500 entries in 0.727s
mircea_popescu: mod6 it's not a crime to have a perl
vtron. however, if you plan as your own strategy to move away from perl and you're judging it more of a liability than anything, then by all means, eschew.
mod6: <+mod6> <+asciilifeform> diana_coman, mod6 , both of you appear to be suffering from mod6's barfolade-leaving
vtron << wut << my V pukes exactly when it can.
mod6: <+mircea_popescu> mod6 wanna genesis your
vtron ? << at this rate, doesn't look like it.
mod6: <+asciilifeform> diana_coman, mod6 , both of you appear to be suffering from mod6's barfolade-leaving
vtron << wut
mircea_popescu: aaanyway, suppose diana_coman wants to add a patch to mod6's
vtron, to better error messages
diana_coman: ftr I used mod6's
vtron on ch1 of ffa and it worked perfectly fine
mircea_popescu: how is
vtron currently fed, via email list thing jurov made ?
mod6: Another thing worth the mention is that my ada-
vtron shells out to gpg - which adds some time as well. one thing I think that would help is if I could figure out how to capture the shell command output directly back into the application instead of having to write to a file, then read the file back into the program.
mod6: To close the loop here a bit, the
vtron stuff I've been doing in ada is a lot faster now than it was -- just needed to get some better loop control.
mod6: ada
vtron being built
pete_dushenski: the
vtron version question is a good one. how do i check again ?
a111: Logged on 2017-04-24 06:12 pete_dushenski: "WARNING: asciilifeform_blackhole_reads.vpatch.asciilifeform.sig is an INVALID seal for asciilifeform_blackhole_reads.vpatch!" << anyone else seen this error ? my
vtron is barfing this up even though my gpgtron says it's a good sig.
a111: Logged on 2017-04-24 06:12 pete_dushenski: "WARNING: asciilifeform_blackhole_reads.vpatch.asciilifeform.sig is an INVALID seal for asciilifeform_blackhole_reads.vpatch!" << anyone else seen this error ? my
vtron is barfing this up even though my gpgtron says it's a good sig.
pete_dushenski: "WARNING: asciilifeform_blackhole_reads.vpatch.asciilifeform.sig is an INVALID seal for asciilifeform_blackhole_reads.vpatch!" << anyone else seen this error ? my
vtron is barfing this up even though my gpgtron says it's a good sig.
☟︎☟︎ mircea_popescu: which is of course bound to hit the situation where we have no proper treatment of file removal in
vtron because old horrors.
mircea_popescu: consider the fine case of mod6 's
vtron since he said something. so he built a
vtron, then later we decided didn't like how it works, he put the time in to understand the thing, fix it... all this happened because he made the first one ; and wouldn't have happened if we were just sitting 6months ago holding dicks and discussing it theoretically.
mircea_popescu:
vtron that presses a tree containing more than one genesis is, by that very fact, a broken implementation.
mircea_popescu:
vtron that presses a multi-root tree is, by that very fact, a broken implementation.
mod6: ok. what should the
vtron do with these extra roots? place them at the end of the flow as leafs?
mircea_popescu: so that it's trb_mod6_doesgirlsonboats.vpatch vs vtron_phf_addsnamespaces.vpatch. no conflict possible.
mircea_popescu: ben_vulpes considering the only reason your lisp
vtron even exists is because you're apparently fond of reimplementation,
mod6: <+asciilifeform> note that a correct
vtron will not misbehave if you have this. << am trying this...