1014200+ entries in 0.711s
dub: he's
the kid
that isnt allowed in
the sandpit because he keeps pooping in
the sand
then eating sandy poop
dub: midnightmagic: maged is a problem for me
too
Bugpowder: It's 2 kids arguing over lunch money a recess. Not
that interesting
midnightmagic: dub:
The problem I have is
that Maged is considering
this at all.
midnightmagic: then: [06:07:41] <EskimoBob> usagi: HOW MANY
TIMES DO YOU NEED ME
TO
TELL YOU "YES"?
BTC-Mining: But
the worth has grown so much I can handle large BTC losses
dub: midnightmagic: best
to let what happens in
the sandpit at
the special kindergarten stay
there?
midnightmagic: meanwhile, out of context: [06:07:17] <usagi> Eskimobob. yes or no. final offer. Are you going
to shut
the fuck up about me and my businesses from now? If you agree, I'll buy you out at .53 a share. Right now.
Bugpowder: All
these finance assholes chasing yield... None of
them buying bitcoins. Seems like a no brainer.
BTC-Mining: Not only
that, but you can make good returns
trading in BTC on
top of it.
midnightmagic: the "how many
time do you need me
to
tell you yes" was a restatement of his earlier "yes"es which were his own idea of
the contract.
BTC-Mining: BTC appreciates much faster
than interests on fiat loans...
Bugpowder: Can we put
that 5BTC joke of a discussion in a different channel?
midnightmagic: both agreeing
to
totally different contracts. And now you both get
to argue with one another until
the end of
time.
midnightmagic: .. yeah,
that doesn't look much like contract at all. It looks
to me like "Here's
the deal, i'll buy back iff"
then "I send shares, you send coins" "do you agree not
to shittalk me?" "yes",
then "fuck off". it's wayy
too slippery
to state with finality.
There is no agreed contract,
there's interference between
the action of
the
trade and
the agreement most germane
to
the
trade.
The restatement of
terms by EB means you were
Bugpowder: might be
time
to
take some profits BTC-Mining
BTC-Mining: I definitly need
to get more into Bitcoin
Bugpowder: I've heard 'they can't get lower' so many
times... Long bond yields were rock bottom for decades in 30s-50s.
Bugpowder: Interesting action with
TLT... QE3 comes out and
TLT just keeps going up
Bugpowder: God US
Treasuries are going
to spike when
the shit goes down
Bugpowder: I don't believe in
technical analysis, but damn does
the BTC/$ chart look strong.
Bugpowder: That is going
to
take some serious legal
threats
dub: I'd much rather see $2.65
than $14
gribble: Best bid: 12.41, Best ask: 12.4102, Bid-ask spread: 0.00020, Last
trade: 12.41, 24 hour volume: 23283, 24 hour low: 12.02, 24 hour high: 12.4102
midnightmagic: EskimoBob: Is
there some
thread somewhere
that I can read without wading
through a bunch of crappy garbage and whining? :)
Luceo: I suggest any doubters read
the IRC log
Luceo: EskimoBob: lol? Why would I need
to be
told how
to
think? You clearly broke
the agreement you made
Luceo: My perception isn't particularly important, Maged has ruled
that you need
to refund
the difference
Luceo: You said
that AFTER
the
trade finished
Luceo: No, you didn't. He repeatedly added
that
the deal was you had
to stfu
Luceo: A lot of people witnessed
the implied contract
Luceo: usagi didn't just offer
to buy shares at 50% above
their
trade value for no reason
Luceo: But
that wasn't
the whole contract, was it?
Luceo: No,
there were no excuses.
The coin and shares
transferred flawlessly.
Luceo: I read
that as 'for me'
Luceo: For
the
THIRD
time
Luceo: EskimoBob: If you buy a server and a domain from me, and I deliver only
the server, have I successfully
traded with you or not?
Luceo: EskimoBob: Yes, did he get
the other service which you sold him?
Luceo: mircea_popescu: I'm not abusing
the bot :(
mircea_popescu: dude's not very bright is he. i
take him off ignore
to help him out. sigh.
EskimoBob: dude, I
take you off
the ignore and
this is what you come up with
Luceo: EskimoBob: My rating said
that you successfully
traded with usagi, I can't hold
that rating can I?
EskimoBob: wtf are you
talking about mircea_popescu?
EskimoBob: Luceo:
thank you for showing me
that your rating is meaningless
mircea_popescu: EskimoBob mostly cause i don't appreciate
the bs wot abuse going on.
Lyspooner: is
there a BFL
type asset on
the market?
FabianB: testing coinbr by
trading :)
FabianB: will continue
testing over next days
gribble: Rating entry successful. Your rating for user EskimoBob has changed from -4
to -4.
FabianB: heh,
thanks jurov, coinbr looks great so far
gribble: Rating entry successful. Your rating for user EskimoBob has changed from -2
to -4.
gribble: You rated user eskimobob on Mon Sep 24 11:51:24 2012, giving him a rating of -2, and supplied
these additional notes: broke his word on a contract. untrustworthy and a bit of a jerk..
Luceo: mircea_popescu: Well
they usually getrating in public :P
Luceo: mircea_popescu:
The links would matter more IF people used gettrust instead of getrating
Ignatius-otc: but if we promote is an infallible
thats a huge stretch
Ignatius-otc: I have no better ideas copumkin, dont misunderstand. I appreciate
the wot and for me so far it has gone well, no scams
Ignatius-otc: I agree most people look at
the rating
themselves and
the raters, as copumpkin said gettrust is awesome. but
to
then forget
that anyone can become well rated
then decide
to scam big
time is silly, and it isnt a working system of
trust
copumpkin: there's nothing you can do
to stop false identities
rg: its creating multiple identities
to rate yoursel
mircea_popescu: Luceo don't
think in numeric
terms.
the links matter more.
rg: and
the ratings will stioll be
there
rg: that's why
the system works
Luceo: Neither will anyone remove
the +40 he's given himself
Luceo: Wont happen
though
Luceo: rg: What's best for my rating is a moderator removing
the -50 coolio has put on it :)
rg: but sometimes you have
to suck it up and do what sbest for your rating
rg: there have been many people who
tried
to - me
Luceo: is going
to get people scammed
Luceo: The fact
that he uprated himself +40
Luceo: The fact
that he downrated me isn't
THAT bad
Luceo: But gribble WOT is controlled by nanotube, and nanotube doesn't want
to change it
Luceo: And
then
to rate after
they
trade
Luceo: Which requires both users
to confirm a
trade, and
trade value BEFORE
they
trade
Luceo: Code an alternative
to gribble WOT
Luceo: I can only suggest
that everyone downrates coolio and his sockie so he cant scam anyone else
gribble: Currently authenticated from hostmask Luceo!~Luc3o@gateway/tor-sasl/luceo . User Luceo, rated since
Tue Jun 12 11:09:09 2012. Cumulative rating 24, from 50
total ratings. Received ratings: 44 positive, 6 negative. Sent ratings: 52 positive, 5 negative. Details:
http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=Luceo Luceo: I've given up on
the WOT :P
Luceo: I
think it's pretty sad
that you cant keep a bargain