detectably, stomp. If no, great, everyone benefits.
Luceo: I
think
that ASIC manufacturer would be more likely
to sell slashed price chips
than attack
the network
midnightmagic: If you're an asic
that just
tok everyone's money publically
to attack
the network?
midnightmagic: If you're an end-customer, you pay most of
the full retail price.
Diablo-D3: not only is it good for me, it means I
trivially destroyed your attack against me
Diablo-D3: you crippled
the network as much as you cripple me
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: If you
think you're right, give your head a shake. It's
trivial
to do. It
takes about 3 months
to upgrade 95%, and
that's just for a non-impact lame-o ddos fix with no known sightings in
the wild.
Luceo: So
the
target
to attack is lessened
midnightmagic: Luceo: You're just
talking about a normal 50% attack now.
Luceo: But
the
total network outside my control
takes a severe hit
too
midnightmagic: Luceo: If you've amassed all
the different asic so you only
take a 1/3 hit, your ability
to attack is lessened.
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: go have gmaxwell and sipa explain
to you why you're wrong
midnightmagic: Luceo: You're missing my point. Right now,
they only mine if
they mine using
the current hash algo.
Diablo-D3: yeah, what happens if I run all
the brands of asic PLUS gpus and fpgas?
midnightmagic: And if
they do? It changes, everybody adapts, and laugh when we discover all
the special asic out
there have become useless and
the network contracts by X
TH
midnightmagic: In fact, I'm pretty sure someone recently already has gotten >50%. But if
they play nice and don't screw with
the network
trust,
then it doesn't matter does it?
Diablo-D3: and
then
they mine on each others blocks when
the opportunity arises
Diablo-D3: okay so, I have a bunch of nodes
that seem like
they're coming from different continents, and none of
them connect
to
the same peers by collusion
midnightmagic: Still, it doesn't matter, all it
takes is a suspicion, or an attempt
to make use of
the >50%.
midnightmagic: you're not listening.
the entire network can be mapped out and all mining hashrate identified. neither of you have read
the academic papers describing how
to do
this or you wouldn't be arguing with me.
Luceo: Here we have 100 miners each controlling 0.5% of
the network
Diablo-D3: and what happens when I use
tor and segregate my bitcoinds
to different parts of
the network?
Luceo: Run 100 bitcoinds on VPS around
the world, mine
to
them
midnightmagic: in fact, yeah, it can. it doesn't even
take very many listening posts
to do it.
midnightmagic: you haven't read
the papers. yeah,
the network can.
Luceo: The most likely hostile asic horders / 51% attackers will not be companie which rely on Bitcoin being successful
to make money
midnightmagic: And everyone who doesn't do it, gets screwed when
they're discovered.
midnightmagic: What
that means is simple: 5 ASIC vendors = 5 secret algos. asic vendor misbehaves? hash algo switches
to support
the other 4 (who are now building individually different blocks) and #5 == paperweight.
midnightmagic: "Edit:
There is no single "secret alternative algorithm" being issued/given
to ASIC vendors.
They are all expected
to come up with
their own and not share it outside
the company except in an emergency."
midnightmagic: "That is not necessarily
true. ASIC vendors are advised
to implement an alternative algorithm
they can switch
to in case of emergency like
this. If
the community felt it necessary
to block out ASICMINER (or some other hostile ASIC hoarder),
the other ASIC vendors would
then publish
their secret alternative algorithms, and Bitcoin could be made
to support
those."
midnightmagic: "That is not necessarily
true. ASIC vendors are advised
to implement an alternative algorithm
they can switch
to in case of emergency like
this. If
the community felt it necessary
to block out ASICMINER (or some other hostile ASIC hoarder),
the other ASIC vendors would
then publish
their secret alternative algorithms, and Bitcoin could be made
to support
those."
midnightmagic: Here I'll quote: "That is not necessarily
true. ASIC vendors are advised
to implement an alternative algorithm
they can switch
to in case of emergency like
this. If
the community felt it necessary
to block out ASICMINER (or some other hostile ASIC hoarder),
the other ASIC vendors would
then publish
their secret alternative algorithms, and Bitcoin could be made
to support
those."
Diablo-D3: and why do you
think I wanted DMC
to have substantial hashpower from multiple manufs?
midnightmagic: Yeah right. A hardfork later and every user who listens
to Gavin when he says "Hey
these guys can now attack
the network, upgrade now
to avoid it," makes
the old fork die.
Diablo-D3: infact I unsubscribed from
the asicminer
thread due
to all
the
trolling
Diablo-D3: I dont know, Ive already asked
theymos
to ban him until he stops
trolling
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3:
Then what's Luke saying in
the asicminer
thread?
Diablo-D3: but
the devs have already stated
they will not change
the algo
Azelphur: I imagine if bitcoin changed algo it'd probably be
the fastest way
to kill
the network, so your point is moot
midnightmagic: And
the naughty conglomerate
that went overboard into a super fancy mining contract because
they discovered nobody's willing
to buy
their device and fund competition against
themselves?
They go away and lots of paperweights mine on a scamcoin altchain.
midnightmagic: And every repsonsible asic device can now mine its own
type of block.
midnightmagic: And if
those vendors end up just being one giant self-mining masturbation circlejerk?
Chaang-Noi: you want win, it is like
talking
to a rock
midnightmagic: Chaang-Noi: I will in a moment, I'm in pacific
time.
Chaang-Noi: midnightmagic or you
talking with D3? if so give up :)
midnightmagic: Every vendor was
told, as Luke-Jr said,
to put a small additional secret piece of logic into
their asics.
midnightmagic: Whose software do you
think
the users are going
to use?
Diablo-D3: THATS
THE WHOLE FUCKING GODDAMNED NETWORK
Diablo-D3: plus, half
the network will ignore you
Diablo-D3: plus anyone on gpu mining since you wont have me
to write a new kernel
midnightmagic: Which given
that most people don't grasp
the nature of how anticompetitive what
they're planning on doing is, is far more likely
to happen.
midnightmagic: And at
that point, doing
their best
to ensure
tha
the bitcoin devs stomp
them.
midnightmagic: In other words, customers *should* if
they were smart, be forcing
them into a purely self-mining contract.
Diablo-D3: the first x units belong
to shareholders period
midnightmagic: But
they'll mine less if nobody ever buys
their devices.
Diablo-D3: asicminer will mine no matter who you send your money
to
midnightmagic: to starve
them out as much as possible so
they aren't able
to mine as effectively.
midnightmagic: No, because it is in
the customers' best interest
to buy OTHER PEOPLES' asics.
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: yes, but
that also goes on even if you buy from basic or deepbit
midnightmagic: You make a device, if you didn't mine 12TH and
then 50TH, it would have made x more profit. If you DO mine, with your customers' own money (which is in
their business plan) you are reducing
the value of
those devices.
Diablo-D3: either we blame anyone _adding_ hardware, no matter if
they manufactured it or not,
to
the network
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: you cant have your cake and eat it
too
Diablo-D3: so _anyone_ who adds more hardware
to
the network is guilty of fucking miners
midnightmagic: And show absolutely zero ability
to grasp even
the notion of what
that means.
midnightmagic: Why would I? I'll send my money
to people who don't cannibalize
their customers' potential profit.
mircea_popescu: if
they don't accept
the offer
that's still fine, obviously you didn't offer enough.
mircea_popescu: im sure if you pay enough you could get
the devices earlier.
mircea_popescu: midnightmagic so basically you'd prefer
they sold
the items rather
than mine with
them/
this is fine. make
them an offer
Diablo-D3: DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW STUPID
THAT SOUNDS
midnightmagic: mircea_popescu: AS A SHAREHOLDER. Not as a customer buying
their devices. In other words,
they're cannibalizing
their future earnings selling devices by doing
the dick move of mining for
themselves.
Diablo-D3: AMD COMPETES WITH MINING BECAUSE
THEY SELL GPUS
THAT CAN BE MINED ON
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic:
THEN BFL, BASIC, AND EVEN AMD IS BAD
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: Why would I support a business which intends
to compete directly against other miners?
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic:
THERE ARE NO CUSTOMERS YET
midnightmagic: It is ENTIRELY a party
to
this discussion, because
that's
the genesis of my objection!
mircea_popescu: fuckall cares what an uninvolved
third party likes or not
mircea_popescu: midnightmagic :"customer" is not a party
to
this discussion
midnightmagic: mircea_popescu: Look at it from
the customers' perspective. Why
the hell would I buy a mining
tool from
the same company who's already staked
the choicest claim and mined it for all it's worth?
mircea_popescu: but on shareholder money... why can't
they do what
they please ?
Diablo-D3: shareholders are NOT entitled
to buy
the hardware
mircea_popescu: Diablo-D3 can't say
that i do. if
they
took preorder money and financed from
that
then yes
Diablo-D3: mircea_popescu: so you dont get
the argument either?