log☇︎
1016700+ entries in 0.78s
midnightmagic: Do they sell to just one customer? If yes, detectably, stomp. If no, great, everyone benefits.
Luceo: I think that ASIC manufacturer would be more likely to sell slashed price chips than attack the network
midnightmagic: If you're an asic that just tok everyone's money publically to attack the network?
midnightmagic: If you're an end-customer, you pay most of the full retail price.
Diablo-D3: not only is it good for me, it means I trivially destroyed your attack against me
Diablo-D3: you crippled the network as much as you cripple me
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: If you think you're right, give your head a shake. It's trivial to do. It takes about 3 months to upgrade 95%, and that's just for a non-impact lame-o ddos fix with no known sightings in the wild.
Luceo: So the target to attack is lessened
midnightmagic: Luceo: You're just talking about a normal 50% attack now.
Luceo: But the total network outside my control takes a severe hit too
midnightmagic: Luceo: If you've amassed all the different asic so you only take a 1/3 hit, your ability to attack is lessened.
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: go have gmaxwell and sipa explain to you why you're wrong
midnightmagic: Luceo: You're missing my point. Right now, they only mine if they mine using the current hash algo.
Diablo-D3: yeah, what happens if I run all the brands of asic PLUS gpus and fpgas?
midnightmagic: And if they do? It changes, everybody adapts, and laugh when we discover all the special asic out there have become useless and the network contracts by X TH
Diablo-D3: so how, pray tell, can you tell?
midnightmagic: In fact, I'm pretty sure someone recently already has gotten >50%. But if they play nice and don't screw with the network trust, then it doesn't matter does it?
Diablo-D3: and then they mine on each others blocks when the opportunity arises
Diablo-D3: okay so, I have a bunch of nodes that seem like they're coming from different continents, and none of them connect to the same peers by collusion
midnightmagic: Still, it doesn't matter, all it takes is a suspicion, or an attempt to make use of the >50%.
midnightmagic: you're not listening. the entire network can be mapped out and all mining hashrate identified. neither of you have read the academic papers describing how to do this or you wouldn't be arguing with me.
Luceo: Here we have 100 miners each controlling 0.5% of the network
Diablo-D3: and what happens when I use tor and segregate my bitcoinds to different parts of the network?
Luceo: Run 100 bitcoinds on VPS around the world, mine to them
midnightmagic: in fact, yeah, it can. it doesn't even take very many listening posts to do it.
Diablo-D3: nope, the network cannot
midnightmagic: you haven't read the papers. yeah, the network can.
Luceo: The most likely hostile asic horders / 51% attackers will not be companie which rely on Bitcoin being successful to make money
Diablo-D3: you cant even tell its one miner
Diablo-D3: and then just switch it on
Diablo-D3: it assumes the hostile is public
midnightmagic: And everyone who doesn't do it, gets screwed when they're discovered.
midnightmagic: Assuming what Luke says, is true.
midnightmagic: What that means is simple: 5 ASIC vendors = 5 secret algos. asic vendor misbehaves? hash algo switches to support the other 4 (who are now building individually different blocks) and #5 == paperweight.
midnightmagic: "Edit: There is no single "secret alternative algorithm" being issued/given to ASIC vendors. They are all expected to come up with their own and not share it outside the company except in an emergency."
midnightmagic: "That is not necessarily true. ASIC vendors are advised to implement an alternative algorithm they can switch to in case of emergency like this. If the community felt it necessary to block out ASICMINER (or some other hostile ASIC hoarder), the other ASIC vendors would then publish their secret alternative algorithms, and Bitcoin could be made to support those."
midnightmagic: "That is not necessarily true. ASIC vendors are advised to implement an alternative algorithm they can switch to in case of emergency like this. If the community felt it necessary to block out ASICMINER (or some other hostile ASIC hoarder), the other ASIC vendors would then publish their secret alternative algorithms, and Bitcoin could be made to support those."
midnightmagic: Here I'll quote: "That is not necessarily true. ASIC vendors are advised to implement an alternative algorithm they can switch to in case of emergency like this. If the community felt it necessary to block out ASICMINER (or some other hostile ASIC hoarder), the other ASIC vendors would then publish their secret alternative algorithms, and Bitcoin could be made to support those."
Diablo-D3: and why do you think I wanted DMC to have substantial hashpower from multiple manufs?
midnightmagic: Yeah right. A hardfork later and every user who listens to Gavin when he says "Hey these guys can now attack the network, upgrade now to avoid it," makes the old fork die.
Diablo-D3: infact I unsubscribed from the asicminer thread due to all the trolling
Diablo-D3: I dont know, Ive already asked theymos to ban him until he stops trolling
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: Then what's Luke saying in the asicminer thread?
Diablo-D3: but the devs have already stated they will not change the algo
Azelphur: I imagine if bitcoin changed algo it'd probably be the fastest way to kill the network, so your point is moot
midnightmagic: Hey don't hate the playa, hate the game.
midnightmagic: And the naughty conglomerate that went overboard into a super fancy mining contract because they discovered nobody's willing to buy their device and fund competition against themselves? They go away and lots of paperweights mine on a scamcoin altchain.
midnightmagic: And everyone accepts them.
midnightmagic: And every repsonsible asic device can now mine its own type of block.
midnightmagic: bitcoin devs change the hashing algo.
midnightmagic: And if those vendors end up just being one giant self-mining masturbation circlejerk?
Chaang-Noi: you want win, it is like talking to a rock
midnightmagic: Chaang-Noi: I will in a moment, I'm in pacific time.
Chaang-Noi: midnightmagic or you talking with D3? if so give up :)
midnightmagic: Every vendor was told, as Luke-Jr said, to put a small additional secret piece of logic into their asics.
midnightmagic: Whose software do you think the users are going to use?
Diablo-D3: THATS THE WHOLE FUCKING GODDAMNED NETWORK
midnightmagic: You're thinking in terms of miners.
Diablo-D3: plus, half the network will ignore you
Diablo-D3: plus anyone on gpu mining since you wont have me to write a new kernel
midnightmagic: Which given that most people don't grasp the nature of how anticompetitive what they're planning on doing is, is far more likely to happen.
Diablo-D3: and they are still all online
midnightmagic: And at that point, doing their best to ensure tha the bitcoin devs stomp them.
midnightmagic: In other words, customers *should* if they were smart, be forcing them into a purely self-mining contract.
Diablo-D3: if NO ONE buys them
Diablo-D3: the first x units belong to shareholders period
midnightmagic: But they'll mine less if nobody ever buys their devices.
Diablo-D3: asicminer will mine no matter who you send your money to
midnightmagic: to starve them out as much as possible so they aren't able to mine as effectively.
midnightmagic: No, because it is in the customers' best interest to buy OTHER PEOPLES' asics.
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: yes, but that also goes on even if you buy from basic or deepbit
midnightmagic: You make a device, if you didn't mine 12TH and then 50TH, it would have made x more profit. If you DO mine, with your customers' own money (which is in their business plan) you are reducing the value of those devices.
Diablo-D3: either we blame anyone _adding_ hardware, no matter if they manufactured it or not, to the network
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: you cant have your cake and eat it too
Diablo-D3: so _anyone_ who adds more hardware to the network is guilty of fucking miners
midnightmagic: That's totally, totally irrelevant.
mircea_popescu: they belong to he who gets them, is all.
mircea_popescu: of "cannibalizing" the profits of gpu miners
mircea_popescu: by this logic anyone making asics is guilty
midnightmagic: And show absolutely zero ability to grasp even the notion of what that means.
midnightmagic: Why would I? I'll send my money to people who don't cannibalize their customers' potential profit.
mircea_popescu: if they don't accept the offer that's still fine, obviously you didn't offer enough.
mircea_popescu: im sure if you pay enough you could get the devices earlier.
mircea_popescu: midnightmagic so basically you'd prefer they sold the items rather than mine with them/ this is fine. make them an offer
midnightmagic: Neither of you know what you're talking about.
Diablo-D3: DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW STUPID THAT SOUNDS
midnightmagic: mircea_popescu: AS A SHAREHOLDER. Not as a customer buying their devices. In other words, they're cannibalizing their future earnings selling devices by doing the dick move of mining for themselves.
Diablo-D3: AMD COMPETES WITH MINING BECAUSE THEY SELL GPUS THAT CAN BE MINED ON
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: THEN BFL, BASIC, AND EVEN AMD IS BAD
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: It's in their business plan.
midnightmagic: Diablo-D3: Why would I support a business which intends to compete directly against other miners?
Diablo-D3: midnightmagic: THERE ARE NO CUSTOMERS YET
midnightmagic: It is ENTIRELY a party to this discussion, because that's the genesis of my objection!
mircea_popescu: fuckall cares what an uninvolved third party likes or not
mircea_popescu: midnightmagic :"customer" is not a party to this discussion
midnightmagic: mircea_popescu: Look at it from the customers' perspective. Why the hell would I buy a mining tool from the same company who's already staked the choicest claim and mined it for all it's worth?
mircea_popescu: but on shareholder money... why can't they do what they please ?
Diablo-D3: shareholders are NOT entitled to buy the hardware
mircea_popescu: Diablo-D3 can't say that i do. if they took preorder money and financed from that then yes
Diablo-D3: mircea_popescu: so you dont get the argument either?