log☇︎
14 entries in 0.692s
asciilifeform: in turn, foo.h churns, churns, 9000 new versions in 6 months, cuz c intrinsically is a '10 lines contain 14 bugs' lang by virtue of sheer obfuscatory ugh ( who can say e.g. how many off-by-ones in http://archive.is/89adR#selection-9.11980-9.13314 ? in all possible calling contexts.. )
a111: 5 results for "how many bugs tolerate", http://btcbase.org/log-search?q=how%20many%20bugs%20tolerate
asciilifeform: !#s how many bugs tolerate
a111: Logged on 2016-10-20 20:40 asciilifeform: 'how many bugs shall we tolerate!?' 'seven!'
asciilifeform: 'how many bugs shall we tolerate!?' 'seven!' ☟︎
asciilifeform: but i have nfi how many bugs ago it was.
a111: Logged on 2014-04-29 22:56 asciilifeform: dijkstra once read a lecture, and exclaimed 'how many bugs shall we tolerate?!' one wag stands up - '3!'
a111: 5 results for "how many bugs", http://btcbase.org/log-search?q=how%20many%20bugs
asciilifeform: $s how many bugs
mircea_popescu: "What really bugs me, however, is how much publicity Koblitz has managed to get out of this. I see him invited to give talks at many venues, but never see anyone invited to present a counter-argument. (For that matter, I don't see invited speakers at cryptography conferences poking fun at the cryptographic work that mathematicians do.) This does not matter so much when Koblitz speaks at a TCS-venue (any intelligent cry
mats: those of means, that understand how to layer without creating as many bugs than were presumed to have been squashed
asciilifeform: decimation: just how many people does the redmond beast need to collect winblowz rent and craft 'bugs' ?
decimation: how many bugs are you willing to tolerate?
asciilifeform: dijkstra once read a lecture, and exclaimed 'how many bugs shall we tolerate?!' one wag stands up - '3!' ☟︎